There is s thin line between Genetics and Eugenics that should be bolder, thicker, better defined. The Hippocratic oath demands it: “First do no harm’.

Eugenics is the practice or advocacy of improving the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. It aims to reduce human suffering by “breeding out” disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population. Early supporters of eugenics believed people inherited mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions could be bred out of the gene pool.

Historically, eugenics encouraged people of so-called healthy, superior stock to reproduce and discouraged reproduction of the mentally challenged or anyone who fell outside the social norm. Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century, yet it earned its negative association mainly from Adolf Hitler’s obsessive attempts to create a superior Aryan race.

Modern eugenics, more often called human genetic engineering, has come a long way—scientifically and ethically—and offers hope for treating many devastating genetic illnesses. Even so, it remains controversial.

Francis Galton

Eugenics literally means “good creation.” The ancient Greek philosopher Plato may have been the first person to promote the idea, although the term “eugenics” didn’t come on the scene until British scholar Sir Francis Galton coined it in 1883 in his book, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development.

In one of Plato’s best-known literary works, The Republic, he wrote about creating a superior society by procreating high-class people together and discouraging coupling between the lower classes. He also suggested a variety of mating rules to help create an optimal society.

Eugenics in America

In the late 19th century, Galton—whose cousin was Charles Darwin—hoped to better humankind through the propagation of the British elite. His plan never really took hold in his own country, but in America it was more widely embraced.

Eugenics made its first official appearance in American history through marriage laws. In 1896, Connecticut made it illegal for people with epilepsy or who were “feeble-minded” to marry. In 1903, the American Breeder’s Association was created to study eugenics.

John Harvey Kellogg, of Kellogg cereal fame, organized the Race Betterment Foundation in 1911 and established a “pedigree registry.” The foundation hosted national conferences on eugenics in 1914, 1915 and 1928.

As the concept of eugenics took hold, prominent citizens, scientists and socialists championed the cause and established the Eugenics Record Office. The office tracked families and their genetic traits, claiming most people considered unfit were immigrants, minorities or poor.

It is obvious that the eugenicists were and are quacks and sociopaths. Bill Gates’ father is William H. Gates Sr. who was a dedicated eugenicist and globalist like his great friends and accomplices the Rockefellers. In the era before Roe v. Wade, Gates Sr. sat on the board of Margret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood. Why is that important? The Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion, but almost no body knows that legal abortion was a law formed by eugenicists, to “genetically improve” the population, by “reducing” the population.


In his book, ‘Vaccine-Nation: Poisoning the Population, One Shot at a Time’, Andreas Moritz, documented the very real eugenics connection between the Rockefeller Foundation (and family) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (and family). In it, He write this about them… “While launching the initiative called the Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines, Bill Gates had said in 2000, “It seems like every new corner we turn, the Rockefellers are already there. And in some cases, they have been there for a long, long time.”

Gates made that speech while announcing that his foundation was pledging $555 million to health programs across the globe.

I say ironic because the Rockefellers have been notorious in their funding of controversial research, dubbed by some as “genocidal”. This research concerns depopulation programs, communist and socialist programs, ‘mind control’ or behavioural modification experiments and the notoriously controversial experiments of Alfred Kinsey.

But the Gates and Rockefellers are old friends and partners in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). The alliance, which controls major international vaccine programs, has the following as members: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, UNISEF, World Bank, WHO, and many national governments.

In vaccine research, it doesn’t get bigger than this. I am detailing this to show just how incestuous the vaccine (and medical) world is. It also illustrates that power is concentrated in just a handful of [unelected] entities.”

Chimeric RNA

Chimeric RNA, sometimes referred to as a fusion transcript, is composed of exons from two or more different genes that have the potential to encode novel proteins.These mRNAs are different from those produced by conventional splicing as they are produced by two or more gene loci.

In 1956, Francis Crick proposed what is now known as the “central dogma” of biology:[3]

DNA encodes the genetic information required for an organism to carry out its life cycle. In effect, DNA serves as the “hard drive” which stores genetic data. DNA is replicated and serves as its own template for replication. DNA forms a double helix structure and is a composed of a sugar-phosphate backbone and nitrogenous bases; this can be thought of as a ladder structure where the sides of the ladder are constructed of deoxyribose sugar and phosphate while the rungs of the ladder are composed of paired nitrogenous bases.[4] There are four bases in a DNA molecule: adenine (A), cytosine (C), thymine (T), and guanine (G). Nucleotides are a structural component of DNA and RNA, being made of a molecule of sugar and a molecule of phosphoric acid. The double helix structure of DNA is composed of two antiparallel strands which are oriented in opposite directions. DNA is composed of base pairs in which adenine pairs with thymine and guanine pairs with cytosine. While DNA serves as template for production of ribonucleic acid (RNA), RNA is usually responsible for making protein. The process of making RNA from DNA is called transcription. RNA uses a similar set of bases except that thymine is replaced with uracil. A group of enzymes called RNA polymerases (isolated by biochemists Jerard Hurwitz and Samuel B. Weiss) function in the presence of DNA. These enzymes produce RNA using segments of chromosomal DNA as a template. Unlike replication, where a complete copy of DNA is made, transcription copies only the gene that is to be expressed as a protein.[5]

Initially, it was thought that RNA served as a structural template for protein synthesis, essentially ordering amino acids by a series of cavities shaped specifically so that only specific amino acids would fit. Crick was not satisfied with this hypothesis given that the four bases of RNA are hydrophilic and that many amino acids prefer interactions with hydrophobic groups. Additionally, some amino acids are very structurally similar and Crick felt that accurate discrimination would not be possible given the similarities. Crick then proposed that prior to incorporation into proteins, amino acids are first attached to adapter molecules which have unique surface features that can bind to specific bases on the RNA templates.[5] These adapter molecules are called transfer RNA (tRNA).

Through a series of experiments involving E. coli and the T4 phage in 1960,[5] it was shown that messenger RNA (mRNA) carriers information from DNA to the ribosomal sites of protein synthesis. The tRNA-amino acid precursors are brought into position by ribosomes where they can read the information provided mRNA templates to synthesize protein.

RNA Splicing[edit]

Creating a protein consists of two main steps: transcription of DNA into RNA and translation of RNA into protein. After DNA is transcribed into RNA, the molecule is known as pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) and it consists of exons and introns that can be split apart and rearranged in many different ways. Historically, exons are considered the coding sequence and introns are considered the “junk” DNA. Although this has been shown to be false, it is true that exons are often merged. Depending on the needs of the cell, regulatory mechanisms choose which exons, and sometimes introns, to join together. This process of removing pieces of a pre- mRNA transcript and combining them with other pieces is called splicing. The human genome encodes approximately 25,000 genes but there are significantly more proteins produced. This is accomplished through RNA splicing. The exons of these 25,000 genes can be spliced in many different ways to create countless combinations of RNA transcripts and ultimately countless proteins. Normally, exons from the same pre-mRNA transcript are spliced together. However, occasionally gene products or pre-mRNA transcripts are spliced together so that exons from different transcripts are mixed together in a fusion product known as chimeric RNA. Chimeric RNA often incorporates exons from highly expressed genes,[1] but the chimeric transcript itself is usually expressed at low levels.

This chimeric RNA can then be translated into a fusion protein. Fusion proteins are very tissue-specific [1] and they are frequently associated with cancers such as colorectal, prostate,[6] and mesotheliomas.[7] They significantly exploit signal peptides and transmembrane proteins which can alter the localization of proteins, possibly contributing to the disease phenotype.

Discovery of Chimeric RNA

One of the first studies to investigate the generation of chimeric RNA examined the fusion of the first three exons of a gene known as JAZF1 to the last 15 exons of a gene known as JJAZ1.[8] This exact transcript, and the resulting protein, was found specifically in endometrial tissue. While often found in endometrial cancers, these transcripts are expressed in normal tissue as well. Originally thought to be the result of chromosomal fusions, one group investigated whether this was accurate. Using Southern blotting and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on the genome, the researchers found no evidence of DNA rearrangement. They decided to investigate further by combining human endometrial cells with rhesus fibroblasts and found chimeric products containing sequences from both species. These data suggested that chimeric RNA is generated by splicing parts of genes together rather than chromosomal re-arrangements. They also performed mass spectrometry on the translated protein to verify that the chimeric RNA is translated into protein.

Recently, advances in next-generation sequencing have decreased the cost of sequencing significantly, allowing more RNAseq projects to be conducted. These RNAseq projects are able to detect novel RNA transcripts instead of the traditional microarray in which only known transcripts can be detected. Deep sequencing enables detection of transcripts even at very low levels. This has allowed researchers to detect many more chimeric RNAs and fusion proteins and has facilitated understanding their role in health and disease.

Chimeric protein products

Numerous putative chimeric transcripts have been identified among the expressed sequence tags using high throughput RNA sequencing technology. In humans, chimeric transcripts can be generated in several ways such as trans-splicing of pre-mRNAs, RNA transcription runoff, from other errors in RNA transcription or they can also be the result of gene fusion following inter-chromosomal translocations or rearrangements. Among the few corresponding protein products that have been characterized so far, most result from chromosomal translocations and are associated with cancer. For instance, gene fusion in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) leads to an mRNA transcript that encompasses the 5′ end of the breakpoint cluster region protein (BCR) gene and the 3′ end of the Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (ABL) gene. Translation of this transcript results in a chimeric BCR–ABL protein that possesses increased tyrosine kinase activity. Chimeric transcripts characterize specific cellular phenotypes and are suspected to function not only in cancer, but also in normal cells. One example of a chimera in normal human cells is generated by trans-splicing of the 5′ exons of the JAZF1 gene on chromosome 7p15 and the 3′ exons of JJAZ1 (SUZ12) on chromosome 17q1. This chimeric RNA is translated in endometrial stroma cells and encodes an anti-apoptotic protein. Notable examples of chimeric genes in cancer are the fused BCR-ABL, FUSERGMLL-AF6, and MOZ-CBP genes expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and the TMPRSS2-ETS chimera associated with overexpression of the oncogene in prostate cancer.[1]

Characteristics of chimeric proteins

Frenkel-Morgenstern et al. have defined two main features of chimeric proteins. They have reported that chimeras exploit signal peptides and transmembrane domains to alter the cellular localization of the associated activities. Second, chimeras incorporate parental genes that are expressed at a high level.[1] A survey of all the functional domains in proteins encoded by chimeric transcripts demonstrated that chimeras contain complete protein domains significantly more often than in random data sets.[9] 0-==0

Databases of chimeric transcripts

Several databases have been constructed to incorporate chimeric transcripts from different resources using a variety of computational procedures:

  • ChiTaRS 
  • ChimerDB 2.0
  • HybridDB 
  • TICdb 
  • dbCrid 
Understanding Genetics

If you are familiar with Greek mythology, you may recall the story of the chimera. It was a beast with the heads of both a lion and a goat, and a serpent in the place of its tail.

The genetic meaning of “chimera” was inspired by this creature. A chimera is a person (or other plant or animal) who is made up of cells from two different individuals. Since those cells came from different sources, their DNA is also different.

Normally, your cells have your DNA, and only your DNA. This is one of the key rules of genetics. Your body is made up of many different kinds of cells, but they are all built using the same instruction manual. They are all contain the exact same set of DNA.

But in chimeras, this rule is broken. Chimeras have two different sets of cells, with two different sets of DNA.

Which parts of you are chimeric might vary. For example, if you have blood chimerism, some or all of your blood cells will have a different set of DNA from the rest of you! But it does not mean your brain cells will also be chimeric. You might have only one set of brain cells, which would have only your DNA. MAYBE….

If you are a chimera, where do the cells with a different set of DNA come from? To find out, let’s take a closer look at how chimerism can happen in humans. We’ll keep using blood chimerism as an example.

What could possibly go wrong?

Well, let us recall how this article begins with the eugenicists and their agenda.

Thomas Huxley’s Revolution – Fabian Socialism and Globalism

The members of the London-centered oligarchy to which Wells had devoted himself at an early age had found themselves stuck in a rut by the turn of the 19th century. These inbred families and retainers who managed the dying British Empire had long been encrusted by the vices of decadence by the time a young man of low breeding and high talent arose amidst the London-ghettos treating syphilis patients as a surgeon’s assistant. This young surgeon’s name was Thomas Huxley.

Huxley possessed a sardonic wit, a deep misanthropy, and an intelligence that were soon discovered by powerful patrons, and by his mid-20’s, this young man found himself a rising star in Britain’s Royal Academy of Science. Here he quickly became a leading creative force, shaping Britain’s powerful X Club, serving as Darwin’s bulldog promoting popular debates featuring himself against literalist members of the clergy. In these debates he argued for Darwin’s chaos-bound interpretation of evolution. He also founded Nature magazine as a propaganda instrument which has been used to enforce scientific consensus favorable to a world empire to this very day.

Huxley chose his opponents carefully, ensuring that he could easily and publicly obliterate the arguments of simple-minded Anglican clergy, and thus convince all onlookers that the only choice they had to account for the evolution of new species was either literal Biblical creationism or his brand of Darwinian evolution. The many alternative scientific theories of the 19th century (such as those found in the works of Karl Ernst von Baer, Georges Cuvier, Lamarck and James D. Dana) which accounted for both the evolution of species, and the harmonics of all parts to a whole, as well as creative leaps were forgotten amidst this false dichotomy which this author unpacked in a recent interview


During his later years, Huxley mentored a young H.G. Wells, together with a whole generation of new imperial practitioners of the arts of social engineering (and social Darwinism). This social engineering soon took the form of Galton’s eugenics quickly becoming an accepted science practiced across the western world.

Wells was himself the son of a lowly gardener, but, like Huxley, exhibited a strong misanthropic wit, passion and creativity lacking in the high nobility, and he was thus raised from the lower ranks of society into the order of oligarchical management by the 1890s. During this moment of vast potential- and – it cannot be restated enough- the oligarchical order that had grown overconfident during the 200+ years of hegemony were petrified to see the nations of the earth rapidly breaking free from this hegemony thanks to the under the international spread of Lincoln’s American System across Germany, Russia, Japan, South America, France, Canada and even China with Sun Yat-sen’s 1911 republican revolution.

The science of population control advanced by Huxley, Galton, Wells, Mackinder, Milner and Bertrand Russell was the basis for a new scientific priesthood and “world government” that would put a stop to the startling disequilibrium unleashed by the electric spread of sovereign nation states, protectionism and commitment to scientific and technological progress.


H.G Wells, Russell and other early social engineers of this new priesthood organized themselves in several interconnected think tanks known as 1) the Fabian Society of Sidney and Beatrice Webb which operated through the London School of Economics, 2) the Round Table Movement begun by the fortunes left to posterity by the racist diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes which also gave rise to the Rhodes Trust, and Rhodes Scholarship programs established to indoctrinate young talent in the halls of Oxford, and finally 3) the Co-Efficients Club of London. As noted by Georgetown Professor Carol Quigley, in his 1981 The Anglo-American Establishment, membership in all three organizations was virtually interchangeable.


A decade after its founding, the League was less successful than Wells and his co-thinkers would have liked, with nationalists from around the world recognizing the evil hand of empire lurking behind the apparent language of “liberal values and world peace”. Sun Yat-sen, among many others was among the anti-Wellsian voices and warned his fellow Chinese in 1924 not to fall into this trap saying:

“The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated”.

In response to this patriotic resistance across the world, a new strategy had to be concocted. This took the form of H.G. Welles’ 1928 The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution. This little-known book served as a guiding blueprint for the next century of imperial grand strategy calling for a new world religion and social order. According to Wells:

“The old faiths have become unconvincing, unsubstantial and insincere, and though there are clear intimations of a new faith in the world, it still awaits embodiment in formulae and organizations that will bring it into effective reaction upon human affairs as a whole.”

In his book, Welles outlines the need for a new scientific gospel to supersede the Judeo-Christian faiths of the western world. This new gospel consisted of a series of tomes which he and his colleague Julian Huxley composed, entitled: 1) The Outline of History (1920) where Wells re-wrote all of history wishing this analysis to replace the book of Genesis, 2)The Science of Life (1930), co-written with Sir Julian Huxley (Thomas Huxley’s Grandson who continued the family tradition along with Aldous), and 3) The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind (1932).


By the time World War II began, Wells’ ideas had evolved new insidious components that later gave rise to such mechanisms as Wikipedia and Twitter in the form of “The World Brain” (19937) where Wells calls for reducing the English language to a “basic English” of 850 accepted words which would make up a world language. In this book, Wells states that “thinkers of the forward-looking type whose ideas we are now considering, are beginning to realize that the most hopeful line for the development of our racial intelligence lies rather in the direction of creating a new world organ for the collection, indexing, summarizing and release of knowledge, than in any further tinkering with the highly conservative and resistant university system, local, national and traditional in texture, which already exits. These innovators, who may be dreamers today, but who hope to become very active organizers tomorrow, project a unified, if not centralized, world organ to pull the mind of the world together.”

By 1940, Wells wrote the The New World Order which again amplified his message. In writing this, he coordinated his efforts with the many Fabians and Rhodes Scholars who had infiltrated western foreign policy establishments in order to shape the the war, but more importantly, the post-war global structure. These were the networks that hated Franklin Roosevelt, Vice-President Henry Wallace, Harry Hopkins and other genuine “New Dealers” who wanted nothing more than to destroy colonialism once and for all in the wake of the war.

Although the bodies of Wells, Russell and Huxley have long since rotted away, their rotten ideas continue to animate their disciples like Sir Henry Kissinger, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Lord Malloch-Brown (whose disturbing celebration of the Coronavirus as a golden opportunity to finally restructure civilization) should concern any thinking citizen. The idea of a “Great Reset” expounded by these modern mouthpieces of history’s bad ideas signals nothing more than a new Dark Age which should turn the stomach of any moral being.

It is here useful to hold the words of Kissinger in mind who had channeled the spectre of Wells telling a group of technocrats in Evian, France in 1992:

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

John Kerry reveals Biden’s devotion to radical ‘Great Reset’ movement

This isn’t the first time Kerry has thrown his weight behind the Great Reset. At a June World Economic Forum virtual event, Kerry said the coronavirus pandemic was “a big moment” that opened the door for the Great Reset and that, “The World Economic Forum – the CEO capacity of the Forum – is really going to have to play a front and center role in refining the Great Reset to deal with climate change and inequity — all of which is being laid bare as a consequence of COVID-19.”

The evidence is now crystal clear about Biden’s connection to the Great Reset. He, John Kerry and the rest of the Biden administration are planning to bring the Great Reset to the United States. And if they are successful, the country will never be the same.

The Great Reset of the World Economic Forum is a two pronged agenda based on the memes of global warming and a world wide pandemic, now extant as the Covid 19 pandemic. Again this is an agenda by technocrats to impose a global government ruled by them, as the history of this movement has made crystal clear.


On March 11, 2020 a ‘pandemic’ was declared after the confirmed death of only 15 people. It was claimed that these people had died from a new SARS2/Corona Virus. This virus was claimed to have originated in a meat market in Wuhan China, and that the bats on sale were infected with this virus, which had jumped the species barrier naturally. However it was discovered that the people who had died of this strange new virus had all worked at the biological laboratory in Wuhan.

As time went on further revelations developed concerning “Gain of Function” research that has been going on in the Wuhan biological lab, and that this research is actually funded by DARPA, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is a research and development agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

Fast Forward to the present >>

A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products
Jessica Rose PhD, MSc, BSc , Peter A. McCullough MD, MP

Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge, Public Health Policy Initiative (PHPI) Texas A & M College of Medicine, Baylor Dallas Campus, Dallas TX USA * Correspondence: (Dr. Jessica Rose) Abstract Following the global rollout and administration of the Pfizer Inc./BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines on December 17, 2020, in the United States, and of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S product on April 1st, 2021, in an unprecedented manner, hundreds of thousands of individuals have reported adverse events (AEs) using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS). We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ~80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males. A total of 67% of all cases occurred with BNT162b2. Of the total myocarditis AE reports, 6 individuals died (1.1%) and of these, 2 were under 20 years of age – 1 was 13. These findings suggest a markedly higher risk for myocarditis subsequent to COVID-19 injectable product use than for other known vaccines, and this is well above known background rates for myocarditis. COVID-19 injectable products are novel and have a genetic, pathogenic mechanism of action causing uncontrolled expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells. When you combine this fact with the temporal relationship of AE occurrence and reporting, biological plausibility of cause and effect, and the fact that these data are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical data, it supports a conclusion that the COVID-19 biological products are deterministic for the myocarditis cases observed after injection.

  1. Background
    Myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium or ‘musculature’ of the heart. [1,2,3,4] The myocardium is made up of many cell types however the greatest mass of tissue is accounted for by cardiomyocytes. [4,5,6] Cardiomyocytes are the principal contractile cells and are supported by specialized conduction and stromal cell types. [4,5,6,7,8] Both systole and diastole are active processes that expend energetic resources of cardiomyocytes which are organized into myofibrils. [8,9,10]
    Myocarditis can manifest as sudden death, chest pain or heart failure. The symptoms of heart failure from myocarditis include effort intolerance, dyspnea, fatigue, and ankle swelling. [1,2,3,4,6,11,12,13]
    The cause is an inflammation of the heart muscle, often following a viral infection, but not exclusively so.
    The damaged muscle is prone to lethal cardiac arrythmias as well as having the potential to develop both right and left ventricular dysfunction (cardiomyopathy). [3,4,12,13]
    Myocarditis is a major risk for cardiac death among the young. [11] The high-risk age population for myocarditis is from puberty through early 30s, and it is the third leading cause of sudden cardiac death in children and young adults. 1 per 100,000 children per year are affected by myocarditis and it has been reported that 0.05% of all pediatric hospitalizations are for myocarditis. Between 0.5 and 3.5% of heart failure hospitalizations are due to myocarditis. Most cases of myocarditis are identified in young adults with males affected more often than females. [12,13,14, 15,16]
    In the context of COVID-19 respiratory illness, there are a significant number of patients who are otherwise healthy experiencing heart-related complications, including myocarditis, but the majority of clinical reports and diagnoses claim cardiac injury based on ICU-related-related injury to the heart.[17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]
  2. This is relevant in terms of contextualizing the potential risk of myocarditis
    from the COVID-19 products against COVID-19 itself and establishing a background rate of myocarditis in specific contexts. Cardiac injuries associated with COVID-19 respiratory illness reveal a set of parameters based on a combination of measurements of troponin levels, electrocardiogram (ECG/EKG).


Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines

Author: Robert O Young CPC, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner

Tested products

An absolute bombshell and major reveals on what is in the vaccines, with use of electron and other kinds of microscopy from original research by Dr. Robert Young and his team, confirming what the La Quinta Columna researchers found—toxic nanometallic content with cytotoxic and genotoxic effects as well as an identified parasite. This is major revelation: please stay tuned for a major article reporting this at ECC, meanwhile please share this video widely!

Phase Contrast, Dark Field, Bright Field Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!

Currently there are four major pharmaceutical companies who manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 now called SARS-CoV-19 vaccine. These manufactures and their vaccine are Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson, a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The intended purpose of these vaccines are to provide immunity from the so-called infectious novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV – 2 virus now called the SARS-CoV – 19. These four pharmaceutical companies have not provided complete FDA disclosure on their vaccine box, insert fact sheet or label for many of the major and/or minor ingredients contained within these so-called vaccines. The purpose of this research article is to identify those specific major and minor ingredients contained in the Pfizer Vaccine, the Moderna Vaccine, the Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen Vaccine using various scientific anatomical, physiological and functional testing for each SARS-COV-2-19 vaccine. As a human right, governed under World Law by the Nuremberg Code of 1947, the vaccine specific ingredient information is critical, required and necessary to know so that any human from any country in the World can make an informed decision whether or not to consent to the SAR-CoV-2-19 inoculation. We have conducted the scientific testing on each vaccine and have identified several ingredients or adjuvants that have not been disclosed which are contained in these four SARS-CoV – 2 -19 vaccines. Currently, these vaccines are being administered to millions of humans around the World under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by each country without full disclosure of all ingredients and in some cases mandated by governments or employers in violation of individual human rights under the Nuremberg Code of 1947.Methodology and TechniquesFour “vaccines” were analyzed which are the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson, using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nano particulate technological approaches. The different instrumentation includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, pHase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines” morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.Live Blood Phase Contrast and Dark-Field MicroscopyImages of the aqueous fractions of the vaccines were subsequently obtained to visually assess the possible presence of carbon particulates or graphene.The observations under optical microscopy revealed and abundance of transparent 2D laminar objects that show great similarity with images from literature (Xu et al, 2019), and with images obtained from rGO standard (SIGMA)(Figures 1, 2 and 3).Images of big transparent sheets of variable size and shapes were obtained, showing corrugated and flat, irregular. Smaller sheets of polygonal shapes, also similar to flakes described in literature (Xu et al, 2019) can be revealed with pHase Contrast and Dark-Field microscopy (Figure 3).All these laminar objects were widespread in the aqueous fraction of the blood (Figure 1) or vaccine sample (Figures 2 and 3) and no component described by the registered patent can be associated with these sheets.In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Live Blood From the So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen “Vaccines”!

[Figure 1 is a Micrograph of a Carbon Cluster of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Viewed in the Live Unstained Human Blood with pHase Contrast Microscopy at 1500x. Note that the Red Blood Cells are Clotting in and Around the rGO Crystal in a Condition Known as Rouleau! A French Word Which Means to Chain. Dr. Robert O. Young, Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari OmniPublishing, 1987 – 2021]

[Figure 1a Micrograph under Phase Contrast Microscopy reveals the normal healthy state of the red blood cells which are even in color, even in shape and even in size. Red Blood cells in their healthy state measure anatomically 7 microns in diameter. Dr. Robert O. Young, Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987-2021]

[Figure 1b Micrograph taken under Phase Contrast Microscopy reveals the live blood 24 hours after the mRNA Vaccine now containing crystallized red blood cells, biological transformations of red and white blood cells, large symplasts of graphene oxide crystals center and Orotic acid crystals in the upper right hand corner of the micrograph. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September, 2021[73][74][83]]

[Figure 1c Viewed Under pHase Contrast Microscopy a Nanotube of Graphene Oxide in Coagulated Red Blood Cells or a Blood Clot. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021

[Figure 1d Viewed Under pHase Contrast Microscopy a Nanotube of Graphene Oxide in Coagulated Red Blood Cells or Blood Clots. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021]

[[Figure 1e Viewed Under Bright Field Microscopy a Nanotube and Microtubes of Graphene Oxide in the Dried Coagulated Blood Cells or a Blood Clot in Addition to Parasite Bulges Expressed in the Cross-linked Fibrin Monomers Indicating a Systemic Parasitical Infection. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021]

[Figure 1f Viewed Under Bright Field Microscopy a Nanotube , Microtube and Cluster Bomb of Graphene Oxide in the Dried Coagulated Blood Cells or Blood Clot in Addition to Parasite Bulges Expressed in the Cross-linked Fibrin Monomers Indicating a Systemic Parasitical Infection. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021]

[Figure 1g Shows Normal Blood Clotting on the Right and Abnormal Blood Clotting on the Left. Please Note that the Normal Blood Clot Contains NO Graphene or Iron Oxide, No Parasites and No Polymerized Protein Pools (White Circles Indicating Cellular Degeneration as Seen in the Blood Clot on the Left. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021.]

[Figure 2b is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and a unidentified parasite (lower right).  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]

Figure 2b is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and an unidentified parasite (lower right). Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021

[Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon.  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]
Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021

Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021

[Figure 3 – Aqueous fraction images containing reduced graphene oxide from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical pHase contrast microscopy, 600X magnification. In addition, the Muestra RD1, La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021; Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension; Delgado Martin, Campra Madrid confirms our findings.

[Figure 4 shows the liposome Capsid containing rGO that Pfizer uses for its product to vehiculate the graphene oxide by attaching the Liposome capsid to specific mRNA molecules for driving the Liposome contents of fGO to specific organs, glands and tissues, namely the ovaries and testes, bone marrow, heart and brain. The image was obtained by a SEM-Cryo preparation.]

[Figure 4b Reveals X ray Diffraction Pattern of the Graphene Particles. Matéria (Rio J.) 23 (1) , 2018. Characterization of graphene nanosheets obtained by a modified Hummer’s method. Renata Hack et al.]

[Figure 5 shows a cluster of graphene nanoparticles in a Pfizer vaccine. They appear to be aggregated.]

[Figure 6 shows a TEM microscopy observation where particles of reduced graphene oxide in a Pfizer “vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles of rGO. This evidence was intitially found by Muestra RD1, and published in the La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021; Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension; Delgado Martin, Campra Madrid and . ]

[The micrograph above is showing the graphene oxide (GO) and the poisoning and destruction of the neutrophils (NET – which make up over 60 percent of all white blood cells) which are designed to pick up and eliminate foreign toxic chemical waste and biologicals. The Scientists at Karlinska Institute, the University of Manchester, Chalmers University of Technology and the Scientific Team of Dr. Robert O. Young have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in the same manner as bacteria, yeast or mold.]

[Figure 7 shows a spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” under an ESEM microscopy coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts) identifying Carbon, Oxygen, Sodium and Chloride. ]

[Figure 7a shows he spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” nanoparticulates of graphene oxide, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, chloride and calcium identified under an ESEM microscope coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe. (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts)]

[Figure 8 – UV spectrum of aqueous fraction of Pfizer vaccine sample.]

[Figure 9 – UV absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270 nm, compatible with presence of rGO. UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).]

[Figure 10 – The spectroscopy UV analysis showed an adsorption due to the presence of reduced graphene oxide, which is confirmed by observation under ultraviolet visible microscopy.]

[Figure 11 shows sharp micron debris of 20 um in length identified in the Pfizer so-called “vaccine” containing Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminum, Chloride, Nitrogen.]

[Figure 12 shows a 20 micron in length particulate identified in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen, chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.]

[Figure 13 shows a Trypanosoma Parasite approximately 50 microns in length found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.]

[Figure 13a shows a Live Blood pHase Contrast Microscopy Micrograph of Trypanosoma cruzi Parasite. ]

[Figure 14 Identifies a Composite of Nano particulates]

Although all of the mRNA products from Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, etc. deny that any of these things are in their products. And they and the WHO, and other regulatory agencies claim these products are safe, and have no adverse effects on the health of the person getting these shots. This is obviously not true as per the evidence given in the document.

Researchers world wide have been reporting similar results when testing the so-called ‘vaccines’ by microscopy.


micro object in mRNA serum

Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and was released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.

In my opinion, the evidence presented below along with additional evidence presented in the video proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The following quotes from Dr. Martin were transcribed from the video.

“Historically, coronaviruses have not been associated with significant illnesses in humans. So how is it that suddenly in 2002 going into 2003 that we have this magical alteration in beta coronaviruses that suddenly makes them lethal?

And that question is the fundamental question that is behind an inquiry that we’ve been on since 1999 and Ralph Baric and NIAID’s (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) first efforts to figure out a way to increase the pathogenicity of beta coronaviruses.

In 1999, there was a grant given to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and in that grant there was an effort to figure out how to amplify certain pathogenicities of what was called recombinant technology around coronavirus. Baric had a decade plus history in working with coronaviruses generally. He had done a lot of work in veterinary science around cardiac conditions for rabbits. There was a huge amount of research around cardiomyopathy in rabbits that had something to do with coronavirus. But in 1999, NIAID funded a project in which we first saw the amplification of pathogenic components of the beta coronavirus. (Note: Anthony Fauci has been Director of NIAID since 1984.)

And it’s very important to understand that happened in 1999 and the work that was done between 1999 and then published in 2002 and 2003 actually started suggesting that there were parts of the coronavirus that could be modified, specifically the Ace-2 receptor and the S-1 spike protein, that could be modified to increase the degree to which the coronavirus could represent a health threat to humans.

Let that just settle in for a moment. Three years before we have the first SARS outbreak (in 2002-2003, called SARS1) we have researchers who are working on amplifying the pathogenicity of the things that make coronavirus extremely harmful to the human system. Now, that feels like that should invoke in at least one or two people a set of questions, which is, how is it that we went for allegedly whatever our evolutionary time frame is where we were coexisting with coronaviruses and suddenly we started manipulating them with recombinant technology in 1999, 2000, 2001, and suddenly nature figures out a way to make these things also highly pathogenetic, in 2002 and 2003, using the exact same mechanism that we’ve done in the lab. Possible? Yes. Plausible? Not a chance.

What makes it even less a chance is if we look at what was actually being patented at the time because we’re actually looking specifically at the sections of coronavirus that are those sections that are specifically modified in the laboratory which happen to also be the things that allegedly become modified by nature. Suspicious? Yes. Possible? Of course. Nature and humans could have been following this exact same trajectory. Plausible? Not so much.

And what makes it less plausible is that we start seeing that the coronavirus in its alleged zoonotic and alleged, you know, kind of natural pathogenicity enhancement happens to be happening at the exact same place that researchers are doing the same work. That seems to be a highly implausible story regardless of who is telling it.

But, what we saw in the wake of 2003 was that the Department of Health and Human Services, remember they’re the umbrella organization that controls the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institute of Health, NIAID, and the funding mechanisms that ultimately go to laboratories across this country and around the world, what we saw was an increased amount of funding going into coronavirus research and the research was specifically focused on, not only the detection of but also the amplification of the pathogenicity of SARS coronavirus.

Now, a number of people have not paid attention to the evolution of this, but what you have in the written record, in the published record from Ralph Baric’s lab, in the public record from a number of other laboratories, you see from 2003 right up until 2012, a proliferation of work around the amplification of attributes of coronavirus that are specifically targeting tissue that is going to be highly susceptible in the lungs and potentially susceptible in the kidneys because the Ace-2 receptor seems to be something that has an enormous amount of attraction in terms of the research.

But we see all this research being done and we’ve been told that the Department of Health and Human Services was doing it because they were very interested in making sure that they could control a response to a potential outbreak somewhere down the road, but during that entire period, there was no vaccine, there was no treatment and there was no diagnostic developed. And that is because the Center for Disease Control also filed patents on the detection of coronavirus and on the treatment for coronavirus. In other words, they built a patent thicket around beta coronavirus stimulating SARS and they built a thicket through which independent inquiry could not happen outside of the important exception, which is people who would play their game.

We’re in a situation where you control the actual thing to test. You control the means of its detection. And you control the mechanism that actually involves the treatment of that the patents held by Ralph Baric, the patents held by the Center for Disease Control, ultimately the 5,111 patents that were issued from the period across from 2003 right up until 2019, the 5,111 patents were all issued within this interesting funding and research and inter-related directorates and inter-related corporate private public partnership kinds of relationships, all of those patents issued around the core platform that said that the CDC was going to adjudicate who could or could not make an independent inquiry.

And so the known regions of alteration have been targets of research funded by NIAID since 2012 and so this idea that somehow or another a magical new strain appeared which has no similarity to anything we’ve seen before is actually patently false.

Since 1999, humans have been manipulating properties of the beta coronavirus model and they have manipulated them such that they become more pathogenic to humans. We saw that emerge in the 2002-2003 outbreak. We saw it kind of resurface in the MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) outbreak in 2012 going into 2013 and we saw it again in 2019. And the very specific things that allegedly have altered in the genome of the beta coronavirus model called SARS CoV, whether it’s SARS CoV1 or MERS or SARS CoV2, those things that have allegedly altered are things that have equally been altered in laboratories, the amplification of the spike protein, the amplification of the Ace-2 receptor, those are all things that were anticipated and done in synthetic exercises in laboratories and we are told that they are the same things that nature figured out at the same time.

We know that Anthony Fauci has been pouring a lot of money into this. Since he took over NIAID, the public record indicates that he has had about $191 billion that has flowed through NIAID. And that money has come not only from the National Institutes of Health appropriations but it has also come from the Department of Defense and the bioweapons and bio-terror programs that were instituted after 2001. So there has been a lot of money going through NIAID… and an enormous amount of it has gone into coronavirus and other pathogens.

What we found interesting was that in 2016 (published online March 15, 2016) there was a publication that came out involving (the same) people who are very intimately involved with the current situation, which in fact stated that a SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 CoV (WIV1-CoV) poised for human emergence. Just sit with this for a minute. On March 15, 2016, we actually have a publication in which we are told that there is a Wuhan Institute of Virology pathogen poised for human emergence. So do you think it was any surprise to a person who has been monitoring this since 1999 that when I heard in December of 2019 that there was allegedly a novel pneumonia strain happening in Wuhan?

Do you think it was a surprise that I actually thought, “Hmm, nature, yeah, nature must have done that,” when I actually have not only the article that states that the Wuhan Institute of Virology coronavirus was poised for human emergence but I actually see that the individuals associated with that are individuals that since 2012 have been working in collaboration with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Agency) and the US AMRID and other agencies and have been funded significantly by a number of foundations to work on development of vaccine templates and platforms and treatment templates and platforms for, are you ready for this, SARS coronavirus outbreaks. And they have gone as far as to make statements about the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.”



  1. Michael Yeadon is a British pharmacologist who attracted media attention for making claims about the COVID-19 pandemic and the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. He previously served as the chief scientist and vice-president of the allergy and respiratory research division of the drug company Pfizer, and is the co-founder and former chief executive officer of biotechnology company Ziarco.
    Yeadon received his PhD under Ian Kitchen at the University of Surrey in Guildford, UK. His thesis was in the respiratory system of rats. Yeadon worked with Salvador Moncada at the Wellcome Research Laboratories, focusing on airway hyper-responsiveness and the effects of pollutants such as Ozone and Nitrogen oxide, as well as working on drug discovery of 5-LO and COX.

    He served as the chief scientist and vice-president of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory research unit in Sandwich, Kent, where he oversaw the development of drugs for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). During his work at Pfizer, Yeadon was responsible for the selection of targets and the progression of new molecules into human trials. His unit developed inhaled and oral NCEs that showed positive results in clinical trials for asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD.

    In 2011, Pfizer closed its Kent research facility, after which Yeadon and three colleagues founded the biotechnology company Ziarco. Ziarco was sold to Novartis for $325 million in 2017.

    Yeadon claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom was “effectively over” in October 2020,that there would be no “second wave” of infections, and that healthy people could not spread the SARS-CoV-2 virus. He has claimed that COVID-19 vaccines were unnecessary, unsafe and could cause infertility in women. In a letter to the European Medicines Agency, Yeadon and the German physician Wolfgang Wodarg called for all vaccine trials to be stopped, suggesting that mRNA vaccines could target the syncytin-1 protein needed for placenta formation. Several of these claims have spread widely on social media.
    Yeadon has also discouraged COVID-19 lockdowns and use of face masks because there is no evidence for their effectiveness[ and alleged that vaccines were part of a deliberate attempt at “mass depopulation”, saying recipients would die within two years.

    Yeadon, Michael; Diamant, Zuzana (2000). New and exploratory therapeutic agents for asthma. New York: Marcel Dekker. ISBN 0-585-25139-8. OCLC 45730917


    1. David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

      Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.

      In my opinion, his research proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.



      1. Jun 4, 2021 — Now, OSHA has reversed this guidance and has stated that employers will not be required to record such adverse reactions (at least through May …

        OSHA’s updated guidance establishes a clear enforcement position that will remain in effect for at least another year, and during this time, employers will not need to record any adverse effects from the COVID-19 vaccine experienced by their employees, regardless of whether the vaccine is mandated or voluntary.



      2. An astronomical blunder is a more accurate way of describing what has happened in this pandemic. To be clear, what this book is about is an intentional action with enormous, adverse, irreversible consequences and health impacts for large numbers of people. When it comes to life or death, we enter the world of homicide. There are deliberate actions that directly impair human health and, in the extreme, cause avoidable, preventable death. To be clearer, for this pandemic, the correct notion is criminally negligent homicide.

        The pandemic big blunder defined in this book results from an ineffective and incompetent large public health system. There are fifty-six state and territorial public health agencies and nearly 3,000 local agencies. They have always been responsible for dealing with emergencies and urgent health threats as well as preventing disease. The US has about 500,000 public health workers. There are about thirty-two US schools of public health that graduate about 16,000 individuals yearly, and graduate programs producing 800 people with a master of public health, health administration, or health educator degree. Some states require certain credentials for public health officials such as a medical license or specialized training in preventive medicine or public health. What has shaped the pandemic blunder across the whole public health system are the federal agencies, namely the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration. Government officials have been supported by a host of allies, principally reporters and commentators in the leftist media, wrong-headed academics, medical societies, medical journals, drug companies, and many leftists in the political world. Inevitably, we must address the causes of the intentional actions and behaviors. Later, both outright corruption and greed will be explored to help answer the inevitable, logical question: How could such a horrendous blunder happen and persist for so long? Is it just a bureaucratic blunder or is it closer to evil intent? If you have any friend or relative who has suffered or died in this pandemic, then you will, by the end of this book, be inclined to think more in terms of evil than incompetence or even merely greed.

        Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment (pp. 2-3). Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.



      3. The 7 major types of microorganisms
        Image result for microscopic organisms
        Microorganisms are divided into seven types: bacteria, archaea, protozoa, algae, fungi, viruses, and multicellular animal parasites ( helminths ).


    2. “All the vaccine need do is to produce a good enough immune response.”–Biss

      But mRNA products are NOT ‘vaccines’ in the manner in which they create an immune response. Vaccines produce the immunity directly,; Vaccines give you immunity to a disease without you getting sick first. They are made using killed or weakened versions of the disease-causing germ or parts of the germ (called antigens).

      mRNA is meant to coax the immune system itself to produce a response.

      Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.

      Sol Gel nanotechnology is capable of creating manmade viruses at the molecular level.

      The essence of nanotechnology is the ability to work at the molecular level, atom by atom, to create large structures with fundamentally new molecular structures..

      Molecular nanotechnology (MNT) is a technology based on the ability to build structures to complex, atomic specifications by means of mechanosynthesis. This is distinct from nanoscale materials.

      Mechanosynthesis is a term for hypothetical chemical syntheses in which reaction outcomes are determined by the use of mechanical constraints to direct reactive molecules to specific molecular sites. There are presently no non-biological chemical syntheses which achieve this aim.



    3. Patents Prove COVID Fraud and Illegal Dealings

      October 2, 2021 7:00 PM By Dr Joseph Mercola

      In the early 2000s, David Martin, Ph.D., founder of M-CAM International, started finding large numbers of patents that violate biological and chemical weapons laws

      In 1999, Dr. Anthony Fauci funded research to create “an infectious replication-defective recombinant coronavirus.” In 2002, Ralph Baric, Ph.D. and colleagues at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak

      Since 1999, at least 4,000 patents involving coronavirus have been filed, including patents detailing key features of the so-called “novel” SARS-CoV-2 virus

      The 2001 anthrax attack, which came out of medical and defense research, led to the passage of the PREP Act, which removed liability for manufacturers of emergency medical countermeasures

      The funds for entitlement programs and pensions will dry up by 2028, at which point the drug industry will go bankrupt as well. With a burgeoning population that is sick from the COVID jabs, we need to prepare new systems to care for each other

      In this interview, we continue our coverage of the COVID “plandemic” by speaking to David Martin, Ph.D., who has done a phenomenal job uncovering the paper trail behind the virus now known as SARS-CoV-2. As it turns out, this is not a novel virus at all, as patents and government grants detailing key features of the virus go back two decades.

      Martin finished his doctorate at the University of Virginia in 1995, after which he was hired on to the medical school faculty in radiology and orthopedic surgery. In 2006, he set up the first medical device clinical trials organization for the University of Virginia — a company called IDEAmed — which conducted medical device clinical trials for U.S. Food and Drug Administration submission. So, he has an extensive background working with FDA clinical trials.

      Monitoring Biological Weapons Violations

      In 1998, he founded another company called M-CAM International, which is focused on finding ways to bring intellectual property into conventional finance. M-CAM also started auditing the U.S. patent system at the request of the U.S. Congress.

      In the early 2000s, M-CAM worked with the Senate Banking Committee and was a contractor for the United States Treasury to expose white collar criminal activity around intellectual property and tax fraud. In doing that work, Martin also discovered something else.

      “Quite alarmingly, we found an enormous number of patents [detailing] biological and chemical weapon violations,” Martin says. “That was not something we were looking for. I let people know this was not something we set out to find. This is something that landed in our lap.

      I developed a technology a decade earlier called linguistic genomics, which is a means by which you can look at unstructured text data and find the metaphoric meaning inside of what is being communicated. As you can imagine, if people of ill intent are trying to do something, they often hide what they’re doing in plain sight, but they use language that is not conventional.

      So, when you find a patent, for example, on a blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade — did you hear what I just said? ‘A blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade.’ Does that sound like it’s a common way to inoculate a population or does that sound like [a bioweapon]?

      And so, finding a number of bioweapons patents, we started taking into account some very serious things. I published once a year the literal global phonebook of every biological and chemical weapon violation that took place anywhere in the world.

      [It tells you] the who, the where, the who funded it, what their addresses are. It was … used by U.S. law enforcement, intelligence communities and elsewhere around the world to track things that were being done inappropriately. And, it was in 1999 [that] we started detecting that there seemed to be an alarming event around coronavirus, which we’re going to get into.”

      Coronavirus Identified as a Potential Vaccine Vector

      As explained by Martin, in 1999, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, identified coronavirus as a possible vaccine vector.

      At the time, the disclosed rationale was to try to come up with an HIV vaccine, and to that end, Fauci, in 1999, funded research to create “an infectious replication-defective recombinant coronavirus.”

      In 2002, Ralph Baric, Ph.D. and colleagues at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak.

      read entire article and see video:



      1. The Open Philanthropy Project –EVENT 201
        Nearly all of OPP’s funding comes from Dustin Moskovitz and Cari Tuna. The OPP also has a donor-advised fund, the Open Philanthropy Project Fund (OPPF). Combined, the three organizations have given almost $1.2 billion in grants since their founding.


      1. Maurice Strong

        Strong and the Roots of the Great Reset

        In 1992, Maurice Strong had been assigned to head the second Earth Summit (the first having been the 1972 Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment also chaired by Strong).

        The Rio Summit had established a new era in the consolidation of NGOs and corporations under the genocidal green agenda of controlled starvation masquerading behind the dogma of “sustainability’. This doctrine was formalized with Agenda 21 and the Earth Charter, co-authored by Mikhail Gorbachev, Jim MacNeill and Strong during the 1990s.

        At the opening of the Rio Summit, Strong announced that industrialized countries had “developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing- are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.”

        In a 1992 essay entitled From Stockholm to Rio: A Journey Down a Generation, published by the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Strong wrote:

        “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. What is needed is recognition of the reality that in so many fields, and this is particularly true of environmental issues, it is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”

        Two years earlier, Strong gave an interview wherein he described a “fiction book” he was fantasizing about writing which he described in the following manner:

        “What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

        When this statement is held up parallel to this man’s peculiar life, we quickly come to see that the barrier between reality and fiction is more than a little blurry.



    1. Death, Meaning, and the Power of the Invisible World | Clay Routledge | The JBP Podcast S4: E53
      Nov 1, 2021

      Terror Management Theory
      Terror Management Theory (TMT), Worldview Defense

      Reviewed by Psychology Today Staff

      Nearly everyone fears death. How that fear influences human thinking and behavior is the focus of terror management theory (TMT) research. According to TMT, death anxiety drives people to adopt worldviews that protect their self-esteem, worthiness, and sustainability and allow them to believe that they play an important role in a meaningful world. Some of these views lead to troubling actions.

      According to TMT, people need to insulate themselves from their deep fear of living an insignificant life destined to be erased by death. One path to address this fear is to assure themselves that they are part of an important group. This desire to reinforce cultural significance in the face of death often results in displays of prejudice based on the belief that the group with which one identifies is superior to others. In this way, people confirm their self-importance, at least to themselves.

      TMT proposes that individuals are motivated to develop close relationships within their own cultural group in order to convince themselves that they will somehow live on—if only symbolically—after their inevitable death. While some of the foundational studies on which TMT is based have failed to replicate, thereby drawing criticism within the field of psychology, the framework continues to resonate for many.

      The Fear of Death
      Terror management theory was developed by Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski and expanded in their 2015 book, The Worm at the Core. But the concept is built on the earlier work of anthropologist Ernest Becker, whose 1973 book, The Denial of Death, argued that the majority of human actions are undertaken primarily as a means to ignore or evade death.

      Most psychologists consider TMT to be a sort of evolutionary trait. Humans naturally became aware of dangerous threats as a means of preserving their lives and continuing their gene pool. The deep existential anxiety that comes with that knowledge is an unfortunate byproduct of this evolutionary advantage.
      read entire article:



      Summary news report highlighting the vitally important statements and declarations of large groups of doctors and scientists worldwide demanding a halt to the COVID injections and vaccine mandates causing high numbers of deaths and very severe adverse events or vaccine damage worldwide, and urging parents everywhere to not vaccinate their children.


      Thousands of Doctors & Scientists Worldwide Call for a Halt to the Unsafe & Toxic COVID Vaccines, for a Halt to Vaccine Mandates, & for Freedom to Practice Medicine & Share Research Without Fear of Censorship – As Medical Boards Issue Unscientific Edicts & Censor Truth telling!

      Video Presentation of the above article at the following link:



  2. RECEIPTS: Patents Expose “Medical Devices” in Jab, Injectable Computing System

    Biotech analyst, Karen Kingston joins Stew Peters and she continues to blow holes in the “safe and effective” narrative surrounding the vaxxines, which are clearly part of an intentional global depopulation plan.

    She says:

    “There are four advanced technologies that are part of these injections and the purpose of them is to trace your social network and your activities, as well as deliver different drugs and genetics and immune processes…

    “Let’s just dive right into it, because I want people to see where I got this information from. If you go to the Moderna website, right on the Moderna website, they post the patents for the injections.

    “Keep in mind, the Pfizer injection – all the mRNA products – fall under Moderna. So, it’s US Patent #10703789B2, issued on July 7th, 2020 and what you’ll see, right there is a description of the four lipid nanoparticles that are in here and that encapsulate the mRNA.

    “As you read through a patent, what you’ll find, in the ‘art’ or the ‘abstract’, when they describe…what this does and in Section 201, they explain that there is a delivery system involved and if you go on to read the delivery system, it can deliver a therapy or genetic product over a period of days, weeks, months or even years.

    “And as you go through the patent, that is related to certain technologies. It’s related to technology US Patent #20100216804 [‘Long Circulating Nanoparticles for Sustained Release of Therapeutic Agents’]…These are nano disks, this is what Dr Botha showed on your show…

    “So, if you go through, you can show how these images in the patent match up to what the doctor has shown you, Dr Botha…It says, right here, in the patent, in the [0046] section, that it can contain gene therapies, medical diagnosis, and for medical therapeutics, pathogen-borne diseases, hormone-related products that can be in there.

    “And then, what’s really important is if you go to [0074], it says that they can also contain moieties. Moieties are biomarkers, so they can put biomedical products in there, so that it actually knows to go to the ovaries, to go to the testes or to go to the heart.

    “So, these VAERS reports are not ‘adverse events’, that means that they were unintended. These are *intended consequences*. These products are programmed to go to certain parts of your body…

    “If you go to the next patent, ending in 65001…this patent is for nano magnets. So the reason why people are magnetic is because they were injected with magnets and you can see in the picture, there’s wires to magnets, permanent magnets and a drug delivery package that’s in there.

    “The point of this product was to treat certain types of cancers, bone cancers and it would attach to the bone. But if you go to Figure 1-A, you’ll see all these little light particles, of what the system looks like underneath the light and it reflects the light. So, all these doctors who are looking at the vials under the microscope, they’re [asking], ‘What are these things reflecting light?’ They’re the magnets and that that’s why people are magnetic.”

    Stew mentions Dr Carrie Madej’s images and descriptions of the particles that grew bright in color as they warmed to room temperature from the -70ºF at which they’re required to be stored. Dr Madej’s nano expert friends told her the bright colors were indicative of superconductivity triggered by exposure to white light.

    Karen responds, “That’s the single-walled carbon nanotubes; the graphene oxide nanotubes combined with Quantum Dot. But they need the magnetics injected in them to host the magnetic field…

    “US Patent 20130251618, again, this falls under the master Moderna patent on the Moderna website. So, it’s clearly-delineated. This is no conspiracy theory, I’m not making anything up. You can go to the patent, it refers to this patent, which is a

    “Method for making semiconducting single wall carbon nanotubes”. Those are made from graphene oxide. They’re one-atom thick. This is common sense –”

    Stew interjects, “It’s written, it’s right there, it’s the proof, it’s in the receipts, so I would like a public apology to you from these Reuters people and from these fact checkers over at USA TODAY. I’m going to name them. Daniel Funke, this guy is a real jerk. I want these people to come out and say, ‘You know what, we got it wrong, Karen Kingston was right, here’s the patents, she brought receipts, graphene oxide is in these shots.’

    “And that is only the bare minimum dangers associated with these things, so they should have no problem moving on past the graphene oxide and now factchecking you on the fact that there’s self-aware, living organisms building little colonies inside of you, while they inject these computing systems that are going to track you through this smart app technology and give you a risk score not based on your health but based on how much of a ‘superspreader’ you are.

    “And you’re superspreading the truth about these vaxxines, and that’s what they want to fight against and I hope that they will come out and admit that they were wrong about this graphene oxide thing, because we’re making headway, we’re moving the needle, here by showing the proof.

    “You see, this is the machine, Karen we have to fight against every single day, sitting behind this desk and that production room over there, these researchers over here, people like you that are hard at work, up all night long putting this stuff together digging through this, so that people don’t get killed! Killed, intentionally murdered by these Globalist oligarchs that have now assumed some pseudo authority, these aristocrat serial killer psychopaths, that’s what they are. Let’s just call it what it is. This is a genocide plan!”

    Karen replies, “It is, to usher in Artificial Intelligence. That’s what it is. So the reason why they’re calling men ‘women’ and women ‘men’ is so that we can call Sophia and Grace ‘she’ – and they’re not. These robots, these things are not humans and what’s happened is that they’ve intentionally, through the Mainstream Media and through this type of [smart] technology, they’ve divided Americans and we’ve started to think less of human beings, which is not what we’re supposed to do…

    “This is very much spiritual warfare and it’s about what’s in our hearts and if we believe in being the Children of God, we believe in God and we connect with each other and that love, we can heal this country. But as long as we continue to divide and hate one another, we’re going to usher in an era of terrorism, that’s what this is, with this Artificial Intelligence and what you’re saying, is tyrannical sociopaths who’ve hijacked our government and hijacked our communities. That’s what’s going on.

    “Real quickly, we can continue to go through some of the evidence I found. The February 4th publication by Gal Ehrlich, who owns this patent for the smart technology app for the vaxxines is entitled, ‘Prioritizing allocation of COVID-19 vaccines based on social contacts increases vaccine effectiveness’ was published on February 4th, 2021.

    “They did a beat in the Virginia-DC area and what they decided was getting vaccinated isn’t based on co-morbidities or your age, it’s based on how you’re engaging as an American in our society. This is an obedience platform, as you said. It’s a way to enslave people and will eventually lead to executions of those who are not obedient. That’s what this is.”

    Stew comments, “This platform is not a doomsday platform of darkness. This might seem hyperbolic. This might seem like fear-mongering but if you’re afraid of something, you’re paralyzed. Fear is a weakness. Being aware, being armed with this information only strengthens you. So this is a platform about winning, because I read the book and I know how it ends. God wins.

    “This is an opportunity to strengthen yourself in order to be a part of – not the resistance, because that suggests we’re on defense – but to be part of the winning team, on offense, because we know we are the majority. And the more people that wake up to this, the better chance we have; together with your neighbors, with your congregation, with the lady at the supermarket, the lady getting her coffee at the drive-through, the one that’s standing there at the pharmaceutical counter, who’s talking to the liar who’s not giving her Informed Consent about what she’s about to inject into her body and it’s all discoverable.

    “I think everybody should print off these patents. We’re going to put them at StewPeters.TV, there will be images there. We’ll put the slides there, underneath this interview and people should print this off and literally carry them around like brochures and hand them out to the people who are simply saying that you’re a conspiracy theorist tinfoil hat-wearing nonsense talker, pushing fear porn and you’re some radical right wing something or other, like this has anything to do with politics, whatsoever!

    “And Daniel Funke, over at USA TODAY, while you’re at it, you want to fact check Dr Ruby on the fact that a Delta Airlines pilot died. You better be careful, because there are people with personal relationships to this pilot who we’ve been talking to, here at the Stew Peters Show. So be careful with your lies, because they’re going to be exposed – and so will you.

    “Karen Kingston, final words?”

    She replies,”This is true and it’s part of the Quantum Dot technology and it’s US Patent #0228565 and what that is is these molecules that are based on the Observer Effect, it’s based on the scientific explanation of the power of prayer…so I do believe if you believe in doom and gloom, you’re going to usher in doom and gloom and hatred and devisiveness but if you believe in the power of God and God’s love and that we share that with one another and we are connected, as humans, then we will prevail and we do know how this ends – God always does win.

    “Be a member, join Team God, join Team Patriots, join Team Humanity and opt out of this tyrannical Artificial Intelligence terrorist attack that’s happening right now in this country. Sacrifice your job, if you have to. Pull your kids out of school. Do the right thing and let’s build this momentum to gain back our country, under the Constitution, which was founded under God, under our God-given inalienable rights and let’s stand up for those and not engage in this tyranny and this Socialism and this obedience enslavement platform.”

    Running Time: 13 minutes


  3. Are We Being Set Up for Mass Depopulation?
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola May 15, 2021 in Opinions, Videos

    Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, fears the combination of vaccine passports and booster vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants may be part of a mass depopulation agenda
    Asymptomatic spread is a fallacy capitalized upon to spread fear and induce compliance. Only people who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection pose any health risk to others, because to be an efficient source of infection, you need a high viral load. If you have a high viral load, your immune system will fight back, which always induces symptoms
    The myth of asymptomatic spread was used to justify lockdowns, which in turn were a tool get you used to giving up your freedoms and go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset
    The Great Reset is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the world’s nations
    Digital vaccine passports will form the foundation of an unprecedented surveillance and control platform into which your entire life will be tied, from health records to biometric ID, to an all-digital centralized banking system and a social credit system, all of which can be turned off in order to coerce you into a particular behavior
    How do you market and implement a financial system that nobody would want if they understood its full ramifications — a change so huge that it not only would mean the end of currency as we know it, but a total revision of sovereignty and individual rights?

    In the interview above, which is part of the full-length documentary “Planet Lockdown,”1 Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, shares his views on the COVID-19 pandemic, fast-tracked COVID-19 “vaccines,” the issue of mutated virus variants and the need for booster shots, and how this manufactured crisis is being used to strip us of our civil liberties.

    Are You Putting the Pieces Together?
    Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology. He’s spent 32 years of his career working for large pharmaceutical companies, and 10 years in the biotechnology sector.

    “I’m in favor of all modes of new medical treatments, whether they’re biologicals or vaccines, small molecules, creams, sprays, ointments, whatever, but I’m fervently against unsafe medicines or medicines used in an inappropriate context,” Yeadon says.

    “Some of the things I’m going to say are not favorable to the current crop of gene-based vaccines and it’s [because] they’re being inappropriately used. I don’t think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a sort of wide-spectrum public health prophylactic …

    A few things have allowed me, I think, to spot what’s going on in the world at the moment. One, I’ve loved biology since I was little. I’ve been continuing to learn and to apply biology broadly, whether it’s pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology [or] toxicology. I’ve got a very broad grounding in all things to do with life science, in terms of health and disease.

    [Secondly], one of my former supervisors said that I had a remarkable facility that stood out above the sort of ordinary things you’d have to do to be a vice president or a CEO. He said I was able to spot patterns in sparse data earlier than my peers. So, when there’s not enough data for most people to judge what was going on, I would often be able to see it.

    I could see a pattern forming when there wasn’t quite enough information … On this occasion, it allowed me, quite quickly, to work out that what we were being told about this virus and what we needed to do in order to stay safe was simply not true.”

    A Massive Fraud Has Been Perpetrated
    Yeadon starts out by highlighting the “enormous changes” made in the U.K.’s attribution of causes of deaths. If you die within 28 days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, you are counted as a COVID-19 death, regardless of other underlying conditions. The same thing was done in the U.S. As noted by Yeadon:

    “We’ve never had anything as absurd as the rule that is now used. It’s not just a matter of disagreeing professionally. It’s just complete nonsense.”

    The shutdown of businesses and forcing healthy people to self-isolate also makes no sense. Yeadon points out that only people who are ill, who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection, pose any health risk to others:

    “To be a good, efficient source of infection, you have to have a lot of virus. And if you have a lot of viruses attacking you, you are fighting back. That process produces symptoms, inevitably, not just occasionally. It must always happen …

    And those people are not people who are walking around in the community, because if you’re full of virus and symptomatic, you are also ill, and ill people tend to stay at home or in bed.”

    Asymptomatic spread, which has no sound basis, was used to justify lockdowns, which never had any basis in fact or science either. Lockdowns were implemented for entirely other reasons, namely to get you used to giving up your freedoms and your normal way of life, and to make you psychologically dependent on an outside source telling you when it’s OK to do what.

    It’s obedience training and a tool to get the population of the world to go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset, which is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the world’s nations.

    “Basically, everything your government has told you about this virus, everything you need to do to stay safe, is a lie,” Yeadon says. “Every part of it … None of the key themes that you hear talked about — from asymptomatic transmission to top-up vaccines [i.e., booster shots] — not one of those things is supported by the science.

    Every piece is cleverly chosen adjacently to something that probably is true, but is itself a lie, and has led people to where we are right now. I don’t normally use phrases like this, but I think we are standing at the very gates of hell … It’s all about control …

    The reason I’m commenting is because I believe it’s not just about my life. More importantly, [it’s the lives] of my children and grandchildren that are being stolen … by a systematic process of fear and control that’s going to culminate in, I think, some very horrible times, and I’m desperate to wake you up …

    We’re probably quite used to politicians occasionally telling white lies, and we kind of let them, but when they lie to you about something technical, something that you can check, and they do it [with] many, many elements of the whole event, then please, you’ve got to believe me, [they’re] not telling the truth.

    And if they’re not telling the truth, that means there’s something else. And I’m here to tell you that there is something very, very bad happening. If you don’t pay attention, you will soon lose any chance to do anything about it.”

    Science Has Been Turned on Its Head
    Yeadon rightly notes that everything we’ve known about virology and infectious disease has been turned upside down during this pandemic. None of the standard responses known to protect people from infectious disease was followed. Normally, you quarantine the sick to contain the infection.

    Locking down entire societies has never been done and has no foundation in science or the history of epidemic control. Similarly, mass testing people without symptoms is without precedence. It simply isn’t done, and for good reason. It’s a waste of resources because as Yeadon explained earlier, we know how viruses spread. This isn’t our first rodeo. We’ve dealt with infectious epidemics before.

    We know how viruses work in the body. When you have an active infection, you develop symptoms as your body mounts its defense. Without symptoms, your viral load is too low to pose a threat, either to yourself or others. The myth about asymptomatic spread has been a fear tactic.

    T-Cell Immunity Is Far More Important Than Antibodies
    Yeadon goes on to review how we’ve been misled about immunity and how your body fights off viruses. You’ve probably heard that the thing that gives you immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.

    The entire vaccination campaign is built around the premise that by injecting a synthetic piece of viral RNA into your cells, your body will start producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in response to which your body will produce specific antibodies that recognize that protein. This is also known as humoral immunity.

    However, while antibodies are important, especially in bacterial infections, antibodies are not the only part of your immunity. More importantly, immunity against viruses — opposed to bacteria — actually does not depend on antibodies. Yeadon explains:

    “Viruses are really tiny, and their business is to get as quickly as they can inside your cells. So, they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into your cell. So, they’re inside. Antibodies are big molecules and they’re generally outside your cells.

    So just think about that for a moment. Antibodies and viruses are in separate compartments. The virus is inside the cell, the antibodies outside the cell. I’m not saying antibodies have no role, but they’re really not very important. This has been proven. There are some people in whom a natural experiment has occurred.

    They have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus.

    So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk. It is not a good measure of whether or not you’re immune. It does give evidence that you’ve been infected, but their persistence is not important as to whether you’ve got immunity …

    We’ve known this for decades. We’ve known about T-cells for decades. They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks. And we’ve known about their importance in defending you against respiratory viruses since probably the 1970s, certainly the 1980s. So, don’t believe anything where people suggest to you that their role is uncertain. We’ve known for a very long time that they are absolutely central.”

    Antibodies Are Not the Answer to Variants
    The central role of T-cell immunity, or cellular immunity, becomes particularly pertinent when discussing the threat of variants, mutated forms of SARS-CoV-2. As mentioned, your immune system is a multifaceted system that allows your body to mount defenses against all sorts of threats. Parasites, fungi, bacteria and viruses are the main threat categories.

    Each of these invades and threatens you in completely different ways, and your immune system has ways of dealing with all of them, using a variety of mechanisms.

    “You’ve got four or five different arms of the immune system: innate immunity, mucosal, antibody, T-cells and compliment[ary systems],” Yeadon says.

    “There are all of these different wonderful systems that have integrated, one with another, because it needs to defend you against all sorts of different threats in the environment. What I’m telling you is that the emphasis on antibodies in respect of respiratory viral infections is wrong, and you can establish that quite easily by doing some searching.”

    In essence, what Yeadon is saying is that whether you’re going to be susceptible to variants has very little to do with whether or not you have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, because antibodies are not your primary defense against viruses. Your T-cells are the ones doing the heavy lifting.

    What this means then, is that getting booster shots for different variants is not going to help you. It will not solve the problem, because these shots do not strengthen your T-cell immunity.

    Carefully Rethink Need for Booster Shots
    Of all the lies we’ve been told over the past year, the ones that worry and frighten Yeadon the most are the lies about virus variants and booster shots. In fact, he believes not buying into these lies may be key to your very survival, and here’s why:

    “It’s quite normal for RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2, when it replicates, to make typographical errors. It’s got a very good error detection, error correction system so it doesn’t make too many typos, but it does make some, and those are called ‘variants.’

    It’s really important to know that if you find the variant that’s most different from the sequence identified in Wuhan, that variance … is only 0.3% different from the original sequence.

    I’ll say it another way. If you find the most different variance, it’s 99.7% identical to the original one, and I can assure you … that amount of difference is absolutely NOT possibly able to represent itself to you as a different virus.”

    He explains how, earlier in the pandemic, scientists obtained blood from patients who had been sickened with the SARS virus 17 or 18 years ago. SARS-CoV-1, responsible for that SARS outbreak, is 80% similar to SARS-CoV-2.

    They wanted to know if the immune systems of these patients would be able to recognize SARS-CoV-2. They did. They still had memory T-cells against SARS-CoV-1, and those cells also recognized SARS-CoV-2, despite being only 80% similar. Now, if a 20% difference was not enough to circumvent the immune system of these patients, why should you be concerned with a variant that is at most 0.3% different from the original SARS-CoV-2?

    “When your government scientists tell you that a variant that’s 0.3% different from SARS-CoV-2 could masquerade as a new virus and be a threat to your health, you should know, and I’m telling you, they are lying,” Yeadon says.

    “If they’re lying, and they are, why is the pharmaceutical industry making top-up [booster] vaccines? You should be terrified at this point, as I am, because there’s absolutely no possible justification for their manufacture. And the world’s medicines regulators have said, ‘Because they are quite similar to the original vaccines … we won’t be asking them to do any clinical safety studies.’”

    Are We Seeing a Mass Depopulation Agenda in Action?
    Yeadon stresses that variants simply aren’t different enough to represent a threat, which is why you don’t now, and won’t in the future, need one or more booster shots. Yet they’re already being made, and regulators are giving them a free pass when it comes to safety and efficacy studies.

    “I’m very frightened of that. There’s no possible benign interpretation of this,” Yeadon says. “I believe they’re going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation.

    This will provide the tools to do it, and plausible deniability. They’ll create another story about some sort of biological threat and you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and a few months or a year or so later, you’ll die of some peculiar inexplicable syndrome. And they won’t be able to associate it with the vaccines.

    That’s my belief — that they’re lying to you about variants so they can make damaging top-up vaccines that you don’t need at all. I think they will be used for malign purposes … We know that the people [SARS-CoV-2] injures and kills are only people who are elderly and or ill, usually both, so we’re talking about less than 0.1% [of the population] …

    Given that this virus represents, at worst, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than influenza, and a smaller risk [than influenza] to almost everyone else … it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn’t need to do anything. [We didn’t need] lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines.

    There are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as the vaccines are. They’re already available and cheap. Inhaled corticosteroids that are used in asthma reduced symptomatology by about 90%.

    An off-patent drug called ivermectin, one of the most widely-used drugs in the world, is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease, including lethality by about 90%. So, you don’t need vaccines and you don’t need any of the measures that have been introduced at all.”

    Key Safety Concerns of mRNA ‘Vaccines’
    In December 2020, Yeadon filed a petition2 calling on the European Medicine Agency to halt Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine until they’ve been restructured to address critical safety concerns. Of course, those trials were not halted. The four key safety concerns Yeadon specified in his petition3 were:

    1.The potential for formation of non-neutralizing antibodies that can trigger an exaggerated immune reaction (referred to as paradoxical immune enhancement or antibody-dependent immune amplification) when the individual is exposed to the real “wild” virus post-vaccination.

    Antibody-dependent amplification has been repeatedly demonstrated in coronavirus vaccine trials on animals.4 While the animals initially tolerated the vaccine well and had robust immune responses, they later became severely ill or died when infected with the wild virus. Put plainly, the vaccine increased their susceptibility to the virus and made them more likely to die from the infection.

    Read more at:



    1. NIH Confirms Fauci LIED Under Oath About Gain-of-Function Research

      Research sought to determine ‘if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model…’

      By Molly Bruns | October 21, 2021

      Richard H. Ebright, molecular biologist at the National Institutes of Health, posted a letter contradicting COVID czar Anthony Fauci‘s previous testimony that the NIH had not funded gain-of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Breitbart reported.

      NIH corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

      NIH states that EcoHealth Alliance violated Terms and Conditions of NIH grant AI110964.

      — Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 20, 2021

      The Oct. 20 letter stated that the NIH money was granted to the EcoHealth Alliance, and was sub-awarded to the Wuhan lab.

      Republicans including Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., responded to the bombshell by calling for Fauci to be “investigated and prosecuted.”

      In the letter, Ebright said the money funded a research project starting in 2018 that tested “if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”

      The researchers on the project did find that “laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus.”

      Ebright explained that by not reporting the protein spike, the EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms and conditions of the grant.

      “Out of an abundance of caution and as an additional layer of oversight, language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant award to EcoHealth that outlined criteria for a secondary review,” the NIH said. “Such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth.”

      The measures put in place required a secondary review pending any serious findings to determine whether the research was safe and if the goals of the project should have been revisited.

      EcoHealth Alliance did not report its findings, thereby violating the terms of the grant.

      The letter from the NIH does note that the coronaviruses that were being studied are distantly related to SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, and are unlikely to have mutated.

      This finding will likely put fibbing Fauci back in the hot seat, as it shows he lied under oath about his knowledge of the gain-of-function research.

      Fauchi has not made a statement regarding these findings as of this writing.



    1. There is a living creature inside the vaccine. It is immortal.
      The “Hydra Vulgaris” See description OCTOBER 5, 2021

      Is this nasty thing eating away at peoples nervous system? Read on—Hydra vulgaris, the fresh-water polyp, is a small animal freshwater hydroid with length from 10mm to 30mm and width about 1 mm. The hydra have four to twelve tentacles that protrude from just outside the mouth. They feed by extending their tentacles and waiting for food to touch the tentacles. They then bring the food to their mouth, ingest and digest the organism. Anything that cannot be digested is egested.
      Ingestion and egestion occur through the mouth.Like other hydras, Hydra vulgaris cling to a base object with a “foot” pad, shaped like a disk. The Hydra moves by releasing its grip on its base and is carried away by the current. H. vulgaris can also move by bending over, grabbing a surface with its tentacles, releasing its grip with its “foot” and flipping over itself.

      H. vulgaris is often used, like many hydra, as a model organism for morphallactic regeneration because they are easy to care for, requiring minimal direct care, and reproduce relatively quickly. It is reported that they do not undergo senescence, making them biologically immortal.
      This species can reproduce in three ways: sexual reproduction, budding, and indirectly through regeneration. The evidence of intelligent self-assembly of nanotechnology and intelligent filament-movement is an indicator of synthetic biology and nanobioelectronics, as per several scientific papers published in various journals, and points to the stealth inclusion of Graphene Oxide in the Moderna vaccine for electromagnetic manipulation of cells and neurons via the creation of synthetic neural networks in the human body and brain.

      This is a clear sign of malfeasance and intended transhumanizing and cyborgizing of the human body through the COVID vaccines.
      It must be remembered that both Pfizer and Moderna developed the Transhumanist mRNA vaccines for DARPA, on DARPA contracts from 2013. Pfizer and Moderna’s military connections as well as the mRNA connections with DARPA’s Regina Dugan now directing the Wellcome LEAP ventures and DARPA’s Dan Wattendorf now at the Gates Foundation were discussed here earlier.
      DARPA’s “Pandemic Prevention Platforms” and ADEPT diagnostic and monitoring platforms are based on bioengineering, gene manipulation, and synthetic biology. These human-takeover programs envision an infinite future of mRNA vaccines and external control of the human body and brain, which Graphene Oxide would permit



  4. When strands of DNA are incorporated into the hydrogels, interactions with a target molecule can cause a displacement of a DNA strand or a change in the crosslinkers, which then affects their mechanical properties flagging up the presence of the target molecule.Aug 22, 2019

    Simple tweak reprogrammes DNA-responsive hydrogel smart …

    DNA hydrogels?
    DNA hydrogels can be fabricated through either chemical linkage of DNA molecules or physical entanglement between DNA chains. By chemical approaches, the polymers are bound together through covalent bonds, which endow environmental stability and intensive mechanical strength.Oct 31, 2019

    DNA hydrogel-empowered biosensing – NCBI › articles › PMC7094116

    DNA hydrogel-empowered biosensing
    Sima Khajouei, Hadi Ravan,⁎ and Ali Ebrahimi

    DNA hydrogels as special members in the DNA nanotechnology have provided crucial prerequisites to create innovative gels owing to their sufficient stability, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and tunable multifunctionality. These properties have tailored DNA hydrogels for various applications in drug delivery, tissue engineering, sensors, and cancer therapy. Recently, DNA-based materials have attracted substantial consideration for the exploration of smart hydrogels, in which their properties can change in response to chemical or physical stimuli. In other words, these gels can undergo switchable gel-to-sol or sol-to-gel transitions upon application of different triggers. Moreover, various functional motifs like i-motif structures, antisense DNAs, DNAzymes, and aptamers can be inserted into the polymer network to offer a molecular recognition capability to the complex. In this manuscript, a comprehensive discussion will be endowed with the recognition capability of different kinds of DNA hydrogels and the alternation in physicochemical behaviors upon target introducing. Finally, we offer a vision into the future landscape of DNA based hydrogels in sensing applications.

    Keywords: DNA hydrogels, Molecular diagnosis, Smart hydrogel, Sol to gel, Gel to sol


    1. COVID Trend #1: Implementation of Control Infrastructure Continues

      To those with open eyes, it has long been patently obvious that the COVID scamdemic was an elaborate and clever ruse to usher in a control infrastructure that is intended to be permanent. Why would ruling bodies, from Canada to Israel to France, from California to New York, invest so much in vaccine certificates or passports with digital QR codes, if this were temporary? Why would Australia invest so much in building COVID quarantine camps for “ongoing operations” if this were temporary? Why would Canada invest so much in COVID isolating centers if this were temporary? Why would Victorian premier ‘Dictator Dan’ Andrews let slip he’s very happy for the Mickleham quarantine center for the “next pandemic”?

      This is designed to permanent!

      The structure of a future Orwellian surveillance state is being assembled. It is incredible that some people are still so asleep that they literally cannot see the architecture of control that is being rapidly constructed right here, right now, under their noses.

      COVID Trend #2: Unvaccinated People Banned from Supermarkets and Grocery Shopping

      Arch NWO insider and war criminal Henry Kissinger once said, “who controls the food supply controls the people.” The agenda of control is advancing methodically. First the carrot, then the stick, then the whip. The NWO controllers know that the idea is to eventually target people’s ability to obtain and/or grow their own food. They know that people may ignore their unlawful edicts and mandates, but only if they can remain independent. If they make people dependent on them for money and food, then compliance becomes far more widespread. A key goal in the ultimate agenda is to make it impossible for the unvaccinated to live a normal life, including getting food, so that then they cave in and get the shot. It was only a matter of time before they introduced this, however as with many things, they are trying it out in a few places first to test the public reaction. Earlier this year a mayor in the Philippines tried to stop the unvaccinated from getting food (and recently their tyrannical leader Duterte threatened to arrest those refusing the vax, as well as suggested vaxxing people in their sleep).

      However, this is the first time to my knowledge that a rich Western nation has tried this. There is now a law in Hesse (a state in Germany) that allows all businesses, even supermarkets, to ban unvaxxed customers, even for groceries and other essentials.


      1. The NWO agenda, amplied via the COVID plandemic, is being played out worldwide in a calculated and methodical fashion. These COVID trends plus the others I have highlighted from previous months show the scamdemic patterns. It is up to all of us to stay informed and aware of this advancing agenda. Although it may be disheartening to see the rate at which the agenda is being cemented in place, remember that the NWO is no match for an aware, determined group of people standing in their power and refusing to comply with tyranny.


        Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

        This article was originally published on The Freedom Articles.

        Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and Odysee/LBRY.




  5. New research shows that the coronavirus spike protein from COVID-19 vaccination unexpectedly enters the bloodstream, which is a plausible explanation for thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.

    “We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, in an interview with Alex Pierson last Thursday, in which he warned listeners that his message was “scary.”

    “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin,” Bridle said on the show, which is not easily found in a Google search but went viral on the internet this weekend.

    Bridle, a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what’s called the “biodistribution study.”

    “It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” said Bridle. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”

    Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle. Instead, the Japanese data showed that the infamous spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.

    “We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation,” Bridle said.

    The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is what allows it to infect human cells. Vaccine manufacturers chose to target the unique protein, making cells in the vaccinated person manufacture the protein which would then, in theory, evoke an immune response to the protein, preventing it from infecting cells.

    A large number of studies has shown that the most severe effects of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself

    “What has been discovered by the scientific community is the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation,” Bridle told listeners.

    Lab animals injected with purified spike protein into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems, and the spike protein was also demonstrated to cross the blood brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.

    A grave mistake, according to Bridle, was the belief that the spike protein would not escape into the blood circulation.

    “Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein — that the vaccine itself, plus the protein — gets into blood circulation,” he said.

    Bridle cited the recent publication of a peer-reviewed study which detected spike protein in the blood plasma of three of 13 young healthcare workers that had received Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. In one of the workers, the spike protein circulated for 29 days.



  6. ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are good treatments for the illnesses claimed to be caused by Covid..
    N-acetylcysteine, vitamin D3, vitamin C & Zinc are also good for keeping flu and virus’ away.

    Better than getting injected with mRNA serums with Graphene Oxide and microscopic creatures like Hydra vulgaris in them.


  7. Covid cases have risen sharply in nearly every country that has launched a mass vaccination campaign.(Please watch this short video before You Tube removes it)
    Why is this happening?

    Mass vaccination was supposed to reduce the threat of Covid but– in the short-term– it appears to make it much worse. Why? And why is Covid now “surging in 4 of 5 the most vaccinated countries”? According to Forbes magazine:

    “Countries with the world’s highest vaccination rates—including four of the top five most vaccinated—are fighting to contain coronavirus outbreaks that are, on a per-capita basis, higher than the surge devastating India, a trend that has experts questioning the efficacy of some vaccines … and the wisdom of easing restrictions even with most of the population vaccinated.” (Covid Surges…Here’s why the US should Worry”, Forbes)


      Published :August 31, 2021•Updated :October 27, 2021
      This information is being suppressed. Please share and download a PDF copy.
      On 20 August 2021 Dr. Robert Young published his team’s findings after analysing the four dominant COVID-19 “vaccines” using Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy. Their findings both confirm and expand upon the prior investigations carried out by Dr. Pablo Campra (University of Almeria, Spain), Dr. Juan F. Gastón Añaños (Hospital de Barbastro, Spain), as well as the recent pathology reports from autopsies of vaccinated deceased which were carried out by Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Prof. Dr. Walter Lang and Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher (Germany & Austria).

      Many of these substances were observed as being bonded to graphene oxide and metallic nanoparticles. GO nanoparticles are necrotic, able to pass into or through physiological barriers including (but not limited to) the blood-air barrier, the blood-testis barrier, the blood-brain barrier, and the blood-placenta barrier. Over a period of several months after intramuscular injection, as much as 75% of the GO nanoparticle “delivery platform”, and most of the substances listed below, are transported extensively throughout the bodies of mammals, into the blood, brain and other organs. Some of the many toxic effects of graphene oxide are myocarditis and blood clotting. Contamination in vaccines appears to be so common that one might be forgiven for thinking that it is deliberate.

      These findings are compositionally consistent with some of the declared contents of the Pfizer and Moderna products. I imagine that further quantitative analysis of the contents should make it possible to identify the likely chemical compounds which have not been explicitly identified by the manufacturers (via mass-spectrometry and molar mass derivations). Considering the experiment that was carried out in Kenya in 2014 (and more here), I suspect that Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (composed primarily of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen) is possibly one of them.

      The discovery of stainless steel (and unidentified black particles) in the Moderna vaccines in Japan may account for some of the iron, carbon, nitrogen, aluminium, silicon, titanium, copper and/or selenium detected in that particular chimera. Moderna are claiming that the stainless steel inclusions were accidental contamination and limited to some batches manufactured by Laboratorios Farmacéuticos Rovi headquartered in Madrid. Dr. Young’s team observed nano-scale shards of stainless steel in the AstraZeneca vaccine, and aggregate stainless steel particles in the Janssen vaccine.

      More recently, reports are coming out of Japan revealing the presence of unidentified floating white contaminants in the Pfizer vaccines, which Pfizer are claiming are likely undissolved vaccine ingredients. Irrespective of the claimed composition thereof, are undissolved solids ever safe when injected into the body?

      COVID-19 VACCINE DECLARED INGREDIENTS [see chart in arig. article]

      The components which do not appear to have been declared include:

      Aluminium (Al)
      Bismuth (Bi)
      Cadmium (Cd)
      Chromium (Cr)
      Copper (Cu)
      Iron (Fe)
      Lead (Pb)
      Magnesium (Mg)
      Manganese (Mn)
      Nickel (Ni)
      Selenium (Se)
      Silicon (Si)
      Sulfur (S)
      Tin (Sn)
      Titanium (Ti)
      Vanadium (V)
      Graphene oxide (C140H42O20)

      …which includes the blood parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas disease) or possibly Trypanosoma brucei (African sleeping sickness), as indicated in the most recent MHRA reports (reproduced below) and four VAERS reports. Trypanosoma is composed of carbon, oxygen, chromium, sulphur, aluminium, chloride and nitrogen.

      Visual evidence from multiple sources indicate what appears to be Hydra vulgaris in some of the vaccines. Its anyone’s guess why these freshwater polyps might be in there.


  8. Lies, More Lies and Damn Lies From Those We Are Mandated to Trust!


    Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner | 10/27/2021

    The following written letters are responses from the following governmental and/or institutional officials that were obtained under the “Freedom of Information Act or FOIA from the U.S., India, Republic of South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Columbia, Uruguay, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Republic of Colombia, Ilse of Man, Phillipines, etc., plus emails from Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI) and several other so-called “virus isolation authors or researchers”.



    1. MASS PSYCHOSIS – How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL
      Aug 3, 2021

      The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing
      By Dr. Joost A. M. Meerloo

      422 pages

      “SINCE 1933, when a completely drugged and trial-conditioned human wreck confessed to having started the Reichstag fire in Berlin, Dr. Joost A. M. Meerloo has studied the methods by which systematic mental pressure brings people to abject submission, and by which totalitarians imprint their subjective “truth” on their victims’ minds. The first two and one-half years of WWII, Dr. Meerloo spent under the pressure of Nazi-occupied Holland, witnessing at first-hand the Nazi methods of mental torture on more than one occasion…Then, after personal experiences with enforced interrogation, he escaped from a Nazi prison and certain death to England, where he was able, as Chief of the Psychological Department of the Netherlands Forces, to observe and study coercive methods officially….

      After the war, he came to the United States…As more and more cases of thought control, brainwashing, and mental coercion were disclosed – Cardinal Mindszenty, Colonel Schwable, Robert Vogeler, and others – his interest grew. It was Dr. Meerloo who coined the word menticide, the killing of the spirit, for this peculiar crime…

      It is Dr. Meerloo’s position that through pressure on the weak points in men’s makeup, totalitarian methods can turn anyone into a “traitor.” And in The Rape of the Mind he goes far beyond the direct military implications of mental torture to describing how our own culture unobtrusively shows symptoms of pressurizing people’s minds. He presents a systematic analysis of the methods of brainwashing and mental torture and coercion, and shows how totalitarian strategy, with its use of mass psychology, leads to systematized “rape of the mind.” He describes the new age of cold war with its mental terror, verbocracy, and semantic fog, the use of fear as a tool of mass submission and the problem of treason and loyalty, so loaded with dangerous confusion. The Rape of the Mind is written for the interested layman, not only for experts and scientists.”-Print ed.




    Living life, part 3

    Date: October 28, 2021
    Author: lars bern

    SarsCov2 is the scientific name for the virus that causes Covid19 and which began to spread at the end of 2019. It is part of the family “Corona” which got its name from the characteristic appearance of the virus body. Its genome consists of a long strand of RNA that is protected by a sheath. As we all know, this casing is lined with a large number of protrusions, nails, which form the “corona”. The protrusions are made up of complex protein molecules, which at the end contain a specific molecular sequence that the virus particle uses to attach to the outside of cells in the host organism. Cells, which they must enter in order to multiply. These molecular sequences can be seen as keys that fit exactly into the particular receptors, keyholes,found in most of the body’s cells. As soon as a virus particle has succeeded in “inserting” one of its keys into one of a cell’s many keyholes, the cell wall forms an inward vesicle that swallows the entire virus particle. Once inside the cell, it detaches from the inside of the cell wall.

    This is step one in the multiplication of the virus particle. Note that the virus particle is about 100 times smaller than the cell in the image.

    Step two begins when the bladder with its entrapped virus particle comes in contact with a ribosome (3 in the picture) The ribosomes can be seen as chemical factories that produce all kinds of proteins.

    Step three in the development of the virus begins when the ribosomes start the production of complete virus particles of type SarsCov2. When the cell’s interior is filled with virus particles (each cell can contain up to thousands of virus particles) it dies. The virus particles are released and begin to circulate in the body. When enough cells have been invaded in this way, the symptoms we have learned to associate with Covid break out.

    Unlike DNA, which is chemically stable double helix strands, RNA molecules are single-stranded. They are therefore characterized by a certain instability. This means that when the RNA strands are copied by the ribosomes, “translation errors” from time to time occur from the original to the copy. In the case of coronavirus, these translation errors mean that a certain proportion of the newly produced virus bodies can be seen as genetic variants. Currently on the theme SARS-Cov2.

    The coronavirus family is constantly present in nature – endemic . Especially in certain animal species and for example in tropical parts of Asia. This means that over time in, for example, animal farms, new coronaviruses with a strongly altered RNA genome arise from time to time. A mutation with partly completely new immunological properties. When these new types of viruses spread to people who have never had this type of coronary infection before, a new wave of epidemics can be started. The new mutation will then be given a new scientific name. Two previous examples are SARS, 2002 and MERS, 2012.

    If the human immune system has previously fought a coronavirus, there are memory cells that recognize all types of SARS viruses. This means that immunity quickly develops in people who have been infected with SARS for decades. But for this to happen, it is necessary that previous SARS infections have been fought in a natural way. That is, with the full breadth of the defense mechanisms that our body’s immune system has at its disposal.

    Now to how our acquired immune system works.

    It acquired the immune system

    When a cell becomes infected with a virus, it immediately begins to secrete complex protective molecules, such as interferon . This substance can be seen as a “distress signal” to other cells in the environment of the infected cell. The cell membranes of the cell that has become infected change their surface structure. These changes are read and interpreted by immune cellswhich circulates around in all body fluids – mainly in the blood and lymph. Some of these immune cells can be seen as a kind of scout whose task is to detect cells whose outer membranes have changed. These scout cells are produced partly in the bone marrow and partly in the so-called lymphatic system. Including certain white blood cells, which can be seen as part of the acquired immune system’s weapons depots. When an altered cell is detected, signals go to these weapons depots to immediately send out defense forces armed to fight the enemy intruder. Some of these signals are included in the group of cytokines .

    Simply put, our immune system can be described as a modern army combined with a highly efficient defense industry and battle command. Popularly, this army’s arsenal can be divided into different groups. In a virus attack, a production of circulating antibodies and a kind of foot soldiers that form in the bone marrow, B lymphocytes and plasma cells begins. Some of them have developed in the thymus (thymus) into so-called T cells . This agile arsenal of blood cells can mark and fight smaller and moving targets. In parallel with this, the production of heavier types of weapons is started by the cellular immune systemactivated. Through blood and lymph, it seeks out targets they can neutralize. They also act as messengers to the lymph nodes, which serve as both a weapons arsenal and training camp. Finally, the heaviest pieces roll forward. Those who do the hard work. Here, for example, there is an interaction between T cells, NK cells (Natural Killer Cells) and macrophages (large eaters) and other types of cells.

    As I have already said, these defense mechanisms have been developed and tested over millions of years by the battle between viruses and the immune system that we humans have inherited from our evolutionary ancestors. It is no exaggeration to say that both our inherited and acquired immune systems have incredible flexibility, adaptability and impact when it comes to fighting viral infections. In addition, some cells in the cellular immune system (the so-called memory cells ) have an extremely well-developed long-term memory . For some virus types lifelong.

    Erik Björn Rasmussen, MD Associate Professor


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: