Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines

An absolute bombshell and major reveals on what is in the vaccines, with use of electron and other kinds of microscopy from original research by Dr. Robert Young and his team, confirming what the La Quinta Columna researchers found—toxic nanometallic content with cytotoxic and genotoxic effects as well as an identified parasite. This is major revelation: please stay tuned for a major article reporting this at ECC, meanwhile please share this video widely!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z2sAH0Woz38r/

Phase Contrast, Dark Field, Bright Field Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!

Germs Are Born In Us and From Us as an Outfection and NOT an Infection of the Body Cells. In other words germs are symptoms of cellular and genetic disorganization and NOT the specific cause of the cellular and genetic disorganization! The GERM is NOTHING and the TERRAIN is EVERYTHING . Germs can only contribute to a state of toxic imbalance but can NEVER cause ANY specific sickness or disease![55] – Dr. Robert O. Young

Abstract

Currently there are four major pharmaceutical companies who manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 now called SARS-CoV-19 vaccine. These manufactures and their vaccine are Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson, a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The intended purpose of these vaccines are to provide immunity from the so-called infectious novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV – 2 virus now called the SARS-CoV – 19. These four pharmaceutical companies have not provided complete FDA disclosure on their vaccine box, insert fact sheet or label for many of the major and/or minor ingredients contained within these so-called vaccines. The purpose of this research article is to identify those specific major and minor ingredients contained in the Pfizer Vaccine, the Moderna Vaccine, the Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen Vaccine using various scientific anatomical, physiological and functional testing for each SARS-COV-2-19 vaccine. As a human right, governed under World Law by the Nuremberg Code of 1947, the vaccine specific ingredient information is critical, required and necessary to know so that any human from any country in the World can make an informed decision whether or not to consent to the SAR-CoV-2-19 inoculation. We have conducted the scientific testing on each vaccine and have identified several ingredients or adjuvants that have not been disclosed which are contained in these four SARS-CoV – 2 -19 vaccines. Currently, these vaccines are being administered to millions of humans around the World under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by each country without full disclosure of all ingredients and in some cases mandated by governments or employers in violation of individual human rights under the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

Methodology and Techniques

Four “vaccines” were analyzed which are the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson, using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nano particulate technological approaches. The different instrumentation includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, pHase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines” morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.

Live Blood Phase Contrast and Dark-Field Microscopy

Images of the aqueous fractions of the vaccines were subsequently obtained to visually assess the possible presence of carbon particulates or graphene.

The observations under optical microscopy revealed and abundance of transparent 2D laminar objects that show great similarity with images from literature (Xu et al, 2019), and with images obtained from rGO standard (SIGMA)(Figures 1, 2 and 3).

Images of big transparent sheets of variable size and shapes were obtained, showing corrugated and flat, irregular. Smaller sheets of polygonal shapes, also similar to flakes described in literature (Xu et al, 2019) can be revealed with pHase Contrast and Dark-Field microscopy (Figure 3).

All these laminar objects were widespread in the aqueous fraction of the blood (Figure 1) or vaccine sample (Figures 2 and 3) and no component described by the registered patent can be associated with these sheets.

In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Live Blood From the So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen “Vaccines”!

[Figure 1 is a Micrograph of a Carbon Cluster of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Viewed in the Live Unstained Human Blood with pHase Contrast Microscopy at 1500x. Note that the Red Blood Cells are Clotting in and Around the rGO Crystal in a Condition Known as Rouleau! A French Word Which Means to Chain. Dr. Robert O. Young, Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari OmniPublishing, 1987 – 2021]

Normal Healthy Normal Blood and After mRNA Inoculation

[Figure 1a Micrograph under Phase Contrast Microscopy reveals the normal healthy state of the red blood cells which are even in color, even in shape and even in size. Red Blood cells in their healthy state measure anatomically 7 microns in diameter. Dr. Robert O. Young, Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987-2021]

[Figure 1b Micrograph taken under Phase Contrast Microscopy reveals the live blood 24 hours after the mRNA Vaccine now containing crystallized red blood cells, biological transformations of red and white blood cells, large symplasts of graphene oxide crystals center and Orotic acid crystals in the upper right hand corner of the micrograph. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September, 2021[73][74][83]]

Nano and Micro Graphene Tubes Cause Pathological Blood Coagulation Leading to Hypercapnia, Hypoxia and Death[73]

[Figure 1c Viewed Under pHase Contrast Microscopy a Nanotube of Graphene Oxide in Coagulated Red Blood Cells or a Blood Clot. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021][2][73][74][83]]

[Figure 1d Viewed Under pHase Contrast Microscopy a Nanotube of Graphene Oxide in Coagulated Red Blood Cells or Blood Clots. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021][2][73][74][83]]

What’s Inside the Blood Clots?

[[Figure 1e Viewed Under Bright Field Microscopy a Nanotube and Microtubes of Graphene Oxide in the Dried Coagulated Blood Cells or a Blood Clot in Addition to Parasite Bulges Expressed in the Cross-linked Fibrin Monomers Indicating a Systemic Parasitical Infection. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021][2][73][74][83]]

[[Figure 1f Viewed Under Bright Field Microscopy a Nanotube , Microtube and Cluster Bomb of Graphene Oxide in the Dried Coagulated Blood Cells or Blood Clot in Addition to Parasite Bulges Expressed in the Cross-linked Fibrin Monomers Indicating a Systemic Parasitical Infection. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021][2][73][74][83]]

Normal Healthy Blood Clot Free From Parasites and Graphene Iron Oxide

[Figure 1g Shows Normal Blood Clotting on the Right and Abnormal Blood Clotting on the Left. Please Note that the Normal Blood Clot Contains NO Graphene or Iron Oxide, No Parasites and No Polymerized Protein Pools (White Circles Indicating Cellular Degeneration as Seen in the Blood Clot on the Left. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 2021.][2][73][74][75][83][85]

What Are the Non-Disclosed Ingredients Contained in CoV – 19 So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen “Vaccines”?

To answer this question an aqueous fraction of the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines were taken from each vial and then viewed separately under pHase Contrast Microscopy at 100x, 600x, 1000x up to1500x magnification showing anatomical evidence of reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) particulates which were compared to micrographs of rGO from Choucair et al, 2009 for identification and verification.[3]

Steps of Analysis of Vaccine Aqueous Fractions

Refrigerated samples were processed under sterile conditions, using laminar flow chamber and sterilized lab ware.

Steps for analyses were:

1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml)

2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample

3. Extraction of hydrophilic aqueous pHase

4. UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy scanning

5. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample

6. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous pHase

Philips XL 30 Scanning Electron Microscope

[1] The Pfizer “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients

The micrographs in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained using 100X, 600X, 1000x and 1500X pHase Contrast, Dark Field and Bright Field Optical Microscopy.[3]

On the left of each micrograph you will view micrographs obtained from the Pfizer vaccine aqueous fraction containing rGO.

On the right of each micrograph you will view a match from known sources containing rGO for anatomical validation.

The observations under a pHase Contrast, Dark-Field, Bright-Field microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron microscopy of the vaccine product by Pfizer, including vaccine products of Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen revealed some entities that can be graphene strips as seen below in Figure 3.

[Figure 2 shows an aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 1000X magnification]

[Figure 2a is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) next to a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite (lower right). Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73][83]]

[Figure 2b is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and a unidentified parasite (lower right).  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]
[Figure 2b is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and a unidentified parasite (lower right).  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]

[Figure 2b is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and an unidentified parasite (lower right). Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73][83]]

[Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon.  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]
[Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1200x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon.  Dr. Robert O. Young, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73]]

[Figure 2c is a 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, September 11th, 2021[2][9][73][74][83]]

[Figure 3 – Aqueous fraction images containing reduced graphene oxide from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical pHase contrast microscopy, 600X magnification. In addition, the Muestra RD1, La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021; Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension; Delgado Martin, Campra Madrid confirms our findings. https://cen.acs.org/articles/86/i4/Graphene-Ribbons.html and https://cen.acs.org/articles/86/i4/Graphene-Ribbons.html [4][73][74] [83]]

[Figure 4 shows the liposome Capsid containing rGO that Pfizer uses for its product to vehiculate the graphene oxide by attaching the Liposome capsid to specific mRNA molecules for driving the Liposome contents of fGO to specific organs, glands and tissues, namely the ovaries and testes, bone marrow, heart and brain. The image was obtained by a SEM-Cryo preparation.[83]]

For a definitive identification of graphene by Transmission Electron Microscopy {TEM}, it is necessary to complement the observation with the structural characterization by obtaining a characteristic electron diffraction standard sample (as the figure ‘b’ shown below).[4]

The standard sample corresponding to graphite or graphene has a hexagonal symmetry, and generally has several concentric hexagons.

[Figure 4b Reveals X ray Diffraction Pattern of the Graphene Particles. Matéria (Rio J.) 23 (1) , 2018. Characterization of graphene nanosheets obtained by a modified Hummer’s method. Renata Hack et al. [4][73][74][83]]

Using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) we observed an intricate matrix or mesh of folded translucent flexible rGO sheets with a mixture of darker multilayer agglomerations and lighter colored of unfolded monolayers as seen in Figure 5. [3][4]

[Figure 5 shows a cluster of graphene nanoparticles in a Pfizer vaccine. They appear to be aggregated.[83]]

The darker linear areas in Figure 5 appear to be local overlap of sheets and local arrangement of individual sheets in parallel to the electron beam.[5]

After the mesh, a high density of unidentified rounded and elliptical clear shapes appears, possibly corresponding to holes generated by mechanical forcing of the rGO mesh during treatment as seen in Figure 6.[4][5]

[Figure 6 shows a TEM microscopy observation where particles of reduced graphene oxide in a Pfizer “vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles of rGO. This evidence was intitially found by Muestra RD1, and published in the La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021; Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension; Delgado Martin, Campra Madrid and . [4][73][74][83]]

The Immune Response to Dietary, Metabolic, Environmental and Respiratory Acids Including Inoculated Organic and Inorganic Micro and Nano Particulates From So-Called “Vaccines”

The bright orange blood crystal below is solidified uric acid viewed at 1200x in the human blood from the ingestion of a high protein diet from animal flesh, blood and interstitial fluids. You will note that there are several neutrophils attempting to clean-up and remove this toxic mass. This is the main purpose of white blood cells which is to manage and maintain the delicate alkaline pH balance of the body fluids.

As you watch the video above you view two neutrophils (neutrophils make up 2/3rds of the total white blood count) swimming through the blood plasma. The neutrophil from the left is moving downward to pick up a biological transformation of a Y-form yeast, like Candida albicans. Within about one minute you will see the neutrophil expel this highly toxic Y-form yeast back into the blood plasma.[[https://youtu.be/yKONi_hDsfE Dr. Robert O. Young – Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987- 2021]

[Two Neutrophils Streaming Through the Blood Plasma Picking up Pathogen or Biological Transformations of Bacteria and Yeast from Cellular Degeneration of What Use to be Healthy Body Cells. Dr. Robert O. Young – Profiles in Medical Microscopy, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987- 2021]

This is the main function of neutrophils to pick up organic and non-organic micro and nano particulates, such as lactic acid, uric acid, bacteria, yeast, mold and even graphene oxide as seen in the micrograph below labeled GO to the right and a neutrophil labeled NET to the left.

Once again, the neutrophils are white blood cells attempting to isolate and then pick up and remove the graphene oxide, a toxic acidic pathogen which was found in all CoV – 2 – 19 so-called “vaccines” as seen in the Dark Field microscopy micrograph below at 1200x magnification!

[The micrograph above is showing the graphene oxide (GO) and the poisoning and destruction of the neutrophils (NET – which make up over 60 percent of all white blood cells) which are designed to pick up and eliminate foreign toxic chemical waste and biologicals. The Scientists at Karlinska Institute, the University of Manchester, Chalmers University of Technology and the Scientific Team of Dr. Robert O. Young have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in the same manner as bacteria, yeast or mold.[83]]

Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) Reveals rGO in Pfizer Vaccine[5][6][7]

The Pfizer vaccine liquid fraction was then analyzed for chemical and elemental content using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) as seen in Figure 6. The EDS spectrum showed the presence of Carbon, Oxygen verifying the rGO elements and Sodium and Chloride since the sample shown in Figures 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 7a were diluted in a saline solution.

[Figure 7 shows a spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” under an ESEM microscopy coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts) identifying Carbon, Oxygen, Sodium and Chloride. [83]]

[Figure 7a shows he spectrum of a Pfizer “vaccine” nanoparticulates of graphene oxide, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, chloride and calcium identified under an ESEM microscope coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe. (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts)[75][83]]

The Quantification of mRNA in the Pfizer Vaccine

The quantification of RNA in the Pfizer sample was carried out with conventional protocols (Fisher).

According to NanoDropTM 2000 spectrophotometer calibration check specific software (Thermofisher), the UV absorption spectrum of total aqueous fraction was correlated to 747 ng/ul of unknown absorbing substances.

However, after RNA extraction with commercial kit (Thermofisher), quantification with RNA specific Qbit fluorescence probe (Thermofisher) showed that only 6t ug/ul could be related to the presence of RNA. The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.

According to microscopic images presented here, most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in the fluids suspension in the sample.

The conclusions are further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for rGO. It must be reminded that RNA does not show spontaneous fluorescence under UV exposure.

[Figure 8 – UV spectrum of aqueous fraction of Pfizer vaccine sample.[1][2][3][5][6][83]]

Ultra Violet Fluorescence Testing of the Pfizer Aqueous Fraction for Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO)[6]

Ultra Violet absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270nm, compatible with presence of rGO particulate.

UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).

[Figure 9 – UV absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270 nm, compatible with presence of rGO. UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).]

[Figure 10 – The spectroscopy UV analysis showed an adsorption due to the presence of reduced graphene oxide, which is confirmed by observation under ultraviolet visible microscopy.]

Figures 11 and 12 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) that reveals the particle size, composition distribution and chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates under observation.[6][7][8][83][84]

[Figure 11 shows sharp micron debris of 20 um in length identified in the Pfizer so-called “vaccine” containing Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminum, Chloride, Nitrogen.[75][83]]

[Figure 12 shows a 20 micron in length particulate identified in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen, chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.[75][83]]

Figures 13 and 14 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) that reveals the particle size, composition distribution and chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates under observation.

Are There Parasites in the Pfizer “Vaccines”?

A 50 micron elongated body, as seen in Figure 13 is a sharp mysterious presence in the Pfizer vaccine. It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS. [Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178][9][83]

[Figure 13 shows a Trypanosoma Parasite approximately 50 microns in length found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen.[83]]

[Figure 13a shows a Live Blood pHase Contrast Microscopy Micrograph of Trypanosoma cruzi Parasite. [9][83]]

Figure 14 identifies a composition of nano particulates including carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen also found in the CoV-19 “vaccines”.

[Figure 14 Identifies a Composite of Nano particulates.[75][83]]

Figures 15 and 16 below show a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectropscopy (EDS) that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates and their morphology.

The white 2-micron-long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.[75][76][83]

[Figure 15 shows nano and micron particulates identified in the Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2 micron long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.[75][76][83]]

[Figure 16 shows that the white 2 micron particulate found in the so-called Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.[75][76][84]]

Figures 17 and 18 show the identification of organic carbon, oxygen and nitrogen particulates with an aggregate of embedded nanoparticles including bismuth, titanium, vanadium, iron, copper, silicon and aluminum which were all found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine.”[75][76][83][84]

[Figure 17 – shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer “vaccine!”[75][76][83]]

[Figure 18 – shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer “vaccine!”[75][76][83][84]]

[2] The Astrazeneca “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients

Figures 19 and 20 show an engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also known as stainless steel of micro and nano particles embedded and identified in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” viewed under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified (EDS) with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy System ( that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates and their morphology.

[Figure 19 – Engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also know as stainless steel.[75][83]]

[Figure 20 shows the quantified nano particulates in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.[75][76]83]]

The XRF (X-ray fluorescence) instrument was used to evaluate the adjuvants in the Astrazeneca “vaccine”, which identified the following molecules of histidine, sucrose, Poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) and ethylene alcohol, also contained in the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”. The results of this test can be seen in Figure 20.[10][83]

The injection of PEG and Ethylene alcohol are both known as carcinogenic and genotoxic.[10][83] PEG was the only adjuvant declared on the data sheet listing the ingredients of the Astrazeneca “vaccine” but also contained in the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”.

[Figure 21 Identifies the Spectrum of AstraZeneca Vaccine Adjuvants. Different colors are used for the four molecules identified by means of reference spectra. Relative concentration is calculated on integrals of reference signals for molecules in a quantitative spectrum acquired with a duty cycle of 5 seconds with the longest calculated T1 was 5sec.]

[3] The Janssen “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients

Figures 22 and 23 shows an organic-inorganic aggregate identified in the Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide.[11] This aggregate is highly magnetic and can trigger pathological blood coagulation and “The Corona Effect” or “The Spike Protein Effect” creation from the degeneration of the cell membrane due to interactions with other dipoles.[11] You can view these biological reactions or cellular transformations in the live blood under pHase Contrast and Dark Field Microscopy in Figures 24, 25 and 26.[1][12]

[Figure 22 A Stainless Steel Aggregation of Carbon , Oxygen, Iron and Nickel Held Together With Graphene Oxide.[75][83]]

[Figure 23 Shows Elements of of Carbon , Oxygen, Iron and Nickel Held Together With Graphene Oxide.[75][83]]

The Corona Effect and Spike Protein Effect

The Endogenously Created “Corona Effect” and “Spike Protein” ARE Caused by Chemical, Parasitical and Radiation Poisoning from Reduced Graphene Oxide and Microwave Radiation![12][82][83]

[Figure 24 “The Corona Effect” and the Endogenous Creation of Exosomes Due to Chemical and Radiation Poisoning of the Vascular and the Interstitial fluids of the Interstitium. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987 – 2021. [83]][Figure 25 Shows “The Corona Effect” and the the Endogenous Birth of S1 Protein Spikes Caused by Radiation and Chemical Poisoning or What I Call The “Protein Spiking Effect”. Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing, 1987 – 2021. [83]]

[Figure 26 This Micrograph Shows the Endogenous Birth of the “Spike Protein” as an Outfection and NOT and Infection! Dr. Robert O. Young, Hikari Omni Publishing , 1987 – 2021,[83]]

Blood Videos 1 of 4 – The Blood of a 55 Year Old Male with Metastatic Brain Cancer – RTPCR CoV -19 Positive

[Figure 26a shows the blood of a 55 year old male with diagnosed brain cancer and mets to the lung, gallbladder and blood. He also RTPCR tested positive for CoVid-2 renamed as CoVid-19. Please note the red blood cell showing the ‘Corona Effect’ on the left of the neutrophil. Neutrophils make up 2/3rds of the total white blood cell count. They are the garbage collectors and purifiers of the blood.][83]https://www.youtube.com/embed/l7ESjNmJX_g?autoplay=0&mute=0&controls=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drrobertyoung.com&playsinline=1&showinfo=0&rel=0&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&enablejsapi=1&widgetid=5

[Figure 26b shows the Live blood as seen under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x plus magnification showing the biological transformation of the red blood cells as they give birth to the “spiked protein” and crowning of their cell membranes, I call the “Corona Effect.”][83]https://www.youtube.com/embed/dGX-UFEy2JQ?autoplay=0&mute=0&controls=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drrobertyoung.com&playsinline=1&showinfo=0&rel=0&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&enablejsapi=1&widgetid=7

[Figure 26c shows a granulocytic neutrophil or the dominate white blood cell removing cellular waste from the vascular fluids. This is not immunity but a neutrophil clearing the vascular fluids from cellular debris from body cells, food and environmental mirco and nano particluates such as aluminum, graphene, titanium, copper, iron, etc.][83] https://www.youtube.com/embed/-c7KDneWK4U?autoplay=0&mute=0&controls=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drrobertyoung.com&playsinline=1&showinfo=0&rel=0&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&enablejsapi=1&widgetid=9

[Figure 26d you will see the visual evidence of the ‘Corona Effect’ of the red blood cells which is NOT a viral infectious condition but a degenerative acidic lifestyle condition of the cell membranes degenerating due to an acidic interstitial fluid biochemistry, an acidic electromagnetic field and an oxygen deprived environment][83]

Figures 24 and 25 above show ‘The CORONA EFFECT’ on the red blood cells with Figure 26 and 26a through d showing ‘The SPIKED PROTEIN EFFECT’ both caused by decompensated acidosis of the interstitial and then vascular fluids from an acidic lifestyle and specifically, exposure to toxic pulsating electro-magnetic fields at 2.4gHz or higher, chemical poisoning from the food and water ingested, toxic acidic air pollution, chem-trails and to top-it-all-off a nano particulate chemical laden CoV – 19 inoculation of graphene and iron oxide.![12][82]

The Magnetic Field and Graphene Oxide

[Programmable Magnetic Graphene Oxide Nanobots[82]]

Programmable magnetic “GO” nanobots injected into the vascular and interstitial fluids of a human or animal body are found to be deposited into the connective and fatty tissues and then into the organs and glands potentially causing biological transformation of the cell membrane (crowning and protein spiking), genetic mutation, and the death of the cell as seen in the darkfield microscopy micrographs as seen above in Figures 24, 25, 26.[77][78][82]

The original nanofabrication techniques were developed by Marc Miskin and colleagues at Cornell University. The research was presented at the American Physical Society in March of 2017. According to a release from EurekAlert, the team spent years developing a nanofabrication process that can produce a million nanobots from a specialized 4-inch silicon wafer in the span of weeks.[82]

[Four-Legged Graphene Oxide Nanobots – https://rumble.com/vkm84h-is-nanobot-technology-or-artificial-intelligence-viable-inside-the-human-bo.html%5B82%5D%5D

These micro-robots shown above feature four legs and are composed of hexagonal graphene oxide which are highly magnetic, flexible and super strong.[77][78][82]

The following is the link for a video showing the activation of graphene oxide triggered by electromagnetic (EMF) pulsating microwave frequencies:

[https://rumble.com/vkm84h-is-nanobot-technology-or-artificial-intelligence-viable-inside-the-human-bo.html] [79][82]

Nanoparticulates of Graphene Oxide

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-david-martin-just-ended-covid-fauci-doj-politicians-in-one-interview/%5B82%5D

This enables the Graphene Oxide nanobots to carry a body weighing about 8,000 times more than each leg. As well, each leg measures only 100 atoms and even down to 1 atom thick, and they can carry bodies 1,000 to 100,000 times thicker.[82][83]

[Hexagonal ‘Smart’ Versions of Graphene Oxide Nanobots Found in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, and Janssen Vaccines![82][83]]

There have been other researchers who have now developed ‘smart’ versions of these graphene oxide nanobots. These versions feature controllers, sensors, transmitters and clocks.[82][83]

The graphene oxide nanobots are powered by using magnetic fields (EMF) or ultrasound, making it possible for them to travel deeply into the human body tissues, organs and glands (such as the reproductive organs,[80][82][83] bone marrow, across the blood-brain barrier and the air-blood barrier of the lungs via the interstitial fluids – the largest organ of the human and animal body called the Interstitium. [81][82][83]

[4] The Moderna “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients

Figure 26 and 27 identified a mixed entity of organic and inorganic matter contained in the Moderna “vaccine.”

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TMS) and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.

The so-called Moderna “vaccine” is a carbon-based Reduced Graphene Oxide substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, aluminum, copper, iron and chlorine.[13][83][84]

[Figure 26 Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals a Graphene Oxide Composite of Embedded Organic and Non-Organic Matter.[83]]

[Figure 27 Reveals Embedded Cytotoxic Nano Particulates.[75][76][83][84]]

Figures 27 and 28 shows an analysis which was also performed under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) and revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates. Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities.

Figure 29 shows they are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, lead, cadmium, and selenium. This highly toxic nano particulate composition are quantum dots of cadmium selenide which are cytotoxic and genotoxic.[14][15][83]

[Figure 27 Reveals the Nano Dots in the Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”.[83]]

[Figure 28 Reveals the Nano Dots in the Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”.[83]]

[Figure 29 Reveals the Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Composite of Nano Particulates in Graphene Oxide Found in the Moderna “Vaccine”.[75][76][83][84]]

Figures 30 and 31 further analysis of the so-called Moderna “vaccine” showed a 100-micron symplast of reduced graphene oxide nano particulate composite. The rGO is composed of carbon and oxygen with contamination of nano particulates of nitrogen, silicon, phosphorus and chlorine.[16][83]

[Figure 30 Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals a Large 100 micron Symplast Composite of Reduced Graphene Oxide.[83]]

[Figure 31 Reveals the Nano Particulate Complex Contained in the Moderna “Vaccine”.[75][83]]

Figures 32 and 33 show carbon-based reduced graphene oxide entities in the Moderna “vaccine” mixed with aggregates filled with Aluminum silicate nano particulates.[17][83]

[Figure 32 Reveals a Complex of Graphene Oxide and Aluminum Silicate Using Transmission Electron Microscopy.[75][83]]

[Figure 33 Reveals the Nano Elements of Graphene Oxide and Aluminum Silicate Contained in the Moderna “Vaccine”.[75][83]]

Discussion

The SARS-CoVid-2-19 pandemic induced the pharmaceutical industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines.

The mechanism of action of these new drugs as declared by the pharmaceutical industry coupled with what is reported in the vaccine products’ data sheet is NOT clear for current medical savants to understand that those new drugs produced by Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson are NOT vaccines but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy.

The name “vaccine” is likely to be an escamotage (trickery) used for bureaucratic and technocratic reasons in order to receive an urgent approval, ignoring all the normal rules necessary for new drugs, especially for those involving novel nanotechnological mechanisms which have never been developed nor experienced by humans any where, at any time in the history of World.

All these so-called “vaccines” are patented and therefore their actual content is kept secret even to the buyers, who, of course, are using taxpayers’ money. So, consumers (taxpayers) have no information about what they are receiving in their bodies by inoculation. Humanity is kept in the dark as far as the nano particulate technological processes involved are concerning, on the negative effects on the cells of the body, but mostly on the possible magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic nano-bio-interaction effect on the blood and body cells.[82]

This current research study via direct analysis on the aforementioned so-called “vaccines” by means of nano particulate technological instrumentation reveals disturbing and life-altering information concerning the truth about the actual toxic acidic contents and their effects of these so-called “vaccines”.

The Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen drugs are NOT “vaccines” but complexed Graphene Oxide nano particulate aggregates of varying nano elements attached to genetically modified nucleic acids of mRNA from animal or vero cells and aborted human fetal cells as viewed and described above. Once again the ingredients in these so-called vaccines are highly magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plant, insect, bird, animal and human cell membranes and their genetics which already has lead to serious injuries (estimated at over 500 million) and/or death (estimated at over 35 million).[17][18] through [55][73][82][83]

The so-called “experts” or “medical savants” are telling YOU that CoV -2 – 19 vaccines are the ONLY way to stop the spread of CoV-19… even when there is NO EVIDENCE of its existence and NO EVIDENCE of it spreading as determined by the scientific method of Koch or Rivers postulates![54]

[Dismantling the Viral Theory – https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dismantling-the-viral-theory.]

That they’re safe — despite the documented evidence is to the contrary…[54][73][83]

That they’re effective — even though millions of “double-jabbed” people are getting sick, theoretically exposing themselves to a NON-EXISTENT VIRUS called CoV – 19, and dying…[55] NOT from some phantom viral infection but from the FEAR or false evidence appearing real and the toxic acid contents of reduced graphene oxide delivered via the genetically modified mRNA to specific targets of the human body leading to pathological blood coagulation, oxygen deprivation, hypercapnia, hypoxia and then death by suffocation.[56][57][58][83][86]

[Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) or Pathological Blood Coagulation.[57][58]]

That YOU MUST get at LEAST two shots PLUS “boosters” to live “normal lives”…

And soon, they’ll be telling YOU that YOU have no choice but to comply with ALL their MANdates even when the CDC and other Governments, Universities and Medical Institutes have admitted in writing that they have NO “GOLD STANDARD” isolation of the CoV – 2 now called CoV – 19 virus![55]

There is NO CORONA VIRUS and NEVER HAS BEEN![56]

Remember …

DON’T LET ANYONE TAKE AWAY YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM!

It is YOUR Body, YOUR Life and YOUR Choice!

Knowledge is power. And it’s the key to understanding why the experimental CoV -19 vaccines are so dangerous — despite the corporate media’s official narrative that suppresses and censors anyone who dares to speak out.

You are in control of your own health. Don’t fall victim to global governments and bureaucrats that are pushing everyone to get vaccinated. Billionaire “philanthropist” Bill Gates and billionaire Big Tech activists think they know what’s best for you and your family.

You must be free to decide what’s right for you. Do NOT let governments and employers force you into getting “vaxxed” “for your own good”.

And never let the cancel culture make you too afraid to stand up for your rights!

In the words of the great French doctor and scientist, Antione BeChamp, “there is nothin

That they’re safe — despite the documented evidence is to the contrary…[54][73][83]

That they’re effective — even though millions of “double-jabbed” people are getting sick, theoretically exposing themselves to a NON-EXISTENT VIRUS called CoV – 19, and dying…[55] NOT from some phantom viral infection but from the FEAR or false evidence appearing real and the toxic acid contents of reduced graphene oxide delivered via the genetically modified mRNA to specific targets of the human body leading to pathological blood coagulation, oxygen deprivation, hypercapnia, hypoxia and then death by suffocation.[56][57][58][83][86]

[Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) or Pathological Blood Coagulation.[57][58]]

That YOU MUST get at LEAST two shots PLUS “boosters” to live “normal lives”…

And soon, they’ll be telling YOU that YOU have no choice but to comply with ALL their MANdates even when the CDC and other Governments, Universities and Medical Institutes have admitted in writing that they have NO “GOLD STANDARD” isolation of the CoV – 2 now called CoV – 19 virus![55]

There is NO CORONA VIRUS and NEVER HAS BEEN![56]

Remember …

DON’T LET ANYONE TAKE AWAY YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM!

It is YOUR Body, YOUR Life and YOUR Choice!

Knowledge is power. And it’s the key to understanding why the experimental CoV -19 vaccines are so dangerous — despite the corporate media’s official narrative that suppresses and censors anyone who dares to speak out.

You are in control of your own health. Don’t fall victim to global governments and bureaucrats that are pushing everyone to get vaccinated. Billionaire “philanthropist” Bill Gates and billionaire Big Tech activists think they know what’s best for you and your family.

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines

Full Disclosure:

As many who have confronted the official narrative on the issue of Covid and the mRNA serums, Dr Robert Young was tried and found guilty of “medical fraud”. Whether this is sufficient to disregard all of the information in the article above, I leave to the reader to decide for themselves. — William Whitten, 11/16/2021

=================================================

Author: Robert O Young CPC, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner

‘pH Miracle’ Author Robert O. Young Sentenced
As part of his previous guilty plea, Robert O. Young admitted in court he has no post high school degree from any accredited school
By Samantha Tatro • Published June 29, 2017 • Updated on June 29, 2017 at 5:54 pm

A San Diego man who penned a book claiming to treat low energy, poor digestion, aches and pains and disease was sentenced for practicing medicine without a license.

“The pH Miracle” author Robert O. Young was arrested by U.S. Marshals in 2014, accused of practicing medicine without a license on his Valley Center avocado ranch.

“The pH Miracle”, sold through Barnes and Noble, Amazon and other stores, claims to help readers treat low energy, poor digestion, aches and pains and disease with an alkaline diet.

Young’s “pH Miracle Retreat” offers nightly rates from $1295 to $2495 per night. The rate includes lodging, meals, supplements, and therapies.

\\][//

19 thoughts on “Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines

      1. Covid-19 Resources: Medical, Legal, Forms, Jobs & Other Critical Information
        September 15, 2021 / 24 Comments
        To better guide your search for information on all things related to Covid-19, a list of resources has been compiled below for each of the following categories: Medical, Legal, Forms & Letters, Jobs, Alternative Resources, and Critical Information on the Bigger Agenda. I will be adding additional resources, and possibly categories, as time goes on – so be sure to bookmark this page.

        https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/covid-19-resources-medical-legal-forms-jobs-other-critical-information/
        \\][//

        Like

    1. ID 2020

      Accenture has joined the ID2020 Alliance with partners like Microsoft to create an open, human-centric approach to identity. The alliance draws on advances in biometrics and innovative technologies and brings together expertise from business, government and non-government agencies.

      ID2020: Digital Identity with Blockchain | Accenture
      https://www.accenture.com › us-en › insight-blockchain-i
      \\][//

      Like


    2. CRISPR-Cas9 allows scientists to swap “problem” genes with “healthy” ones. In the case of the patient in China, the scientists used it to modify genes in immune cells. Then they cultured the edited cells, increasing their number, and injected them back into the patient. It is hoped that the genetically modified cells will attack the cancerous cells and destroy them.

      https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/11/how-gene-editing-is-changing-the-world/
      \\][//

      Like

  1. CAUSE OF DEATH AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

    UNDECLARED COMPONENTS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINES
    20.09.2021 16:00 |

    On Monday, 9/20/202 in the pathological institute in Reutlingen, the results of the autopsies of eight people who died after COVID19 vaccination will be presented.

    The fine tissue analyses were performed by pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang. The findings confirm Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher’s finding that among more than 40 corpses he autopsied who had died within two weeks of COVID19 vaccination, approximately one-third of those deaths were caused by the vaccination. Microscopic details of the tissue changes will be shown during the live-streamed press conference. Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz will report on the current parameters of the statistical recording of vaccination events.

    The press conference will also present the results of the analysis of COVID-19 vaccine samples by an Austrian research group, which are in line with the findings of scientists from Japan and the USA. Undeclared metal-containing components were found in the vaccine. Visually, vaccine elements are conspicuous by their unusual shape.

    The results of the investigation have led to legal and political demands, for example, for the immediate collection of information by the authorities in order to be able to assess the health risk posed to the population by the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, early signals of impaired fertility in vaccinated individuals can be examined by consulting IVF registries. Through the cancer registry, insights can be gained into the development of cancer due to the genetic modifications of the viral RNA. Suspension of COVID-19 vaccination should be considered.

    https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/

    \\][//

    Like

  2. David Martin presents hard evidence showing COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon.
    February 17, 2021 11:30 AM By James Bailey

    David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and was released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.

    In my opinion, the evidence presented below along with additional evidence presented in the video proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

    The following quotes from Dr. Martin were transcribed from the video.

    “Historically, coronaviruses have not been associated with significant illnesses in humans. So how is it that suddenly in 2002 going into 2003 that we have this magical alteration in beta coronaviruses that suddenly makes them lethal?

    And that question is the fundamental question that is behind an inquiry that we’ve been on since 1999 and Ralph Baric and NIAID’s (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) first efforts to figure out a way to increase the pathogenicity of beta coronaviruses.

    In 1999, there was a grant given to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and in that grant there was an effort to figure out how to amplify certain pathogenicities of what was called recombinant technology around coronavirus. Baric had a decade plus history in working with coronaviruses generally. He had done a lot of work in veterinary science around cardiac conditions for rabbits. There was a huge amount of research around cardiomyopathy in rabbits that had something to do with coronavirus. But in 1999, NIAID funded a project in which we first saw the amplification of pathogenic components of the beta coronavirus. (Note: Anthony Fauci has been Director of NIAID since 1984.)

    And it’s very important to understand that happened in 1999 and the work that was done between 1999 and then published in 2002 and 2003 actually started suggesting that there were parts of the coronavirus that could be modified, specifically the Ace-2 receptor and the S-1 spike protein, that could be modified to increase the degree to which the coronavirus could represent a health threat to humans.

    Let that just settle in for a moment. Three years before we have the first SARS outbreak (in 2002-2003, called SARS1) we have researchers who are working on amplifying the pathogenicity of the things that make coronavirus extremely harmful to the human system. Now, that feels like that should invoke in at least one or two people a set of questions, which is, how is it that we went for allegedly whatever our evolutionary time frame is where we were coexisting with coronaviruses and suddenly we started manipulating them with recombinant technology in 1999, 2000, 2001, and suddenly nature figures out a way to make these things also highly pathogenetic, in 2002 and 2003, using the exact same mechanism that we’ve done in the lab. Possible? Yes. Plausible? Not a chance.

    What makes it even less a chance is if we look at what was actually being patented at the time because we’re actually looking specifically at the sections of coronavirus that are those sections that are specifically modified in the laboratory which happen to also be the things that allegedly become modified by nature. Suspicious? Yes. Possible? Of course. Nature and humans could have been following this exact same trajectory. Plausible? Not so much.

    And what makes it less plausible is that we start seeing that the coronavirus in its alleged zoonotic and alleged, you know, kind of natural pathogenicity enhancement happens to be happening at the exact same place that researchers are doing the same work. That seems to be a highly implausible story regardless of who is telling it.

    But, what we saw in the wake of 2003 was that the Department of Health and Human Services, remember they’re the umbrella organization that controls the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institute of Health, NIAID, and the funding mechanisms that ultimately go to laboratories across this country and around the world, what we saw was an increased amount of funding going into coronavirus research and the research was specifically focused on, not only the detection of but also the amplification of the pathogenicity of SARS coronavirus.

    \\][//

    Like

      1. Health Care Workers Speak Out on Why They Would Rather Lose Their Jobs Than Take a COVID-19 Vaccine

        Despite being promoted as safe and effective by legacy media, many health care workers are refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccines, and those who openly speak out about their concerns get censored by Big Tech companies or kicked off their platforms.

        Some nurses and doctors are refusing vaccine mandates even if means it will cost them their jobs.

        The Epoch Times reached out to some of these health care professionals to see why.

        ‘Impossible to Give Fully Informed Consent’

        Emily Nixon is a registered nurse who has been working in the health industry for 18 years. When her employer, MaineHealth, announced that it would make the vaccine mandatory, she quickly organized a group called The Coalition for Healthcare Workers Against Medical Mandates and filed a lawsuit.

        “Thousands of health care workers have and will be losing their jobs. The already weak health care infrastructure of Maine will not withstand this devastating loss of staff. Life will be lost. Care is already being rationed. We have been experiencing a media blackout in this state,” Nixon said.

        “Speaking from my point of view, an intelligent, healthy, and empowered health care professional that takes excellent care of herself, it is an insult to expect that I would accept an injection of unknown substance and efficacy and provide an example to the great people that I serve that they too should submit their power over to pharmaceutical companies—convicted felons—in an effort to put a band-aid on the gaping wound of reality.

        “It is unconscionable to mandate injections without exemption, especially when the injection is a brand new medical product still undergoing its first year of study. Breakthrough cases are not properly reported on. We know this vaccine is ‘leaky.’ The safety and effectiveness of this vaccine has not been proven. There are other safe and alternative treatments. It is impossible to give fully informed consent without long-term, unbiased data. Threatening our jobs is blatant coercion. Our God-given right to bodily integrity and personal autonomy has been stripped with these mandates and we will not stand for it,” Nixon said.

        ‘The Side Effects Are Real’

        Jaclyn Zubiate, who was working for Southern Maine Health Care, loved her job as a nurse.

        “I did not take the vaccine, even though I will be terminated … Now with the data that we have, we know that the survival rate is quite high. Over the last 18 months, I have only sent one patient to the ER in respiratory distress. COVID has no distinguishing features among other viruses like other diseases that we have vaccines for. Why would I need a vaccine for something with a 99 percent survival rate that does not have any distinguishable features?” said Zubiate.

        “Health care workers are not taking it because they know that the side effects are real. In urgent care, I have seen myocarditis, cellulitis, [and] unusual neurological symptoms, among a variety of other side effects. I have seen people very ill post-vaccine, and then go on to test positive. The positivity rate for contracting COVID on the vaccinated is very high per the recent studies and what I am seeing in my clinic. A vaccine should work, and it is not working. It should be tested for years on something other than humans before we call it ‘safe and effective.’ There have been over 15,000 deaths from the vaccine that the media is not talking about. I will never take that risk on myself,” Zubiate said.

        ‘The Data Speaks for Itself’

        Jessica Mosher has been a registered nurse for more than a decade. She is a mother of four and a veteran of the United States Navy who lost her job for refusing the shots.

        She was a nursing supervisor, patient observer manager, and nurse program director at Redington-Fairview General Hospital.

        “Protecting my health and staying true to my religious convictions will always be my choice over a job. The scriptures promise that ‘as long as the earth remains, there will be seedtime and harvest’; this side of heaven, we have an abundance of employment options, but only one life,” Mosher said.

        “I have a master’s degree in nursing and am employed as a professor of nursing research and evidence-based practice. I am skilled in collecting and analyzing data and in drawing conclusions. I did not rely on the media, government, or Big Tech for any of my health care decisions prior to COVID-19 and I have no plans to change course. The data speaks for itself related to the harm these experimental vaccines have caused and the lack of studies that have been conducted.

        “What I have seen as a nurse and what others have shared post-vaccination seals the deal. The virus, like the cold and flu, does not have a cure. However, it has an almost 100 percent survival rate. Those pushing the vaccine are following the money. I am following the science. Health care workers do not walk away from their passion or stable salary to be difficult. The amount of people willing to be fired should be cause for alarm in and of itself,” she said.

        ‘Health Care Workers Have Natural Immunity‘

        John Lewis worked for a large hospital in southern Maine.

        He is pro-life and believes that all life is precious.

        “Knowing all three available vaccines were either tested, developed, or produced using fetal cell lines from elective abortions, I could not in good conscience violate my deeply held beliefs. Anticipating I would be able to file a religious exemption, it is hard to accept [that] I’m not being afforded an exemption based on my duties after considering I am a remote worker and do not interact with patients,” Lewis said.

        “Outside of medical or religious exemptions, many health care workers consider the risk-benefits of getting the vaccine. It is the same approach to providing patient care, where the patient is allowed informed consent. Many of the health care workers have natural immunity. Others do not feel there is enough long-term research into adverse effects. Also, these health care workers see with their own eyes what is happening in hospitals, which isn’t necessarily in line with the narrative,” Lewis said.

        ‘None of Us Are Seeing’ Surges

        Heather Sadler, a registered nurse, also loves to be a nurse, but she said that her and her family’s health are much more important than her paycheck.

        “This is new vaccine (if you want to call it that) technology that has NEVER been deployed successfully, and has no data regarding long-term effects, not to be confused with ‘side effects’ as the general public seems to be hung up on. I have always been someone who analyzes my health care choices through the lens of risk-benefit ratio. Knowing what I know about COVID (and I’ve done a lot of research), I do not fall into any of the high-risk for severe illness/death categories: age over 65, obese, heart disease, diabetes, chronic lung conditions, and immunocompromised. For me and my immediate family, there is greater risk of having a side effect, or long-term effect from injecting a virtually unknown substance into ourselves,” Sadler said.

        Read entire article:

        https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/health-care-workers-speak-out-on-why-they-would-rather-lose-their-jobs-than-take-a-covid-19-vaccine_4065164.html

        Like

    1. SARS2/Covid 19 has never been isolated as a virus.

      SARS-COV 2 VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED COVID-19 SWABS PRODUCE UP TO 95% OF FALSE POSITIVES ALL CERTIFIED BY HEALTH AUTHORITIES With the most complete analysis on Covid-19 tests

      Dr. Stefano Scoglio

      Published 2020

      “I have argued, among other things, that the virus cannot be considered isolated, because what is considered as “isolated” is indeed a complex matrix, made up of more or less centrifuged pharyngeal or broncho-alveolar fluid, in which, according to my calculations, there are about 30 billion viral-like particles (human and bacterial nucleic acids, extra-cellular vesicles, exosomes, etc.), and this complex matrix, without knowing if there is and how much virus there is, is defined as the “isolated virus”. As reported by an important study on exosomes (a little known branch of biology, which through has been around for about 50 years), most of the human pathological liquids used for testing, are made for the most part of human genome particles, up to 99.6% (see my paper “The new Pathology of asymptomaticity and the invalid swab test”). Collapse.”

      https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/SARS-COV-2-VIRUS-HAS-NEVER-BEEN-ISOLATED-COVID-19-Scoglio/9c9265bd95eaec0384958bafd0a977186b8c4791

      \\][//

      Like

  3. Eugyppius on “Original Antigenic Sin” and why we should never vaccinate kids against the ro. NEVER. As in not ever.
    Alex Berenson
    Oct 26
    As in not now, or later, or EVER.

    As in move to a state where it’s not required if your state requires it.

    As in protest.

    As in lie.

    As in know the science better than your kid’s pediatrician, her teacher, her school board member, so that you can explain – simply and without getting upset – why they do not know what they’re talking about.

    As in DO NOT let your kids get a jab of mRNA that will at best protect them for a matter of months and at worst will wrongfoot their immune systems so that for THE REST OF THEIR LIVES they will be burdened with a miswired response to a virus that they would otherwise defeat easily.

    A lot of you have asked me for sources on the general (roughly zero) risk to kids. I will include those in a separate email. But read and understand this piece first; it is the background you need.

    The money shot:

    “The most dangerous thing to do, at this point, would be to vaccinate children. The virus is not a threat to them, and if they are infected by the new forms of SARS-2 that are sure to emerge every winter, we will begin to establish – through them and the as yet unvaccinated – the layered immunity that is the only way of coming to terms with SARS-2 in the longer term.”

    eugyppius
    More on Original Antigenic Sin and the Folly of Our Universal Vaccination Campaign
    To review: We have now had ten months of mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Nearly 7 billion doses have been administered worldwide. This unprecedented campaign has not eradicated Corona; it has not even suppressed infections. Instead, case statistics have ballooned almost everywhere. While the vaccinated appear to enjoy some protection against severe……
    Read more:
    https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/eugyppius-on-original-antigenic-sin/comments
    \\][//

    Like

  4. Peter Duesberg
    In the 1970s, Duesberg won international acclaim for his groundbreaking work on cancer.[22] Duesberg’s early work on cancer included being the first to identify the oncogene v-src from the genome of Rous sarcoma virus, a chicken virus believed to trigger tumor growth.[21] Duesberg disputes the importance of oncogenes and retroviruses in cancer. He supports the aneuploidy hypothesis of cancer that was first proposed in 1914 by Theodor Heinrich Boveri.[21][23]

    Duesberg rejects the importance of mutations, oncogenes, and anti-oncogenes entirely. Duesberg along with other researchers, in a 1998 paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reported a mathematical correlation between chromosome number and the genetic instability of cancer cells, which they dubbed “the ploidy factor,”[24] confirming earlier research by other groups[25] that demonstrated an association between degree of aneuploidy and metastasis.

    Although unwilling to concur with Duesberg in throwing out a role for cancer genes, many researchers do support exploration of alternative hypotheses.[26] Research and debate on this subject is ongoing. In 2007, Scientific American published an article by Duesberg on his aneuploidy cancer theory.[27] In an editorial explaining their decision to publish this article, the editors of Scientific American stated: “Thus, as wrong as Duesberg surely is about HIV, there is at least a chance that he is significantly right about cancer.”[28]

    AIDS
    Main article: Duesberg hypothesis
    In his 1996 book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, published by Regnery Publishing, a politically conservative book publisher based in Washington, D.C., and in numerous journal articles and letters to the editor, Duesberg asserts that HIV is harmless and that recreational and pharmaceutical drug use, especially of zidovudine (AZT, a drug used in the treatment of AIDS) are the causes of AIDS outside Africa (the so-called Duesberg hypothesis). He considers AIDS diseases as markers for drug use, e.g., use of poppers (alkyl nitrites) among some homosexuals, asserting a correlation between AIDS and recreational drug use.[29] This correlation hypothesis has been disproven by evidence showing that only HIV infection, not homosexuality nor recreational/pharmaceutical drug use, predicts who will develop AIDS.[5][7][30][31][32]

    Duesberg asserts that AIDS in Africa is misdiagnosed and the epidemic a “myth”, claiming incorrectly[33] that the diagnostic criteria for AIDS are different in Africa than elsewhere.[34][35], and that the breakdown of the immune system in African AIDS patients can be explained exclusively by factors such as malnutrition, tainted drinking water, and various infections that he presumes are common to AIDS patients in Africa.[35] Duesberg also argues that retroviruses like HIV must be harmless to survive, and that the normal mode of retroviral propagation is mother-to-child transmission by infection in utero.[36]

    Since Duesberg published his first paper on the subject in 1987, scientists have examined and criticized the accuracy of his hypotheses on AIDS causation. Duesberg entered a long dispute with John Maddox, then-editor of the scientific journal Nature, demanding the right to rebut articles that HIV caused AIDS. For several years Maddox consented to this demand[9] but ultimately refused to continue to publish Duesberg’s criticisms:

    [Duesberg] forfeited the right to expect answers by his rhetorical technique. Questions left unanswered for more than about ten minutes he takes as further proof that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. Evidence that contradicts his alternative drug hypothesis is on the other hand brushed aside…Duesberg will not be alone in protesting that this is merely a recipe for suppressing challenges to received wisdom. So it can be. But Nature will not so use it. Instead, what Duesberg continues to say about the causation of AIDS will be reported in the general interest. When he offers a text for publication that can be authenticated, it will if possible be published.— Maddox, 1993[11]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg
    \\][//

    Like

  5. The story of a largely unknown evolution – Germ theory hoax
    Milton Wainwrightb and Sulaiman Ali Alharbia,⁎

    Abstract
    The Piltdown Man debacle provides us with the most infamous forgery in science. However, another equally intriguing story exists concerning a document by a Bostonian called George Sleeper, which purported to be a pre-Darwin–Wallace anticipation of evolution and an equally convincing account of the germ theory published before Louis Pasteur’s famous studies on this subject. The story involves two giants in the world of evolutionary theory, Alfred Russel Wallace and E.B. Poulton. While Wallace was convinced that the Sleeper document was genuine, Poulton’s detailed investigations showed that it was a fake and a hoax. Despite this conclusion, doubts still exist about the authenticity of the Sleeper document.

    Keywords: Scientific forgery, Piltdown Man, Alfred Russell Wallace, History of evolution, History of the germ theory
    Go to:
    1. Introduction
    Most biologists know of the most famous hoax in the history of science, the so-called Piltdown forgery. What follows is the story of another evolution hoax that is surprisingly largely unknown. Two eminent evolutionists appear in this story, and both initially believed that an unknown American had originated the theory of natural selection before Darwin and Wallace to natural selection and beaten Pasteur to the germ theory.

    Anyone reading the prestigious science magazine, Nature on January 22nd, 1914, would have come across an article entitled, A Remarkable Anticipation of Darwin (Anon, 1914). Here, it was said, two of the most eminent evolutionists of the day, Alfred Russell Wallace and E.B. Poulton were supporting the authenticity of a pamphlet describing work apparently having priority over Darwin and Wallace on the theory of evolution by the agency of natural selection (Poulton, 1913). Of the two naturalists, Wallace was particularly impressed and commentated:

    Supposing the work to be genuine, I doubt whether so much of pregnant thought and penetrating imagination has ever before been recorded in so small a compass.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730743/

    \\][//

    Like

  6. ‘pH Miracle’ Author Robert O. Young Sentenced
    As part of his previous guilty plea, Robert O. Young admitted in court he has no post high school degree from any accredited school
    By Samantha Tatro • Published June 29, 2017 • Updated on June 29, 2017 at 5:54 pm

    A San Diego man who penned a book claiming to treat low energy, poor digestion, aches and pains and disease was sentenced for practicing medicine without a license.

    “The pH Miracle” author Robert O. Young was arrested by U.S. Marshals in 2014, accused of practicing medicine without a license on his Valley Center avocado ranch.

    “The pH Miracle”, sold through Barnes and Noble, Amazon and other stores, claims to help readers treat low energy, poor digestion, aches and pains and disease with an alkaline diet.

    Young’s “pH Miracle Retreat” offers nightly rates from $1295 to $2495 per night. The rate includes lodging, meals, supplements, and therapies.

    ‘pH Miracle’ Author Robert O. Young Sentenced


    \\][//

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: