‘zeit’ German for, ‘time’ / ‘geist’ German for ‘ghost’ zeitgeist = time ghost or ‘spirit of the age’


Booming demand for consumer and goods, labor shortages, bad weather, and an array of COVID-related supply chain snarls are contributing to backlogs of cargo ships at ports around the world.

Among those seaports are the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach in Southern California, the two busiest container ports in the United States. On October 10, 2021, the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8 captured this natural-color image of dozens of cargo ships waiting offshore for their turn to unload goods. On the same day, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) on NASA’s Terra satellite acquired similar imagery.

According to data released by the Marine Exchange of Southern California, there were 87 container ships in the vicinity of the two ports on that day. Twenty-seven ships were in berths and 60 were waiting (either anchored or floating in drift zones) offshore. The number of ships waiting was down from a record-high of 73 on September 19, 2021. The two ports have had unusually large numbers of waiting ships since June 2020. Before then, cargo ships rarely waited to unload.

Ship backlogs at ports are not limited to Los Angeles. Elsewhere in the United States, ports in New York, New Jersey, Georgia, and Texas have faced similar challenges, according to news reports. Meanwhile, China’s Yantian port in Shenzhen has more than 67 container ships waiting, partly because tropical cyclone Kompasu caused the port to temporarily close. Ports in Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai all had 10 or more container ships waiting in mid-October, according to Bloomberg.

NASA-funded researchers have used satellites and other tools to track different ways that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed aspects of human activity and its impact on the environment. Researchers have tracked indicators ranging from air pollution and night time light activity and shipping. In particular, the Interagency Implementation and Advanced Concepts Team (IMPACT) at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center has been using artificial intelligence technology and high-resolution satellite imagery to track shipping activity at major U.S. ports.


I don’t buy it. This has to be part of the Great Reset agenda. It simply doesn’t add up.

How can all of this bullshit be going down on Biden’s watch if it is not a manufactured crisis?

How the far-left is SABOTAGING America so they can RESET it

A top General just delivered a bone chilling warning about civil war in America

Americans are worried about the state of our politics.

Leftists control every cultural and political institution in America and never shy away from flexing their power.

And this top General just delivered a bone chilling warning about civil war in America.

Barack Obama fired General Stanley McChrystal from his position of commanding U.S. forces in Afghanistan after a 2010 Rolling Stone article where McChrystal criticized then-Vice President Joe Biden.

McChrystal went on to endorse Biden in the 2020 election.

But now in an interview with Fox Business Channel, McChrystal warned that political polarization has put America closer to a civil war at any time since the 1860s.

“You know, I don’t want to be more alarmist than I should be, but what stops a society from just completely fragmenting in that case?” McChrystal stated. “What stops a civil war? We all say, ‘It could never happen here again,’ and unlike 1860 there’s not this overriding economic issue of slavery … but now we’ve got this tribalism that I would argue may be as strong as it was back then.”

Over the last decade, Leftists grew more culturally strident on social issues and institutions such as pro sports, big business, Silicon Valley, the media, academia, and Hollywood adopted more forward-facing radical Leftist positions.

Every power center in America suddenly got “woke.”

Liberals now hold the power to censor their political opponents and pressure companies to fire anyone that disagrees with leftwing orthodoxy.

Now that Democrats control the White House and Congress, Joe Biden’s ordering the FBI to spy on parents at school board meetings and treat them as domestic terrorists.

The Left’s dominance is driving polarization, which General McChrystal warns could lead to a breakdown of civil society.

“So, what’s to stop people from no longer identifying themselves as Americans and starting identifying themselves as liberal Americans, or conservative Americans, or this American or that American and then saying, ‘Well, why don’t we have our own state or our own nation?’” McChrystal added, “I don’t think it’s at all impossible that we would start to hear that.”


The Prerequisites for a Successful Insurgency by David Galula

“It follows that any country where the power is invested in an oligarchy, whether indigenous or foreign, is potential ground for a revolutionary war.

“The problem becomes particularly dangerous when the society does not integrate those who, by the level of their education or by their achievements, have proved to belong to the true elite. For it is among this rejected elite that the insurgents can find the indispensable leaders.

“The insurgent is not restricted to the choice of a single cause. Unless he has found an over-all cause, like anticolonialism, which is sufficient in itself because it combines all the political, social, economic, racial, religious, and cultural causes described above, he has much to gain by selecting an assortment of causes especially tailored for the various groups in the society that he is seeking to attract.

“The police. The eye and the arm of the government in all matters pertaining to internal order, the police are obviously a key factor in the early stages of an insurgency; they are the first counterinsurgent organization that has to be infiltrated and neutralized. Their efficiency depends on their numerical strength, the competency of their members, their loyalty toward the government, and, last but not least, on the backing they get from the other branches of the government – particularly the judicial system.

“The border areas are a permanent source of weakness for the counterinsurgent whatever his administrative structures, and this advantage is usually exploited by the insurgent, especially in the initial violent stages of the insurgency. By moving from one side of the border to the other, the insurgent is often able to escape pressure or, at least, to complicate operations for his opponent.

*All excerpts have been taken from Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice, David Galula, Praeger Security International.


Sustainability: The Tyranny of the 21st Century
Premiered Oct 6, 2021
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 50

Sustainability is going to be the buzzword of the century. Everywhere we turn, we hear about sustainable practices in business and industry, sustainable foods and agriculture, sustainable energy, and so on. Businesses and governments sign on to “Sustainable Development Goals,” and so civil responsibility is framed in terms of this seemingly simple idea: sustainability. What does sustainability entail, though? What informs it? In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James Lindsay walks through Herbert Marcuse’s New Leftism of the 1960s and 1970s and explains how sustainability has become Marcuse’s “New Sensibility.” In other words, sustainability is the new way of thinking about the world so that we can have liberation, which is to say Communism. Join James in this groundbreaking episode of the New Discourses Podcast to explore this idea at its ominous roots.

America has been exceptional over 200 years. It’s not because of the policies of the left. It’s the nation’s freedoms and limited government that have led to the good things we enjoy today as Americans.

If the left really had full control of the country, it wouldn’t be America for long. Check out D’Souza’s comments and see for yourself the outcome of such a radical change for yourself.

Yes, Virginia, There is a Deep State
A major untold story of the Trump era has been the political comeback of the CIA, NSA, and FBI, who thanks to an ingenious marketing campaign now enjoy widespread support among young liberals
Matt Taibbi–Oct 16. 2021

On The Young Turks the other night, during a segment called — this is not a joke — “RebelHQ,” commentator Ben Carollo extolled the virtues of the CIA. In one section, he described how intelligence officials responded to “Donald Trump trying to plan some ridiculous scheme to maintain himself as president”:

It’s not a conspiracy theory to say that these government officials wanted to listen to congress and cared about Democratic norms and respected the constitutional structure of the way the United States is today.

When I first heard Carollo talking about the desire of intelligence officials to “listen to congress,” I thought he was being literal.

Maybe, I thought, he meant that time in 2014, when the CIA spied on the the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into its torture program, wiring up Senate computers and reading staffers’ emails. Or perhaps he meant that time in 2015, when the Obama administration was using the NSA to listen to Israeli critics of his Iran deal, and ended up with “inadvertent” access to phone calls back and forth with political opponents in the U.S. congress, on both sides of the aisle.

Or, maybe Carollo also meant that time when the CIA intercepted communications between the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community and congressional staff, about pending whistleblower complaints. As the ICIG put it in one of its declassified notifications, “CIA security compiled a report that includes excerpts of these whistleblower-related communications, and this report was eventually shared with CIA management.” This way, the CIA bosses could know ahead of time who was going to congress with complaints about abuses! Good times.

Alas, Carollo didn’t mean intelligence officials are listening to congress in that sense. His video essay entitled, “Fact-checking Glenn Greenwald’s stunt on Fox News,” was designed to refute the apparently ridiculous notion that “there’s some sort of secret deep state working behind the scenes.” A central part of his argument is that unlike agencies like Homeland Security, formed under the Republican administration of George W. Bush and designed to be “far more shielded from congressional oversight,” the CIA reports to congress and basically does what it’s told.

The agencies with the real power to color outside the lines, Carollo tells us, are DHS-sub-operations, “specifically ICE, and Customs and Border Control,” which “have far less congressional oversight and far less structure in place for there to be those checks and balances.” Because of that, Carollo says, “Donald Trump was more than capable of enacting an extremely racist border policy.”

Even the Pentagon and the defense intelligence agencies are less of a concern, he said, because “when it comes to something like the military, there’s a long history of deep congressional oversight,” and “many checks and balances that are put into place.”

Carollo looks like he’s about six, and I say that fully conceding jealousy over his full head of hair. It’s relevant only because he’s representative of a generation of young, left-leaning intellectuals who grew up in the Trump years believing the CIA, FBI, NSA, and other such agencies to be trusted, straight-and-narrow defenders of democratic “norms.” These credulous kids with piercings and chin-beards who think the secret services are on their side are the fruits of one of the great P.R. campaigns of our time.

Six or seven years ago, “Deep State” was a term you would only see in left-leaning media. Bill Moyers explored the theme on his site from time to time, and when The Nation asked Edward Snowden about it, he said, “There’s definitely a deep state. Trust me, I’ve been there.”

The “deep state” was on the liberal left’s front burner then because a spate of horrendously ugly revelations put it there. We learned via Snowden that the NSA was collecting the communications of people all around the world in secret (Carollo might want to mark down that congress wasn’t informed) in a program the U.S. Court of Appeals just last year declared illegal.

We found out top intelligence officials like CIA chief John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied to congress, among other things about the warrantless surveillance program, and got away without perjury charges despite a furious outcry from legislators (another useful factoid for Carollo, on the oversight front). We learned about the CIA’s systematic use of torture techniques, ranging from anal feeding to threatening to rape and murder relatives to induced hypothermia, another fun set of pastimes the agency decided not to burden congress with knowledge of.

Worst of all, we learned Barack Obama and his staff held regular “Terror Tuesdays” meetings to decide who they would and would not kill by secret drone assassination, a program which many Americans were surprised to learn was run not by the military but by the CIA. Obama — who would eventually be quoted joking that it “turns out I’m really good at killing people” and “I didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine” — widened the secret “kill list” to include Americans.

When Trump arrived, it almost immediately became obvious his historical destiny was to be the best thing that ever happened to the secret services. In the same way hydroxychloroquine became snake oil the instant Trump said he was taking it, the “Deep State” became a myth the moment Trump and his minions started saying they believed in it.


Rigging the election worked. Only a few people who have kept abreast with how it happened are aware of it. Why wouldn’t they pull the same gag again? The judicial parties that went along with it the first time are liable for black mail by those who bought them off. New teams of election workers can always be bought. The Dominion voting machines are still in operation, still have the same adjudication software and internet connection ability. No one is watching the store! It would be easier this time to rig the elections, 2022 & 2024.

Our opposition is not here listening in. They are the mainstream players. They write the official narrative that the dupes buy hook line and sinker.

They still don’t care about backwater outlets like Tabbi and Greenwald. They have the fucking NY TIMES and NEWSWEEK MSNBC ASSOCIATED PRESS…the whole Mockingbird propaganda system, the deep state operators like CIA & FBI….NSA listening to all our plans.

The whole panoptic maximum security state is in their hands.

You think any of those forces are afraid of getting caught?!?!

The national security state has utter impunity, they are indemnified by interlocking directorates.

Naïveté is not innocence, it is gross and moribund ignorance.

I can give you a good example that your embrace of the Hegelian Left/Right Dichotomy was embraced by the Marxists as a technique of Divide and Conquer which worked for some 70 years and brought numerous bloody revolutions and two world wars.

The generalized application that you are suggesting is in error, and can be shown as false, in that just recently with the previous administration of Donald Trump, we had a successful governing executive branch despite the continued ongoing attacks by the deep state oligarchs who finally took Trump down with a rigged presidential election in 2020.

Don’t forget how successful the Trump Presidency was…!!!…it should be easy to compare his with the current Biden regime that is totally destroying America in the short ten months of its despotic rule.

The ‘old Republican Party” is dead, the new Trumpist Republican Party is waiting in the wings to bring back American greatness once again.

Let us take back Congress in 2022, and the presidency again in 2024. It will be our last chance to regain the Republic.

I am not very hopeful myself. The oligarchs that rigged the 2020 presidential election seem to have the techniques down to an artform, They used the same methods during the Newsom recall vote, and kept that jackal in office.

Massive civil disobedience may be the only trick left in our top hat… and that would likely go hot and we would have a civil war on our hands. Dangerous but better than silently walking into the tyranny they have set up..

Remember on top of this we have the mRNA injection mandates, that are becoming a cause for resistance as well.. There are multiple issues to bring to the streets in the coming weeks and months.

Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat

Things are falling apart FAST. In the last 9 months the Biden regime has plunged the USA into a “New Normal” of medical tyranny, an open southern border which millions of illegal immigrants have invaded the US and are still coming, Prices on EVERYTHING has skyrocketed. Cargo ships are stuck outside of harbors for months now, and are not offloading cargos some of which must be perishable goods that are going bad. One ship’s anchor has hit an oil line and spilled oil into the offshore sea. IF an anchor rips up the cables in the area it can cause a huge Internet brownout. If this is part of an agenda, that Internet shut down will likely coincide with a lightning speed martial law declaration going unheard and happening by surprise.

My point being, We do not have much time here. We are in the midst of the Great Reset NOW!!! The agenda is on Fast Forward>>


Or you will “Own nothing and be happy” soon.


© 2021 William Whitten


63 thoughts on “SPIRALING CRISIS

  1. RECEIPTS: Patents Expose “Medical Devices” in Jab, Injectable Computing System

    Biotech analyst, Karen Kingston joins Stew Peters and she continues to blow holes in the “safe and effective” narrative surrounding the vaxxines, which are clearly part of an intentional global depopulation plan.

    She says:

    “There are four advanced technologies that are part of these injections and the purpose of them is to trace your social network and your activities, as well as deliver different drugs and genetics and immune processes…

    “Let’s just dive right into it, because I want people to see where I got this information from. If you go to the Moderna website, right on the Moderna website, they post the patents for the injections.

    “Keep in mind, the Pfizer injection – all the mRNA products – fall under Moderna. So, it’s US Patent #10703789B2, issued on July 7th, 2020 and what you’ll see, right there is a description of the four lipid nanoparticles that are in here and that encapsulate the mRNA.

    “As you read through a patent, what you’ll find, in the ‘art’ or the ‘abstract’, when they describe…what this does and in Section 201, they explain that there is a delivery system involved and if you go on to read the delivery system, it can deliver a therapy or genetic product over a period of days, weeks, months or even years.

    “And as you go through the patent, that is related to certain technologies. It’s related to technology US Patent #20100216804 [‘Long Circulating Nanoparticles for Sustained Release of Therapeutic Agents’]…These are nano disks, this is what Dr Botha showed on your show…

    “So, if you go through, you can show how these images in the patent match up to what the doctor has shown you, Dr Botha…It says, right here, in the patent, in the [0046] section, that it can contain gene therapies, medical diagnosis, and for medical therapeutics, pathogen-borne diseases, hormone-related products that can be in there.

    “And then, what’s really important is if you go to [0074], it says that they can also contain moieties. Moieties are biomarkers, so they can put biomedical products in there, so that it actually knows to go to the ovaries, to go to the testes or to go to the heart.

    “So, these VAERS reports are not ‘adverse events’, that means that they were unintended. These are *intended consequences*. These products are programmed to go to certain parts of your body…

    “If you go to the next patent, ending in 65001…this patent is for nano magnets. So the reason why people are magnetic is because they were injected with magnets and you can see in the picture, there’s wires to magnets, permanent magnets and a drug delivery package that’s in there.

    “The point of this product was to treat certain types of cancers, bone cancers and it would attach to the bone. But if you go to Figure 1-A, you’ll see all these little light particles, of what the system looks like underneath the light and it reflects the light. So, all these doctors who are looking at the vials under the microscope, they’re [asking], ‘What are these things reflecting light?’ They’re the magnets and that that’s why people are magnetic.”

    Stew mentions Dr Carrie Madej’s images and descriptions of the particles that grew bright in color as they warmed to room temperature from the -70ºF at which they’re required to be stored. Dr Madej’s nano expert friends told her the bright colors were indicative of superconductivity triggered by exposure to white light.

    Karen responds, “That’s the single-walled carbon nanotubes; the graphene oxide nanotubes combined with Quantum Dot. But they need the magnetics injected in them to host the magnetic field…

    “US Patent 20130251618, again, this falls under the master Moderna patent on the Moderna website. So, it’s clearly-delineated. This is no conspiracy theory, I’m not making anything up. You can go to the patent, it refers to this patent, which is a

    “Method for making semiconducting single wall carbon nanotubes”. Those are made from graphene oxide. They’re one-atom thick. This is common sense –”

    Stew interjects, “It’s written, it’s right there, it’s the proof, it’s in the receipts, so I would like a public apology to you from these Reuters people and from these fact checkers over at USA TODAY. I’m going to name them. Daniel Funke, this guy is a real jerk. I want these people to come out and say, ‘You know what, we got it wrong, Karen Kingston was right, here’s the patents, she brought receipts, graphene oxide is in these shots.’

    “And that is only the bare minimum dangers associated with these things, so they should have no problem moving on past the graphene oxide and now factchecking you on the fact that there’s self-aware, living organisms building little colonies inside of you, while they inject these computing systems that are going to track you through this smart app technology and give you a risk score not based on your health but based on how much of a ‘superspreader’ you are.

    “And you’re superspreading the truth about these vaxxines, and that’s what they want to fight against and I hope that they will come out and admit that they were wrong about this graphene oxide thing, because we’re making headway, we’re moving the needle, here by showing the proof.

    “You see, this is the machine, Karen we have to fight against every single day, sitting behind this desk and that production room over there, these researchers over here, people like you that are hard at work, up all night long putting this stuff together digging through this, so that people don’t get killed! Killed, intentionally murdered by these Globalist oligarchs that have now assumed some pseudo authority, these aristocrat serial killer psychopaths, that’s what they are. Let’s just call it what it is. This is a genocide plan!”

    Karen replies, “It is, to usher in Artificial Intelligence. That’s what it is. So the reason why they’re calling men ‘women’ and women ‘men’ is so that we can call Sophia and Grace ‘she’ – and they’re not. These robots, these things are not humans and what’s happened is that they’ve intentionally, through the Mainstream Media and through this type of [smart] technology, they’ve divided Americans and we’ve started to think less of human beings, which is not what we’re supposed to do…

    “This is very much spiritual warfare and it’s about what’s in our hearts and if we believe in being the Children of God, we believe in God and we connect with each other and that love, we can heal this country. But as long as we continue to divide and hate one another, we’re going to usher in an era of terrorism, that’s what this is, with this Artificial Intelligence and what you’re saying, is tyrannical sociopaths who’ve hijacked our government and hijacked our communities. That’s what’s going on.

    “Real quickly, we can continue to go through some of the evidence I found. The February 4th publication by Gal Ehrlich, who owns this patent for the smart technology app for the vaxxines is entitled, ‘Prioritizing allocation of COVID-19 vaccines based on social contacts increases vaccine effectiveness’ was published on February 4th, 2021.

    “They did a beat in the Virginia-DC area and what they decided was getting vaccinated isn’t based on co-morbidities or your age, it’s based on how you’re engaging as an American in our society. This is an obedience platform, as you said. It’s a way to enslave people and will eventually lead to executions of those who are not obedient. That’s what this is.”

    Stew comments, “This platform is not a doomsday platform of darkness. This might seem hyperbolic. This might seem like fear-mongering but if you’re afraid of something, you’re paralyzed. Fear is a weakness. Being aware, being armed with this information only strengthens you. So this is a platform about winning, because I read the book and I know how it ends. God wins.

    “This is an opportunity to strengthen yourself in order to be a part of – not the resistance, because that suggests we’re on defense – but to be part of the winning team, on offense, because we know we are the majority. And the more people that wake up to this, the better chance we have; together with your neighbors, with your congregation, with the lady at the supermarket, the lady getting her coffee at the drive-through, the one that’s standing there at the pharmaceutical counter, who’s talking to the liar who’s not giving her Informed Consent about what she’s about to inject into her body and it’s all discoverable.

    “I think everybody should print off these patents. We’re going to put them at StewPeters.TV, there will be images there. We’ll put the slides there, underneath this interview and people should print this off and literally carry them around like brochures and hand them out to the people who are simply saying that you’re a conspiracy theorist tinfoil hat-wearing nonsense talker, pushing fear porn and you’re some radical right wing something or other, like this has anything to do with politics, whatsoever!

    “And Daniel Funke, over at USA TODAY, while you’re at it, you want to fact check Dr Ruby on the fact that a Delta Airlines pilot died. You better be careful, because there are people with personal relationships to this pilot who we’ve been talking to, here at the Stew Peters Show. So be careful with your lies, because they’re going to be exposed – and so will you.

    “Karen Kingston, final words?”

    She replies,”This is true and it’s part of the Quantum Dot technology and it’s US Patent #0228565 and what that is is these molecules that are based on the Observer Effect, it’s based on the scientific explanation of the power of prayer…so I do believe if you believe in doom and gloom, you’re going to usher in doom and gloom and hatred and devisiveness but if you believe in the power of God and God’s love and that we share that with one another and we are connected, as humans, then we will prevail and we do know how this ends – God always does win.

    “Be a member, join Team God, join Team Patriots, join Team Humanity and opt out of this tyrannical Artificial Intelligence terrorist attack that’s happening right now in this country. Sacrifice your job, if you have to. Pull your kids out of school. Do the right thing and let’s build this momentum to gain back our country, under the Constitution, which was founded under God, under our God-given inalienable rights and let’s stand up for those and not engage in this tyranny and this Socialism and this obedience enslavement platform.”

    Running Time: 13 minutes



    1. The False-Consensus Effect: People Overestimate How Much Others Are Like Them

      Here are the key points of the article:

      The false-consensus effect is a cognitive bias that causes people to overestimate how much others are like them, in terms of sharing things such as their beliefs, values, characteristics, experiences, and behaviors.

      For example, the false consensus effect can cause someone with extreme political beliefs to incorrectly assume that the majority of the population shares those beliefs, even though most people don’t.

      The false-consensus effect can be attributed to several partly interrelated causes, including motivated reasoning, biased exposure to information, increased cognitive availability of certain information, increased focus on certain information, and using one’s own perspective as an anchor when assessing other people’s perspective

      To reduce the false-consensus effect, you can increase awareness of this bias, engage with alternative perspectives, consider what can cause people to develop different perspectives, create psychological distance from your perspective, change your motivational considerations, use other debiasing techniques, and look at concrete data.

      Accounting for this bias can help you understand and predict people’s behavior, including your own, even when you don’t reduce this bias directly, but you should remember that there is substantial variability in whether and how people display it.



      1. When the CDC chose to lift restrictions on the vaccinated, ICAN went to work. Through its attorneys, it formally demanded that the CDC also (at the least) lift restrictions on the naturally immune. It provided the CDC with over 60 studies reflecting that natural immunity is more durable and robust than vaccine immunity. The CDC’s response is shameful. It fails to address any of these studies, collectively involving millions of people, and instead cites a single irrelevant study of a few hundred people that does not even involve comparing vaccine versus natural immunity!

        As reflected in ICAN’s formal exchange with the CDC, the available data and studies reflect as follows regarding the current virus causing most COVID-19 in the United States:

        And here is the full story. In May, the CDC revised its recommendations for fully vaccinated people, lessening certain restrictions. This same guidance, however, made no mention of those who have already recovered from COVID-19.

        Immediately after the CDC revised its recommendations, ICAN, through its attorneys, demanded that the CDC immediately include those who have recovered from COVID-19 in the same category as those fully vaccinated. ICAN’s demand was based on a robust body of science.

        The CDC responded with a ridiculous form response thanking us for our “interest in” COVID-19. Our attorneys therefore submitted the letter as a formal petition to the CDC on July 6, 2021, to which the CDC is required by law to thoroughly respond.

        In September, after even more studies had come out evidencing the robust and durable nature of natural immunity (and the waning efficacy of the vaccines), and having not yet received a response from the CDC (as they were busy cooking up the Kentucky study), our attorneys supplemented the Citizen Petition with 56 additional studies supporting that natural immunity is, in fact, superior to vaccine immunity.

        Months after ICAN first contacted the CDC regarding natural immunity and submitted the petition, the CDC responded that it, “find[s] no basis to further modify the current CDC recommendation in this area until the science warrants it.” The CDC’s conclusion relied on one single study of Kentucky residents and ignored each of the 60+ studies ICAN submitted it the CDC!

        ICAN’s attorneys have now submitted a reply to the CDC. In that reply, the attorneys explain that the Kentucky study, a retrospective study of only a few hundred people, is irrelevant as to whether it is appropriate for the CDC to lift restrictions on the naturally immune because the study did not compare naturally immune individuals with vaccinated individuals. Instead, it compared the naturally immune to the naturally immune with subsequent vaccination.
        Read entire article:


        Dr David E Martin joins Mike Adams during this latest phase of the Plandemic, in which tens of thousands of First Responders are being forced to resign and in which several large businesses and labor unions putting up a fight against this insane tyranny.

        He says, “We have a situation where it’s very clear that the plans that were laid out by the World Health Organization in the ‘World at Risk’ scenario for the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board in September of 2019 – and for people who haven’t read it, I encourage you to read it because this is the playbook. We are playing through the whole playbook.

        THIS IS A TEST
        “What we’re trying to do is we’re trying to see exactly how far people will respond, on what level of motivation. So we started out with the pretend, ‘Oh, this is for your neighbor’s interest, this is for your grandmother’s interest.’ So we appeal to some of that familial guilt and shaming – and we got a certain number of the population that way – and then, we upped the ante, we decided that when grandma doesn’t work, we’re going to free beer and donuts, so we did the incentive play and we saw a number of states do the lotteries and the financial incentives and everything else, and Mike, this has been a market test.

        “It’s a market test and it’s always been set up as a market test. That’s why I remind people, we don’t have to interpret the facts, we just have to read the facts. This was a market test to see at what level, what threshold we start getting pushback.


      2. Biden mocks pushback of vaccine mandates on CNN Town Hall
        Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., reacts to President Biden’s comments on vaccine mandates at the CNN Town Hall #FoxNews


      3. An astronomical blunder is a more accurate way of describing what has happened in this pandemic. To be clear, what this book is about is an intentional action with enormous, adverse, irreversible consequences and health impacts for large numbers of people. When it comes to life or death, we enter the world of homicide. There are deliberate actions that directly impair human health and, in the extreme, cause avoidable, preventable death. To be clearer, for this pandemic, the correct notion is criminally negligent homicide..

        Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment (pp. 1-2). Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.


      4. FOI response from Canada’s National Research Council: No record of “COVID-19 virus” (SARS-COV-2) isolation by anyone, anywhere on the planet.
        Christine Massey
        FOI response from Canada’s National Research Council: No record of “COVID-19 virus” (SARS-COV-2) isolation by anyone, anywhere on the planet.



      5. Laughing At Climate Hysteria
        Posted on Sat 10/23/2021 by PA Pundits – International1

        By David Wojick, Ph.D. ~

        We should laugh at climate hysteria, especially the fantasy proposals for stopping evil climate change. Electrify everything, running it on wind and solar? Restructure the economy? Restart the world in a green image? Stop eating meat and drinking milk? These proposals are all laughable, so feel free to laugh at them, as it will do a lot of good.

        Same for the scary science that supposedly justifies these outrageous proposals. It only exists in monster computer models that are deliberately programmed to produce it. True science is based on observation and we are seeing nothing to support these fantastical hot models. Floods, droughts, heatwaves, hurricanes and wildfires, are all continuing to occur in normal amounts. Same with sea level rise. Dealing with natural disasters is important but hoping to prevent them by not using gasoline or gas is just nuts.

        Why laugh? There are several good reasons. First of all, ridicule is a powerful form of criticism. Properly used it is far more effective than anger. Laughing at the green fantasies also makes them a lot less scary, especially the end-of-days climate scares. This helps alleviate the fear that is being forced upon the children. But the best reason is that it feels good to laugh. Anger is useful in its proper place, but endless anger is debilitating. If you think about it the right way, these green fantasies are hilarious. I read the green news for laughs and they never disappoint.

        Moreover, fixating on the fantasies distracts us from the real issues. These are the dangerous small steps that the fantasies are used to justify. Pushing electric vehicles for example. Or subsidizing the building of more tax-sheltering wind farms and acre-eating solar slabs. Combining the two is a super fantasy. In the case of wind and solar the battle has to be fought at the project level, but making fun of the fantasy can be very useful. President Trump’s great joke is a good starting point — “Honey I want to read tonight. Is the wind blowing?”
        So the rush to do all this green stuff just speeds up the failure. They will hit the wall of impossibility at higher speed. First the impossible target was 2050, then 2040 something, now 2030 or even sooner. The politicians have been competing, blind to the simple fact that they are staking their careers on impossibilities.

        We can all look forward to the collapse of alarmist climate policy. The best way to do that is to make fun of it, because the stupidity is truly hilarious. In the short run we will need some good blackout jokes. Also some good electric vehicle charging jokes, which ought to be easy. And we really need good jokes about bad science.

        Then there is COP26, a true circus. Biden is reportedly taking a whopping 18 cabinet bigwigs and other federal goons. Imagine them all crowding into a tiny clown car, an electric of course, and running out of juice. They can take turns peddling a generator!

        They are not negotiators so what will they be doing in Glasgow? Probably handing out brochures at the American Pavilion. That is what most of the 20,000 or so fly in delegates do. It is a huge sideshow you never hear about, but should laugh about, especially given the roaring energy crisis going on around them. A few blackouts would do them nicely.

        Climate hysteria is laughably stupid, so let’s start laughing. It is easy to do once you try.
        Read entire article:



        Doctors can now prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 in Nebraska

        Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson issued a legal opinion on October 14, saying that his office will not seek disciplinary action against doctors who prescribe ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine as off-label drugs to treat or prevent Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

        The legal opinion is in response to a request from Nebraska Department of Health CEO Dannette Smith. The department licenses and disciplines doctors, and Smith has asked whether or not it would be “deemed unlawful or otherwise subject to discipline” for doctors to use ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or other “off-label use” medications to treat or prevent COVID-19.

        Peterson says that his office finds that “the available data do not justify filing disciplinary actions against physicians simply because they prescribe ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to prevent or treat COVID-19.”

        However, he notes that health care providers in general may be subject to discipline if they neglect to obtain informed consent, deceive their patients, prescribe excessively high doses, fail to check for contraindication or engage in misconduct.

        The opinion also states that allowing physicians to consider these early treatments will free them to evaluate for other tools that could save lives and keep patients out of hospitals and possibly find relief for the strained healthcare system as well. The legal opinion also notes that there may be other promising off-label medicines that help treat COVID-19.

        “I haven’t focused on the legality of it, I focused on the possible benefits that it might have for my patients, many of whom are quite ill with COVID,” says Dr. Louis Safranek, a specialist in infectious diseases. He relates that he is still prescribing ivermectin to his patients, and more than 500 have successfully overcome the disease with its help.

        Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine effective against COVID-19




    2. https://noqreport.com/2021/05/15/are-we-being-set-up-for-mass-depopulation/

      Are We Being Set Up for Mass Depopulation? Never thought I would even think it but of course we are…

      Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, fears the combination of vaccine passports and booster vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants may be part of a mass depopulation agenda
      Asymptomatic spread is a fallacy capitalized upon to spread fear and induce compliance. Only people who have discernible symptoms of a respiratory infection pose any health risk to others, because to be an efficient source of infection, you need a high viral load. If you have a high viral load, your immune system will fight back, which always induces symptoms
      The myth of asymptomatic spread was used to justify lockdowns, which in turn were a tool get you used to giving up your freedoms and go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset
      The Great Reset is about transferring global wealth and ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and giving them the power to control the world’s nations
      Digital vaccine passports will form the foundation of an unprecedented surveillance and control platform into which your entire life will be tied, from health records to biometric ID, to an all-digital centralized banking system and a social credit system, all of which can be turned off in order to coerce you into a particular behavior
      How do you market and implement a financial system that nobody would want if they understood its full ramifications — a change so huge that it not only would mean the end of currency as we know it, but a total revision of sovereignty and individual rights?

      In the interview above, which is part of the full-length documentary “Planet Lockdown,”1 Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, shares his views on the COVID-19 pandemic, fast-tracked COVID-19 “vaccines,” the issue of mutated virus variants and the need for booster shots, and how this manufactured crisis is being used to strip us of our civil liberties.

      Are You Putting the Pieces Together?
      Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology. He’s spent 32 years of his career working for large pharmaceutical companies, and 10 years in the biotechnology sector.

      “I’m in favor of all modes of new medical treatments, whether they’re biologicals or vaccines, small molecules, creams, sprays, ointments, whatever, but I’m fervently against unsafe medicines or medicines used in an inappropriate context,” Yeadon says.

      “Some of the things I’m going to say are not favorable to the current crop of gene-based vaccines and it’s [because] they’re being inappropriately used. I don’t think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a sort of wide-spectrum public health prophylactic …

      A few things have allowed me, I think, to spot what’s going on in the world at the moment. One, I’ve loved biology since I was little. I’ve been continuing to learn and to apply biology broadly, whether it’s pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology [or] toxicology. I’ve got a very broad grounding in all things to do with life science, in terms of health and disease.

      [Secondly], one of my former supervisors said that I had a remarkable facility that stood out above the sort of ordinary things you’d have to do to be a vice president or a CEO. He said I was able to spot patterns in sparse data earlier than my peers. So, when there’s not enough data for most people to judge what was going on, I would often be able to see it.

      I could see a pattern forming when there wasn’t quite enough information … On this occasion, it allowed me, quite quickly, to work out that what we were being told about this virus and what we needed to do in order to stay safe was simply not true.”

      A Massive Fraud Has Been Perpetrated
      Yeadon starts out by highlighting the “enormous changes” made in the U.K.’s attribution of causes of deaths. If you die within 28 days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, you are counted as a COVID-19 death, regardless of other underlying conditions. The same thing was done in the U.S. As noted by Yeadon:

      Yes he’s right The human immune system is a marvel which The WHO has been screwing with since at least 1972:
      2 memos Who Bulletin ’72 showing what these shots do







      1. Thirty-five groups of doctors, research scientists and lawyers across US, UK, Germany, Austria and Japan examined a thousand vials of Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca ‘vaccines’ and found hundreds of sharp edged metal pieces in one droplet along with parasite material. When researchers heated the samples while being observed under the microscope, the particles began to move and were in-sync with each other. Sharp metal objects, graphene layers, large rectangular objects that have never seen before, are not biologic and likely are harmful when inside a human body. These doctors are calling for a worldwide halt of Covid injections. -GEG




        17,000+ Reports of Deaths After COVID Vaccines, Including New Report of 12-Year-Old Who Died After Pfizer Vaccine

        VAERS data released Friday by the CDC included a total of 818,044 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 17,128 deaths and 122,833 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Oct. 15, 2021.

        Data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020, and Oct. 15, 2021, a total of 818,044 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

        The data included a total of 17,128 reports of deaths — an increase of 362 over the previous week, and a new report of a 12-year-old who died after getting the Pfizer vaccine.

        There were 117,399 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 5,434 compared with the previous week.

        Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 612,125 adverse events, including 7,848 deaths and 50,225 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Oct. 15, 2021.

        Of the 7,848 U.S. deaths reported as of Oct. 15, 11% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 28% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

        In the U.S., 406.1 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Oct. 15. This includes: 237 million doses of Pfizer, 154 million doses of Moderna and 15 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
        Read entire article:


    3. World Health Organization’s Widespread Corruption & Massive Funding By Bill Gates Exposed (Video) — Nwo Report

      Bill Gates Exposed (Video)

      Date: October 22, 2021

      Author: Nwo Report

      Source: Tim Brown

      A documentary was released recently that exposes the widespread criminal activity in the World Health Organization and the massive funding of it by none other than Bill Gates. Why this man has not been targeted as Enemy Number One of the human race I know not. Yet, he definitely is an evil man with an evil agenda, and he seems to have a lot of minions to aid him in that agenda.

      According to The Defender: “Trust WHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences — including Bill Gates’s role as No. 1 funder — controlling the World Health Organization, to the peril of public health.

      Trust WHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences that are controlling the World Health Organization (WHO) — and that have been since the very beginning. Founded in 1948 by 61 member states whose contributions initially financed the organization, WHO was quickly infiltrated by industry.

      From Big Tobacco to the nuclear industry and pharmaceuticals, industry has historically dictated WHO’s global agenda and continues to do so in the present day, putting profits and power ahead of public health.

      Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder

      In April 2020, Donald Trump suspended U.S. funding to WHO while the administration conducted a review into its “role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.” This clearly propelled the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation into the WHO’s No.1 funder slot. Upon election, President Joe Biden reversed the Trump administration decision, restoring U.S. funding to WHO.





    4. G. Edward Griffin
      New Findings on Preventing Blood Clots from the ‘Vaccine’
      My last webinar received more rave reviews than ever before. My guests, John Hewlett and Stanford Graham, knocked it out of the park with the latest findings on how to minimize the development of blood clots related to mRNA injections now being forced on the public. The response was so strongly favorable, I decided to broadcast it again for the folks who missed it previously.

      A little warning is in order. When this was recorded, I was a bit late arriving, due to automobile problems. John Hewlett did a great job filling the gap with background information but, if you want to jump ahead to the main discussion, it begins at 18 minutes.

      Main topics of discussion:

      First Covid autopsy findings in Europe:
      Blood clots were in every organ of the body.

      Spike proteins create blood clots:
      A fact well known before they were designed into Covid vaccines.

      Covid and the vaccine to treat it were patented before the pandemic began:
      Based on the forensic patent analysis of Dr. David E. Martin.

      Blood vessels can overcome spike-protein damage if they have an abundant source of nitric oxide: A healthy body makes its own nitric oxide, but production declines with age.

      Declining production of Nitric-Oxide can be overcome, not by patented chemicals from a test tube, but by supplementation of food factors: And this is where we took a deep dive into what those natural substances are and what is necessary to maintain healthy blood vessels in spite of ageing – a protocol that I have personally followed every day for many years.

      I get those specific food factors in organic form from a blend called Cardio Miracle.

      If you registered for the webinar but could not attend, you will want to watch it now! It’s one of the clearest and most vital messages I’ve shared in years.

      So, we are sending you the replay. If you want to see source material for the facts discussed, links to the research and patents are shown below.

      We will leave the video up for a few days … so, if you can’t get to it right away, you can still catch it…. But, remember: Deadly pathogens have been patented and manufactured. Don’t wait too long to get this information.


    5. https://www.corbettreport.com/nwnw20211028/?

      Story #1: NIH Silently Removes “Gain of Function” from Website After Report Confirms Directors Fauci and Collins Lied to Congress About Funding the Research in China


      Archived: Gain-of-Function Research Involving Potential Pandemic Pathogens


      Archived 2009: Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response (EPR)


      Archived 2021: Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response (EPR)


      CDC Changes Definition of “Vaccines” to Fit Covid-19 Vaccine Limitations


      Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology


      Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity


      What is the WHO? – Questions For Corbett #066


      Story #2: J&J aka LTL Uses Sneaky Bankruptcy Maneuver to Block Lawsuits Over Cancer Claims


      Johnson & Johnson Pulls Sale of Talc-Based Baby Powder In North America


      Asbestos Found in Baby Powder. You’ll Never Guess How J&J Respond!… #PropagandaWatch




    1. Parents Warn of Their Children Being Subjected to Transgender Indoctrination

      In the United States, a sharp rise in the number of children identifying as transgender has alarmed some parents. As these numbers rapidly grow, three mothers share the warning signs of transgender indoctrination.

      The Child Transgender Numbers Explosion
      A study conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics released in May 2020 showed nearly 10 percent of high school students in just one school district identified as gender-diverse. That 10 percent figure is far higher than past estimates, such as a 2017 government survey of U.S. high school students, in which only 1.8 percent said they identified as transgender. While some studies suggest the higher rate of suicide and attempted suicide among transgender children is related to non-affirmation, other research shows that the higher rate of suicide and attempted suicide among adolescents with gender dysphoria is more related to their know history of other psychiatric diagnoses and self-reported emotional and behavioral problems. While the study called The Trevor Project—widely cited by those who push the affirmation-only approach to avoid self-harm—does show that a significant number of transgender youth admit the heavy use of drugs and alcohol, the study did not explore or provide any statistics regarding the preexistence of other psychiatric diagnoses or self-reported emotional and behavioral problems among the participants.

      The Social/Mental Vulnerabilities
      While each of the three families in this story come from different backgrounds and live in different states, each of their newly self-identified transgender children have some things very much in common. They are all in the same age group, they are all socially awkward, and all have been diagnosed with some form of social or psychological disorder.

      Vera Lindner of Los Angeles, California, told The Epoch Times “the trans bomb was dropped,” into her world a year ago when her daughter was 14 years old. Her daughter, now 15, had been diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and Attention Deficit Disorder. She suffers from depression, anxiety, insulin resistance, and obesity. Her daughter was also diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

      Dee, of Clover, South Carolina has a 17-year-old daughter who was indoctrinated at the age of 15. Her daughter has been diagnosed with pre-adoption trauma.

      A concerned mom in Augusta, Georgia, who is a single parent, spoke to The Epoch Times under the condition of anonymity using the pseudonym Mary. She said her son made his transgender announcement in November 2020. While not formally diagnosed with any specific disorder, she “had him tested when he was younger for being on the [autism] spectrum and he fell in the gray zone.”

      “They could not say yes or no,” Mary added. “He has always been a bit socially awkward and quirky.”

      How it Began
      Another commonality is the way each child was drawn down the transgender path. It all began with online connections who introduced them to the transgender world through various social media groups.

      The trans-transformation of Vera’s daughter started when she began identifying as a lesbian and started watching a lot of YouTube videos like “What do lesbians look like?” and “Who is the ‘most lesbian’ from among this line-up?” Then came the “unrequited love for a butch-lesbian girl who was the first one to self-identify as a ‘trans-boy.’”

      “This individual was the ring-leader, very aggressive,” Vera explained. “Also, very tech-savvy.” The “trans-boy” set up multiple Discord groups for the group her daughter had been introduced to, with channels such as “vent,” “general,” “art,” “LGBT” and specifically, “NSFW” where they were posting male nudes and pornography for each other to watch.

      According to the Urban Dictionary, “NSFW” is “internet slang” for “Not Safe For Work” or “Not Safe For Wife” and is “used for a fandom of some sort when people want to discuss and share the sexual and porno side of the fandom.”

      “At the same time,” Vera added, “they all got into TikTok and Instagram and started watching trans-related content—vile, stupid narcissistic young adults posting rotten material on these platforms.”

      The subject matter of these posts centered around such things as, “you are trans if you…,” “you have been playing a role of a girl all along but you are not a girl,” and posed questions like “do you feel like a girl?”

      For Dee’s daughter, everything started when “a friend who had decided she was trans a year before took her down the proverbial hole and taught her what to wear” and exposed her to lesbian pornography.

      Through the social media platforms Instagram, Tumblr, Reddit, Pinterest, YouTube, and TikTok, her daughter watched videos about “trans-men” and “how to get testosterone.”

      As with Vera’s and Dee’s daughters, Mary’s son spent hours on social media sites consuming hard-core, graphic pornography sent to him by his new, online trans peer group that evades parental controls by classifying the content “cartoons.”

      The Drastic Transformation
      By the time Vera’s daughter was in eighth grade she “was so hyper-fixated on LGBT that she was incapable of speaking about anything else besides LGBT” and she “cycled through orientations of lesbian, pan, queer, until finally she dropped the trans bomb shortly after turning 14.” Soon after, she “cut her hair, started wearing boys’ clothes, bought men’s underwear” and “demanded a binder.” She also wanted to get a “supplement from Amazon for increasing testosterone,” which she refused to purchase for her, and to see a “gender doctor,” which she refused to take her to.

      Where Dee’s daughter had once been a “happy, seemingly well-adjusted and mature,” child who “excelled academically, she quickly became “disobedient, contentious, contemptuous and untruthful.”

      Where she once appeared as a normal teen-aged girl, she now “presents as a boy wearing dark colors, hoodies, and occasionally wears a binder” and she has “Cut off her beautiful hair and tries to pass with a man bun.”

      Mary said she was shocked at her son’s trans declaration as there was “no prior behavior that would indicate any of this.”

      As with Vera’s daughter, Mary’s son became “obsessed with talking about trans issues.” She said “all talks revolved around it,” and “he demanded puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy.”

      Mary said the transformation of her son started after he “found friends who were also declaring non-binary and transgender status and they began providing him with “their old girl clothes.” He quickly went from “cautiously” wearing a skirt to “full-on cross-dressing” and he “became noticeably irritable and rude,” a characteristic she said was “extremely out of character” for her son. During one manic episode, she said her son began screaming at her to look at him to recognize that he is “a girl now.”

      “It was very disturbing and frightening,” she said.

      The Fight to Reclaim Their Children
      Because her daughter was “going through a mental breakdown upon dropping the trans bomb,” Vera and her husband decided not to take away her electronic devices. To mitigate the destructive influence of social media, they did purge her accounts of all transgendered contacts. They also stopped sending their daughter to her therapist, who had started “casually talking about testosterone and encouraging transition.”

      Her daughter’s PCOS is being managed with meds and she has a daily regimen of light exercise. She has started tenth grade in a charter school and is making new friends. Still, the therapy that has had the most positive impact on her daughter has been volunteering on family farms.

      “She adores animals,” Vera said, “so we adopted two kittens in addition to the dog we brought with us. Being around animals and kind people has helped her rebuild her self-esteem. We also go for walks daily. Her depression is much better, definitely in remission. So is the eating disorder. Here, she is connecting with real humans and hearing their real-life stories.”

      For Dee—because “there’s too much being shared at high school at lunch and during breaks”—parental monitoring of her social media accounts, a summer job, increased volunteer work to get her off social media, and new social circles has had only marginal improvements on her daughter’s behavior. But she isn’t giving up.

      Fearful and overwhelmed by the sudden changes in her son, the decision was made by Mary to send her son to stay with his father. During those next three weeks, she began to dig into his online history and many changes have been made. Since her son’s return from his father’s home, she has taken away his electronic devices and has three layers of parental control on his phone. She uses Circle and Bark apps to monitor the phone’s screen-time and frequently checks with her internet provider for controls they provide. Despite her efforts, she said her son still manages to find “a lot of gender-bending in obscure corners of the internet.”

      “His attitude is slightly better,” she said. “I have taken him to a new therapist that is not affirming. I am not sure how much that has helped so far though. The previous therapist was terrible and made things go from bad to violent with the blind affirmation model.

      Their Greatest Fears
      Vera fears that her daughter will be taken by Child Protective Services because she is “not affirming,” She also fears that her daughter will be influenced by her friends to take hormones or worse, to have irrevocable surgeries. “She has made tremendous progress in healing her mental illnesses and I don’t want her to slip back,” Vera said.

      Dee also fears that her daughter will “medicalize and embark on a course of surgery that will cause irreparable damage to her body.”

      “And I fear she will latch onto her ‘glitter’ family and become estranged from us,” she confessed.

      Mary in Georgia also fears that her son “will begin medicalization when he turns 18” and that “he will ruin his body and his life in search for happiness that is promised to him” but “will only result in his ruination mentally and physically.”

      “He will become a forever patient of the pharmaceutical and medical industry and dwindle his dating pool down to nothing and he will be alone,” she grieved.

      Who’s to Blame?
      Although a self-described “lifelong” liberal Democrat, Vera blames former President Barack Obama “who got bought with the millionaire transvestites’ money” and the liberals “who parrot trans slogans” and “allowed this ideology to infiltrate so deeply the American society and families.”

      She blames the “friends who dragged” her daughter into the trans world, and the school lockdowns that left home-bound, isolated children “hanging on their phones all day long to be immersed into this cult.”

      “And I blame myself,” she confessed, “for not doing deep reading on this whole trans-thing years ago. I immersed myself only after she dropped on us the trans-bomb, unexpectedly.”

      Dee also blames “the friend who dragged” her daughter into this, “and social media, which uses algorithms to shove the trans-agenda into her online world.” She also blames her daughter’s three therapists, “all of whom affirmed her and treated her like a special unicorn.”

      Primarily, Mary blames the tech industry.

      “They know the danger this technology poses to our mental health and the influence it has especially on young vulnerable people,” she said. “I blame them for not having stronger walls against pornography when kids can easily click an ‘over 18’ button.”

      She also blames the pharmaceutical and medical industry who “blindly affirm this and push drugs and surgeries on kids” and therapists who use suicide statistics to pressure them into affirming their child’s irrational decisions yet give no thought to the idea that the child may deeply regret those choices and “take their life after the transition.”
      Read entire article:


    2. Tracking QAnon: how Trump turned conspiracy-theory research upside down

      By taking fringe ideas mainstream, the former US president taught new and dangerous lessons about manipulating social and mass media.

      Conspiratorial thinking

      During his presidency, Trump frequently retweeted followers linked to the notorious conspiracy theory QAnon, a narrative that originated in 2017 and claimed that a powerful cabal of Democrats and elites are trafficking and abusing children — and that Trump is fighting them. *Although Trump never endorsed QAnon, he repeatedly refused to condemn the conspiracy theory in interviews and once praised its followers for their support:*

      The following is the full extent of what Trump said about QAnon

      President Trump claimed at a press conference Wednesday that he doesn’t know much about the fringe conspiracy theory QAnon, but that he understands its supporters “like me very much” and that they “love America.”

      And yet this what whole article in NATURE Magazine is based on in linking Trump to QAnon.


      Joseph Uscinski, a political scientist at the University of Miami in Florida and Kate Starbird

      Assistant Professor at University of Washington and Quassim Cassam, a philosopher at the University of Warwick in Coventry, UK. are cited as “a group studying how conspiracy theories spread in society” And yet the author of the article Jeff Tollefson doesn’t mention Starbird’s first name is Kate. So a reader would have to look the name. Tollefson claims that these three researchers are “part of a group” but never shows that they have ever collaborated, or even know each other.

      And yet Tollefson boldly claims, “by taking fringe ideas mainstream, the former US president taught new and dangerous lessons about manipulating social and mass media.”

      Tollefson goes on to assert, “Researchers like Donovan knew QAnon was primed to embrace the theory that the 2020 US presidential election was rigged. They had already watched QAnon merge with the anti-vaccine movement to back theories that the coronavirus was engineered to earn money for vaccine makers.”

      That this assertion is simply unverified hyperbole, it is a common technique of mainstream media to make such claims as ‘opinion’ presented as facts.

      To the critical reader it is obvious that Trump never embraced, or even knew what QAnon actually was. It has been proven that a cabal of corporatist oligarchs did in fact conspire to rig the 2020 presidential election. It is also now well established that the so-called ‘Covid 19 Pandemic’ is political–medical fraud, and one of the dual pronged agenda of the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset”.




      Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines



      William Gates Sr. Financed Eugenics

      The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier





      Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment . Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.



  2. Election Operatives Manufactured Votes from Low Income Voters to Steal States

    October 19, 2021 John Harper

    In 2020 President Trump won more votes than any sitting president in US history. Trump increased his vote totals by 12 million votes in 2020 over 2016.

    Biden got a record low number of counties in the United States by a supposed “winner” – only 16%.

    But somehow Democrat Joe Biden, who did not campaign and can barely string two sentences together, supposedly won 81 million votes.

    The same guy who can’t get 20 people to come out and see him when he travels around the US.

    So how did Joe do it? How did Democrats steal the 2020 election?

    We now know Democrats used several means to score illegal votes in several states. We witnessed them counting ballots behind closed doors, bringing in endless piles of ballots days after the election, locking Republicans out of the counting rooms, pulling boxes of ballots out from under tables when all the observers were sent home, driving in vanloads of ballots in the early hours of the morning after Joe Biden fell far behind.

    And now we have another clue on how they stole the election and who they stole their votes from.

    Huffington Post today credited “low-income voters” with giving Joe Biden the win.

    This is preposterous on its face since everyone knows Trump connected to working-class voters like no other president in the last 100 years.

    But it does give us a clue on where they found these mysterious votes.

    Via The Huffington Post.

    High turnout among low-income voters in the 2020 election — especially in battleground states — helped deliver victories for Joe Biden and Democrats in the Senate and House, concluded the study, “Waking the Sleeping Giant,” by the Poor People’s Campaign. The organization, an advocate for low-income Americans, launched a nonpartisan voter registration drive ahead of the 2020 vote across 16 states…

    …But the 2020 elections saw the highest voter turnout in U.S.history, including among poor and low-income voters, noted the study.




    1. CDC — Updated infection/fatality survival rates for untreated Covid 19:
      Age group 0 – 19 yrs = 0.00003% — survival rate: 9999%
      Age group 20 – 49 yrs = 0,0002% — survival rate: 99.98%
      Age group 50 – 69 = 0.005% — survival rate: 99.5%
      Age group 70+ 0..054% — survival rate:94.6%



      1. Hydra are virtually immortal in a lab environment. Their unique abilities make them ideal for studies in healing and aging. Hydra regeneration was noted in 1744

        Hydra vulgaris, the fresh-water polyp, is a small animal freshwater hydroid with length from 10 mm to 30 mm and width about 1 mm. Wikipedia

        Scientific name: Hydra vulgaris

        Phylum: Cnidaria

        Order: Anthoathecata

        Family: Hydridae

        Kingdom: Animalia

        Hydra vulgaris Pallas, 1766: Hydra vulgaris; Pallas, 1766



      2. On the issue of false positive test data, there are serious impacts not just for individuals who pursue medical and possibly hospital care. On a larger level, the political and media attention to new waves of the coronavirus may be a scam. In an American Thinker, December 2020 article, Dr. Mike Yeadon, former chief scientific officer and V.P., and allergy and respiratory research head with Pfizer Global R&D, argues that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.” He “warned that if half of tests for COVID-19 are false positives. …We are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy … on what may well be completely erroneous data on this coronavirus.”


        Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment (p. 21). Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.


      3. July 3, 2021
        COVID-19 Pandemic And Vaccine Update
        By Thomas T. Siler, M.D.

        In February, I wrote an article for American Thinker discussing the new mRNA vaccines. Then, there was scant data about the vaccines except for the trials done to get emergency approval for their use for COVID-19. Now, since the first vaccine was given in the middle of December, there have been six months of use to analyze the vaccines again. It’s time to revisit the subject.

        In the first article, I outlined the new vaccines and struck a cautious tone on calling them safe and effective, since there was not enough evidence to do so. Moreover, during the pandemic, it was clear there was a higher-risk group of older Americans who had co-existing conditions that raised their mortality. It seemed reasonable then that the high-risk group would surely benefit from a vaccine, but it was not clear if everyone else would also benefit from the vaccine. Six months later, the pandemic has already peaked and we’ve learned much more about the vaccine safety and side effects.

        The pandemic is going away across America because we have reached herd immunity (and why does this not get mentioned anymore?). This is due to three things: (1) people already immune (due to cross-reactive immunity to other common Coronaviruses); (2) people who have had COVID-19 and are now immune, (3) people now vaccinated.

        Note that cases already started decreasing in January, way before a significant number of people were vaccinated. Dr. Marty Makary made this call in April in a Wall Street Journal article saying we would be at herd immunity near the end of April… and he was correct. Former Pfizer executive, Michael Yeadon, also made this call and said there was no need to vaccinate people with a low risk of disease as we would reach herd immunity. He was also correct.

        So, even without discussing the vaccine effectiveness or side effects, there is no need to vaccinate “everyone.” But still, there is a massive PR effort, media push, and CDC/Dr. Fauci disinformation campaign to get all vaccinated. One must ask why they’re pushing fear to force vaccines.

        Initial vaccine side effects seemed to be limited to reactions at the time of injection and a handful of anaphylaxis reactions (life-threatening allergic reactions). Now, though, when one analyzes the VAERS data, which reports adverse vaccine reactions, we see many more side effects from the vaccines. Most understand that the CDC’s VAERS system is not the greatest system. Its underreporting of side effects is estimated to run from being 10 to 100 times off.

        Obviously, a vaccine designed to protect a patient should not result in his/her death. To date, the VAERS system has recorded 6,000 deaths in close proximity (1-2 weeks) to getting vaccinated. This has never happened before in vaccine history.

        Establishing the vaccine as the cause of death is difficult and it’s certain that not all the deaths were from the vaccine. Many of the older people who were vaccinated could have died of other causes. However, if death is a side effect and the VAERS system is underestimating the magnitude, shouldn’t this be a reason to pause our vaccination program until these deaths get investigated? Shouldn’t we know how many people may be dying from the vaccine? But instead, we get only a relentless push to vaccinate everyone while refusing to mention death as a possible complication. One must ask why this is.

        VAERS data also includes 1,300 cases of anaphylaxis and 2,000 cases of Bell’s palsy (paralysis of muscles on one side of the face). The Astra Zeneca vaccine had to be temporarily halted due to a rare thrombosis in cerebral veins. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have listed clotting side effects as well: Deep venous thrombosis (1,370), pulmonary embolism (2,000), thrombosis (1,919), cerebrovascular accident (1,732). There have been 566 reported spontaneous abortions and over 3,000 women report heavy or irregular periods. Myocarditis, or cardiac inflammation, has also recently been documented as a side effect in teenagers.

        Again, no one has yet proven causality but, if these serious side effects are under-reported, as is usually the case, shouldn’t this give us pause to investigate certain side effects further before giving to people of low disease risk? Why is the medical profession not drawing attention to these side effects? Remember that Hippocrates said, “first, do no harm.” And why are the media ignoring reporting on vaccine side effects that are more frequent than previously used vaccines? Currently, no one receiving the vaccines can give true informed consent,

        I am a recently retired physician and not against vaccines. I have taken and advised my patients to take other adult vaccines when indicated after they have been approved and tested in the usual fashion. However, mRNA technology is a brand new way to make a vaccine that has never been used in humans in any large scale until last December. I was cautious in calling mRNA vaccines “safe and effective” in February and now I would be even more cautious about giving these vaccines to certain patient groups.

        Even in the short follow-up period (six months now), these vaccines have many serious side effects and long-term side effects are still not known. We are nearing or at herd immunity and can take a more cautious approach now. It is now proven that there are oral, outpatient regimens of drugs such as Hydroxychloroquine and/or Ivermectin, that can treat COVID-19 successfully. There will still be sporadic cases as the pandemic wanes but those too can be treated instead of taking a vaccine.

        Recommendations moving forward:

        1) Older patients with comorbidities that raise the risk of dying from COVID-19 can still take the vaccine, although I would prefer a moratorium on further vaccination for COVID-19 until more studies are done.

        2) Younger patients without comorbidities and at low risk of dying from COVID-19 would be better served, in my opinion, by avoiding the now-known side effects and the still unknown long-term side effects of the vaccine. Instead, they should treat any infection with Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin.

        3) Healthy children do not need to be vaccinated. The side effects of the vaccine are likely to be higher than any morbidity or mortality COVID-19 causes in children. (WHO agreed with me!) Mortality from COVID-19 in kids is extremely low (.003%), lower even than the flu. Also, kids do not spread the infection to adults.

        4) Pregnant women (or women planning to be pregnant) should not take these vaccines. (They should never take an experimental vaccine.) There are too many reports of spontaneous abortion and menstrual irregularities that have not yet been investigated.

        5) We have reached herd immunity. There will be sporadic cases going forward. Management from here should shift to safe treatments for outpatients. There is certainly no need “to vaccinate everyone” to get out of the pandemic.

        6) Persons who have been infected with COVID-19 have a strong immune response and could choose to wait on the vaccine for at least a year.

        7) Do not be afraid of the variants. Viruses mutate all the time in minor ways (97% homologous). Usually, the virus becomes more transmissible but less deadly and this is likely what will be proven with the new variants. The recommendations above are not likely to change due to new variants, so ignore the establishment’s perpetual fear machine.

        8) At this juncture, the new technology of injecting mRNA to create a vaccine does not seem safer than our older ways of producing vaccines.



      The Plan to Control the World
      This is not just an article, but a unique in depth overview of the globalist’s strategy to use Covid-19 as an excuse to create global tyranny.

      You will see how they suppress every effective cure for Covid-19, so they can enforce a very dangerous vaccine onto all of humanity. This vaccine will contain nanotechnology that connects us to artificial intelligence and start the process of transhumanism, making us hybrids that lose the ability to think freely. If you think that’s insane, you’re right. It is pure madness, but it’s nevertheless the hidden agenda behind the vaccine for Covid-19.

      Nothing is about your well-being, but everything is about creating a world of control. Read the entire report to see the facts for yourself.

      You will also see abundant evidence that the pandemic has been planned for decades and how everything is orchestrated with mass fraud, global bribery, unprecedented censorship and extreme corruption in media, and governments.

      Don’t read this if your time is limited. Choose a shorter topic here if you are in a hurry. If you want to get the full scope of what is happening in our world, and see all the evidence, then proceed.

      Cures for Covid-19 are Forbidden
      While humanity is facing the worst nightmare in her entire existence, suddenly a sound of deliverance resounds: there is healing for Covid-19! Thousands upon thousands of patients recovered from this horrible virus in a matter of days, without any side effects, without hospitalization and virtually without any deaths. This incredibly powerful cure is an age old anti-viral medicine that has been used worldwide for more than 60 years: hydroxychloroquine.

      ‘This is the end of the pandemic’ exclaimed one of the world’s most renown scientists, professor Didier Raoult from France.

      Professor Raoult is the global expert on infectious diseases and personally treated more than four thousand covid patients with this safe, cheap and amazingly effective drug combo: hydroxychloroquone combined with azitromycine. Virtually all of his patients healed in a short period of time. (1)

      In his footsteps followed medical doctors like Dr. Zelenko from New York (2) who healed over a thousand Covid-19 patients, and Dr. Stella Immanuel from Texas who saw 350 patients recover (78) without a single death. All over the world tens of thousands of covid patients recovered rapidly, thanks to this amazing treatment.

      Study from 2005 proved
      anti-viral effect of HCQ on SARS-CoV
      The strong anti-viral effect of chloroquine on SARS-CoV had already been proven by an extensive scientific study by the NIH (which is directed by Dr. Anthony Fauci) in 2005. The conclusion of this study was:

      ‘Chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture.’ (79)

      Professor Raoult, Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Emmanuel and many other medical doctors around the world saw thousands of covid patients recover in days, after being treated with HCQ + ZINC + AZ.

      This should indeed have been the end of the pandemic, right there and then. So why is the world still suffering from this health crisis? Because something insane happened, which may be too absurd to believe… yet it’s the sad reality we must be aware of. After the tremendous success of this powerful anti-viral drug combo, several so called ‘health’ organisations’ or ‘medical’ institutions around the world did someting nobody could have imagined, in even their wildest imaginations:

      they conducted studies to prove to the world that this safe drug is no good and is in fact dangerous. They did everything in their ability to hide the cure for Covid-19 from humanity.

      Fraudulent Studies Disqualify a Safe Drug for Covid-19
      One such fraudulent study was released by one of the world’s most renown scientific institutions: ‘The Lancet’ from the United Kingdom. They published a paper that supposedly ‘proved’ how ineffective and actually harmful HCQ is. Result? The whole world started to reject this cure.

      Shortly after the release of this study, several scientists exposed this report as a shameful scam. It was full of false data and had no scientific validity at all.

      LANCET Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis
      Mandeep R Mehra
      Frank Ruschitzka
      Amit N Patel
      Published:June 05, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6
      PlumX Metrics
      After publication of our Lancet Article,1 several concerns were raised with respect to the veracity of the data and analyses conducted by Surgisphere Corporation and its founder and our co-author, Sapan Desai, in our publication. We launched an independent third-party peer review of Surgisphere with the consent of Sapan Desai to evaluate the origination of the database elements, to confirm the completeness of the database, and to replicate the analyses presented in the paper.
      Our independent peer reviewers informed us that Surgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, client contracts, and the full ISO audit report to their servers for analysis as such transfer would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements. As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process.

      ‘How strange… in the hands of real medical practioners HCQ heals tens of thousands of patients, with virtually no deaths, and in the hands of the WHO it kills a thousand people…’
      She took a good look at this study and discovered something horrendeous: the World Health Organization gave their patients absurd, lethal doses of HCQ. Dr. Nass revealed: (4)

      The WHO tests use excessive, dangerous HCQ doses. These tests are not testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather testing whether patients survive toxic, non-therapeutic doses.


  3. Thomas T. Siler, M.D., American Thinker
    Waking Times

    There is a massive propaganda push against those choosing not to vaccinate against COVID-19 with the experimental mRNA vaccines. Mainstream media, the big tech corporations, and our government have combined efforts to reward compliance and to shame and marginalize non-compliance. Their mantra says that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Persons who choose not to vaccinate are characterized as unintelligent, selfish, paranoid people who don’t read much and live in a trailer park in Florida (or Alabama, or Texas, or name your state). Never has there been such an effort to cajole, manipulate through fear, and penalize people to take an experimental medical treatment.

    However, as time has passed with this pandemic and more data accumulates about the virus and the vaccine, the unvaccinated are looking smarter and smarter with each passing week. It has been shown now that the vaccinated equally catch and spread the virus. Vaccine side effect data continues to accumulate that make the risk of taking the vaccine prohibitive as the pandemic wanes. Oral and IV medications (flccc.net) that work early in the treatment of COVID-19 are much more attractive to take now as the vaccine risks are becoming known, especially because the vaccinated will need endless boosters every six months.

    First, let’s address the intelligence of the unvaccinated. Vaccine hesitancy is multi-factorial and has little to do with level of education or intelligence. Carnegie Mellon University did a study assessing vaccine hesitancy across educational levels. According to the study, what’s the educational level with the most vaccine hesitancy? Ph.D. level! Those can’t all have been awarded to liberal arts majors. Clearly, scientists who can read the data and assess risk are among the least likely to take the mRNA vaccines.

    Read entire article:


      A group of physicians called ‘America’s Frontline Doctors’ gave a national press conference, in which they openly declared:

      ‘The media have been lying to you about Covid-19. We are here to tell you there are effective and safe treatments. Nobody needs to die. Nobody needs to go to hospital. Most people who are treated with HCQ+zinc recover quickly. There is a cure, hydroxychloroquine works!’

      The video of their press conference was viewed over 20 million times in one day… and was then removed by Facebook and YouTube. Their entire website was even taken down from the internet!

      Jul 27, 2020

      America’s Frontline Doctors SCOTUS Press Conference Transcript

      A group of American doctors calling themselves “America’s Frontline Doctors” held a press conference on COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, and more outside the Supreme Court of the United States. Read the transcript of their press conference here.

      Congressman Norman: (00:00)

      … I’ll turn it over.

      Simone Gold: (00:01)

      Thank you. Thank you so much congressmen. So we’re here because we feel as though the American people have not heard from all the expertise that’s out there all across our country. We do have some experts speaking, but there’s lots and lots of experts across the country. So some of us decided to get together. We’re America’s Frontline Doctors. We’re here only to help American patients and the American nation heal. We have a lot of information to share. Americans are riveted and captured by fear at the moment. We are not held down by the virus as much as we’re being held down by the spider web of fear. That spiderweb is all around us and it’s constricting us and it’s draining the lifeblood of the American people, American society, and American economy.

      Simone Gold: (00:53)

      This does not make sense. COVID-19 is a virus that exists in essentially two phases. There’s the early phase disease, and there’s the late phase disease. In the early phase either before you get the virus or early, when you’ve gotten the virus, if you’ve gotten the virus, there’s treatment. That’s what we’re here to tell you. We’re going to talk about that this afternoon. You can find it on America’s Frontline Doctors, there’s many other sites that are streaming it live on Facebook. But we implore you to hear this because this message has been silenced. There are many thousands of physicians who have been silenced for telling the American people the good news about the situation, that we can manage the virus carefully and intelligently, but we cannot live with this spider web of fear that’s constricting our country.

      Simone Gold: (01:45)

      So we’re going to hear now from various positions. Some are going to talk to you about what the lockdown has done to young, to older, to businesses, to the economy, and how we can get ourselves out of the cycle of fear. Dr. Hamilton.

      Dr. Bob Hamilton: (02:03)

      Thank you, Simone. And thank you all for being here today. I’m Dr. Bob Hamilton. I’m a pediatrician from Santa Monica, California. I’ve been in private practice there for 36 years. And today I have good news for you. The good news is the children as a general rule are taking this virus very, very well. Few are getting infected. Those who are getting infected are being hospitalized in low numbers. And fortunately the mortality rate of children is about one fifth of 1%. So kids are tolerating the infection very frequently, but are actually asymptomatic.

      Dr. Bob Hamilton: (02:38)

      I also want to say that children are not the drivers of this pandemic. People were worried about, initially, if children were going to actually be the ones to push the infection along. The very opposite is happening. Kids are tolerating it very well, they’re not passing it on to their parents, they’re not passing it onto their teachers. Dr. Mark Woolhouse from Scotland, who is a pediatric infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist said the following. He said, “There has not been one documented case of COVID being transferred from a student to a teacher in the world.” In the world.

      Dr. Bob Hamilton: (03:19)

      I think that is important that all of us who are here today realize that our kids are not really the ones who are driving the infection. It is being driven by older individuals. And yes, we can send the kids back to school I think without fear. And this is the big issue right now, as Congressman Norman alluded to, this is the really important thing we need to do. We need to normalize the lives of our children. How do we do that? We do that by getting them back in the classroom. And the good news is they’re not driving this infection at all. Yes, we can use security measures. Yes, we can be careful. I’m all for that. We all are. But I think the important thing is we need to not act out of fear. We need to act out of science. We need to do it. We need to get it done.

      Read entire transcript:




  4. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power by Byung-Chul Han – review

    An examination of the internet age suggests that we should cultivate the heresies of secrets and silence

    During a commercial break in the 1984 Super Bowl, Apple broadcast an ad directed by Ridley Scott. Glum, grey workers sat in a vast grey hall listening to Big Brother’s declamations on a huge screen. Then a maverick athlete-cum-Steve-Jobs-lackey hurled a sledgehammer at the screen, shattering it and bathing workers in healing light. “On January 24th,” the voiceover announced, “Apple Computer will introduce the Macintosh. And you’ll see why 1984 won’t be like [Orwell’s] Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

    The ad’s idea, writes Korean-born German philosopher Byung-Chul Han, was that the Apple Mac would liberate downtrodden masses from the totalitarian surveillance state. And indeed, the subsequent rise of Apple, the internet, Twitter, Facebook, Amazon and Google Glass means that today we live in nothing like the nightmare Orwell imagined. After all, Big Brother needed electroshock, sleep deprivation, solitary confinement, drugs and hectoring propaganda broadcasts to keep power, while his Ministry of Plenty ensured that consumer goods were lacking to make sure subjects were in an artificial state of need.

    There’s still time to stop the surveillance society

    The new surveillance society that has arisen since 1984, argues Han, works differently yet is more elegantly totalitarian and oppressive than anything described by Orwell or Jeremy Bentham. “Confession obtained by force has been replaced by voluntary disclosure,” he writes. “Smartphones have been substituted for torture chambers.” Well, not quite. Torture chambers still exist, it’s just that we in the neoliberal west have outsourced them (thanks, rendition flights) so that that obscenity called polite society can pretend they don’t exist.

    Nonetheless, what capitalism realised in the neoliberal era, Han argues, is that it didn’t need to be tough, but seductive. This is what he calls smartpolitics. Instead of saying no, it says yes: instead of denying us with commandments, discipline and shortages, it seems to allow us to buy what we want when we want, become what we want and realise our dream of freedom. “Instead of forbidding and depriving it works through pleasing and fulfilling. Instead of making people compliant, it seeks to make them dependent.”

    Your smartphone, for Han, is crucial in this respect, the multifunctional tool of our auto-exploitation. We are all Big Brother now. It is in part Catholicism with better technology, a modern rosary that is handheld confessional and effective surveillance apparatus in one. “Both the rosary and the smartphone serve the purpose of self-monitoring and control,” he explains. “Power operates more effectively when it delegates surveillance to discrete individuals.” And we queue overnight to get the latest model: we desire our own domination. No wonder the motto for Han’s book is US video artist Jenny Holzer’s slogan: “Protect me from what I want.”


    No matter. How might we resist psychopolitics? In this respect, Han cuts an intriguing figure. He rarely makes public appearances or gives interviews (and when he does he requires journalists turn off their recorders ), his Facebook page seems to have been set up by Spanish admirers, and only recently did he set up an email address which he scarcely uses. He isn’t ungooglable nor yet off the grid, but rather professor at Berlin’s University of the Arts and has written 16 mostly lovely, slender volumes of elegant cultural critique (I particularly recommend The Burnout Society, The Scent of Time, Saving Beauty and The Expulsion of the Other – all available in English) and is often heralded, along with Markus Gabriel and Richard David Precht, as a wunderkind of a newly resurgent and unprecedentedly readable German philosophy.

    For all that, and I mean this as a compliment, Byung-Chul Han is an idiot. He writes: “Thoroughgoing digital networking and communication have massively amplified the compulsion to conform. The attendant violence of consensus is suppressing idiotisms.”

    Indeed, the book’s last chapter is called “Idiotism”, and traces philosophy’s rich history of counter-cultural idiocy. Socrates knew only one thing, namely that he knew nothing. Descartes doubted everything in his “I think therefore I am”. Han seeks to reclaim this idiotic tradition. In an age of compulsory self-expression, he cultivates the twin heresies of secrets and silence.

    Perhaps similarly, for our own well being, in our age of overspeak and underthink, we should learn the virtue of shutting up.




  5. Newly Released Documents Show NIH Funded Gain-of-Function Research in China: Experts
    BY ZACHARY STIEBER October 22, 2021

    The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research in China that created a more potent form of a bat coronavirus, according to newly disclosed documents.

    An experiment conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, situated near where the first cases of COVID-19 were reported, compared mice infected with the original bat coronavirus to mice infected with a modified strain created by researchers, according to the documents.

    The mice infected with the modified version “became sicker than those infected” with the original version, Lawrence Tabak, the principal deputy director at the NIH, told lawmakers in letters (pdf) on Oct. 20.

    The “limited experiment” was aimed at seeing if “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model,” Tabak wrote, adding that the “unexpected result” was not “something that the researchers set out to do.”

    Whether intended or not, the research fits the definition of gain-of-function, some experts say.

    “The genetic manipulation of both MERS and the SARS conducted in Wuhan clearly constituted gain-of-function experiments,” Jonathan Latham, executive director of The Bioscience Research Project, told The Epoch Times in an email. “Further, it is absurd of NIH to describe the enhanced viral pathogenicity that was observed in the experiments they funded as ‘unexpected’ when clearly these experiments were expressly designed to detect increased pathogenicity.”

    The NIH “corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist with Rutgers University, wrote on Twitter.

    The newly released documents primarily consist of the fifth and final progress report (pdf) for the series of grants. The report was submitted on Aug. 3, over two years after the research concluded.

    EcoHealth’s final report also contained a description of experimenting on clones of MERS-CoV, a virus that caused an outbreak in the Middle East in 2012 and has a mortality rate of approximately 35 percent, according to the World Health Organization.

    The scientists said they used a “similar reverse genetics strategy” that they utilized in studies of the bat coronaviruses and, after constructing a “full-length infectious clone of MERS-CoV,” they replaced the receptor binding domain of the virus with domains from various strains of coronaviruses identified in bats from southern China.

    Jack Nunberg, a virologist and director of the Montana Biotechnology Center at the University of Montana, told The Epoch Times in an email that both viruses use the same receptor protein.

    “By keeping to the same receptor protein, I’d label the experiment overly risky (due to the pathogenic backbone and their previous findings of increased virulence in some chimeras) but not blatantly” gain-of-function, he said.

    Both Dr. Francis Collins, the outgoing director of the NIH, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, who heads the agency’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), have denied the agency has funded gain-of-function research in China.

    “Neither NIH nor NIAID have ever approved any grant that would have supported ‘gain-of-function’ research on coronaviruses that would have increased their transmissibility or lethality for humans,” Collins said in a May statement.

    The term generally refers to any research that increases the pathogenicity or transmissibility of a biological agent like a virus.

    The research in question was funded through millions of dollars of grants from the NIH to EcoHealth Alliance, which then funneled money to the lab in Wuhan.

    The NIH has repeatedly declined to make documents concerning the research public, only disclosing many after being sued or pressured by members of Congress.

    “Thanks to the hard work of the Oversight Committee Republicans, we now know that American taxpayer dollars funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab,” House Oversight Ranking Member James Comer (R-Ky.) told The Epoch Times in an email.

    The documents were sent to the Comer and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

    The NIH says a review of EcoHealth’s research plan before it allocated the funding determined it did not fit the definition of research involving “enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential” because the bat coronaviruses “had not been shown to infect humans.” However, “out of an abundance of caution,” language in the terms and conditions of the grant award stated that a secondary review would be triggered by multiple scenarios, including EcoHealth reporting a one log, or 10-time increase, in growth.

    “This means EcoHealth should have reported if any of the viruses being tested turned out to grow 10 times faster or more than the control virus would without their new spike proteins,” an NIH spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

    EcoHealth failed to abide by conditions of the grant, Tabak said, and was notified that it has five days from Oct. 20 to submit to NIH all unpublished data from the experiments and work conducted under the award.

    Presented with the accusation by some that the new documents show Fauci and Collins lied to Congress, the NIH spokesperson said that the allegation is incorrect.

    The challenge appears to revolve around different definitions of gain-of-function research. The NIH has defined it as research that is “reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to … viruses such that the resulting virus has enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility (via the respiratory route) in mammals.” Its parent office, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), defines “enhanced potential pandemic pathogens” in a framework (pdf) as a highly transmissible and highly virulent pathogen that is enhanced through research.

    “While the findings of this limited experiment in mice were somewhat unexpected, NIAID reviewed the progress report and has determined that the research described in the progress report would not have triggered a review under the HHS P3CO Framework because the bat coronaviruses used in this research have not been shown to infect humans and the experiments were not reasonably expected to increase transmissibility or virulence in humans,” the spokesperson said.

    The grant is suspended while the NIH conducts a review that includes working with EcoHealth to get more information about its noncompliance.

    EcoHealth has not responded to requests for comment, including questions sent last month after another set of documents, detailing other work the nonprofit funded with U.S. taxpayer money, were made public.

    The fresh disclosures add to the concern about government transparency, Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right to Know, told The Epoch Times in an email.

    “It has been obvious for decades that our federal government is not transparent enough, that there is not nearly enough congressional oversight and that the Freedom of Information Act badly needs strengthening. We citizens need better transparency tools to uncover all sorts of corruption, mismanagement, waste, fraud, abuse of power, and impending disasters,” he said, adding that NIH in particular has an “abysmal” track record of being transparent.

    “Even if the research EcoHealth conducted under the National Institutes of Health grant does not precisely fit the definition of gain-of-function, which is for scientists and not policy analysts to decide, government transparency certainly required the NIH to reveal this information at the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. At this point, it is obvious that the NIH and other government health agencies require reform and far more intensive oversight by Congress, and in some cases outright abolition,” added S.T. Karnick, publications director at The Heartland Institute.



    1. Ever since early reports began to circulate about the extent of injection-related deaths and injuries, many high-ranking medical professionals have been urgently calling for the complete withdrawal of the dangerous Covid jabs from public distribution. No matter how esteemed and distinguished the reputations of these medical whistleblowers, their professional opinions have been consistently ignored.

      A brief survey of some of the professional assessments currently being brushed as aside in the rush towards universal vaccination are the following: They include the position of Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most widely published medical researchers in the United States. He writes

      The current code vaccines; AstraZeneca, J&J, Pfizer & Moderna right now are obsolete. They do not cover the new variants Patients are failing on these vaccines, they’re being hospitalised and getting sick despite having the vaccines. The vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and percent injury, and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.”

      Dr. Luc Montagnier, expert virologist and Nobel Prize winner in 2008 in the Physiology of Medicine, writes,

      We’re in unknown territory and proclaim mandatory vaccines for everyone. It’s insanity. It’s vaccination insanity that I absolutely condemn.

      Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a professor, virus expert, and one of the cited research scientists in German history, writes,

      Gene-based vaccines are an absolute danger to mankind and their use at present violates the Nuremberg codex, such that everyone who is propagating their use should be put before a tribunal.”

      Especially the vaccination of children is something that is so criminal that I have no words to express my horror … We are horribly worried that there’s going to be an impact on fertility. And this will be seen in years or decades from now. And this is potentially one of the greatest crimes, simply one of the greatest crimes imaginable.”

      Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, an experienced vaccinologist with deep experience as a vaccine designer, writes,

      The mass vaccination hype will undoubtedly enter history as the most reckless experiment in the history of medicine.

      Dr. Zev Zelenko, a renowned medical practitioner who has successfully treated thousands of Covid patients writes,

      Covid War Criminals Should Face Nuremberg-Style Trials For Crimes Against Humanity.

      See this.

      The deaths and injuries being caused by the tainted injections are becoming major factors in the disarray that is taking hold of many hospitals. Many health care professionals, but especially nurses, have become aware of the dishonesty reverberating throughout many emergency rooms and intensive care units. They are fleeing the sites of murder and mayhem– of deception and malfeasance– being perpetrated under the besmirched banner of fighting Covid-19.




      1. “A good narrative soundly beats even the best data” — Davos Agenda, 2015

        Historically, grand narratives like that of Marxism ignore science, disregard alternative perspectives, and censor dissenting ideas.

        In his 1979 book, “The Post Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge,” Lyotard argued, “The grand narrative has lost its credibility, regardless of what mode of unification it uses, regardless of whether it is a speculative narrative or a narrative of emancipation.”

        godsharves-100×100 World Economic Forum to Launch ‘Great Narrative’ Initiative Following the Great Reset
        Be serious about health! Try a month of the World’s best superfoods and FEEL THE DIFFERENCE!
        Lyotard believed, “Science has always been in conflict with narratives,” and that “Judged by the yardstick of science, the majority of them prove to be fables.”

        The WEF claims that its great reset agenda will help emancipate society from the unsustainable and inequitable practices of shareholder capitalism.

        But according to Lyotard’s philosophy, the WEF’s so-called great narrative initiative lost its credibility the moment it was conceived.

        And who are they enlisting to help craft their narrative?

        Geneticists, futurists, philosophers, scientists, and special interest groups that tow the great reset line will be the ones shaping the great narrative.

        “In the battle for hearts and minds of human beings, narrative will consistently outperform data in its ability to influence human thinking and motivate human action” — Davos Agenda, 2015

        The World Economic Forum is keenly aware of the philosophy behind narratives and how to use it to manipulate human behavior.

        According to a WEF blog post from 2015 entitled, “How Narratives Influence Human Behavior,” the guest author from the World Bank argues that “a good narrative soundly beats even the best data.”

        “In the battle for hearts and minds of human beings, narrative will consistently outperform data in its ability to influence human thinking and motivate human action,” he writes.

        The author goes on to warn, “A false dichotomy has emerged between the use of narrative and data analysis; either can be equally misleading or helpful in conveying truth about causal effects.”

        It’s a matter of trust.

        Narratives are essential to storytelling and making sense of information.




      2. Drug Administration to take formal positions against home treatment and use of HCQ. Include the leftist mainstream media waging endless war against Trump. Mix in the medical and public health establishments, including major medical societies that backed the government positions. The media attack against HCQ was propelled initially by two medical research articles published in two of the most prestigious medical journals. The leftist mainstream media jumped on the negative findings for HCQ. In what has amounted to a remarkable historic event, both articles were retracted soon after a number of people were able to correctly explain that both papers were bogus at best, and possibly intentionally fraudulent.
        The situation for The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine has been widely seen as a failure of the peer review process used by journals. Both withdrawn articles were accepted very quickly, while many others with positive findings on HCQ could not get accepted. Those two articles, before their retraction, created a global storm against the use of HCQ. For example, USA Today screamed, “Coronavirus patients who took HCQ had higher risk of death, study shows.”
        The World Health Organization ordered nations to stop using HCQ and suspended trials being held in hundreds of hospitals across the world. And France, Italy, and Belgium banned HCQ for COVID-19 trials. Such is the power of negative published studies that feed an anti-HCQ narrative. This is still going on as new published articles in medical journals give negative findings on HCQ that have no merit or applicability to early home/outpatient use. An interesting example of how broad the disinterest in pillar one is the major media exposure given to successful author Alex Berenson. He has devoted himself to finding and articulating problems with contagion control measures, all well and good. But he has ignored the inattention to the pillar one option and, therefore, has not recognized the big pandemic blunder.

        Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment (pp. 19-20). Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.


  6. William C. Campbell – Nobel Lecture: Ivermectin: A reflection on simplicity

    The Coronavirus and the Constitution | The Coronavirus and Public Policy

    Hillsdale College
    342K subscribers
    This Hillsdale College online symposium session features a panel discussion with Hillsdale President Larry P. Arnn and members of the Hillsdale Politics Department. They discuss the political issues facing Americans as a result of the coronavirus crisis. View other symposium sessions: https://symposium.hillsdale.edu.

    Support Hillsdale College: https://secured.hillsdale.edu/hillsda


    1. Psychiatrist Mark McDonald has defined a delusional psychosis produced by the pandemic. He noted that fear is the “driving force of the coronavirus pandemic and the hysteria” around it. “Fear has become a new virtue. Never before in the history of this country have we told people that fear is good,” or to “settle into” those fears and allow them “to control and constrain your life,” said the doctor. Moreover, the pandemic “hysteria” has reached the stage of “going beyond fear, going beyond the crazy itself, to what I would call group control,” he said. By keeping a lot of positive information from people, those in power have intentionally fed fear hysteria and anxiety.
      Another aspect of this fear society is that ordinary people are increasingly being asked by government to “rat” on others who are not complying with contagion controls. In other words, the US is rapidly using its own citizens as a de facto police force. This seems very similar to communist China, which deliberately created a society where neighbor informs on neighbor.

      Hirschhorn, Joel S. . Pandemic Blunder: Fauci and Public Health Blocked Early Home COVID Treatment (p. 4). Outskirts Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.



    2. The 2021 Ice Age — Iowa Climate Science Education

      by Conny Lundberg

      Fifty years ago today, the LA Times announced the new ice age. NASA said it would come in 50-60 years. 24 Oct 1971, 37 – The Los Angeles Times at Newspapers.com h/t/ Don Penim U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age … Continue reading → via Real Climate Science https://ift.tt/2ZidqAj October 24, 2021 at 10:42AM

      Why Climate Science Peer Review Is Worthless

      Climate science has no system of checks and balances. The people who write climate models are the same ones who evaluate themselves, and then journalists parrot what the modelers say, and refuse to print any other opinions.

      Modelers like James Hansen and Gavin Schmidt are also are the people who alter the temperature data when it doesn’t match their models.

      Twenty years ago, NASA’s James Hansen was upset that the US was cooling – even as CO2 increased. It didn’t match his expectations.

      How can the absence of clear climate change in the United States be reconciled with continued reports of record global temperature?

      in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

      So he fixed this by removing the removed the heat of the 1930s, rather than fixing the climate models.

      NASA 1999 NASA 2019

      These massive adjustments were made to produce the desired results.

      Spreadsheet Data

      The graph below shows the magnitude of the adjustments.

      When plotted against atmospheric CO2 below, you can see that NOAA altered the data to precisely match the theory.

      The National Climate Assessment data shows that the US was much hotter during the 1930s than it is now, yet NOAA’s alterations fly through peer review without being questioned.

      The EPA also shows that US summers used to be much hotter.

      Then the press reports the exact opposite and refuses to talk to anyone who questions the assertions of the climate modelers.

      It’s Not Your Imagination.

      Summers Are Getting Hotter.


      NY TIMES

      Extraordinarily hot summers — the kind that were virtually unheard-of in the 1950s — have become commonplace.

      This year’s scorching summer events, like heat waves rolling through southern Europe and temperatures nearing 130 degrees Fahrenheit in Pakistan, are part of this broader trend.

      The chart above, based on data from James Hansen, a retired NASA climate scientist and professor at Columbia University, shows how summer temperatures have shifted toward more extreme heat over the past several decades.

      To create the bell curves, Dr. Hansen and two colleagues compared actual summer temperatures for each decade since the 1980s to a fixed baseline average. During the base period, 1951 to 1980, about a third of local summer temperatures across the Northern Hemisphere were in what they called a “near average” or normal range. A third were considered cold; a third were hot.

      Since then, summer temperatures have shifted drastically, the researchers found. Between 2005 and 2015, two-thirds of values were in the hot category, and nearly 15 percent were in a new category: extremely hot.

      Practically, that means most summers are now either hot or extremely hot compared with the mid-20th century.

      New York Times writers also don’t bother to read their paper’s own history.

      The Heat Wave Of 1896 And The Rise Of Roosevelt

      During the summer of 1896, a 10-day heat wave killed nearly 1,500 people, many of them tenement-dwellers, across New York City. Many thousands of people were crammed into tenements on the Lower East Side, with no air conditioning, little circulating air and no running water. Families were packed together — with five to six people sharing a single room. Extra space on the floor was rented out to single men — many of whom worked six days a week doing manual labor out in the sun.

      “It was so densely packed that most people couldn’t even live inside the tenement itself,” says Ed Kohn, a professor of American history at Bilkent University in Ankara, Turkey. “The streets in front of tenements, and the rooftops and the fire escapes were … filled with people all of the time because there was no room for everybody to fit inside.”

      Kohn is the author of Hot Time in the Old Town, which chronicles the fatal heat wave.

      Hot Time in the Old Town: Cover Detail





      LIST PRICE: $27.95

      Read an Excerpt

      “This was 10 days [with temperatures reaching] 90 degrees at street level and 90 percent humidity, with temperatures not even dropping at night,” Kohn says. “No wind — so at night there was absolutely no relief whatsoever.”


      Forty-five years ago, climate scientists knew that earth was cooling, and blamed every imaginable form of bad weather on it.


      Reality destroyed global warming theory, so the world’s leading climate scientists plotted to alter reality.

      From: Tom Wigley

      To: Phil Jones

      Subject: 1940s

      Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600

      Cc: Ben Santer


      Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly

      explain the 1940s warming blip.

      If you look at the attached plot you will see that the

      land also shows the 1940s blip (as I’m sure you know).

      So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC,

      then this would be significant for the global mean — but

      we’d still have to explain the land blip.

      I’ve chosen 0.15 here deliberately. This still leaves an

      ocean blip, and i think one needs to have some form of

      ocean blip to explain the land blip (via either some common

      forcing, or ocean forcing land, or vice versa, or all of

      these). When you look at other blips, the land blips are

      1.5 to 2 times (roughly) the ocean blips — higher sensitivity

      plus thermal inertia effects. My 0.15 adjustment leaves things

      consistent with this, so you can see where I am coming from.

      Removing ENSO does not affect this.

      It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip,

      but we are still left with “why the blip”.

      Let me go further. If you look at NH vs SH and the aerosol

      effect (qualitatively or with MAGICC) then with a reduced

      ocean blip we get continuous warming in the SH, and a cooling

      in the NH — just as one would expect with mainly NH aerosols.

      The other interesting thing is (as Foukal et al. note — from

      MAGICC) that the 1910-40 warming cannot be solar. The Sun can

      get at most 10% of this with Wang et al solar, less with Foukal

      solar. So this may well be NADW, as Sarah and I noted in 1987

      (and also Schlesinger later). A reduced SST blip in the 1940s

      makes the 1910-40 warming larger than the SH (which it

      currently is not) — but not really enough.

      So … why was the SH so cold around 1910? Another SST problem?

      (SH/NH data also attached.)

      This stuff is in a report I am writing for EPRI, so I’d

      appreciate any comments you (and Ben) might have.


      Attachment Converted: “c:\eudora\attach\TTHEMIS.xls”

      Attachment Converted: “c:\eudora\attach\TTLVSO.XLS”



      1,500 Years Of Heatwaves





      1. The 2021 Ice Age — Iowa Climate Science Education
        Fifty years ago today, the LA Times announced the new ice age. NASA said it would come in 50-60 years. 24 Oct 1971, 37 – The Los Angeles Times at Newspapers.com h/t/ Don Penim U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age … Continue reading → via Real Climate Science https://ift.tt/2ZidqAj October 24, 2021 at 10:42AM

        The 2021 Ice Age — Iowa Climate Science Education



      2. Clear and Present Danger with Philippe Argillier
        James Grundvig sets up this episode of Unrestricted Truths by saying, “World War II didn’t end in 1945, it went underground. Eugenics turned into genetics. A global Shadow Government was formed in 1954. Their doctrine, ‘Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars’ was launched.”

        The 44-page manual published in May 1979, ‘Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars’, funded by the Rockefellers, Harvard University, Air Force and international bankers is a plan for total, worldwide control of the world’s energy – not just gas and electric – but YOUR energy, with a plan to control it all. A copy of the classified ‘Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars’ (Technical Manual SW7905.1) was accidentally left in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a surplus sale, when it was found in 1986.

        It is the product of a discipline called “Operations Research” developed during World War II to attack enemy populations using tools of social engineering and psychological warfare. It was allegedly published by the JASON group, and presented at the first known Bilderberger Group meeting in 1954.

        According to this secret document, the “international elite” decided in 1954 to wage a “quiet war” against the American people through the manipulation of industry, peoples’ pastimes, education and political leanings. It called for a quiet revolution, pitting people against each other, with the goal of shifting wealth from “the irresponsible many” into the hands of the “responsible and worthy few,” which is exactly what we have seen implemented with the COVID-19 PSYOP and bioweapon; a massive transfer of wealth from the middle classes to the billionaire elite who comprise the Shadow Government.

        Much of this secret war of the elites against the people has been fought under the guise of “sustainable growth” and by promoting the lie of human-caused Climate Change from fossil fuel carbon emissions, which has gone under many names: UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030, The Green New Deal and the Great Reset, always with the abiding message that humans are overpopulated and that we’re destroying the Earth.

        In other words, we are the carbon they want to reduce and the Shadow Government has succeeded in brainwashing billions of people into committing mass suicide with the COVID jab.

        Maria Zack of Nations in Action introduces us to French billionaire, Philippe Argillier who she says has an extensive background in high finance and infrastructure development. Over the course of his work, he has run into the Shadow Government, which he describes as an “Extremely sophisticated entity, run by a few people that runs the lives of 8 billion people on Earth.”

        She says she spent 4 months investigating Philippe and his claims, which she was able to validate in several countries. She’s come to understand that the theft of the 2020 Election “Is just a tiny piece of what we have to do, because now, we’re headed right up to the pinnacle, to the head of the snake, of having to take them down in order to fix everything else below.

        “Nothing can be fixed unless you go to the root problem…so, I’ve been very grateful for Philippe’s time and his labor of love for humanity in helping us learn more, so we can work cohesively to actually build this system of eradication and also outing the truth to the people and that’s what’s really been a mammoth effort and he’s been a trooper for standing by and helping us, because we could not do this without him.”

        Argillier says the day-to-day operations of the Shadow Government are run by 38 individuals but more important than the identity of these people is this entity’s structure and system that controls the global Deep State of compromised government members around the world and which it is his goal to eradicate without any conflict and which he believes he has the power to do with the four databanks, of which he obtained full ownership on September 1st of this year.

        He says, “We had a meeting on October 3rd, very recently in Cap d’Ail in the South of France with representatives of the Shadow Government and…we had a clear understanding that we are moving forward with the agenda to change and alter this system for a better world. Owning the databanks, I am in a position to do so but I also, I made it clear that we could work in a way that there would be no conflict – unless they’re looking for a conflict.”

        Philippe says that twelve days after this October 3rd meeting in Cap d’Ail, Vincent Bolloré announced that, “After 30 years of ownership of the Continent of Africa, he made a decision that it was about time for him to move out of Africa and that is all over the news in France…This man is linked to two of the 38 billionaires behind the Shadow Government…I was not even expecting such an answer from these individuals as to setting up their structure in alignment with the agenda of my databanks. So this is very important news…I repeat, Vincent Bolloré has decided to leave the Continent of Africa and I think he’s made a very wise decision.”

        Philippe says that he’s in the process of eradicating the French government’s machinations in Africa. “Too many presidents, too many countries on the Continent of Africa have been abused, have been raped by the outrageousness of the governments, including mine and I am very upset by the French government and they’ll have to change their agenda also, because the work that we’re doing is for humanity, not only limited to the United States of America and to France.”

        James asks him if the CCP has representation among the 38 and Philippe replies in the affirmative and, “Actually, China is on its way to literally purchase the whole Continent of Africa but at the same time, the Chinese government is fully aware of the databanks and pretty much stands on waiting to see what the next step will be and at this moment, I am the only one who knows what the next step will be. This is a strategy that I have worked for the past 7 years.”

        When asked what his next steps will be, Philippe says, “I’m not even going to have to tell you, because you will witness it for yourself. That’s the power of the databanks. I don’t need to divulge what’s going to happen, you’ll see it for yourself. Already, since September 1st, people see it…

        “When you really have the power, you don’t really have to use it…you just have it and the people know it…The true warrior is a peaceful warrior…”

        James then explains how he stumbled upon the Shadow Government after his son was vaccinated at the age of 3 and became autistic. It became his goal to help his son do something unique with his abilities, while at the same time revealing the corruption at the pharmaceutical companies and at CDC, so that the authorities would take care of them.

        Philippe says, “I’m going to help you with this. And that’s what my legacy’s all about and…I want to reassure you, James, it’s moving forward and it’s moving very quickly.”

        Running Time: 77 mins


        Click to access SILENT_20WEAPONS_20for_20QUIET_20WARS.pdf



  7. NIH Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function COVID Experiments; Gives EcoHealth Five Days To Report Data
    FRIDAY, OCT 22, 2021 – 04:11 AM

    A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that the US-funded so-called “gain-of-function” research in Wuhan, China – and that the US nonprofit which conducted it, EcoHealth Alliance – led by the controversial Peter Daszak, “failed to report” that they had created a chimeric bat coronavirus which could infect humans.

    In a letter addressed to Rep. James Comer (R-KY), NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence A. Tabak cites a “limited experiment” to determine whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.” According to the letter, humanized mice infected with the modified bat virus “became sicker” than those exposed to an unmodified version of the same bat coronavirus.

    Daszak failed to report this finding, and has been given five days to submit “any and all unpublished data from the experiments and work conducted” under the NIH grant.

    Rutgers University Board of Governors Chemistry Professor Richard H. Ebright sums it up. :
    See new Tweets
    Richard H. Ebright
    NIH corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

    NIH states that EcoHealth Alliance violated Terms and Conditions of NIH grant AI110964.

    While Tabak’s letter goes to great lengths to insist that EcoHealth’s work couldn’t have produced SARS-CoV-2, it absolutely vindicates Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who Fauci repeatedly called a liar in July for accusing him of funding GoF research in Wuhan, China.

    As we noted in September, proof that the US funded of GoF research was blown wide open thanks to materials (here and here) released through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health, revealing that EcoHealth was paid to make chimeric SARS-based Covid that they confirmed could infect human cells.

    While evidence of this research has been pointed to in published studies, the FOIA release provides a key piece to the puzzle which sheds new light on what was going on.

    “This is a roadmap to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19 (via The Intercept).

    We also learned in September that 18 months before the Pandemic, Daszak applied for a grant to release enhanced airborne coronaviruses into the wild in an effort to inoculate them against diseases that could have otherwise jumped to humans, according to The Telegraph, citing leaked grant proposals from 2018.

    New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.

    They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to fund the work.

    Daszak hoped to use genetic engineering to cobble “human-specific cleavage sites” onto bat Covid ‘which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells’ – and included plans to commingle high-risk natural coronaviruses strains with more infectious, yet less deadly versions. His ‘bat team’ of researchers included Dr. Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center.

    Darpa refused the contract – saying “It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk,” while warning that Daszak hadn’t fully considered the dangers involved in enhancing the virus via gain-of-function research, or by releasing a vaccine into the air.

    Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, who struggled to get work published showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had been carrying out “gain of function” work for years before the pandemic, said the research may have gone ahead even without the funding.

    “This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,” he said. -Telegraph

    In short, after a massive drop of receipts proved that Fauci, and his boss Francis Collins, lied, the NIH itself has finally acknowledged funding Gain-of-Function research.



    1. NIH admits US funded gain-of-function in Wuhan — despite Fauci’s denials

      MORE ON:

      Fauci predicts COVID vax for kids 5-11 will be available in early November

      CDC monitoring ‘Delta plus’ COVID-19 variant, director says
      It’s another Fauci flub.

      The National Institutes of Health has stunningly admitted to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan lab — despite Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly insisting to Congress that no such thing happened.

      In a letter to Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) on Wednesday, a top NIH official blamed EcoHealth Alliance — the New York City-based nonprofit that has funneled US funds to the Wuhan lab — for not being transparent about the work it was doing.

      NIH’s principal deputy director, Lawrence A. Tabak, wrote in the letter that EcoHealth’s “limited experiment” tested whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”



    2. ‘Fuck Joe Biden’ Chant Drowns Out Fox ALCS Postgame Show Hosts | 21 Oct 2021 | Chants of “Fuck Joe Biden” repeatedly interrupted the Fox ALCS postgame show Tuesday, as show producers raced to hit the mute button as often as they could without shutting down the hosts. The postgame show, broadcast outside Fenway Park on Tuesday evening, was rife with fans chanting their displeasure at Biden. The chant was heard at least four times during the broadcast, according to Mediaite.




      1. COP26
        2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference
        The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, also known as COP26 and as the Glasgow Conference, is the 26th United Nations Climate Change conference.


  8. Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars An Introduction Programming Manual Operations Research Technical Manual

    The following document is taken from two sources. The first, was acquired on a website
    (of which I can’t remember the address) listing as its source the book titled Behold A Pale
    Horse by William Cooper; Light Technology Publishing, 1991. The second source is a
    crudely copied booklet which does not contain a copyright notice, or a publishers name.
    With the exception of the Forward, the Preface, the main thing that was missing from the
    first source was the illustrations. As we began comparing the two, we realized that the
    illustrations, and the accompanying text (also missing from the first) made up a
    significant part of the document. This has now been restored by The Lawful Path, and so
    far as I know, is the only internet copy available complete with the illustrations.
    We have no first-hand knowledge that this document is genuine, however many of the
    concepts contained herein are certainly reasonable, important, and bear strong
    If anyone has additional knowledge about the source of this document; has better copies
    of the illustrations than the ones posted here; has any missing pieces to this document, or
    has any comments which can improve upon the quality of this document, we will
    appreciate your comments.

    The Lawful Path http://www.lawfulpath.com


    1. Vincent Bolloré (born 1 April 1952) is a French billionaire businessman. He is the chairman and CEO of the investment group Bolloré.[1] As of September 2021, his net worth is estimated at US$9 billion.[2]

      In late 2004, his investment group started building a stake in advertising group Havas, becoming its largest single shareholder. He mounted a coup and replaced Alain de Pouzilhac as CEO in July 2005. In 2005, through his family company, he expanded his media interests by launching the Direct 8 television station. Towards the end of 2005, he began building a stake in independent British media planning and buying group, Aegis. As of July 2006, his stake in Aegis stood at 29%.[6] Direct Soir [fr], a free newspaper, was launched in June 2006.[citation needed] In January 2008, he manifested interest in becoming a shareholder of famed, but troubled, Italian car manufacturer Pininfarina.[citation needed] In 2014, as Vivendi president he decided to invest in the Italian telecom company Telecom Italia and in the Italian broadcaster, Mediaset, controlled by Berlusconi family’s holding company Fininvest.[7]

      The Bolloré Group also has important positions in the economies of several former French colonies in Africa (in particular Ivory Coast, Gabon, Cameroon, and Congo).[8][9][10] On 24 April 2018, Bolloré was brought into custody for questioning concerning perceived links between discount rates for political consulting (through Havas) and port concessions in Lomé, Togo; and Conakry, Guinea. He was subsequently indicted for “corruption of foreign agents”, “falsification of documents”, and “complicity in breach of trust”.[11][12] If found guilty, he could face a maximum fine of €1 million and up to 10 years’ imprisonment.[13]

      As a result of Universal Music Group IPO at Euronext Amsterdam, Bolloré now held 18 percent of UMG shares.[14]



    October 25, 2021 | David Marks, CHD
    Waking Times

    “Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home — so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.” — Eleanor Roosevelt

    Those who have questioned the intentions behind government policy in response to the pandemic continue to observe the unreasonable intensity of supporters of mandated protocols. Declaring vehement loyalty to vaccine therapy, their minds are closed to any further input.

    Vaccination proponents don’t want to see or hear anything contradicting their very confident, though most questionable position: that a benevolent government, supported by a monolithic, knowledgeable, scientific community, is successfully dealing with the crisis.

    In addition to the challenges of an uncompromising public debate, some of us face a personal crisis: The compassionate principles of long-term relationships are being tested.

    With entrenched devotion to vaccines, loved ones and friends who were once willing to discuss most other topics, refuse to engage. At a minimum, they express disappointment in our lack of understanding and compliance. When forthright they confess their judgment — our unwillingness to conform causes continuing affliction.

    Many people have been persuaded that anyone who has doubts about the infallible words and irrefutable facts presented by somber leaders and an impartial press corps are infecting others with dangerous information.

    Failures of the pandemic response are increasingly laid at the feet of the unvaccinated.

    However, the furious indignation is often irrational, inordinate and out of character, suggesting it is driven by a set of external stimuli designed to create the response.

    A looming crisis, initially presented with expectations of horrific consequences including widespread severe disease and millions dead, can be viewed as the beginning of a prescribed government response to the pandemic.

    The intentional amplification of the threat, unjustifiable by any scientific defense, was never diminished, even as ominous predictions of suffering and mortality proved to be greatly exaggerated.

    From the moment vaccines were released, anyone who doubted their importance and efficacy has been depicted as a hostile deviant entranced by fantasies or blindly following aberrant leaders.

    And although so-called anti-vaxxers are belittled for their ignorance, there is no indication those rejecting enforced protocols are doing anything but defending their inalienable rights — life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    The extreme aggressive tactics of the government and media to promote vaccines — including a campaign to humiliate those who refuse to comply — have the earmarks of psychological warfare, with manipulation of citizens on a grander scale than any effort in recent history.

    The continuing prevailing mindset of many people appears to be the reaction to a calculated induction of a mass hypnotic trance.

    Of all aspects of pandemic response, this is one of the most troubling, and should cause us to consider its probability, provenance and rectification.

    The government’s use of a psychological operation — aka PSYOP — to promote immunization follows standards and practices for engendering a cult mentality to reach its objectives.

    The central technique for initiating and maintaining an obedient population is developing an “us versus them” mindset. The demonization of outsiders is essential.

    Demands and sacrifices are made of the members, solidifying their involvement and ensuring they see themselves as superior to those who don’t participate.

    These mesmeric psychological operations can be identified in groups small and large, including mass populations.

    The most dramatic example of a PSYOP engendering a cult is the rise of fascism in Nazi Germany. An elite propaganda machine entranced a nation into believing they were a superior race, arousing a blind loyalty to their cause, with a loss of moral parameters unmatched in modern history.

    Hitler’s most loyal troops, the SS, closely associated with forced labor and death camps, and deemed a criminal organization by the Nuremberg tribunals, wore belt buckles and kept daggers engraved with the words, “my honor is loyalty.”

    More recently, less-militarized cults have made some dramatic impact in the United States.

    The religious organization, the People’s Temple, in its early days gained the support of politicians and manipulated the media to project a positive spin on its activities.

    The People’s Temple devolved into darkness, eventually leading to a quintessential cult event in Jonestown, Guyana. On the cusp of being arrested for the murder of a visiting congressman, their leader, Jim Jones, demanded the highest level of loyalty: Hundreds of members committed mass suicide, including their children, by drinking a cyanide-valium cocktail.

    Mass hypnosis allows transference of an individual’s attention and priorities to a singular objective or ideology, and loyalty to the cause is elevated, overshadowing self-preservation.

    Another example of an influential cult based in the United States is the Unification Church. Their members, the Moonies, were staunchly loyal to Sun Myung Moon, who was famous for presiding over spectacular mass weddings of arranged marriages.

    The Unification Church also funneled money to powerful politicians through grants and speaking fees. Moon founded the Washington Times, which openly supported his political agenda.

    As a lead investigator in a BBC biography of the Korean Cult leader, I met and interviewed former devotees and abettors who described the process of indoctrination into a trance of blind obedience.


    1. Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland was blasted this week during a hearing over the FBI’s involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

      Gohmert asked Garland point blank, “Regarding the two men who broke the glass in the two doors there at the Speaker’s lobby when the two Capital Police who had been standing there moved to the side to allow them access, were any of those people who broke in and did damage to those doors working for the FBI or other federal law enforcement entities?”

      You won’t believe Garland’s response.

      Or lack of response.

      “This is an ongoing criminal investigation and I’m really not at liberty to discuss. There have been some filings in a nature of discovery which has been provided to the defendants, but other than that I can’t discuss this now.”

      Gohmert points out some of those involved were working for the FBI. The reveal makes the “facts” regarding Jan. 6 much more suspicious. The American people want to know, and they certainly can’t trust the Biden administration for answers.

      This is a serious change in how the events of Jan. 6 played out. If people working for the FBI were involved in people entering the Capitol, the questions is why? Was this part of their job, and what mission did they have?


    1. Investigative journalist Harry Vox filmed 2014
      It happened during the Ebola scare of 2014. It’s something that has been tried year after year after year and has not been successful until now. What’s changed? They finally have ALL our media working in LOCKSTEP.
      And yes—yes—I give you links because I am crippled and work with 2 FINGERS!!! So do me and you a favor and look at the stories I’ve already written and other links…

      This interview with an investigative journalist (a real one) named Harry Vox took place during the EbolaMania scare of 2014. Vox had gotten hold of a 2010 document authored mainly by “futurologist” Peter Schwartz and published by the Rockefeller Foundation. That document airily predicts in its “Lockstep” scenario the events during the Coronavirus health scare. Link:


      Watch video: He is describing in 2014 what is happening right now with the Covid Plandemic.



      1. A passage from Carl Sagan’s 1996 book, “The Demon Haunted World.”
        The book, known for the examination of scientific thinking, had this prediction which seems to be eerily accurate on page 40:

        “I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or my grandchildren’s time — when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the key manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30-second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance.”



      2. The Shots do not Work as Claimed, but The Shots do Work as Intended.

        This was always an exercise [experiment] in genetic modification.

        They lied to people. What’s new???
        There never was a deadly virus. They tried this year after year after year. Case in point? This article below laying out how they tried this in 2009:

        If at First, You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try, Try Again

        By Joyce Bowen
        Well I’ll be damned. This has been tried before. Our population has exploded since. Circumstances were the same. More people died from the shots than they did from the swine flu—then came the bird flu. I remember the microchip idea coming from Obama’s lips long ago. Remember? They are trying to pass it now. Our freedoms and families and properties were threatened. They are being threatened again.

        Here in the USA, laws were being passed to strip us of those things we hold dear. Government overreached into our lives then—again.

        I have no recollection of these laws. But then I was so busy with family, who had time?

        This is not about a virus. This is about control.



    1. Japan drops vaccine rollout, goes to Ivermectin, ends COVID almost overnight | 27 Oct 2021 | Japan has PULLED the vaccines and substituted Ivermectin – and in one month, wiped COVID out in that country.

      Safe? Japan pulls Moderna vaccine, ends nationwide vaccine drive after “magnetic” “metals” found to contaminate jabs.

      Three lots of Moderna jabs recalled in Japan over stainless steel contamination.

      Several Japanese cities report white stuff floating in jab vials.

      Japan minister of health tells docs to recommend IVM.

      Japan now a major success story after it beats COVID rapidly.

      By September deaths from the COVID-19 Vaccine jabs were being investigated.

      At roughly that time, the vials were under scrutiny and metal “magnetic” material was found in them.

      Very shortly thereafter, the Japanese minister of health announced doctors could prescribe Ivermectin.

      A month later, the Western press is shocked that COVID has all but disappeared from the island.




      1. Koch’s postulates
        Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease. The postulates were formulated by Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler in 1884, based on earlier concepts described by Jakob Henle, and refined and published by Koch in 1890.

        Dr Judy, who worked at Fort Detrick and who worked for years with Anthony Fauci at NIH replies, “No, COVID-19, the disease is not caused by SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus.

        “SARS-CoV-2 is not a real human virus, it’s a monkey virus grown in the vero monkey cell line, always has been, just as SARS was created in that cell line and the variants are in that cell line.

        “So the disease, COVID never satisfied any of Koch’s Postulates or the Hill’s Criteria for a causative agent of a disease, because in order for the virus, SARS-CoV-2 to have caused COVID, everybody with evidence of infection has to have disease.

        “And what we know is, essentially, nobody with evidence of infection by that fraudulent PCR test – that is not testing for SARS-C0V-2 – and PCR does not test for an infectious virus.

        “Nobody’s sick. This has a 99.7% survival rate, so there’s no such thing as an ‘asymptomatic carrier’ of a disease-causing virus. A virus either makes you sick or it doesn’t.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: