The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

Her Fauci

This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CCBY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.
Background:
Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of
Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.
The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1
In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.
“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2 On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought
to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003
SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their
application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their
patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with
their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included
considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment
(both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United
States could be conducted without permission or infringement.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research
grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on
Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for
determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the
form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with
CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus
patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of
interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.
These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were
instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019

This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.
This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request

Contents
35 U.S.C. § 101 ……………………5
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror ……………….. 7
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of America Citizens….. 10
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress ……………………………………………………………… 12
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity ………….. 16
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation ………………………. 20
15 U.S.C. § 19 – Interlocking Directorates …………………………………. 21
35 U.S.C. §200 – 206 – Disclosure of Government Interest ……………….. 23
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial ………………………………………… 25
The Commercial Actors ……………………………… 27

35 U.S.C. § 101
From Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion for the majority Section 101 of the Patent Act provides: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful … composition of matter,
or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.” 35 U.S.C. § 101.
We have “long held that this provision contains an important implicit exception[:] Laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable.” Mayo, 566 U.S., at _, 132 S.Ct., at 1293 (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Rather, “they are the basic tools of scientific and technological work'" that lie beyond the domain of patent protection. Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293. As the Court has explained, without this exception, there would be considerable danger that the grant of patents would "tie up" the use of such tools and thereby "inhibit future innovation premised upon them." Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1301. This would be at odds with the very point of patents, which exist to promote creation. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 309, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) (Products of nature are not created, and "manifestations… of nature [are] free to all men and reserved exclusively to none'”).3
In their majority opinion in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that the Court had “long held” that nature was not patentable. Merely isolating DNA does not constitute patentable subject matter. In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, “A newly isolated
human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV.”4
No “causal” data was provided for this statement.
When they filed their patent application on April 25, 2003 their first claim (and the only one that survived to ultimate issuance over the objection of the patent examiner in 2006 and 2007) was the genome for SARS CoV.
While this patent is clearly illegal under 35 U.S.C. §101, not only did the CDC insist on its granting over non-final and final rejections, but they also continued to pay maintenance fees on the patent after the 2013 Supreme Court decision confirmed that it was illegal.
In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS CoV using a number of methods including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.
It is important to note that the CDC’s patent applications were also rejected in non-final and final rejections for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. In the first non-final rejection, the USPTO stated that the CDC’s genome was published in four Genbank accession entries on April 14, 18, and 21, 2003 with identity ranging from 96.8% to 99.9% identical sequences.

Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak. After seeking an illegal patent, petitioning to override the decision of an examiner to reject it, and ultimately prevailing with the patent’s grant, the CDC lied to the public by stating they were controlling the patent so that it would be publicly available”.
Tragically, this public statement is falsified by the simple fact that their own publication in Genbank had, in fact, made it public domain and thereby unpatentable. This fact, confirmed by patent examiners, was overridden by CDC in a paid solicitation to override the law.
While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public. In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:
“This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”
The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot in this case. Further, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his bogus “invention”

18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
Indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or with the knowledge that such funds are to be used, in full or in part, in order to carry out—
(A) an act which constitutes an offense within the scope of a treaty specified in subsection (e)(7), as implemented by the United States, or (B) any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act….
By no later than April 11, 2005, Dr. Anthony Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein. Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment – Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang – Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004.
This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.
The CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcoHealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. This research was known to involve surface proteins in coronavirus that had the capacity to directly infect human respiratory systems. In flagrant violation of the NIH moratorium on gain of function research, NIAID and Ralph Baric persisted in working with chimeric coronavirus components specifically to amplify the pathogenicity of the biologic material.
By October 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in NIAID’s funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal in isolating and manipulating viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response.

By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.

Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:

“Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.” Economics will follow the hype.”
The CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. 2015-2016. These projects took place during a time when the work being performed was prohibited by the United States National Institutes of Health.
The public was clearly advised of the dangers being presented by NIAID-funded research by 2015 and 2016 when the Wuhan Institute of Virology material was being manipulated at UNC in Ralph Baric’s lab.
“The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk,” agrees Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Both Ebright and Wain-Hobson are long-standing critics of gain-of-function research.
In their paper, the study authors also concede that funders may think twice about allowing such experiments in the future. “Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue,” they write, adding that discussion is needed as to “whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved”.
But Baric and others say the research did have benefits. The study findings “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger”, says Peter Daszak, who co-authored the 2013 paper. Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance, an international network of scientists, headquartered in New York City, that samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe.
Studies testing hybrid viruses in human cell culture and animal models are limited in what they can say about the threat posed by a wild virus, Daszak agrees. But he argues that they can help indicate which pathogens should be prioritized for further research attention.”
Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC, NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate non-pharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.
Progress indicator(s) by September 2020
• Donors and countries commit and identify timelines for: financing and development of a universal influenza vaccine, broad spectrum antivirals, and targeted therapeutics. WHO and its Member States develop options for standard procedures and timelines for sharing of sequence data, specimens, and medical countermeasures for pathogens other than influenza.
• Donors, countries and multilateral institutions develop a multi-year plan and approach for strengthening R&D research capacity, in advance of and during an epidemic.
• WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, academic and other partners identify strategies for increasing capacity and integration of social science approaches and researchers across the entire preparedness/response continuum.”
As if to confirm the utility of the September 2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Dr. Fauci began gloating that his fortunes for additional funding were likely changing for the better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as follows:
“The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.”

18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of
American Citizens Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; Dr. Anthony Fauci has intimidated and coerced a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government by intimidation and coercion.
With no corroboration, Dr. Anthony Fauci promoted16 Professor Neil Ferguson’s computer simulation derived claims that, “The world is facing the most serious public health crisis in generations. Here we provide concrete estimates of the scale of the threat countries now face. “We use the latest estimates of severity to show that policy strategies which aim to mitigate the epidemic might halve deaths and reduce peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, but that this will not be enough to prevent health systems being overwhelmed. More intensive, and socially disruptive interventions will therefore be required to suppress transmission to low levels. It is likely such measures – most notably, large scale social distancing – will need to be in place for many months, perhaps until a vaccine becomes available.” 17 Reporting to the President that as many as 2.2 million deaths may result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated and could not be measured with any accuracy, Dr. Fauci intimidated and coerced the population and the government into reckless, untested, and harmful acts creating irreparable harm to lives and livelihoods. Neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (principally funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)19 had any evidence of success in estimating previous burdens from coronavirus but, without consultation or peer-review, Dr. Fauci adopted their terrifying estimates as the basis for interventions that are explicitly
against medical advice.

 The imposition of social distancing was based on computer simulation and environmental models with NO disease transmission evidence whatsoever.

 The imposition of face mask wearing was directly against controlled clinical trial evidence and against the written policy in the Journal of the American Medical Association. “Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”
 In both the Imperial College and the IHME simulations, quarantines were modeled for the sick, not the healthy.

Insisting on vaccines while blockading the emergency use of proven pharmaceutical interventions may have contributed to the death of many patients and otherwise healthy individuals.21 Using the power of NIAID during the alleged pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical countermeasures used by, and validated in scientific proceedings, that offered alternatives to the products funded by his conspiring entities for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefit.

18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
On October 22, 2020, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a report entitled: BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: NIH Should Publicly Report More Information about the Licensing of Its Intellectual Property.
In this document, the authors reported that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received, “up to $2 billion in royalties from its contributions to 34 drugs sold from 1991-2019.”22
A casual review of the NIH Office of Technology Transfer report of active licenses23 appears to conflict with the GAO report on several important facts. Conspicuously absent from the GAO report are over 30 patents associated with active compounds generating billions of dollars in revenue. Why would it be that the GAO and the NIH couldn’t agree on something as simple as drugs generating income for NIH?
Since the passage of the Bayh Dole Act (Pub. L. 96-517, December 12, 1980), federally funded research has been an economic bonanza for U.S. universities, federal agencies, and their selected patronage. For the first decade following Bayh Dole, NIH funding doubled from $3.4 billion to $7.1 billion. A decade later, it doubled again to $15.6 billion. In the wake of September 2001, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) saw its direct budget increase over 300% without accounting for DARPA funds of as much as $1.7 billion annually from 2005 forward. In 2020, NIH’s budget was over $41 billion.
What has become of the $763 billion of taxpayer funds allocated to making America healthier since inventors have been commercially incentivized? Who has been enriched?
The answer, regrettably, is that no accountability exists to answer these questions.
The NIH is the named owner of at least 138 patents since 1980.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services is the named owner of at least 2,600 patents. NIAID grants or collaboration have resulted in 2,655 patents and patent applications of which only 95 include an assignment to the Department of Health and Human Services as an owner. Most of these patents are assigned to universities thereby making the ultimate commercial beneficiaries entirely opaque. One of the largest holders is SIGA Technologies (NASDAQ: SIGA) who, while publicly reporting close affiliation with NIAID, is not referenced in the NIH GAO report. SIGA’s CEO, Dr. Phillip L. Gomez spent 9 years at NIAID developing its vaccine program for HIV, SARS, Ebola, West Nile Virus, and Influenza before exiting to commercial ventures. While their technology is clearly derived from NIAID science, the company reports revenue from NIAID but no royalty or commercial payments to NIH or any of its programs.

NIAID’s Director, Dr. Anthony Fauci is listed as an inventor on 8 granted U.S. patents. None of them are reported in
NIAID, NIH, or GAO reports of active licensing despite the fact that Dr. Fauci reportedly was compelled to get paid for his
interleukin-2 “invention” – payments he reportedly donated to an unnamed charity.

Of the 21 patents listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Orange book itemized in the GAO report, none of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s patents are listed. Furthermore, none of the NIAID patents are listed despite clear evidence that Gilead Sciences and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (a division of Johnson & Johnson) have generated over $2 billion annually from sales that were the direct result of NIAID funded science. Missing from the GAO report are 2 patents for Velclade® which has been generating sales in excess of $2.18 billion annually for several years. None of the patents for Yescarta® are listed in the GAO report. None of the Lumoxiti® patents are listed in the GAO report. None of the Kepivance® patents are listed in the GAO report. In violation of 37 USC §410.10 and 35 USC §202(a), over 13 of the 21 patents in the GAO report fail to disclose government interest despite being the direct result of NIH funding.
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Own Patent Track Record:
US Patent 6,190,656 and 6,548,055 Immunologic enhancement with intermittent interleukin therapy
A method for activating a mammalian immune system entails a series of IL-2 administrations that are effected intermittently over an extended period. Each administration of IL-2 is sufficient to allow spontaneous DNA synthesis in peripheral blood or lymph node cells of the patient to increase and peak, and each subsequent administration follows the preceding administration in the series by a period of time that is sufficient to allow IL-2 receptor expression in peripheral or lymph node blood of the patient to increase, peak and then decrease to 50% of peak value. This intermittent therapy can be combined with another therapy which targets a specific disease state, such as an anti-retroviral therapy comprising, for example, the administration of AZT, ddI or interferon alpha. In addition, IL-2
administration can be employed to facilitate in situ transduction of T cells in the context of gene therapy. By this approach the cells are first activated in vivo via the aforementioned IL-2 therapy, and transduction then is effected by delivering a genetically engineered retroviral vector directly to the patient.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/487,075, filed Jun. 7, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/063,315, filed May 19, 1993, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,419,900, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/452,440, filed May 26, 1995, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,696,079, which is the National Stage filed under 35 USC 371 of PCT/US94/05397, filed May 19, 1994, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Filed May 19, 1993
Issued a Final Rejection January 20, 1998. Rejected after abandonment August 14, 1998 and April 12, 1999. Reduced and modified claims granted May 8, 2000.
This family of patents was the basis of Fauci’s lie to the British Medical Journal in which he falsely stated:
“Dr Anthony Fauci told the BMJ that as a government employee he was required by law to put his name on the patent for the development of interleukin and was also required by law to receive part of the payment the government received for use of the patent. He said that he felt it was inappropiate (sic) to receive payment and donated the entire amount to charity.”

He was not “required by law” to commit fraud on the patent office and then get paid for it!

US Patent 6,911,527 HIV related peptides
This invention is the discovery of novel specific epitopes and antibodies associated with long term survival of HIV-1
infections. These epitopes and antibodies have use in preparing vaccines for preventing HIV-1 infection or for controlling progression to AIDS.
Filed May 6, 1999
Rejected as unpatentable January 22, 2003. Issued with a final rejection on July 15, 2004 after submitting reconsideration requests. Modified and restricted claims allowed September 29, 2004.
US Patent 7,368,114 Fusion protein including of CD4 Novel recombinant polypeptides are disclosed herein that include a CD4 polypeptide ligated at its C-terminus with a portion of an immunoglobulin comprising a hinge region and a constant domain of a mammalian immunoglobulin heavy chain. The portion or the IgG is fused at its C-terminus with a polypeptide comprising a tailpiece from the C-terminus of the heavy chain of an IgA antibody ara tailpiece from a C-terminus of the heavy chain of an IgM antibody. Also disclosed herein are methods for using these CD4 fusion proteins.
Filed October 24, 2002
Rejected as unpatentable August 18, 2006. Paid appeal to overturn examiner’s findings February 15, 2007. Rejected again May 11, 2007. On October 10, 2007 applicants further narrowed the construction of what was clearly not a patent and the USPTO granted less than half the claims that had been sought in the original filing.
US Patent 9,896,509, 9,193,790 and 9,441,041 Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV GP120 and. alpha.4. beta.7 integrin
Methods are provided for the treatment of a HIV infection. The methods can include administering to a subject with an HIV infection a therapeutically effective amount of an agent that interferes with the interaction of gp120 and .alpha.4 integrin, such as a .alpha.4.beta.1 or .alpha.4.beta.7 integrin antagonist, thereby treating the HIV infection. In several examples, the .alpha.4 integrin antagonist is a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to a .alpha.4, .beta.1 or beta.7 integrin subunit or a cyclic hexapeptide with the amino acid sequence of CWLDVC. Methods are also provided to reduce HIV replication or infection. The methods include contacting a cell with an effective amount of an agent that interferes with the interaction of gp120 and .alpha.4 integrin, such as a .alpha.4.beta.1 or .alpha.4.beta.7 integrin antagonist. Moreover, methods are provided for determining if an agent is useful to treat HIV.
Rejected May 22, 2017 as Double Patenting. In their response, the applicants acknowledge the illegal act and seek only those components of their application that extend beyond the life of the issued patents. On October 11, 2017, the limited claims were issued.
A sample of the convoluted flow of funds that evades public disclosure.
U.S. Patent 8,999,351 was issued to Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Burnaby, British Columbia. In their patent, they disclose that their research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (Grant HHSN266200600012C). Ironically, this $23 million grant was awarded in 2006 to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., not to Tekmira.

In 2012, Alnylam agreed to pay Tekmira $65 million to settle legal disputes including a $1 billion damages claim for “relentless and egregious” misappropriation of Tekmira’s trade secrets. From the patent filing’s earliest priority of November 10, 2008, there is no public record stating Tekmira as the beneficiary of this NIAID grant. Notwithstanding, the lipid nanoparticle technology developed from this grant is the technology now used in the Moderna COVID-19 intervention. In their 10-Q filing, Alnylam reports to have a license to technology from Arbutus – formerly Tekmira – which has accused Acuitas of misappropriating trade secrets and licensing them to Moderna and Pfizer’s collaboration with BioNTech.
Additional references can be found at:
https://www.ott.nih.gov/nih-and-its-role-technology-transfer
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2017/206288Orig1s000TAltr.pdf
https://www.gao.gov/assets/720/710287.pdf
https://grantome.com/search?q=%22National%20Institute%20of%20Allergy%20and%20Infectious%20Diseases%22

15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.27 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.
“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”
On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003
SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.

1986-1990 NIAID Grant AI 23946 leading to patent U.S. 7,279,327 “Methods for Producing Recombinant Coronavirus” Filed 2002 and issued 2007 https://patents.google.com/patent/US7279327B2/ru
The paper first published from the NIAID grant is
https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC7109931&blobtype=pdf
1990 Pfizer files U.S. Patent 6,372,224 on a vaccine for the S-protein on coronavirus November 14, 2000 which was abandoned April 2010 making it public domain.
1990s Work focused on CoV association with cardiomyopathy (see above)
Early reference to the “emergence” of CoV as a respiratory pathogen in
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-1899-0_91.pdf
2000 Ralph Baric AI23946 and GM63228 from the National Institutes of Health actively working recombinant CoV
2001 National Institute of Health, Allergy and Infectious diseases. “Reverse Genetics with a Coronavirus Infectious cDNA Construct.” 4/1/2001-3/31/005 $1.0 million total costs/yr. RS Baric, PI
2002 Asia CoV SARS outbreak
2003 April 25, 2003 CDC Patent filed and ultimately becomes US7,220,852 (the patent on the RNA
sequence) and 7,776,521 (the patent on the testing methodology. These patents give the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services the ability to control the commercial exploitation of SARS coronavirus.
Dr. Anthony Fauci appointed to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Grand Challenges Scientific Advisory Board (served through 2010).
April 28, 2003 Sequoia Pharmaceuticals $953K for pathogen response and patent US7,151,163 https://www.sbir.gov/node/305319
July 21, 2003 Ralph Baric’s team (using AI23946 and GM63228) file U.S. Patent 7,618,802 which issued on November 17, 2009. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7618802B2
Dana Farber Cancer Institute files U.S. Patent 7,750,123 on a monoclonal antibody to neutralize SARS CoV. This research is supported by several NIH grants including National Institutes of Health Grants A128785, A148436, and A1053822.
2004 January 6, 2004 – SARS and Bioterrorism linked at Bioterrorism and Emerging Infectious Diseases: antimicrobials, therapeutics and immune modulators.
https://tks.keystonesymposia.org/index.cfm?e=web.meeting.program&meetingid=706
At this conference, the term “The New Normal” was introduced by Merck
FAUCI AND BARIC start making money!!! National Institutes of Health, Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
SARS Reverse Genetics. AI059136-01. $1.7 million total costs, RS Baric, PI. 10% effort. 4/1/04- 3/31/09.
The project develops a SARS-CoV full length infectious cDNA, the development of SARS-CoV replicon particles expressing heterologous genes, and seeks to adapt SARS-CoV to mice, producing a pathogenic mouse model for SARS-CoV infection.

National Institutes of Health, Allergy and Infectious Diseases. R01. Remodeling the SARS Coronavirus Genome Regulatory Network. RS Baric, PI 10% effort. 7/1/04-6/30/09. $2.1 million
November 22, 2004 University of Hong Kong patents SARS associated spike protein on CoV and pursues patent US 7,491,489 005 DARPA gets in on the game Synthetic Coronaviruses. Biohacking: Biological Warfare Enabling Technologies, June 2005. Washington, DC. DARPA/MITRE sponsored event. Invited Speaker Review timeline from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO_EeYB0i0U and
https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20APRBotWslides.pdf
2008 Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 commences with $10,189,682 to UNC Chapel Hill
https://taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/AwardDetail arg_awardNum=U54AI057157&arg_ProgOfficeCode=104
2009 Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 continues with $5,448,656 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID)
2010 Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 continues with $8,747,142 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID)
Patent issuance for SARS coronavirus patents peak post the Asia outbreak at 391 issued patents.
August 6, 2010, Moderna (prior to its establishment) files U.S. Patent 9,447,164 which attracted the investment of (and “inventorship” for) venture capitalists at Flagship Ventures. This patent grew out of the work of Dr. Jason P. Schrum of Harvard Medical School supported by National Science Foundation Grant #0434507. While the application claims priority to August 2010, the application didn’t get finalized until October, 2015. On November 4, 2015, the USPTO issued a non-final rejection on this original patent rejecting all claims.
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0434507 with reference to the grant funding in https://molbio.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/publications/Szostak_pdfs/Schrum_et_al_JACS_2009.pdf
2011 Crucell joined the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson in February taking with it all of its SARS technology.
Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 continues with $7,344,820 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID)
2012 MERS isolated in Egypt
Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 continues with $7,627,657 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID)
2013 Biodefense Grant U54 AI057157 continues with $7,226,237 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant
from NIAID)
2014 April 23, 2014, Moderna files patent on nucleic acid vaccine with Patents US9872900 and US100224352015 Moderna signs a vaccine development agreement with NIAID and executes it with the lead on the mRNA-1273 lead developer and inventor Guiseppe Ciaramella.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements.html
2016 NIH through Scripps Institute and Dartmouth College file patent application WO 2018081318A1 “Prefusion Coronavirus Spike Proteins and their Use” disclosing mRNA technology that overlaps (and is used in tandem with) Moderna’s technology.
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018081318A1/en Lead Inventor Barney Scott Graham was well known to Moderna as he’s the person at NIH that Moderna “e-mailed” to get the sequence for SARS CoV-2 according to Moderna’s report here (“In January 2020, once it was discovered that the infection in Wuhan was caused by a novel coronavirus, Bancel quickly emailed Dr. Barney Graham, deputy director of the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institutes of Health, asking him to send the genetic sequence for the virus.”) https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/05/26/vacc-m26.html
In addition, co-inventor Jason McLellan worked with Graham on a vaccine patent jointly owned with the Chinese government filed in Australia in 2013
https://patents.google.com/patent/AU2014231357A1/en?inventor=Jason+MCLELLAN.
2017 August – Sanofi buys Protein Science Corp with considerable SARS patent holdings
2018 June – Sanofi buys Ablynx with considerable SARS patent holdings
2019 March, https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/sherlock-biosciences-licenses-wyss-technology-to-create affordable-molecular-diagnostics/ funded by Open Philanthropy – the same organization that would be the financial sponsor of the Event 201 “table-top” exercise that laid out the entire “pandemic” plan in October 2019.

15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
Every combination, conspiracy, trust, agreement, or contract is declared to be contrary to public policy, illegal, and void when the same is made by or between two or more persons or corporations, either of whom, as agent or principal, is engaged in importing any article from any foreign country into the United States, and when such combination, conspiracy, trust, agreement, or contract is intended to operate in restraint of lawful trade, or free competition in lawful trade or commerce, or to increase the market price in any part of the United States of any article or articles imported or intended to be imported into the United States, or of any manufacture into which such imported article enters or is intended to enter. Every person who shall be engaged in the importation of goods or any commodity from any foreign country in violation of this section, or who shall combine or conspire with another to violate the same, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof in any court of the
United States such person shall be fined in a sum not less than $100 and not exceeding $5,000, and shall be further punished by imprisonment, in the discretion of the court, for a term not less than three months nor exceeding twelve months.
Through non-competitive grant awards to UNC Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric, to selection of the Bio-Safety Level 4 laboratory locations, to the setting of prices for Remdesivir and mRNA therapies from Moderna and Pfizer, NIAID, CDC, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have been involved in allocating Federal funds to conspiring parties without independent review.
Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of securing additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID’s Dr Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone. Forcing the public to rely on The COVID Tracking Project – funded by the Bloomberg, Zuckerberg and Gates Foundation and presented by a media outlet (The Atlantic) – not a public health agency – Dr. Fauci used fraudulent testing technology (RT-PCR) to conflate “COVID cases” with positive PCR tests in the living while insisting that COVID deaths be counted by symptoms alone. This perpetuated a market demand for his desired vaccine agenda which was recited by him and his conspiring parties around the world until the present. Not surprisingly, this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci’s and others’ criteria for depriving citizens of their 1st Amendment rights.

TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI PARASITE 1
TRYSPANOSOMA PARASITE 2

TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI (PARASITE IN PFIZER VAX) – DR MADEJ FOUND IT IN MODERNA TOO

UNDECLARED COMPONENTS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINES

https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/

\\][//

60 thoughts on “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

    1. The Scale and Size of the Worldwide Covid-19 Vaxx Operation

      I have not been able to review the relevant documents in detail with a view to establishing the number of victims resulting from the Nazi medical experiments.

      While the Nuremberg principles are of utmost relevance to the Covid-19 vaccine project, simplistic comparisons should be avoided. The context, the history and the mechanisms of compliance pertaining to the mRNA “vaccine” are fundamentally different.

      The scale and size of the Worldwide Vaxx operation as well as its complex organizational structure (WHO, GAVI, Gates Foundation, Big Pharma) is unprecedented.

      Humanity in its entirety is the objective of the Vaxx project. The target population for vaccine experimentation of the Covid-19 vaccine is 7.9 billion people, involving several doses. Multiply the World’s population by 4 doses (as proposed by Pfizer): the order of magnitude is 30 billion doses Worldwide. The numbers are in the billions. The likely impacts on mortality and morbidity are beyond description.

      Big Money is behind this public-private partnership project.

      We are dealing with a Worldwide process of crimes against humanity. Entire populations in a large number of member states of the UN are subject to compliance and enforcement (without the Rule of Law).

      If they refuse the vaccine, they are socially marginalized and confined, rejected by their employers, rejected by society: no education, no career, no life. Their lives are destroyed.

      If they accept the vaccine, their health and their life are potentially in jeopardy. The evidence of mortality and morbidity resulting from vaccine inoculation both present (official data) and future (e.g. undetected microscopic blood clots) is overwhelming.

      And that’s just the beginning.

      Extensive crimes against humanity Worldwide are being routinely committed. It’s Genocide.

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-19-vaccine-and-the-nuremberg-code-crimes-against-humanity/5755776
      \\][//

      Like

      1. In February of 2020, a state-run Chinese institute seeks a patent on the use of remdesivir to treat coronavirus, based on the results of a single patient.

        In April of 2020, Anthony Fauci cited a study, which he said proved remdesivir could block coronavirus.

        He claimed the study showed that remdesivir was “safe and efficacious” in the use against the Ebola virus in 2018 and 2019.

        But this was a lie.

        If one were to actually look at the study, which was testing four different drugs against Ebola virus, they will find that the Safety Board pulled remdesivir out of the trial 6 months early, because over 50% of the patients who received it died.

        Fauci quoted a second study in his mandating of the use of remdesivir, a study conducted by the makers of remdesivir, wherein 50 patients with COVID were administered the drug for 10 days.

        27% of them suffered from multiple organ dysfunction, septic shock ad acute kidney injury.

        8% of them had to be taken off the drug after only 5 days, because it was killing them.

        After the CCP and Fauci recommended the use of remdesivir, the US secured the world’s supply and began treating Americans with it.

        COVID patients immediately began suffering kidney failure, which was then blamed on COVID, even though studies by the manufacturer show that Remdesivir causes it in 23% after only a few days.

        When the kidneys fail, the lungs fill with liquid, which is how thousands have died in the hospitals, being put on ventilators.

        And it’s all being blamed on COVID.

        But if we read the fine print, we see that this is t be expected with remdesivir.

        And this has happened before.

        YouTuber, Jamie Dlux compared two patients from the past, Freddie Mercury and Magic Johnson, both diagnosed with HIV around the same time, both advised by none other than Anthony Fauci to take the drug, AZT.

        As Freddie Mercury took deadly doses of the drug, his health quickly deteriorated until he died.

        Magic Johnson started taking it but it made him feel worse and so he stopped.

        The media storm surrounding Johnson’s condition immediately disappeared after he stopped taking AZT and never mentioned it.

        And Magic Johnson is alive and healthy today.

        This is how they kill us.

        They sow fear with pop culture lies and kill us with deadly drugs in the hospital.

        Just like the so-called vaccines, which the FDA were aware of how deadly they were back in October of last year, where they published all the side effects we are seeing today in the vaccinated, while failing to include them in the vaccine inserts.

        For copies of these documents and for healthy treatment, you can go to Dr Ardis’ website.

        https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/how-big-pharma-uses-fauci-and-the-media-to-murder-americans/
        \\][//

        Like

      2. JRad, asks for a medical explanation of how the virus attaches itself and how does it suppress your mRNA’s from working.
        in the term” mRNA” “m’ means message or messenger.
        https://greenwald.substack.com/p/an-nba-star-and-new-yorks-governor/comments#comment-3088183

        RNA stands for Ribonucleic acid is a polymeric molecule essential in various biological roles in coding, decoding, regulation and expression of genes. RNA and deoxyribonucleic acid are nucleic acids.

        In theory the mRNA solutions the messenger molecule informs the immune system cells how to produce a particular spike protein to fight off a particular virus.

        That is the scientific theory as far as it goes. However there seems to be complications involves with the production of these spike proteins, and they seem to produce a immune response that goes beyond attacking the virus cells and begin attacking the immune system itself, creating a T-cell deficiency that causes an immunodeficiency of cell-mediated immunity. This is very similar to AIDS.

        Now we have further problems with the actual products being produced by Moderna, Pfizer and others. Many investigations have shown the presence of nano size Graphene Oxide, a toxic metallic solution that is within a solgel solution.

        https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-carrie-madej-first-us-lab-examines-vaccine-vials-horrific-findings-revealed/

        Like

      3. Dr. Judy Mikovits, graduated with a PhD in biochemistry from George Washington University, spent 22 years working for the National Cancer Institute.
        She fell out of favor with the mainstream scientific community when she began speaking out against the propaganda campaign being waged by the mainstream medical community and media. She like many have been called ‘conspiracy theorist’ for opinions that are considered heresy by the mainstream corporatist interests.

        Her 22 year career at the National Cancer Institute was demolished because of her outspoken criticism of the history on the Srs2 Cov19 “virus”.
        She claimed that such a virus could not arise in the natural environment, and had to have been man made. Although her claims have now been verified on this issue, she is still held in contempt by the mainstream, and Dr. Fauci who has now been proven a pathological liar is still held up as a hero by the mainstream.

        Now that same mainstream medical/media complex is denying the proven existence of the toxic Graphene Oxide being found in both the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA solutions, that are falsely called “vaccines”.

        The people of the world finds themselves surrounded by false official narratives on a myriad of topics, one of the most critical of which is this so-called “pandemic’.

        These mRNA solutions are so new that it simply cannot be rationally expected for anyone to know the long term effects of these injections. But current adverse reactions can be seen as a harbinger of a horrific future.
        Those who are willing to roll the dice and take a chance with these injections are taking an amazing risk, a life or death risk in many cases.

        Personally I will never willingly submit to being injected with these substances.
        I would advise others to think long and hard, and to find out as much as you can about these injections before choosing which way to go.
        \\][//

        Like

      4. PRESS CONFERENCE ON MONDAY, 9/20/2021
        4PM IN THE LIVE STREAM

        CAUSE OF DEATH AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

        UNDECLARED COMPONENTS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINES

        On Monday, 9/20/202 in the pathological institute in Reutlingen, the results of the autopsies of eight people who died after COVID19 vaccination will be presented. The fine tissue analyses were performed by pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang. The findings confirm Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher’s finding that among more than 40 corpses he autopsied who had died within two weeks of COVID19 vaccination, approximately one-third of those deaths were caused by the vaccination. Microscopic details of the tissue changes will be shown during the live-streamed press conference. Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz will report on the current parameters of the statistical recording of vaccination events.

        The press conference will also present the results of the analysis of COVID-19 vaccine samples by an Austrian research group, which are in line with the findings of scientists from Japan and the USA. Undeclared metal-containing components were found in the vaccine. Visually, vaccine elements are conspicuous by their unusual shape.

        The results of the investigation have led to legal and political demands, for example, for the immediate collection of information by the authorities in order to be able to assess the health risk posed to the population by the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, early signals of impaired fertility in vaccinated individuals can be examined by consulting IVF registries. Through the cancer registry, insights can be gained into the development of cancer due to the genetic modifications of the viral RNA. Suspension of COVID-19 vaccination should be considered.

        *Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt

        *Prof. Dr. Walter Lang

        *Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz

        https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/

        Like

      5. Unvaxed At Risk From Vaxed In Coming Dark Winter – Karen Kingston

        Karen Kingston is a medical analyst that researches a wide variety of things in the medical world. She’s an expert in getting new drugs and medical devices approved and pass regulatory hurdles. She researched the drug patents for the CV19 vaccine and says the unvaxed are at serious medical risk form the vaxed. Kingston explains, “If you take a look at the biological license approval for Pfizer, it specifically explains that Comirnaty is a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA. What is that? That is a man-made genetic material that coats the spike protein of SARS COV 2. So,

        external-content.duckduckgo-150×150 Unvaxed at Risk from Vaxed in Coming Dark Winter – Karen Kingston

        Dr. Zelenko’s vitamin pack that serves as an over the counter alternative to Hydroxychloroquine and a targeted vitamin mix to boost your immunity. Keep from getting Sick!

        people who are injected are producing trillions of the disease causing spike protein, and they can infect other people. This was documented in the August 2015 document by the FDA called ‘Viral Based Gene Therapies’ and shedding analysis and design studies. This is what’s called a viral gene based therapy, and it’s very well documented by the FDA. . . . That is clear evidence that they knew the shedding would occur.”

        This is so insidious that the FDA is well aware of unvaxed pregnant women. Kingston says, “Not only can you get sick, but if you get pregnant and are around someone who is vaccinated, that could result in the death of your baby, your baby dying within one month of being born, birth defects and autoimmune disease over its lifetime. That is horrifying.”

        Kingston says there are also cases of vaxed parents infecting their unvaxed children. Kingston says, “If you look at the weekly morbidity and mortality reports from the CDC in August, they showed . . . that there was a major spike in cases of hospitalization in children between 1 and 4 years old, then 5 and 12, and 12 to 18 beginning in January and going up very quickly. Well, the children were not supposed to be vaccinated. That’s correct–the parents are. As parents get more and more vaccinated, the children, particularly 1 to 4 year olds, are the highest spike in hospitalizations due to Covid. Children never got Covid before. What they are getting is Covid from their parents being vaccinated.”

        Kingston gives ways to minimize the risk for the unvaccinated and also some help for the vaccinated with a supplement called NAC.

        Kingston says the world needs to wake up to the extreme and contends, “This is absolutely unlawful, and I just can’t believe parents, police officers, healthcare providers and our government are just standing by and basically letting a conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and murder on our children and employees. I am tired of people saying this is conspiracy theory, it’s unproven. It’s not. All these documents are available on the FDA, NIH and USPTO.gov.”

        C60-complete-small-150×150 Unvaxed at Risk from Vaxed in Coming Dark Winter – Karen Kingston

        C60Complete Black Seed Oil & Curcumin Gel Capsules – World’s Best Anti-inflammation supplement!

        One thing is for sure, more and more vaxed people and some unvaxed people are going to get sick, and many will also die from the vaccines forced on the world. Can it be avoided? Kingston says, “I think there is a way to avoid this to get the truth out there and to start treating people. Otherwise, yes, let’s heed the words of Dr. Fauci, this time and this time only, which is that we are in for a dark winter.”

        https://sarahwestall.com/unvaxed-at-risk-from-vaxed-in-coming-dark-winter-karen-kingston/

        \\][//

        Like

      6. The Great Reset Is Accelerating Into Global Tyranny
        Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

        The World Economic Forum’s 2030 agenda includes the dictum that you will “own nothing and be happy.” The unstated implication is that the world’s resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite, and you’ll have to pay for the temporary use of everything
        The WEF’s 2030 agenda is part of what is now advertised as The Great Reset
        Also part of The Great Reset is the transition from shareholder capitalism to “stakeholder capitalism,” which world leaders claim will provide “equity” for all
        In reality, stakeholder capitalism destroys freedom and shifts power over nations from elected governments to private corporations and other unelected “stakeholders” such as the WEF
        Since the first quarter of 2020, we’ve already gotten a taste of what The Great Reset will mean for public health. The basic premise is that of a biosecurity state, where unelected “stakeholders” decide what is best for everyone
        The World Economic Forum’s 2030 agenda includes the strangely ominous dictum that you will “own nothing and be happy.” The unstated implication is that the world’s resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite, and you’ll have to pay for the temporary use of absolutely everything.

        Nothing will actually belong to you. All items and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is restricted to an upper stratum of social class. Just how will this imposed serfdom make you happy?

        Again, the unstated implication is that lack of ownership is a convenience — they’re just making your life easier. Rent a pot and then return it. You don’t need storage space! Imagine the freedom! They even promise the convenience of automatic drone delivery straight to your door.

        Artificial intelligence — which is siphoning your data about every aspect of your existence through nearly every piece of technology and appliance you own — will run your life, predicting your every mood and desire, catering to your every whim. Ah, the luxury of not having to make any decisions!

        Planned Theft Under the Cover of a Pandemic

        This is the mindset they’re trying to program into you. As just one example, in a mid-November 2020 video announcement, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said:1

        “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change.”

        Some, however, are starting to realize that these narratives of “building back better” and “resetting” the economy to ensure “equity” are proverbial mouse traps. Once you bite the cheese, you’ll be stuck, robbed of your freedom forevermore.

        In the video above, author Douglas Kruger explains why freedom is impossible without the right to private ownership. The technocratic elite of course do not want you to understand the real-world ramifications of what they have planned, which is why they try to sell this diabolical idea as something that will benefit society and finally make life fair for everyone. It’s an attractive narrative, but a dangerous fantasy to buy into. As noted November 16, 2020, by National File:2

        “… Trudeau suggested the COVID-19 virus provided an ‘opportunity for a reset … to re-imagine economic systems.’ This was taken as an endorsement of a World Economic Forum plan to concentrate most private property in the hands of Big Tech mega-corporations.

        The ‘Great Reset’ plan involves a collaboration between national governments and international bodies to ‘reset capitalism’ with an integrated transnational technocratic welfare/surveillance state by the year 2030 …

        WEF member corporations and government partners would accomplish the ‘reset’ by using economic policy to virtually abolish individual property and concentrate nearly all wealth in the hands of international mega-corporations.

        The idea would be to leverage the welfare state and gig economy to replace the economic status quo of individual ownership with one where the majority of individual needs are rented instead.”

        Learn to Recognize the Great Reset Catchphrases

        https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/09/30/stakeholder-capitalism.aspx
        \\][//

        Like

      7. “Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” ~ Richard Horton, former Editor-in-Chief of the Lancet

        \\][//

        Like


      8. NY Gov Unhinged: “Vaccines Are From God…Be My Apostles!”
        New York Governor Kathy Hochul went into a bizarre rant in front of a church congregation, shifting a public health problem into one of religious significance. Is this starting to look like a cult instead of science? Also, Gov. Hochul signs executive order to fire thousands of nurses – amidst a critical shortage of nurses in NY. Make sense?”
        \\][//

        Like

      9. “The findings confirm Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher’s finding that among more than 40 corpses he autopsied who had died within two weeks of COVID19 vaccination, approximately one-third of those deaths were caused by the vaccination. Microscopic details of the tissue changes will be shown during the live-streamed press conference. Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz will report on the current parameters of the statistical recording of vaccination events.”

        And that is what we witness by watching this presentation, Microscopic slides and video of the tissues from these autopsies, plus microscopic images of the so called ‘vaccines’, showing the strange objects suspended in the solutions.

        https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en

        Peter Schirmacher

        Peter is acting chairman of the German Society of Pathology, director of the Institute of Pathology at Heidelberg University Hospital, and president of the German Association for the Study of the Liver. His research interests include molecular and morphological digestive system carcinogenesis, especially of the liver and pancreas, tumor banking, and virtual microscopy. He has published over 80 peer-reviewed publications and thinks that “pathology has a bright future, with great challenges in molecular diagnostics, biobanking, and innovative imaging approaches.”

        https://thepathologist.com/power-list/the-power-list-2015/peter-schirmacher

        \\][//

        Like

      10. These three short clips are the smoking guns that clearly indicate the COVID pandemic was planned and carried out by Big Pharma, the UN and corrupt government officials.

        Most of us have already seen the clip that was filmed in January 2017, in which Fauci warns that Trump will be challenged by the outbreak of a new virus.

        Many have also seen another clip, filmed on December 9, 2019 with Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance, which received millions from Fauci for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in which he brags about how he caused a bat coronavirus to become infectious to humans three weeks before the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia.

        New footage has now come to light that was broadcast on C-SPAN 2 on October 29th, 2019, showing Anthony Fauci and Rick Bright, who was then the director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) at HHS plotting to stage a massive health scare around a “new virus” from China in order to bypass the normal FDA approval for vaccines that we’ve been using since the 1940s, to force mRNA on the general public, in what may be the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle proving the premeditation of the plandemic, because we have all the other pieces, how they cooked it, how they built it, how they delivered it, how they admitted they were going to do it and how they were already prepared with the vaccine patents for what they had produced.

        Recall that Dr Zev Zelenko had told us that when President Trump ordered hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to be made widely available to Americans via his Right to Try legislation and he said it was Rick Bright who countermanded that order with one that restricted the use of HCQ to hospitals only, defeating the entire purpose of HCQ, because it is early treatment with HCQ that can keep you out of the hospital, altogether.

        Dr Zev Zelenko said that in Rick Bright’s actions, “I saw the mechanisms of genocide…Out of 600,000 dead Americans [who perished with COVID], we could have prevented 510,000 from even going to the hospital.”

        Trump fired Bright on April 22, 2020 over this insubordination but because it is impossible to actually fire swampy Federal agents like Bright, he was reassigned to a new role at NIH to help “accelerate the development and deployment of novel point-of-care testing platforms”.

        Because Bright is a Globalist Big Pharma shill

        https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/fauci-bright-and-daszak-caught-wargaming-covid-virus-and-mrna-vaccine-rollout/
        \\][//

        Like

      11. Francis Boyle
        Francis Anthony Boyle (born March 25, 1950)[1] is a human rights lawyer and professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law.[2] He has served as counsel for Bosnia and Herzegovina and has supported the rights of Palestinians and indigenous peoples.

        COVID-19 conspiracy theories
        Boyle has claimed that SARS-CoV-2 is a genetically engineered bioweapon that escaped from a high-level lab in Wuhan, China. Boyle has no academic degree in virology or biology,[10] and genomic analysis by virologists has ruled out such conspiracy theories.[11][12]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Boyle#COVID-19_conspiracy_theories

        Hakim, Mohamad S. (February 14, 2021). “SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19, and the debunking of conspiracy theories”
        . Reviews in Medical Virology: e2222. doi:10.1002/rmv.2222
        . ISSN 1099-1654
        . PMC 7995093
        . Currently, there are some fictitious and pseudoscientific claims as well as conspiracy theories associated with the Covid‐19 pandemic. Some people have alleged that SARS‐CoV‐2 is of laboratory origin and the result of deliberate genetic manipulation. According to these conspiracy theories, a novel virus is a human‐made biological weapon, not the result of natural evolution and selection.
        ______________________________________
        GOVERNMENT COVERUP OF GENOCIDE, WE HAVE THE DATA: CEASE AND DESIST NOW W/ TOM RENZ

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/fpq9fVuiQL4u/

        \\][//

        Like

    2. https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2021/75309a-eng.php — graphene oxide masks

      https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/09/no_author/spartacus/ – Covid scam

      How the FDA Manipulates the Media
      The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been arm-twisting journalists into relinquishing their reportorial independence, our investigation reveals. Other institutions are following suit

      By Charles Seife on October 1, 2016

      https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-fda-manipulates-the-media/

      \\][//

      Like

      1. DoD Documents: Over 70% “COVID” Hospitalizations are “Fully Vaccinated” Over 65
        Stew Peters Show Published October 4, 2021

        Rumble — Attorney Thomas Renz joined Stew Peters to reveal the highly censored DoD documents proving that the “vaccine” is more dangerous than it is helpful, as the vast majority of patients over 65 hospitalized with “COVID” are more-than-likely experiencing injury from the shots!

        https://rumble.com/vnb99j-dod-documents-over-70-covid-hospitalizations-are-fully-vaccinated-over-65.html

        \\][//

        Like

    3. Dr Carrie Madej joins Stew Peters to describe the incredibly creepy things she found when she put the contents of the vials from three different batches of the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson vaccines under a microscope.

      Dr Madej describes what appeared to be self-assembling synthetic biology and these horrific, seemingly sentient microscopic tentacled organisms and brilliant colors emanating from some of these graphene-like structures, which nanotechnology experts told her may be indicative of a superconducting material.

      If it is so that the vaxx contents are superconductive, then based on what she was told at these shady “business owner” meetings that she was invited to attend in Atlanta and based on what she’s read about a project Bill Gates is currently orchestrating in West Africa, through GAVI, MasterCard and TrustStamp, an AI-powered biometrics company, they are building out a system that ties your vaccine status and medical records to a digital ID and a digital currency system, that they’re calling the “Wellness Pass”.

      She says the African test subjects can only obtain money through their digital ID and Mastercard and that cash has been completely abolished. The intention is to perfect this system in Africa before launching it globally.

      At the meetings she had attended in Atlanta, they plainly stated their intention to secretly implement a technology that can monitor and control the behavior of the populace, in conjunction with a Pavlovian social credit system and “Predictive Policing” and that is exactly what this Bill Gates project is doing.

      TRANSCRIPT [LIGHTLY REDACTED FOR BREVITY]

      https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-carrie-madej-first-us-lab-examines-vaccine-vials-horrific-findings-revealed/

      https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2021/75309a-eng.php
      graphene oxide masks

      https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/09/no_author/spartacus/

      \\][//

      Like

    4. Severe adverse events vs. severe COVID-19
      norstadt

      Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine is widely used to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and has been deemed safe by government agencies and medical experts. What does the safety study say? While the main text describes some aspects of the adverse event rate, the study’s supplementary appendix includes important numbers. Of particular note (see Table S3, reproduced below) are the 240 severe adverse events in the vaccine group compared to 139 for the placebo. The difference of 101 is too large to be a statistical fluke (physicists would call it a 5-sigma effect), and the trial’s randomization leads to the conclusion that approximately this many excess events were indeed the result of vaccination.

      The vaccine’s adverse event excess can be compared to the reduction in COVID-19 cases. During the two month surveillance window, vaccine recipients had one case of “severe COVID-19” while placebo recipients had 9 (see Table S5). If the vaccine causes 101/(9-1) = 12.6 severe adverse events for every severe COVID-19 case prevented, is that a net benefit?

      https://norstadt.substack.com/p/severe-adverse-events-vs-severe-covid
      \\][//

      Like

    5. Click to access US7220852.pdf

      CORONAVIRUS ISOLATED FROM HUMANS
      )United States Patent
      Rota et al.
      US007220852B1
      US 7,220,852 B1

      (10) Patent No.:US007220852B1
      (45) Date of Patent: May 22, 2007

      ABSTRACT
      Disclosed herein is a newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Also provided are the nucleic acid sequence of the SARS-CoV genome and the amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections therewith. Immune stimulatory com
      positions are also provided, along with methods of their use.

      \\][//

      Like

    6. Dr. Anthony Fauci has intimidated and coerced a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government by intimidation and coercion.

      With no corroboration, Dr. Anthony Fauci promoted Professor Neil Ferguson’s computer simulation derived claims that, “The world is facing the most serious public health crisis in generations. Here we provide concrete estimates of the scale of the threat countries now face.

      “We use the latest estimates of severity to show that policy strategies which aim to mitigate the epidemic might halve deaths and reduce peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, but that this will not be enough to prevent health systems being overwhelmed. More intensive, and socially disruptive interventions will therefore be required to suppress transmission to low levels. It is likely such measures – most notably, large scale social distancing – will need to be in place for many months, perhaps until a vaccine becomes available.” Reporting to the President that as many as 2.2 million deaths may result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated and could not be measured with any accuracy, Dr. Fauci intimidated and coerced the population and the government into reckless, untested, and harmful acts creating irreparable harm to lives and livelihoods.18 Neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (principally funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) had any evidence of success in estimating previous burdens from coronavirus but, without consultation or peer-review, Dr. Fauci adopted their terrifying estimates as the basis for interventions that are explicitly against medical advice.  The imposition of social distancing was based on computer simulation and environmental models with NO disease transmission evidence whatsoever.  The imposition of face mask wearing was directly against controlled clinical trial evidence and against the written policy in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”

       In both the Imperial College and the IHME simulations, quarantines were modeled for the sick, not the healthy”

      –Fauci-Covid Dossier

      \\][//

      Like

    7. David makes a tight case, backed by mountainous evidence that COVID-19 wasn’t a lab leak. It is a US bioweapon, as is the so-called vaccine. The primary motive is money.

      Everything David says can be used in a court of law and is backed by over 20 years of research, patent filings and FOIA documents, including Anthony Fauci’s recently-released emails. David does not speculate about anything. He doesn’t get into any ulterior motives beyond what he has seen in official or verified documents. What he can definitively prove is that COVID-19 is a financially-motivated scam more than 20 years in the making.

      Furthermore, he says “SARS-CoV-2” is not novel. It’s the same old SARS (SARS-CoV-1) bioweapon targeted for human lung epithelium that Anthony Fauci commissioned the University of North Carolina to create and which was patented on April 19th 2002, months before what he calls the “alleged” outbreak in Asia.

      David then goes through the CDC’s patent filing for SARS coronavirus on April 25th, 2003, followed three days later by a filing by Sequoia Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of same, in a patent on anti-viral agents of control of infections by coronavirus. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals (subsequently, AB Links Pharmaceuticals) was later rolled-up into the proprietary holdings of Pfizer, Crucell and Johnson & Johnson.

      David says this is a RICO case. “And the RICO pattern, which was established in April 2003 for the first coronavirus was played out to exactly the same schedule, when we see SARS-CoV-2 show up, when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID – prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?”

      https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/there-is-no-variant-not-novel-no-pandemic-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich/

      \\][//

      Like

      1. “I’m Vaccinated, But I Also Have Covid – And it Spread Through My Entire Family!” – CNBC Host Grills Fauci on Vaccine ‘Breakthrough’ Cases (VIDEO)
        By Cristina Laila
        Published October 2, 2021 at 6:29pm
        Dr. Fauci on Friday was grilled on CNBC about so-called Covid ‘breakthrough’ cases.

        “Dr. Fauci, you guys have been pushing the vaccine and I understand why – I’m vaccinated, but I also have Covid and it spread through my entire family in the past few weeks,” CNBC host Sara Eisen said from her home office.
        She continued, “And I just wonder about the public messaging around vaccinations. Three vaccinated people got Covid in my house, two unvaccinated children got it. Are you too casual about the limitations of the vaccine? Because it does feel to me that breakthroughs are happening, they’re happening regularly and we haven’t really seen the government pay much attention to them or warn about them!”

        Fauci was visibly irritated and tried to interrupt Eisen, but she continued, “We were still able to get it and transmit it! Thank God we’re not in the hospital, I get it, I’m vaccinated but, you can get it and transmit it and the government hasn’t been warning about that!”

        Fauci responded in his signature condescending tone: “Oh yes I am! We have said that and let me give you the science and the facts,” Fauci retorted as he rattled off vaccine statistics.

        VIDEO:

        https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/vaccinated-also-covid-spread-entire-family-cnbc-host-grills-fauci-vaccine-breakthrough-cases-video/
        \\][//

        Like

      2. Magnetic Beads for SARS-CoV-2 Specific Bioseparation

        Magnetic Beads for SARS-CoV-2 Specific Bioseparation. Advance Your Research on COVID19 Immune Response. The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) has …

        https://www.genscript.com/magnetic-beads-for-sars-cov-2-specific-bioseparation.html

        S1 Spike Protein

        The recent COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has influenced both the health care systems and economies around the world, and has posed challenges to vaccines, drugs and diagnostics development. Since the outbreak, Sino Biological have been actively tracking the change and movement of the virus to make products “up to date”. Our SARS-CoV-2-related recombinant protein and antibody products have been widely used by researchers across different disciplines and have since generated near 500 citations so far. In addition, those reagents in COVID-19 have been accelerating the progress in serological assay development against SARS-CoV-2. We have also developed the largest bank of recombinant mutant proteins of spike protein, its segments (e.g., S1, RBD, S2), and nucleocapsid. The variant proteins have been actively used by scientists to assess the phenomena of “antibody evasion” caused by the mutagenesis of key residues in the spike protein.

        https://www.sinobiological.com/research/virus/2019-ncov-antigen
        \\][//

        Like

      3. The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice
        Elizabeth M. Rhea, Aric F. Logsdon, Kim M. Hansen, Lindsey M. Williams, May J. Reed, Kristen K. Baumann, Sarah J. Holden, Jacob Raber, William A. Banks & Michelle A. Erickson
        Nature Neuroscience volume 24, pages368–378 (2021)Cite this article

        240k Accesses

        47 Citations

        5792 Altmetric

        Metricsdetails

        Abstract
        It is unclear whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019, can enter the brain. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 binds to cells via the S1 subunit of its spike protein. We show that intravenously injected radioiodinated S1 (I-S1) readily crossed the blood–brain barrier in male mice, was taken up by brain regions and entered the parenchymal brain space. I-S1 was also taken up by the lung, spleen, kidney and liver. Intranasally administered I-S1 also entered the brain, although at levels roughly ten times lower than after intravenous administration. APOE genotype and sex did not affect whole-brain I-S1 uptake but had variable effects on uptake by the olfactory bulb, liver, spleen and kidney. I-S1 uptake in the hippocampus and olfactory bulb was reduced by lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. Mechanistic studies indicated that I-S1 crosses the blood–brain barrier by adsorptive transcytosis and that murine angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is involved in brain and lung uptake, but not in kidney, liver or spleen uptake.

        Main
        Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress, COVID-19 is associated with a host of symptoms that relate to the CNS, including loss of taste and smell, headaches, twitching, seizures, confusion, vision impairment, nerve pain, dizziness, impaired consciousness, nausea and vomiting, hemiplegia, ataxia, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage1,2. It has been postulated that some of the symptoms of COVID-19 may be due to direct actions of the virus on the CNS; for example, respiratory symptoms could be in part due to SARS-CoV-2 invading the respiratory centers of the brain1,3. Encephalitis has also been reported in COVID-19, and could be a result of virus or viral proteins having entered the brain4,5. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA has been recovered from the cerebrospinal fluid4, suggesting it can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Other coronaviruses, including the closely related SARS virus that caused the 2003–2004 outbreak, are able to cross the BBB6,7,8, and SARS-CoV-2 can infect neurons in a BrainSphere model9. However, SARS-CoV-2 could induce changes in the CNS without directly crossing the BBB, as COVID-19 is associated with a cytokine storm, and many cytokines cross the BBB to affect CNS function10.

        Here we assess whether one viral protein of SARS-CoV-2, the spike 1 protein (S1), can cross the BBB. This question is important and clinically relevant for two reasons. First, some proteins shed from viruses have been shown to cross the BBB, inducing neuroinflammation and otherwise impairing CNS functions11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Second, the viral protein that binds to cells can be used to model the activity of the virus; in other words, if the viral binding protein crosses the BBB, it is likely that protein enables the virus to cross the BBB as well18,19. S1 is the binding protein for SARS-CoV-2 (ref. 20); it binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)21,22,23 and probably other proteins as well.

        In this study, we show that I-S1 readily crossed the murine BBB, entered the parenchymal tissue of the brain and, to a lesser degree, was sequestered by brain endothelial cells and associated with the brain capillary glycocalyx. We describe I-S1 rate of entry into the brain after intravenous (i.v.) and intranasal administration, determine its uptake in 11 different brain regions, examine the effect of inflammation, APOE genotype and sex on I-S1 transport, and compare I-S1 uptake in the brain to the uptake in the liver, kidney, spleen and lung. Based on experiments with the glycoprotein WGA, we found that brain entry of I-S1 likely involves the vesicular-dependent mechanism of adsorptive transcytosis.

        Results
        see entire article:
        https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8
        \\][//

        Like

      4. The History of the Hazard Circular

        Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed. This I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is capital control of labor by controlling wages. THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY.
        – Hazard Circular, 1862

        While re-reading the Gustavus Myers book “The History of the Great American Fortunes”, I stumbled upon a little factoid, caught in the massive spiderweb of knowledge that is that three volume tome. Pulling upon that thread I was lucky enough to find at the end of it a book that I am reasonably certain has been long forgotten, and so I am currently reading it into an audiobook format for your listening pleasure. However, as is always the case, I have stumbled upon yet another interesting bit of information in this current book, and this would be the “Hazard Circular”. In the book it was simply referenced as a circular (or letter) from “the creditors” of the United States, circa 1862, to every bank in New York and New England. The contents of this circular are very provocative; they set out the fact that the banks use the control of the creation of money to enslave people through devaluing their wages. I was quite shocked by this brazen statement and so I set forth in search of its origins. Little information was readily available on the internet, so I turned to the old and mouldering books and periodicals of a century ago to disinter the true history of the “Hazard Circular”…

        THE GENESIS
        First and foremost, it would be wise to lay out the contents of the circular in full form and provide a little background about the time in which it was allegedly written. The circular (or private letter) was purported to have been brought to America by a Mr. Charles Hazzard, from whom the circular derives its name. Mr. Hazzard, it is said, was an agent of the capital and banking interests in London. The circular letters, with which he was charged with distributing, were to be given to the capitalists and bankers in New York and New England. The full letter reads as follows:

        “Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed. This I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is capital control of labor by controlling wages. THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY. The great debt that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war must be used as a measure to control the volume of money; to accomplish this the bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now waiting to get the Secretary of the Treasury to make this recommendation to Congress. It will not do to allow the “greenback,” as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, for we cannot control them, but we can control the bonds, and through them the bank issue.”
        Chas. Hazzard.

        At the time of the circular’s alleged distribution by Mr. Hazzard in 1862, the United States had been fractured and was deeply embroiled in the sanguinary combat of the American Civil War. It would indeed be by the force of this “war power” that the institution of chattel slavery would be undone in the United States, a fact that was, whether by coincidence or prescience, eerily predicted in the “Hazard Circular”, for it would not be until 1863, that President Lincoln delivered the Emancipation Proclamation, making the abolition of chattel slavery a goal of the war effort. The “Greenback” currency mentioned in the circular, was the fiat-stuff which sustained the Union Government during the period of the war. The expenditures of the conflict far exceeded the revenues of the Union, and rather than turn to usurious loans from foreign powers, the Government would print about $450,000,000 of the paper money, backed by nothing, but free of debt. This short experiment with Government issued notes was to be just that. Again, as the “Hazard Circular” predicted, after the war, agitation began immediately to return to the gold-standard and abandon the Greenback, and its circulation was contracted over several years. This was punctuated by the Panic of 1873 and the resulting “Great Depression” (a period of economic distress only overshadowed by the events of the 1930’s), which would help to bring monetary policy to the forefront of the public’s mind. These were a few of the events in the years surrounding and succeeding the distribution of the “Hazard Circular” in 1862, although it would not become known to the general public for another 20 or so years.

        THE CIRCULAR SURFACES
        It was not until 1886, that the “Hazard Circular” would be disclosed to the general public. The disclosure would percolate through the presses of the United States over the next decade, and become a keystone of the partisan rhetoric of the blossoming “Populist” Movement. During the 1890’s the “Hazard Circular” and several other provocative letters would make their rounds through the public conscience. To some, the letters were seen as one of the “greatest infamies of civilized history“[1], and proofs of a vast conspiracy by the industrial-capitalist class to manipulate the American economy and therefore the destinies of the people. Others would claim the letters to be “proven forgeries“[2], even going so far as to offer a bounty of $100 in gold for any proof to the contrary[3].

        While the debate raged on about the authenticity of the document, few actually bothered to trace its origin. Little evidence was ever offered to prove the “Hazard Circular” forged and spurious, and on the opposite side, it is doubtful anyone ever claimed the $100 golden reward offered by Joseph W. Ady. However, for the researcher not merely interested in the partisan mudslinging of the time, further information on the circular slowly leaked through the press.

        Read entire article:
        https://fileandclaw322.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/history-of-the-hazard-circular/
        \\][//

        Like

      1. Rome Declaration: Over 6,700 Doctors Sign Letter Rejecting Coronavirus Tyranny
        Tyrants are alive and well during these Covid days. If you tremble with righteous anger when tyrants raise a clenched fist to crush the innocent and helpless, then you and I can become friends, even if you’re a Liberal.
        A few days ago, thousands of physicians told national governments they are resisting their totalitarianism and will not take it anymore. They declared government officials are not in charge of health care, and in attempting to control it, they are tyrants and totalitarians.

        The Rome Declaration states in part: “the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end.”

        A powerful statement rejecting coronavirus tyranny has been signed by over 6,700 doctors. The document is known as the “Rome Declaration” and physicians from all over the world have signed.

        A conference that took place earlier this month in San Juan, Puerto Rico featured the initiating physicians. One of the goals of the event was to be a launchpad for “more in-depth and open conversations around the Covid pandemic.”

        One positive outcome of the conference is that persecuted physicians who are fighting to preserve the patient-doctor relationship have found that their courage has inspired others:

        Although many of the doctors on the panel have been censored and criticized on both social media and mainstream media…many have received strong positive recognition in the medical community prior to expressing their views around the pandemic.

        Reaffirming their commitment to the Hippocratic Oath, the physicians cited an “unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients”. They declare in part that “the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end.”

        Read the document here and encourage your physician to sign:

        We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a crossroad, are compelled to declare the following;

        WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;

        WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;

        WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;

        WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;

        WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;

        WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;

        WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.

        NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:

        RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care.

        RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.

        RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.

        RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.

        RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.

        RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical care.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Declaration as of the date first written.

        https://rairfoundation.com/rome-declaration-over-6700-doctors-sign-letter-rejecting-coronavirus-tyranny/
        \\][//

        Like

    8. Pfizer Whistleblower Unveils Emails Describing Use of Aborted Fetal Cells for Vaccine

      October 16, 2021

      Information released by a Pfizer employee indicates that top executives at the giant drug-maker have been trying to soft-pedal the connection between its corona vaccine and tissue that is derived for aborted babies, according to documents released by the watchdog group Project Veritas.

      Melissa Strickler, who described herself in a Project Veritas video as an employee at the company’s plant in McPherson, Kansas, came forward with the information.

      In the documentation published by Project Veritas, Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer’s chief scientific officer, wrote that aborted fetal tissue was used in connection with vaccine development.

      However, he urged in an email that the connection not be baldly stated to the public.

      “HEK293T cells, used for the IVE assay, are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus,” Dormitzer wrote. “On the other hand, the Vatican doctrinal committee has confirmed that they consider it acceptable for Pro-Life believers to be immunized. Pfizer’s official statement couches the answer well and is what should be provided in response to an outside inquiry.”

      In an interview, Strickler told Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe that the initials at the beginning of that email stand for “human embryo kidney cells” and the “293” refers to an experiment number.

      Vanessa Gelman, Pfizer’s senior director of worldwide research, wrote that the company wanted to be sure the issue was not raised in public.

      “From the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there,” Gelman wrote.

      “We believe that the risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who may take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there. We have not received any questions from policymakers or media on this issue in the last few weeks, so we want to avoid raising this if possible,” she wrote.

      https://www.madpatriotnews.com/pfizer-whistleblower-unveils-emails-describing-use-of-aborted-fetal-cells-for-vaccine/

      \\][//

      Like

  1. FORMER PFIZER VP: THEY’RE GOING TO KILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY
    April 12, 2021
    In a recent Life Site News interview by Patrick Delaney, former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, Dr Michael Yeadon, who just retired told him point-blank, “Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.”

    And why would the government be lying about something so fundamental? “Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.”
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/former-pfizer-vp-theyre-going-to-kill-you-and-your-family/

    The Vax Is Human Sacrifice
    – Dr. Zev Zelenko
    In early August, 2021, Dr Zelenko testified before an Israeli Rabbinical court that the majority of those “vaccinated” (which is over 80% of the Israeli population) will likely be dead within 3 years.

    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-vax-is-human-sacrifice-dr-zev-zelenko/
    \\][//

    Like

    1. mRNA Covid Vaccines Are NOT “Vaccines”! Medical Device To Stimulate the Human Cell Into Becoming a Pathogen Creator!
      February 8, 2021 7:07 AM By Expat Gal

      6:19 Minute Video

      Dr. David E. Martin

      – “This is Not A Vaccine! This is an mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a PATHOGEN CREATOR!”

      – Vaccine is a legally defined term

      – A vaccine has to stimulate both an immunity within the person receiving it & disrupt transmission. The mRNA strand going into the cell is not to stop transmission, it is a treatment! If it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials.

      – Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer

      – If we said we are going to give prophylactic care for cancer that people do not have, you would be laughed out of the room!

      – It is a chemical pathogen device that is actually designed to unleash a chemical path production within a cell. It is a device, not a drug. It is a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.

      – This is by their own admission, NOT a vaccine.

      – This “vaccine” is designed to MAKE YOU SICK! 80% of the people who are exposed to the virus have no symptoms. 80% of the people who get this injected into them have a clinically adverse event! You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness not to induce an immuno-transmissive result. Nothing about this will stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells get you sick.

      – Will trigger an autoimmune response among many things.

      Dr. Judy Mikovits

      – It is a synthetic pathogen. They are injecting the synthetic part of the virus into the body.

      – It can directly cause multiple sclerosis, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease…that is what the expression of that pathological envelope…accelerated cancer…which has been known for decades! You are literally infected with the disease!

      ————————————————

      Notes from Expat Gal:

      I have been delayed in posting additional research on the “vaccines”. My apologies. I can unequivocally state from my 90+ hours of research that I do not believe anyone should be taking this vaccine under any circumstances. This is not medical advice but understand these “vaccines” appear to be bioweapons where your own cells will begin attacking your organs, resulting in severe, lifelong illness and/or death! There are multiple preventative options available including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, zinc, vitamin D & more! I will be publishing articles on how to strengthen your immune system after I post a few more very eye-opening videos about the IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE these “vaccines” will do to your body.

      Pray for wisdom & guidance. PLEASE TRUST in your God-given immunity! You were perfectly & wonderfully made. Ignore these lies by the Enemy to permanently damage your health and possibly to end your life before it would occur otherwise!

      Psalm 139:14, King James Version

      I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.

      Matthew 10:16, King James Version

      Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

      ————————————————

      For those wanting additional information, please see “DR. DAVID MARTIN TAKES APART THE PHONY STORY THAT MODERNA AND PFIZER ARE DELIVERING ‘VACCINES’” 31:44 Minute video on Bitchute

      “Joel Skousen: ‘In this bombshell video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_hwJkhNo9w&feature=youtu.be, (also here: https://www.facebook.com/529628186/videos/10158906974763187/, in case it gets censored) Dr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say ‘gene therapy’ not ‘vaccine.’ They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

      He proves by referencing the official definition of a vaccine that these are not vaccines. He says you cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.

      The WHO admits that with these shots don’t do any good. In a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: ‘I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.’ By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather they only claim their devices are ‘gene therapy’.

      If this isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it a vaccine? To gain the broad immunity that only vaccines are given. The 1986 law on Vaccine liability provides an exclusion only for vaccine makers, not for gene therapy—so they would be liable. This is why states are keeping this state of emergency in place to help shield Moderna and Pfizer and the states themselves. The state of emergency maintains the illusion of vaccine shield.

      He then explains from a legal view that Moderna and Pfizer qualify as deceptive practices of making medical claims without clinic trial proof. 15 US Code, Section 41 of the Trade Commission act, is the law on deceptive practices. He shows why Moderna was never a vaccine company. In 2018, it was a gene therapy company, and still is.’”

      ———————————————-

      Official bio

      Dr. David Martin founded M·CAM® in 1998 and has served as its CEO and Chairman since that time. M·CAM® has been an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance.

      Dr. Martin is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and is the Founder of the Purple Bridge Funds. He managed the Innovation Alpha ETFs (NYSE:INAU; NYSE:INAG; and NYSE:TWAR).  He is the creator of the public equity index – the CNBC IQ100 powered by M·CAM® which now is reported as a leading economic indicator for the U.S. and Global Innovation Economy published by The Conference Board.

      As a spokesperson for global financial and intangible asset accountability and quality reform, Dr. Martin has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, and Asia in advocating and deploying infrastructure to support growing reliance on contract and proprietary rights in business transactions. Under the leadership of Dr. Martin, M·CAM® has supported the modernization of banking, intangible asset, tax, and accounting laws through its work with oversight agencies and policy makers. This work included work with the United States Congress, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the United States Departments of the Treasury and Commerce, the European Union and many other countries. Dr. Martin received his undergraduate (BA) from Goshen College, his Masters of Science from Ball State University, and his Doctorate (PhD) from the University of Virginia.

      Dr. Martin is a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

      —————————————-
      Bio pulled from this article.

      “Judy A. Mikovits, PhD, earned her BA from University of Virginia and PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from George Washington University. In just over twenty years she rose from an entry-level lab technician to become director of the lab of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms at the National Cancer Institute before leaving to direct the Cancer Biology program at EpiGenX Pharmaceuticals in Santa Barbara, California.

      There in 2006, she became attracted to the plight of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Autism. In only five years she developed the first neuroimmune institute from a concept to a reality and is primarily responsible for demonstrating the relationship between immune based inflammation and these diseases.

      She has published over 50 scientific papers.

      Dr. Mikovits spoke the truth about the fraudulent use of government research money, the marketing of inaccurate retrovirus tests, Medicare fraud, the contaminated blood supply, and the harm that is associated with vaccines and their schedule of administration.

      Her research showed how retroviruses are linked to the plague of modern illnesses that are bankrupting the U.S. healthcare system.

      She was arrested without a warrant and held in jail for 5 days without the opportunity for bail as a fugitive from justice. Her career was destroyed.

      Her story is documented in the book, Plague: ​One Scientist’s intrepid Search For the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Autism, and Other Diseases.”

      https://z3news.com/w/mrna-covid-vaccines-vaccines-medical-device-stimulate-human-cell-pathogen-creator/
      \\][//

      Like

  2. Twitter Censored Dr. Baric’s CV and Its Documentation of Gain-of-Function Research and Me for Accurately Reporting the Bombshell Story
    By Naomi Wolf

    The Intercept’s recent FOIA results added abundant documentation of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s funding, using U.S. tax dollars, for dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab—funding that Fauci had denied in testimony to Sen. Rand Paul; funding, indeed, that I had tried to share with the public on Twitter in early June, the day before Twitter deplatformed me permanently.

    The Intercept’s FOIA trove adds important detail to existing documentation of that NIH-funded gain-of-function research and its potential links to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. Natalie Winters of The National Pulse has been out front with this story before The Intercept confirmed it separately.

    So was I. Indeed, my own deplatforming from Twitter followed my having pinned private detective Brian O’Shea’s (disclosure, my husband’s) reading of Dr. Ralph Baric’s full CV, which linked this North Carolina researcher to gain-of-function work funded by Fauci’s agency. Twitter has yet to tell me exactly why I was kicked off its platform and blocked from sharing this well-sourced information with my 145,000 followers.

    Twitter went so far as to deplatform me and then slander me across the globe: news reports mis-stated—via a Twitter spokesperson—that I’d been deplatformed for “vaccine misinformation.”

    The First Amendment in the United States means that the government cannot outright censor critics or opponents; but the private sector—in this case Big Tech—is clearly aligned to do the dirty work of the administration.

    I was accused of “Madness” (The New Republic), of having “always struggled with the truth,” of being an “anti-vaxxer.” Matt Gertz of Media Matters and CNN charged me with “pushing increasingly bonkers conspiracy theories”; he did so on Twitter, a platform on which I am no longer able to respond.

    It seems my real crime may have been asking questions that other reporters have failed to ask, and in sharing information that undermines Fauci’s claims to Congress.

    This very public silencing of a critic of pandemic-related “lockdowns” and of a debunker of Fauci’s denials of having ever funded gain-of-function research was no doubt meant to chill other critics. I received countless emails from other reporters and influencers stating that they supported me, but were scared to say so publicly, lest they be deplatformed as well.

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/twitter-censored-dr-barics-cv-and-its-documentation-of-gain-of-function-research-and-me-for-accurately-reporting-the-bombshell-story_4005419.html

    \\][//

    Like

    1. Arne Burkhardt, German pathologist, researcher. Certified in medicine University Kiel, Germany; certified pathologist University Hamburg. Recipient Konjetzny prize Cancer Liga Hamburg, 1980. Member International Association Oral Pathologists (councilor 1992-1996).

      https://prabook.com/web/arne.burkhardt/42818

      https://www.doctolib.de/pathologie/ravensburg-wuertt/arne-burkhardt

      https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/ –Conference on mRNA solutions with undisclosed material in them.

      \\][//

      Like

      1. “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

        ~ Dr. Macia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal

        https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/bioethics/article/view/5993

        \\][//

        Like

  3. “Have the oligarchs finally recognized their overreach?’

    No, perhaps they are illustrating that they can do anything they want, let the people know about it, and know that nothing significant will be done about it.

    ‘The Revelation of the Method’

    #110 “Revelation of the Method” AKA: if the elites hide their “secret plans” in film, does it eliminate their negative karma?

    the Revelation of the Method is an occult ritual, specifically a “Masonic psychodrama.” Used casually, the implication is always the same: when the Cryptocracy commits major crimes, they will broadcast their intentions in advance, through popular movies and television.

    NEW episode out NOW!

    Like

  4. Patent Law already says that naturally occurring gene sequences cannot be patented.
    as is explained and documented in the Fauci/Covid Dossier, the FDA was bribed with a lot of money (as a grant) to make an exception for the gene sequences used in the Moderna product. after that ruling paid for by Moderna the other companies could then use the same sequences as a patented process.

    These are the details that David Martin discovered in his research.

    In other words these sequences were ‘public domain’ originally, which also meant that the government could use them. But these powerful pharmaceutical corporations wanted a monopoly on the sequences for profit…Huge profits considering the world population held captive by this “Pandemic”.
    \\][//

    Like

    1. https://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/45-health-chapters-from-around-the-globe-found-world-council-of-health-to-provide-factual-and-effective-covid-19-advice/

      See video on this page:

      45 health NGOs establish World Council of Health for “factual and effective” advice on Covid-19 issues
      The World Council for Health is an umbrella coalition made up of 45 health-focused NGOs from around the world. They promise to provide honest medical leadership during the Covid-19 health emergency and on other health issues.
      By The Rio Times -September 28, 2021

      RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The newly founded World Council for Health was launched on September 22 and says it provides the latest unbiased scientific guidance so that individuals and frontline health professionals can make the best health decisions without being forced into a coercive narrative that does not allow for other interpretations as is the case today.

      The World Council for Health is an umbrella coalition made up of 45 health-focused non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from around the world. They will provide what they say is honest medical leadership during the Covid health emergency and on many other health issues now and in the future.

      Read also: Check out our coverage on Dissenter’s Voice

      One of the World Council for Health’s fundamental principles is to build trust with the public. Confidence in public institutions has been eroding, so The World Council for Health has established itself to be completely independent of governments, pharmaceutical companies, and other financial and political stakeholders. In this way, the council is free to promote factual and effective health care advice.

      “There are many things people can do to stay healthy,” said Dr. Tess Lawrie of the United Kingdom, who serves on the Global Health Council’s steering group.

      She added, “The World Council for Health will provide the latest and best expert guidance on how to prevent and safely manage Covid at home. By providing people with the information and treatments they need and want to take control of their own health, the World Health Council aims to eliminate the prevailing climate of uncertainty and fear.

      The Covid treatment guide is the first of many in an ambitious plan to regularly produce reliable guides on a wide range of health topics. These will be readily available on the newly established website.

      Other members of the founding steering group explain their different motivations for establishing the World Health Council as a force for good in the world.

      Dr. Tracy Chandler of Doctors Speaking Out for Science New Zealand (NZDSOS) was unequivocal in pointing out the urgent need for an independent health agency.

      One of the fundamental principles of the World Health Council is to build public trust. “At no time in history has freedom of choice been more important than it is today. But to make informed decisions, you need information you can trust. It is the Council’s job to provide them with that information,” added Dr. Naseeba Kathrada of the Coalition of Caring Health Workers of South Africa.

      “Today’s launch is just the first step. Our new approach will transcend national boundaries,” predicted Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, South African founder of Transformative Health Justice and International Legal Alliance for Health.

      “There is no greater need than that of humanity working for truth, health and freedom. As we move forward, we welcome other groups that align with the vision of the World Health Council to join us in creating a healthier world.

      “It’s not about us, it’s about our children and future generations,” concludes Dr. Jennifer Hibberd, “There is a better way, and we will find it together.

      The World Health Council provides the latest, unbiased scientific guidance to help individuals and frontline health professionals make the best health decisions. It is an umbrella organization supported by several leading health and wellness organizations from around the world.

      It takes a principled and ethical stance to be free from government and corporate influence. At launch, it had over 45 member organizations, and the organization expects that number to grow rapidly.

      STEERING GROUP MEMBERS

      Tess Lawrie, UK, MBBCh, PhD, director of EbMCsquared, CiC, and founder of the UK Ivermectin Recommendations Development Initiative.

      Jennifer Hibberd, Canada, BSc, DDS, DPD, MRCDC, specialist dentist, clinical scientist and editor.

      Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, South Africa, LLB, activist, journalist, mediator, founder of Transformative Health Justice (THJ) and.
      International Legal Alliance for Health (ILAH). Chair of the Legal Committee

      Zac Cox, UK, BDS, LCPH, founder of World Doctors Alliance, specialist dentist and homeopathic physician.

      Tracy Chandler, New Zealand, BSc (Hons), MB ChB, FRNZCGP, FACNEM, MNZSCM, PGDipSEM, Founder of New Zealand Doctors Speaking out with Science (NZDSOS), Cert Dermoscopy, Cert Homeopathy, AIMA Member, ACNEM Examiner, ACNEM Board Member and Treasurer (2018-2020).

      Naseeba Kathrada, South Africa, MB. ChB (Natal), founder of the Caring Healthcare Workers Coalition and founder of the Covid Home Management Team Durban

      Mark Trozzi, Canada, MD, emergency physician, critical resuscitation instructor

      Maria Hubmer-Mogg, Austria, MD, certified herbalist, co-founder of World Health Forum 21

      Karen McKenna, Canada, MBA, B.Comm (Hons), PMP, operations for the World Doctors Alliance

      Anna De Buisseret, UK, BA (Hons), Dip. Law, Barrister, Retired Officer (LT, 51st Signal Regiment).

      https://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/45-health-chapters-from-around-the-globe-found-world-council-of-health-to-provide-factual-and-effective-covid-19-advice/

      Like

      1. Covid-19 Vaccines Lead to New Infections and Mortality: The Evidence is Overwhelming

        Country Case Studies. Mortality and Morbidity

        By Gérard Delépine

        Global Research, September 28, 2021

        This article demonstrates unequivocally that mortality and morbidity has increased dramatically as a result of the vaccine. The incidence of Covid positive cases has also increased.

        “And everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months”

        Dr Delépine carefully analyses the pre and post vaccine trends for 14 countries in major regions of the World.

        The latest official figures (September 15, 2021) point to approximately:

        40,666 mRNA vaccine reported and registered deaths in the EU, UK and US (combined) and

        6.6 Million reported “adverse events”.

        But only a small fraction of the victims or families of the deceased will go through the tedious process of reporting vaccine related deaths and adverse events to the national health authorities.

        Those death and injury figures (EU, UK, US) SOFAR are at least ten times higher than the official reported cases.

        410,000 deaths, 66 million injuries out of a population of approximately 850 million.

        Moreover, the health authorities are actively involved in obfuscating the deaths and injuries resulting from the mRNA “vaccine”, while inflating the number of Covid-19 related deaths. (“autopsies not required”).

        Ironically, not only does Pfizer have a criminal record with the US Department of Justice for “fraudulent marketing”, the EU Commission has chosen Pfizer BioNTech as its “Reliable Partner” for the production of 1.8 billion doses over the next 3-4 years, in a contract which is currently under negotiation.

        Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 28, 2021

        ***

        Two months ago, we tried to alert people to the paradoxical results of the covid19 vaccines by publishing the pre- and post-vaccination mortality curves for Israel and Great Britain [1] which already showed that these vaccinations were followed by ‘a considerable increase in contamination and mortality lasting 6 to 8 weeks after the start of vaccination. [2]

        Since this period, vaccination campaigns have spread worldwide even to countries where covid was not present. And everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months. [3]

        How many deaths and severe accidents will it take for executives, WHO, health agencies FDA, EMA among others, to look at the proven results of this experimental pseudo-vaccination in the real world and derive the results from it? consequences ?

        Reminder of the proven facts published by the WHO

        We present below the epidemic curves of the most vaccinated countries as published by the WHO (with our comments in red).

        ASIA

        In Nepal, a country of 28 million inhabitants

        The vaccination campaign, using the Chinese vaccine and the Indian Astra Zeneca, began at the end of January 2021. So far, after ten months of the epidemic, the country had 270,092 confirmed cases and 2017 deaths and the daily average of new cases s ‘amounted to 350.

        Four months after vaccination began, the epidemic has exploded with a current average of 8,000 new cases daily. As of May 22, Nepal had 497,052 (+ 90%) confirmed cases and 6,024 deaths (+ 200%.)

        Since the start of vaccination, in 2 months, the number of infected has multiplied by 5 (123,066 on 22/5) and that of deaths by 9 (735 on 22/5).

        In Cambodia, a country of 27 million inhabitants

        South America

        In Colombia , a country of 50 million inhabitants

        country severely affected by the disease, the epidemic began to decline sharply until the start of the vaccination campaign on February 18, 2021.

        Since then, the number of daily infections has quadrupled and daily mortality has multiplied by 3

        See entire containing graphs:

        https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-vaccines-lead-to-new-infections-and-mortality-the-evidence/5746393

        \\][//

        Like

    2. Details of a teleconference on the COVID-19 pandemic response held in early 2020 between leading scientists including Dr. Anthony Fauci remain shrouded in secrecy after the U.K. government heavily redacted documents requested by a newspaper.

      The U.K. Daily Mail submitted a Freedom of Information request to its government for emails relating to the secretive meeting between British and American health officials. The requestwas answered by a cache of 32 emails that were almost entirely redacted, leaving the details of what was discussed on that teleconference call unknown, the paper reported.

      What is known is that in the early days of the pandemic, a group of scientists led by Fauci, Dr. Jeremy Farrar, the director of the London-based megacharity Wellcome Trust, and Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, among others, held the call “in total confidence” and that after the call, the public campaign by many of the participants to stifle discussion of the lab-leak theory intensified.
      Before the conference call, some of the world’s top virologists who participated had raised concerns that the emerging SARS-CoV-2 virus had features that “(potentially) look engineered” — but after this call those scientists reversed their opinions and publicly condemned the hypothesis that COVID-19 escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a conspiracy theory.

      Since the call was held on February 1, 2020, EcoHealth Alliance’s ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology have come to light, and Fauci’s repeated assurances that the U.S. National Institutes of Health did not fund risky virus research at the Wuhan lab have been shown to be false. It is in the public interest to learn what was discussed on the call, to know if top health officials had a conflict of interest in publicly discrediting the lab-leak theory.

      However, the Daily Mail reports how the U.K. government is obscuring the details of the call:

      The Mail on Sunday requested emails, minutes and notes on the call between Sir Patrick Vallance – Britain’s chief scientific adviser – and its organisers Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust medical charity, and Anthony Fauci, the US infectious diseases expert and presidential adviser.

      Yet when the documents were released they had page after page redacted with thick lines of black ink by Whitehall officials. Even the names of experts copied in on discussions were blocked – and exchanges as trivial as one Edinburgh biologist’s ‘thank you’ for being invited – leaving only a few basic details about the call visible.

      The lines left intact include a demand for the discussions, involving 13 participants around the world, to be conducted in ‘total confidence’, and an intriguing email line suggesting ‘we need to talk about the backbone too, not just the insert’.

      That was possibly sent by Dutch virologist Marion Koopmans, a member of the World Health Organisation team that produced a widely criticised report into Covid’s origins.
      According to the Daily Mail, a request for communications on the origins of COVID-19 between Sir Patrick Vallance, the U.K.’s chief scientific adviser, Farrar, and Fauci were “rejected on cost grounds,” even though the government said it had the information requested.

      “Such absurd state secrecy is highly contemptuous towards taxpayers and to a world that wants to know what caused this devastating pandemic to guard against similar catastrophes in the future,” the paper complained.

      “Such official obfuscation only serves to fuel concerns over a possible cover-up on Covid’s origins – and about Britain’s strange silence on issues of such global importance, which surprises some close international allies.”

      Reporters first learned of the conference call from a Freedom of Information Act request for Fauci’s work-related emails issued by BuzzFeed News. Emails detailing the specifics of what was discussed were redacted. In an interview with USA Today, Fauci said the call was a “productive back-and-forth conversation where some on the call felt [SARS-CoV-2] could possibly be an engineered virus.”

      Details of the call were also discussed by Farrar in his book on the pandemic, where admits to being “50-50” on the question of the lab-leak theory after the Feb. 1 call, even though days later he would sign a highly influential statement by leading scientists condemning the lab-leak hypothesis as a conspiracy theory.

      Another participant on the call, Dr. Kristian Andersen, a virologist at Scripps Research, had studied the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 and wrote in an email to Fauci just before the call that “some of the features (potentiallly) look engineered.” He also said that several experts who had looked at the virus “find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory,” though he would later claim that these scientists changed their opinions as new evidence convinced them it was more likely the virus originated in nature.

      A mere three days after the conference call, Andersen emailed Daszak to strategize about pushing back against “crackpot theories” suggesting “this virus being somehow engineered with intent” when that was “demonstrably not the case.”

      The public ought to know why these scientists changed their opinions so rapidly in light of the fact that many of them were connected to 2014 and 2019 NIH research grants for gain-of-function research in China.

      Gain-of-function research involves genetically manipulating a virus to make it more transmissible among mammals, particularly among humans, to study how virus might evolve in nature and develop vaccines or strategies to prevent a pandemic. The 2014 research grant was funded at a time when the U.S. had established a moratorium on federal funding for such research, which had been deemed risky because of the possibility that a lab accident might cause a pandemic.

      The 2019 grant proposal revealed that Daszak’s group EcoHealth Alliance had sub-awarded NIH money for bat coronavirus research in Wuhan, China.

      Documents published by DRASTIC further revealed that in 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for a grant to study pathogens to create infectious bat coronaviruses in the Wuhan lab that would be altered to boost their ability to infect human cells. Daszak had proposed to work with Shi Zhengli, the top virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to insert “appropriate human specific cleavage sites” into SARS-like viruses, demonstrating that EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab were interested in conducting exactly the kind of research that is hypothesized to be related to the origins of COVID-19.

      https://www.theblaze.com/news/daily-mail-blasts-u-k-government-for-heavily-redacting-emails-related-to-origins-of-covid-19
      \\][//

      Like

  5. Horowitz: The country with the best data shows infection rates higher among the vaccinated
    DANIEL HOROWITZ | October 04, 2021

    The idea of mandating the vaccine to protect other people is built upon a complete lie.

    Whatever side of the vaccine debate you may find yourself on, it is clear that none of us predicted cases would grow exponentially a year later, when most adults are vaccinated and there is so much more built-up immunity. The evidence that cases are growing among the vaccinated is too compelling to ignore and makes the entire push for vaccination, and certainly for mandated shots, completely unmoored from reality. Isn’t it about time we start asking questions about the consequences of a leaky vaccine?
    It’s time to stop calling infections among the vaccinated “breakthrough” cases. In fact, The U.K., which posts the most comprehensive granular weekly data every Thursday, shows that COVID cases per capita are more common among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated in most age groups.

    As you can see, the vaccinated have more cases per capita in nearly all age groups except for those under 30. The only logical explanation is that the youngest cohorts were vaccinated most recently, when there might still be some degree of efficacy from the vaccine. Which is why, even among the young cohorts, the cases among the vaccinated are higher among those vaccinated earlier. What this clearly means is that its protection wears off after a few months, especially for those who need it the most. According to the Public Health England data, for the 60s age cohort, the infection rates are now 63% higher among the vaccinated than unvaccinated, up from 53% in last week’s report.

    Thus, any discussion of vaccine passports and mandates is completely contrary to reality. Not only do the vaccinated spread the virus, they might be doing so at greater levels. Whether the shots offer some protection against severe illness for a few extra months is still unclear, given that hospitalization rates are skyrocketing among the vaccinated, but either way, that is a personal decision whether one wants to assume the risks to achieve some lighter symptoms. The notion that unvaccinated health care workers with stronger immunity from prior infection are a greater threat to patients than those without prior immunity who are vaccinated is absurd. This point is underscored by a recent outbreak of the virus in an Israeli hospital where 39 of the 42 patients, staff, and family members infected were fully vaccinated.

    At this point, it is impossible to overlook the absolute failure of this vaccine to achieve its stated goal. There were dramatically more deaths this August than last August, something that makes zero sense given the high vaccination rates. The few unvaccinated people can’t be responsible for a worse outcome than when nobody was vaccinated.
    https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-the-country-with-the-best-data-shows-infection-rates-higher-among-the-vaccinated

    \\][//

    Like

    1. Graphene oxide induces dose‑dependent lung injury in rats by regulating autophagy
      Authors: Lei Zhang Shuge Ouyang Hongbo Zhang Mingke Qiu Yuxin Dai Shuqing Wang Yang Wang Jingmin Ou
      Published online on: March 5, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9893
      Article Number: 462

      Abstract
      Graphene is a two‑dimensional structured material with a hexagonal honeycomb lattice composed of carbon atoms. The biological effects of graphene oxide (GO) have been extensively investigated, as it has been widely used in biological research due to its increased hydrophilicity/biocompatibility. However, the exact mechanisms underlying GO‑associated lung toxicity have not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of GO in lung injury induction, as well as its involvement in oxidative stress, inflammation and autophagy. The results revealed that lower concentrations of GO (5 and 10 mg/kg) did not cause significant lung injury, but the administration of GO at higher concentrations (50 and 100 mg/kg) induced lung edema, and increased lung permeability and histopathological lung changes. High GO concentrations also induced oxidative injury and inflammatory reactions in the lung, demonstrated by increased levels of oxidative products [malondialdehyde(MDA) and 8‑hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8‑OHdG)] and inflammatory factors (TNF‑α, IL‑6, IL‑1β and IL‑8). The autophagy inhibitors 3‑methyladenine (3‑MA) and chloroquine (CLQ) inhibited autophagy in the lung and attenuated GO‑induced lung injury, as demonstrated by a reduced lung wet‑to‑dry weight ratio, lower levels of protein in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and a reduced lung injury score. Furthermore, 3‑MA and CLQ significantly reduced the levels of MDA, 8‑OHdG and inflammatory factors in lung tissue, suggesting that autophagy also mediates the development of oxidative injury and inflammation in the lung. Finally, autophagy was directly inhibited in BEAS‑2B cells by short hairpin RNA‑mediated autophagy protein 5 (ATG5) knockdown, which were then treated with GO. Cell viability, as well as the extent of injury (indicated by lactate dehydrogenase level) and oxidative stress were determined. The results revealed that ATG5 knockdown‑induced autophagic inhibition significantly decreased cellular injury and oxidative stress, suggesting that autophagy induction is a key event that leads to lung injury during exposure to GO. In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicated that GO causes lung injury in a dose‑dependent manner by inducing autophagy.

      Graphene is a two-dimensional structured material with a hexagonal honeycomb lattice composed of carbon atoms, and is currently the thinnest and most widely used non-metallic nanomaterial (1). Graphene has unique electrical and mechanical properties, a large specific surface area and potential biocompatibility. As a result, it is widely used in materials, electronics, energy, optics and biomedical fields, such as cell imaging, drug delivery and biosensing (2-5). With the large-scale production and application of graphene, research into its biological toxicity has been attracting increasing attention. A large number of studies have confirmed that the biotoxicity of graphene nanomaterials depends on their individual physicochemical properties (including size, morphology and functional groups), concentration, route of biological ingestion and the organs involved (6-9). Different forms of graphene and their derivatives display different physical/chemical properties and biological toxicities.

      Read entire article:
      https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/etm.2021.9893

      Like

  6. Graphene face masks
    Report a Concern
    Starting date:July 13, 2021Posting date:September 28, 2021Type of communication:AdvisorySubcategory:Medical DeviceSource of recall:Health CanadaIssue:Product SafetyAudience:General Public, Healthcare Professionals, HospitalsIdentification number:RA-75309

    Last updated: 2021-09-28
    Media enquiriesPublic enquiries
    Issue
    UPDATE (September 28, 2021): Additional graphene face mask authorized for sale

    Health Canada has authorized the sale of an additional face mask containing graphene: the Zen Guard Disposable Face Mask With Biocidal Coating, by Trebor Rx Corp. Please see the updated table below. Aside from the products listed in the table, no other graphene face masks are currently permitted for sale in Canada.

    Companies wishing to sell graphene masks must first provide evidence to Health Canada demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of their models, as the risks with using graphene masks may vary depending on mask design. Health Canada continues to encourage Canadians to submit a complaint if they find graphene masks being sold in Canada other than the ones listed in the table below.

    Health Canada will continue to update the permitted products table below if it authorizes any other face masks containing graphene. Consumers are encouraged to check back for updates.

    UPDATE (July 13, 2021): Graphene face masks by Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd. can resume sale in Canada; Health Canada found no health risks of concern with these products

    Summary
    Products: Face masks manufactured by Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd. labelled to contain biomass graphene.
    Issue: Health Canada assessed four models produced by the company and found no health risks of concern. As a result, sale of these masks can resume in Canada. No other graphene face masks are currently permitted for sale in Canada. If additional graphene masks are permitted for sale, Health Canada will update Canadians.
    What to do: Do not use face masks labelled to contain graphene unless they are listed in the table below. Report any health product adverse events or complaints to Health Canada.
    Health Canada previously advised Canadians not to use face masks that contain graphene after a preliminary assessment identified some potential for inhaled graphene particles to cause early lung effects in animals (e.g., early signs of inflammation). As a precaution while a risk assessment was ongoing, Health Canada directed all known importers and distributors of these masks to remove four mask models from one manufacturer, Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd., from the market.

    Health Canada has reviewed the available scientific literature along with data provided by Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd., related to the biomass graphene contained within its four models. The review found that biomass graphene particles are not shed from these masks in quantities that are likely to cause adverse lung effects.

    Health Canada also determined that the filtration performance of these masks meets the performance standard listed on the label. The Department did not find evidence that biomass graphene provides any added antimicrobial, or antiviral protection.

    As a result, given the evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of these products, Health Canada is permitting the sale of the four Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd. mask models to resume in Canada (see models listed below).

    No other graphene face masks are currently permitted for sale in Canada. Consumers should notify Health Canada by submitting an online complaint form should they become aware of other graphene masks being sold in Canada.

    Companies wishing to sell graphene masks must first provide evidence to Health Canada demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of their models, as the risks with using graphene masks may vary depending on mask design.

    Graphene masks permitted for sale
    Manufacturer Model Number
    Trebor Rx Corp. Zen Guard Disposable Face Mask With Biocidal Coating, model 0-51497-200004-6
    Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd. SMDP20605
    SNN200642
    SNN70369B (C-Shaped)
    SNN70370B (Willow Leaf-Shaped)
    Health Canada will continue to update Canadians if additional graphene masks are permitted for sale in Canada.

    Original Advisory (April 2, 2021): Face masks that contain graphene may pose health risks

    Issue
    Health Canada is advising Canadians not to use face masks that contain graphene because there is a potential that they could inhale graphene particles, which may pose health risks.

    Graphene is a novel nanomaterial (materials made of tiny particles) reported to have antiviral and antibacterial properties. Health Canada conducted a preliminary scientific assessment after being made aware that masks containing graphene have been sold with COVID-19 claims and used by adults and children in schools and daycares. Health Canada believes they may also have been distributed for use in health care settings.

    Health Canada’s preliminary assessment of available research identified that inhaled graphene particles had some potential to cause early lung toxicity in animals. However, the potential for people to inhale graphene particles from face masks and the related health risks are not yet known, and may vary based on mask design. The health risk to people of any age is not clear. Variables, such as the amount and duration of exposure, and the type and characteristics of the graphene material used, all affect the potential to inhale particles and the associated health risks. Health Canada has requested data from mask manufacturers to assess the potential health risks related to their masks that contain graphene.

    Until the Department completes a thorough scientific assessment and has established the safety and effectiveness of graphene-containing face masks, it is taking the precautionary approach of removing them from the market while continuing to gather and assess information. Health Canada has directed all known distributors, importers and manufacturers to stop selling and to recall the affected products. Additionally, Health Canada has written to provinces and territories advising them to stop distribution and use of masks containing graphene. The Department will continue to take appropriate action to stop the import and sale of graphene face masks.

    https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2021/75309a-eng.php
    \\][//

    Like

    1. Video: “How Many People Are We Going to Kill if We Keep Following this Narrative”, Asks Ontario Emergency Physician

      By Dr. Rochagné Kilian and Strong and Free Canada

      Global Research, October 06, 2021

      Dr. Rochagné Kilian, an ER doctor in Owen Sound, Ontario, resigned in protest of mandatory vaccines and the corruption of our health services.

      Dr. Kilian came to public attention when the recording of the Grey Bruce hospital board was released (watch below).

      In that recording, board president Gary Simms cannot provide any evidence whatsoever of his dire predictions of a ‘tidal wave of pediatric Covid cases’ which he says are coming this fall, while threatening Dr. Kilian when she spoke up for the truth.

      Dr. Kilian has spoken out before regarding the growing corruption of our health care services and has shown leadership and integrity by resigning from her position.

      “At least 80% of the ER patients in the past three months were double-vaxxed”, says Dr. Kilian of her informal survey of patients entering the ER with serious medical issues. “How many people are we going to kill if we keep following this narrative?”

      Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

      Featured image is a screenshot from the video

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-many-people-we-going-kill-we-keep-following-narrative-asks-ontario-er-doctor/5757801

      Video: Dr. Daniel Nagase – 75th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-dr-daniel-nagase-75th-anniversary-nuremberg-trials/5757884

      \\][//

      Like

      1. quantum integrative medicine
        The laws of quantum physics define the human body as a quantum system, from the smallest vibrations and energy units that communicate with each other. … Using quantum mechanics in medicine could provide disease detection in the early stages or highlight risks of disease before they manifest themselves.

        –Dr. Rochagné Kilian

        \\][//

        Like

      2. Video: “How Many People Are We Going to Kill if We Keep Following this Narrative”, Asks Ontario Emergency Physician
        By Dr. Rochagné Kilian and Strong and Free Canada, October 06, 2021

        Dr. Rochagné Kilian, an ER doctor in Owen Sound, Ontario, resigned in protest of mandatory vaccines and the corruption of our health services. Dr. Kilian came to public attention when the recording of the Grey Bruce hospital board was released. Read more…

        Video Emerges Where Fauci and Others Planned for a “Universal mRNA Flu Vaccine” Which Became the “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine” Because People Were Not Afraid Enough of the Flu Virus
        By Brian Shilhavy, October 06, 2021

        Last night Alex Jones of Infowars.com did a special broadcast regarding an October, 2019 video that they had just become aware of that was a panel discussion hosted by the Milken Institute discussing the need for a Universal Flu Vaccine. Read more…

        Pure Insanity: Now Anyone with Any Disease in Alberta Can be Counted as a “COVID” Case
        By Ethan Huff, October 05, 2021

        In an announcement, Alberta Chief Health Officer Deena Hinshaw explained that people who test “negative” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), as well as people who never get tested at all but who show respiratory symptoms of any kind, will be automatically added to the official case count that the government relays to the media. Read more…

        People are Dying Worldwide: “Foreign Aid” to Finance 1.8 Billion Vaccine Doses. Western Governments, Billionaires and Big Pharma Come to the “Rescue of the Poor Countries”
        By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, October 07, 2021

        The mRNA “experimental” vaccine was launched in mid to late December 2020. In many countries, there was a significant and immediate shift in mortality following the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine. Read more…

        The Covid “Killing Spree” – And the “Robotization” of the Survivors. We Need A Nuremberg 2.0
        By Peter Koenig, October 06, 2021

        During Hitler’s Nazi Reich, doctors and nurses were obliged to kill disabled or handicapped children – for the good of society, for obtaining a clean Arian State. And for economics. Most of them complied. They killed innocent children, adults, and old-age people as well, for the same purpose. The elderly and infirm were injected with a poison, so they wouldn’t cost money to the state. Read more…

        Why Is the UN Dictating Canada’s Provincial Health Policies?
        By Prof. Scott Masson, October 06, 2021

        There can be no rationale for trashing the Nuremberg Code that does not destroy the ethical legitimacy of health care, no appeal to the public good when conscience has been denied any validity, and no claim to defend a health-care system that dismisses thousands of health professionals that does not simultaneously destroy it. Read more…

        Lessons for Ethically-compromised Physicians in 2021 from the Doctors Trial at Nuremberg (1946 – 1947)
        By Dr. Gary G. Kohls, October 06, 2021

        The Medical Case, U.S.A. vs. Karl Brandt, et al. (also known as the Doctors’ Trial), was prosecuted in 1946-47 against twenty-three doctors and administrators accused of organizing and participating in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the form of medical experiments and medical procedures inflicted on prisoners and civilians. Read more…

        Video: Dr. Kary B. Mullis. “No Infection or Illness Can be Accurately Diagnosed with the PCR Test”
        By Kary B. Mullis and Dr. Gary Null, October 06, 2021

        In 1996, Dr. Gary Null interviewed the late Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary B. Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test. He stated that no infection or illness can be accurately diagnosed with PCR. He also discussed his thoughts regarding Dr. Fauci and the scientific and medical establishments. Read more…

        J’Accuse! The Gene-based “Vaccines” Are Killing People. Governments Worldwide Are Lying to You the People, to the Populations They Purportedly Serve
        By Doctors for COVID Ethics, October 06, 2021

        The signal of harm is now indisputably overwhelming, and, in line with universally accepted ethical standards for clinical trials, Doctors for Covid Ethics demands that the COVID-19 “vaccination” programme be halted immediately worldwide. Read more…

        “The Harmful Behaviour of Facebook”: Social Media Destabilizes Democracy and Harm Users’ Mental Health
        By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida, October 06, 2021

        Controversies involving the role of social networks in the contemporary world are on the rise. Far beyond the blackout on October 4, large technology companies have recently been criticized for acting in a socially destructive way, harming the mental health of their users and fostering the polarization of society. Read more…

        \\][//

        Like

  7. Hospital systems purge thousands of workers to engineer health care collapse

    The purge of hospital workers with natural immunity is now under way, with The Epoch Times reporting that a large New York health care system has fired 1,400 employees for refusing to be injected with toxic spike protein nanoparticle bioweapons that are mislabeled “vaccines.”

    In Michigan, the Henry Ford hospital has seen the resignation of 400 employees who refuse to commit vaccine suicide, prompting the hospital CEO to grin and brag about how his workers are now “nearly 100 percent vaccinated.”

    As this “pandemic of the VACCINATED” accelerates into the Dark Winter of 2021 – 2022, the health care systems are purging the very health care workers who are going to remain living and capable of treating those injured by spike protein nanoparticles.

    The end goal is, of course, total collapse and the mass extermination of humanity to create a post-human world. It is now accelerating right before our eyes, with food shortages, energy scarcity, vaccine mandates, power grid failures and more.

    Listen to the full analysis in today’s feature podcast here.

    https://www.brighteon.com/c7ac26aa-25aa-4324-b799-be3e23833e47

    \\][//

    Like

      1. LEAKED GRANT PROPOSAL DETAILS HIGH-RISK CORONAVIRUS RESEARCH
        The proposal, rejected by U.S. military research agency DARPA, describes the insertion of human-specific cleavage sites into SARS-related bat coronaviruses.
        A GRANT PROPOSAL written by the U.S.-based nonprofit the EcoHealth Alliance and submitted in 2018 to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, provides evidence that the group was working — or at least planning to work — on several risky areas of research. Among the scientific tasks the group described in its proposal, which was rejected by DARPA, was the creation of full-length infectious clones of bat SARS-related coronaviruses and the insertion of a tiny part of the virus known as a “proteolytic cleavage site” into bat coronaviruses. Of particular interest was a type of cleavage site able to interact with furin, an enzyme expressed in human cells.

        The EcoHealth Alliance did not respond to inquiries about the document, despite having answered previous queries from The Intercept about the group’s government-funded coronavirus research. The group’s president, Peter Daszak, acknowledged the public discussion of an unfunded EcoHealth proposal in a tweet on Saturday. He did not dispute its authenticity.
        Since the genetic code of the coronavirus that caused the pandemic was first sequenced, scientists have puzzled over the “furin cleavage site.” This strange feature on the spike protein of the virus had never been seen in SARS-related betacoronaviruses, the class to which SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, belongs.

        The furin cleavage site enables the virus to more efficiently bind to and release its genetic material into a human cell and is one of the reasons that the virus is so easily transmissible and harmful. But scientists are divided over how this particular site wound up in the virus, and the cleavage site became a major focus of the heated debate over the origins of the pandemic.

        Many who believe that the virus that caused the pandemic emerged from a laboratory have pointed out that it is unlikely that the particular sequence of amino acids that make up the furin cleavage site would have occurred naturally.

        Adherents of the idea that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from a natural spillover from animal hosts have argued that it could have evolved naturally from an as-yet undiscovered virus. Further, they argued, scientists were unlikely to have engineered the feature.

        “There is no logical reason why an engineered virus would utilize such a suboptimal furin cleavage site, which would entail such an unusual and needlessly complex feat of genetic engineering,” 23 scientists wrote earlier this month in an article in the journal Cell. “There is no evidence of prior research at the [Wuhan Institute of Virology] involving the artificial insertion of complete furin cleavage sites into coronaviruses.”

        But the proposal describes the process of looking for novel furin cleavage sites in bat coronaviruses the scientists had sampled and inserting them into the spikes of SARS-related viruses in the laboratory.

        “We will introduce appropriate human-specific cleavage sites and evaluate growth potential in [a type of mammalian cell commonly used in microbiology] and HAE cultures,” referring to cells found in the lining of the human airway, the proposal states.

        The new proposal, which also described a plan to mass vaccinate bats in caves, does not provide conclusive evidence that the virus that caused the pandemic emerged from a lab. And virus experts remain sharply divided over its origins. But several scientists who work with coronaviruses told The Intercept that they felt that the proposal shifted the terrain of the debate.
        “Some kind of threshold has been crossed,” said Alina Chan, a Boston-based scientist and co-author of the upcoming book “Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19.” Chan has been vocal about the need to thoroughly investigate the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from a lab while remaining open to both possible theories of its development. For Chan, the revelation from the proposal was the description of the insertion of a novel furin cleavage site into bat coronaviruses — something people previously speculated, but had no evidence, may have happened.

        “Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab,” said Chan. “This definitely tips the scales for me. And I think it should do that for many other scientists too.”

        Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has espoused the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated in a lab, agreed. “The relevance of this is that SARS Cov-2, the pandemic virus, is the only virus in its entire genus of SARS-related coronaviruses that contains a fully functional cleavage site at the S1, S2 junction,” said Ebright, referring to the place where two subunits of the spike protein meet. “And here is a proposal from the beginning of 2018, proposing explicitly to engineer that sequence at that position in chimeric lab-generated coronaviruses.”

        “A possible transmission chain is now logically consistent — which it was not before I read the proposal.”
        Martin Wikelski, a director at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, whose work tracking bats and other animals was referenced in the grant application without his knowledge, also said it made him more open to the idea that the pandemic may have its roots in a lab. “The information in the proposal certainly changes my thoughts about a possible origin of SARS-CoV-2,” Wikelski told The Intercept. “In fact, a possible transmission chain is now logically consistent — which it was not before I read the proposal.”
        Entire article:

        https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/
        \\][//

        Like

      2. Wuhan Institute of Virology Had Plans for Developing Covid-Like Virus | Truth Over News
        Truth Over News
        TRUTH OVER NEWS
        JEFF CARLSON AND HANS MAHNCKE

        New documents reveal Peter Daszak and the Wuhan Institute of Virology had submitted a proposal to the Pentagon in 2018 for the development of a Covid-like Virus.

        The proposal included conducting risky gain-of-function experiments on existing high-risk viruses that had previously been discovered in Yunnan, China – almost certainly at the Mojiang Mine where three miners had died in 2012 with Covid-like symptoms.

        Their plans included a blueprint for inserting a human-specific feature into an existing coronavirus, thereby making it more transmissible to humans.

        Daszak also planned to mass vaccinate bats in the wild by spraying them with skin-penetrating aerosolized nanoparticles containing spike proteins.

        The plans – which are a virtual recipe for creating a pandemic – were never disclosed by Daszak or by his collaborators.

        Watch video:
        https://www.theepochtimes.com/wuhan-institute-of-virology-had-plans-for-developing-covid-like-virus-truth-over-news_4021679.html
        \\][//

        Like

  8. There is a guy named Vincent Rancaniello, a virologist who I believe to be a disinformant. He has YouTube shows on virology, and he is adamant that the Corona Virus is natural occurring despite all the new evidence that it was created as a bioweapon by DARPA. One of his agents, Jeff Biss was on the Glenn Greenwald forums denying all the info I was posting on the subject. Biss praised Rancaniello and insisted I listen to his radio shows and “learn some real facts about virology”… Finally Biss sent me Rancaniello’s email address.
    So I emailed a couple articles to him showing microscopic imagery of the crap seen in the Pfizer and Moderna products. Rancaniello never replied. Tonight I read an article from the Intercept, where I found this quote, “Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University, was adamant that the proposal did not change his opinion that the pandemic was caused by a natural spillover from animals to humans. “There are zero data to support a lab origin ‘notion,’”

    https://theintercept.com/2021/09/09/covid-origins-gain-of-function-research/
    \\][//

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: