William Gates Sr. Worked With Planned Parenthood and the  Rockefeller-Financed Eugenics Movement in America | Truth and Conspiracy


Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.

Many scientists argue that even though viruses can use other cells to reproduce itself, viruses are still not considered alive under this category. This is because viruses do not have the tools to replicate their genetic material themselves. Mar 7, 2020

Since a virus is not alive it is not “biological”, therefore it cannot be said to be a biological weapon. The weapon should be deemed a ‘bio-chemical weapon’

Redefining terms:

Coronavirus is a Biological Warfare Weapon

Robert Skopec1*

1 Researcher-Analyst, Dubnik, Slovakia

*Corresponding Author(s):

Robert Skopec

Researcher-Analyst, Dubnik, Slovakia

Received Date: Jun 10, 2020

Accepted Date: Dec 24, 2020

Published Date: Dec 31, 2020



Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act has given a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it. Francis Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.


Dr. Boyle discusses the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China and the Biosafety Level 4 Laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. He believes the virus is potentially lethal and an offensive biological warfare weapon or dual-use biowarfare weapons agent genetically modified with gain of function properties, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up and is now taking drastic measures to contain it [1,2].

The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.

Helping you take control of your health in these crazy times is Dr. Richard Fleming, a prolific author in addition to being a physicist, a nuclear cardiologist, researcher and attorney.



Parasites and sharp metal pieces in hundreds and hundreds of vials across all companies.

This worldwide Consortium is striking back calling for an immediate moratorium on all injections until this can be investigated

Dr Axel Bolland
Dr Maria Humber-Mogg
Dr Michael Dytka
Dr Peter Schirmacher
Dr. Walter Lang
Dr Wener Bergholz

Here, we discuss his latest book “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation,” slated for release September 7, 2021. It’s currently available for preorder on Amazon. It’s an incredibly well-documented book and contains history that many of us aren’t aware of. As it turns out, the creation of this virus goes back not a year or two but two decades.

“My area of aptitude [is] physics and calculus, the mathematic language for that. Physics, and particularly high energy particle physics, is something that I find very fascinating.

I eventually wound up doing some of that later on in life as a nuclear cardiologist. So, [I’ve done] 53 years of research in physics, and in medicine, I actually developed the inflammation in heart disease theory and presented it to American Heart in 1994.

I joined American Heart in 1976 as the youngest faculty member at that time, and I got put in several standing committees as a result — basic and advanced cardiac life support as well as the physician cholesterol education faculty.

I did a lot of research on dietary influences and factors that are critical, not only for in the end — heart disease — but other chronic inflammatory diseases, be that cerebrovascular diseases, strokes, diabetes or cancer,” Fleming explains.

Standing on Principles of Ethics

Fleming is also a scientific reviewer for more than 16 different journals. He was on the external clinical review board for The Lancet, but quit in protest of the fake hydroxychloroquine article they published — an act I believe demonstrates his dedication to scientific integrity. He also resigned from the British Medical Journal Open Quality due to similar concerns.

“Eventually we either stand behind principles or we acquiesce and become nothing more than the German doctors of Nazi Germany during World War II,” he says. “And as history showed us, they eventually paid a price at the Nuremberg Trials …

There are people — powers that be — that think that they have things going their direction, but it’s very clear to me that they’re not confident that they’ve got everybody under control. The way in which this is all being handled demonstrates that they’re more worried about the truth coming out than not. And I think they’re worried about the consequences, as they should be.”

Digging Up the Truth

Early on in 2020, Fleming started researching treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 using the Fleming Method, which you can learn more about on Using this method, you can measure how a given intervention works on the tissue level, and how infection or inflammation is responding to the treatment.

He ended up developing 52 treatment combinations, and over the course of that study, the length of hospitalization stays went from five to six weeks down to one to two weeks. But he also learned something else.

“In the process of doing that research, I dug more and more and investigated what was going on, and that led me into the background of the research that many of these people had been doing,” Fleming explains.

“Tens of millions of dollars have been funneled out of the U.S., and Anthony Fauci has helped with that. He’s been on those committees. You can see the grant numbers in the book.”

Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?

While gain-of-function can be used for benevolent purposes, it can just as easily be used for nefarious ones, “and that’s kind of what you see happening,” Fleming says.

“You see real efforts to produce viruses, coronaviruses, in particular. Spike proteins of coronaviruses to be even more specific, as I show in the book, paid for by the federal government by people who say they were not involved in gain-of-function research.

Well, their fingerprints are on the documents, or on the published papers or on the grants or on the patents. You can’t say that you’re not involved in things when the documents show differently. They show the work and the money that came out of the federal government that went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, that went to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other places.

For me, as a researcher, obviously, once I start to investigate something, the only way you can stop me from doing that is to put a bullet in my head. Otherwise, I’m going to stay after it. There are things that are not in the book that are going to come out in international criminal court, things I’m saving for that, because this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.

It violates the biological weapons convention treaty. You just have to look at the definitions. It provides nothing useful to humanity. It’s dangerous. When Fort Detrick is involved and the Department of Defense is involved … and you see these monies and you see the people that are involved, you realize that … the United States was playing China, China was playing the United States, and you saw who got caught in between. And they’re still playing the game.

For lack of a better term, this book is an indictment. That’s now my attorney hat going on saying that I have provided in this book evidence that I would take to a grand jury … I’m not somebody who is going to give up on having these people dealt with, because all the freedoms that we have lost, and the rights that we have lost as individuals, not to mention just the numbers of people who have died.

My argument is … the reason why they died is because they didn’t get treatment for the inflammation and the blood clotting that I and other doctors have shown works. The ultimate argument is that you can’t kill somebody more than dead … they can’t do worse than kill the patient. And we’ve already seen what doing nothing does. It kills the patient.

At no other time in American history have doctors looked at patients and said, ‘We can’t do anything for you. Go home and come back when you get sicker.’ We have always treated people with breathing problems with medications for breathing problems. We’ve always treated people with clotting problems with medicines to stop the clotting.

And so, the reason why this is so critical to understand is because the same people who were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people who have interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people who have been involved in the development of these vaccines.”

While Fleming carefully lays out the evidence in his book, he leaves it up to you, the reader, to decide whether SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon or not. However, he says, if you do come to that conclusion (and he believes you will once you’ve seen the evidence), “then you have to recognize that the vaccines are nothing more than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon.” Hence, the COVID shots are bioweapons too.

Warning to Medical Professionals

If you are a doctor, nurse, pharmacist or other health professional administering these COVID shots, you may be wise to reconsider your participation in this scheme. A significant problem is there’s no way to provide or obtain informed consent. As noted by Fleming:

“If you’re injecting someone with these drug vaccine biologics, you are injecting them with something that you cannot possibly give them informed consent for, which means you’re violating your Hippocratic Oath, you’re violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, you’re violating the Nuremberg Code, you’re violating the Declaration of Helsinki.

It’s right across the board. It’s not even something that you can pretend doesn’t happen anymore. It’s just in everybody’s faces. And you can see that the powers that be are so stressed out right now that they are cajoling and coercing and manipulating and attacking. My friends in Italy tell me that vaccinated people are behaving in the same way that they did during World War II towards the Jews and the intellectuals.

And let’s remember, the first people Hitler put in concentration camps weren’t the Jews. The first people were the intellectuals, because if you take the intellectuals and the doctors off the street, if you stop people from talking, you can control the people.

So, the pressure being put on the medical community in this country and in countries around the world to simply go along is nothing more than the equivalent of what Adolf Hitler and the SS did during World War II when they rounded up the intellectuals. One [thing] will lead to the next and there’s nothing about this that has been a successful campaign to control an infectious virus …

All you have to do is read the emergency use authorization documents. I’m just stunned at how many people have not read these. I’m stunned at physicians not having read these.”

On, you can find several video presentations and PDFs where Fleming goes through the emergency use authorization documents. With that data in hand, Fleming suggests asking yourself some fundamental scientific questions, such as: “Is there any statistical difference in the number of people who developed COVID-19 or died among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated?”

The answer provided in the documents is no. There is no statistical difference between the two groups. The vaccines do not statistically reduce COVID-19 infection or death thereof. There are fewer cases in absolute numbers, but statistically there’s no difference. Add to that the risk of side effects. If you take the shot, you risk developing inflammation and blood clotting.

The same people that were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people that have interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people that have been involved in the development of these vaccines. ~ Dr. Richard Fleming

As noted above, coerced administration of these shots violate any number of laws. Fleming also cites supreme court rulings in which the court ruled people have the right to choose their own health care.

“Rochin versus California had to do with an individual who was forced to undergo emetic medications to force him to vomit, to bring up things in his stomach. The Supreme Court said, ‘You do not have a right to force this medication on people.’

Griswold versus Connecticut showed that the U.S. government cannot take away the personal rights of health care in individuals unless there’s some type of compelling and substantial reason, and then it has to be put into law. It can’t come out of the executive branch.

Cruzan versus Director of Missouri Department of Health in 1990, specifically stated that patients have a right to refuse any treatment. You cannot force treatment on people. Well, this is forced treatment. This is coerced treatment.

And Doe v. Rumsfeld proved in 2004 that investigational drugs could not be forced upon people unless there is a presidential waiver or informed consent. Well, here’s the kicker on presidential waiver, which is what they’re going to go to.

Anybody who takes an oath of office — the president of the United States, senators, representatives to Congress, governors, police officers, judges, lawyers, administrative officials — cannot violate the U.S. Constitution. If they do, they’ve committed treason, by definition.

In the U.S. Constitution, it states that Treaty Law and the Constitution and statutes are the supreme law of the land. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifically states that you cannot force people to take a drug; that they have to have informed consent, and that animal research has to have been done beforehand to prove it’s safe.

So, if a president, including this one, issues an order that this is a mandate and is required, then he is violating the U.S. Constitution by violating Treaty and therefore has committed treason.

It’s not only an impeachable offense, it is punishable by death because that’s [the punishment for] treason. You can’t force U.S. citizens to undergo forced experimentation.

And you can’t get around that by doing something cute like having the FDA say, ‘Whoa, well, we’ve now approved it, OK?’ Because the Supreme Court has already ruled that you cannot force people to take a treatment and the only party that can change that is the Supreme Court.”

Moderna Has Been Aware of Risks for Years

You’ve probably heard that the mRNA in the COVID shots are designed to stay right around the injection site. However, Fleming points out that Moderna knew this wasn’t the case, as they published research in 2017 showing a lipid nanoparticle vaccine for influenza ended up in the brain, bone marrow, liver, spleen and just about everywhere else in the bodies of the test animals.

“So, for people to come up now and say, ‘Gosh, golly gee whiz, we just didn’t expect that’ is a little disingenuous,” Fleming says. “And I think you have to ask yourself, why does the cardiologist know about the 2017 paper but the people responsible for the technology claim they don’t?

And so, what you see are normal healthy people responding to a massive production of spike proteins and healthy people should make a massive immune response. What does that immune response do? It produces inflammation and blood clotting, and then the spike proteins go across the blood-brain barrier and cause prion diseases just like what’s been shown in humanized mice and rhesus macaque models.

I’m willing to bet that the people who made this gain-of-function virus already knew that, because one of the things that had the government and Big Pharma coming after me in the 1990s [and] early 2000s was the fact that the research I was doing in dietary and inflammatory disease had the same Neu-5-Ac raft receptor that the glycoprotein 120 of HIV — which Shi Zhengli put [into the virus] in 2004 — attaches to.

So, the people that were doing this were paralleling my research … It turns out that that information is critical for getting this virus to be able to attach and to infect people like it’s doing. So, it’s interesting how you can be minding your own business and doing really good research, trying to answer some questions, and it might just expose the people that are doing nefarious things.”

What You Can Do if Your Job Mandates the Jab is a real treasure trove of information that you can surf through. There, you’ll also find sample documents for medical, religious, legal and Constitutional exemptions to vaccination that you can present to your employer, educational institution or anyone else trying to bully you into taking an experimental COVID shot.

He also has fliers you can print out and distribute that lay out your U.S. Constitutional and statutory rights as a citizen, as well as petitions for the President of the United States, Senate, House of Representatives and state governors, calling on them to investigate those responsible for this gain-of-function bioweapon. You can find all of those petitions under the “Actions” tab at the top right corner. Fleming also encourages people to take legal action.

“I’m working with a number of attorneys to file suits in [the U.S.], [and I’m] one of the experts in the International Court and Italian courts for suits being filed for crimes against humanity. So, the bottom line answer to this is going to be everybody deciding that they need to take action and [hold those responsible] accountable. And yes, this may mean you lose your job …

You have to look at this, at this point in time, and ask yourself what type of world are you leaving your children and your grandchildren? This is never about you. This is never about me. This is about the children and the grandchildren.

Whatever we leave them, they’re going to essentially be stuck with it. If we abandon them — and the founding fathers did not abandon us — then we are responsible for allowing this to happen. It’s on us, so there’s no easy way … If you ever wondered what you would have done in 1930s Germany, today, you know.”

Cases Filed With International Criminal Court

According to Fleming, Italian lawyers have already filed a case in Italian Federal Courts and plan to file with the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Attorneys from six different countries are also putting together a joint case. While the U.S. did not ratify the ICC, American citizens can still be held accountable in the ICC.

Laws and statutes being relied upon include the Biological Weapons Convention treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It’s now up to the ICC to decide what it wants to do, and when.

“It doesn’t really matter how long this takes or to whom this has to go. I’m a firm believer that there are enough good, honest people on this planet that if the people communicate and work together, the tide on this can and will be turned,” Fleming says.

“It’s the same story all over the world. All the people that I’ve talked to in the different countries that I’ve been working with have the same feeling. They’re coerced. Their citizens are being bribed, which, as a side note, anytime the government has to bribe the people to do it, you have to say, ‘If it was really a good idea, why would you have to bribe me? I would be lining up for it.’

I’m the ultimate, I think, research scientist. After 53 years, I really feel very strongly about being a scientist physician. And I am incredibly offended when Anthony Fauci says he is science, because he’s not …

If these ‘vaccines’ actually worked and there was scientific evidence, I’d be on here telling you to take it. What you’re hearing me tell you is, ‘Don’t take it.’ These things are biological weapons. They’re nothing more than a genetic code of a biological weapon that was made, that was paid for, and put together by nefarious people … I’m not anti-vaccine. I’m anti-stupid.”

We’re Battling the Biggest Propaganda Campaign in History

In closing, Fleming says:

“One of the things I do want to make a comment on now is for the people who have not been vaccinated. When you’re looking at people who have been vaccinated, step back for just a moment and recognize that many of those people got vaccinated because they were told that this was the only way to protect the people that they loved.

What we need to do is have the intelligence and the compassion necessary to look at those individuals and say, ‘I get it. No judgment.’ If there’s a shedding problem or something like that that you’re dealing with, there are treatments available that you can look at. I put those on the website, too.

But come together and support those people, because they were just doing what they thought was right. Many of them are scared, and they have been made so scared. By the way, what type of country, what type of world, spends so much effort frightening the blazes out of its citizens? That says something.”

Indeed, this is undoubtedly the most effective propaganda campaign in the history of humanity, and it’s hard to blame someone for cracking under that type of a coordinated assault. The good news is that common sense has not entirely died yet. Fleming says:

“I think there’s a lot of people that are very concerned that things have gone south, so to speak. I’m actually encouraged. One of the things that I’ve noticed about being here in Texas is that common sense has not died … [and] what I’ve repeatedly gotten from people is ‘Don’t dumb it down.’

It’s not a matter of turning people into Ph.D., M.D.’s or whatever, it’s a matter of just being truthful and honest with them. People have a really good capacity, when they get away from all the nonsense happening, to look at the truth and realize it’s the truth and to listen to nonsense being thrown at them and realize that it’s just garbage and manipulation. So, common sense is a really useful tool for everybody to have. That and compassion …

We used to frequently sit down and have conversations with families and friends where you’d argue back and forth and you discuss things, and I can’t be the only person that would walk away from a conversation and go, ‘Well, I hadn’t really thought about that. Let me think about that’ because that’s kind of a different point of view.

That exchange stopped when they quarantined people, when they isolated us, put us in our homes and controlled what you could see on the Internet and on television. Well, we’ve come far enough back out of it that that exchange has started again.

People have had to fight to get that information out, but it’s that sharing of information and knowledge that is so critical to turning this around, and actually bringing all of this nonsense under control. Not just the virus, but the manipulation of people that has been going on and the lies and the deceit and the abuse of power. They used our money to do it. They used our lives to do it. They used our livelihoods to do it.”

More Information

To learn more, be sure to pick up a copy of “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation.” You can also find a lot of information on, including science-based treatment suggestions for COVID-19 and side effects from either the COVID shot or spike protein transmission from a person who got the shot.


41 thoughts on “COVID 19 IS A BIOWEAPON

  1. Horowitz: Harvard researcher finds absolutely no correlation between vax rates and COVID cases globally

    “Basically, our organization is run on COVID money now.” ~ Chris Croce, senior associate scientist, Pfizer (Project Veritas undercover video)

    We were lied to … big-time.

    Back in December, the CDC stated clearly that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine “was 95.0% effective (95% confidence interval = 90.3%–97.6%) in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in persons without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Indeed, in late March, Director Rochelle Walensky promised, “Our data from the CDC suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus.” Even those who had questions about transmission among the vaccinated were only concerned about asymptomatic transmission, whereas now we see that the vaccinated can contract the infection symptomatically.

    Fast-forward three-quarters of a year through the era of mass vaccination, and a Harvard researcher could not find any correlation between vaccination rates and COVID case rates after examining 68 countries and 2,947 counties in the United States. “At the country-level, there appears to be no discernible relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days,” concluded the authors in the study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology. “In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”

    The authors continue:

    Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

    Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.
    It’s also important to keep in mind that when calculating the data, the authors used a sensitivity analysis by applying a one-month lag on the percentage population fully vaccinated so that people wouldn’t be considered fully vaccinated until 14 days after the second dose. However, studies have shown that this is the most vulnerable time for getting the virus. Why should that be blamed on the lack of vaccination rather than on the vaccine? So if anything, the numbers are likely even more unfavorable to the vaccine than this analysis suggests.

    “The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants,” conclude the authors, including the lead researcher from Harvard’s Center for Population and Development Studies and a student researcher from Canada. The study did not factor in which vaccine predominated in a given country, but rather looked at the top-line vaccination rates, which include several vaccines that likely vary in terms of effectiveness.

    How can these mandates hold up in court given that they likely don’t even pass the rational basis test of fulfilling a state’s vital interest of stopping the spread of a virus?

    A July study of Israel perfectly embodies the complete lack of efficacy from this vaccine, especially in recent months. In a study published in a European CDC journal, Israeli researchers in one hospital found studies a serious outbreak among a group of patients and staff of whom 96% were vaccinated. 42 patients and staff wound up getting COVID from a vaccinated dialysis patient who had an extremely high viral load. According to the authors, “Of the 42 cases diagnosed in this outbreak, 38 were fully vaccinated with two doses of the Comirnaty vaccine, one was recovered with one vaccination and three were unvaccinated.” All patients and family members wore surgical masks and all staff wore N-95s with face shields and gloves.



      1. Ethics Professor Gives Heartbreaking Final Lesson on Refusing Vaccine Before Being Fired

        Rumble — Dr. Julie Ponesse, Professor of Ethics, University of Western, gives an emotional last lesson to her students in anticipation of being fired for choice to not take an experimental and unapproved Covid-19 vaccine.

        She was subsequently fired.



      1. Sharri Markson: Unmasking the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Origins of COVID-19
        In this episode, award-winning journalist Sharri Markson takes us inside her groundbreaking research into the origins of COVID-19 and how events really unfolded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Her findings are detailed in her new book and documentary of the same name “What Really Happened in Wuhan.”

        Markson is the investigations editor at The Australian and host of the show “Sharri” on Sky News Australia.


      2. 26, Sep 2020 Dr Heiko Schöning Interview in London English mit Deutschem – he was arrested shortly after !
        Uncensored Doctors

        Explaining Common Sense
        Founder of Doctors for the Truth
        Co Founder of the Extra Parliamentary Inquiry Committee for Covid19
        Measures taken are “Absolutely Inappropriate”
        Explains Mass Media and Government dominated the scene
        We are being false information
        Thousands of Doctors protesting
        Epidemiologists all state there should be an Age Targeted Strategy when it comes to Lockdown – which is common sense
        Risk Groups are elderly and those with major health issues.
        Sheltered the Elderly and build up the immunity in the younger crowd.
        Heiko Schöning speculates that the 2008 financial crash and the mounting debt that Covid19 is the excuse by governments for the “Great Reset”

        Look out for the book Covid19 False Alarm
        and Review

        Those responsible for taking advantage of the Covid19 Crisis and those responsible for “Measures” in the name of Covid19 that result in deadly or devastating consequences – watch your backs for a long time – just like war criminals – teams of lawyers are preparing cases to demonstrate your culpability and seek reparations for as long as it takes to bring about justice.

        One of the “Measures” in Australia is the continued obstructing of Australian Doctors from prescribing HCQ to treat COvid19 high risk stratified patients in absolutely ANY protocol.

        Please sign this petition to let Australian Doctors Prescribe HCQ
        Please then post it to your facebook from the petition page

        Key People involved in the Australian Obstruction are
        Associate Professor Julian Elliot – Heading the The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce

        Adjunct Professor John Skerritt “having direct responsibility for both the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Office of Drug Control”



    1. Wuhan scientists and US researchers planned to create a new coronavirus in 2018: Consortium led by Brit Peter Daszak asked DARPA to fund research at lab in city where Covid pandemic began
      By CHARLOTTE MITCHELL FOR MAILONLINE | 18:08 EDT, 5 October 2021 |

      A 2018 grant proposal sought to combine data from similar strains for new virus
      It was submitted by scientists from US, China and Singapore, but was rejected
      A genetics expert from the WHO told The Telegraph that such work could explain why a close ancestor for Covid-19 has yet to be found in nature
      The Wuhan Institute of Virology has consistently denied creating Covid-19

      US and Chinese scientists were planning to create a new coronavirus before the pandemic erupted, leaked proposals show.

      Last month, a grant application submitted to the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) revealed that an international team of scientists had planned to mix genetic data of similar strains to create a new virus.

      The grant application was made in 2018 and leaked to Drastic, the pandemic origins analysis group.
      ‘We will compile sequence RNAseq data from a panel of closely related strains and compare full length genomes, scanning for unique SNPs representing sequencing errors.

      ‘Consensus candidate genomes will be synthesized commercially using established techniques and genome-length RNA and electroporation to recover recombinant viruses,’ the application states.

      This would result in a virus which had no clear ancestor in nature, a World Health Organization (WHO) expert told The Telegraph.

      The expert, who asked the paper not to publish their name, said that, if such a method had been carried out, it could explain why no close match has ever been found in nature for Sars-CoV-2.

      The closest naturally occurring virus is the Banal-52 strain, reported in Laos last month. It shares 96.8 per cent of Covid-19’s genome.

      No direct ancestor, which would be expected share around 99.98 per cent, has been found so far.

      The WHO expert told The Telegraph that the process detailed in the application would create ‘a new virus sequence, not a 100 per cent match to anything.’

      ‘They would then synthesise the viral genome from the computer sequence, thus creating a virus genome that did not exist in nature but looks natural as it is the average of natural viruses.

      ‘Then they put that RNA in a cell and recover the virus from it.

      ‘This creates a virus that has never existed in nature, with a new ‘backbone’ that didn’t exist in nature but is very, very similar as it’s the average of natural backbones,’ the expert said.

      The proposal was rejected and the database of viral strains at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was taken offline some 18 months later, making it impossible to check what scientists there were working on.

      The institute’s scientists have consistently denied creating the coronavirus in their lab.

      The grant application proposal was submitted by British zoologist Peter Daszak on behalf of a group, which included Daszak EcoHealth Alliance, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the University of North Carolina and Duke NUS in Singapore, The Telegraph reported.

      The grant application proposal was submitted by British zoologist Peter Daszak on behalf of a group, which included Daszak EcoHealth Alliance.

      Experts told the paper that creating an ‘ideal’ average virus could have been part of work to create a vaccine that works across coronaviruses.

      Last month, it emerged that the US had funded similar research to that outlined in the 2018 grant proposal.

      Files obtained by The Intercept as part of an FOI request to drill down the possible root of COVID and whether the US had any role in it showed that in 2014, the National Health Institute (NIH) approved a five-year, yearly grant of $666,000 a year for five years ($3.3million) for EcoHealth Alliance, a US research organization, into bat coronavirus.

      EcoHealth Alliance, in its proposal to the NIH, acknowledged the risks involved were ‘the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs’ among staff, who could then carry it out of the lab.

      The NIH gave them the money anyway – something Dr Anthony Fauci was previously forced to admit when testifying before Congress in May this year. EcoHealth Alliance then gave $599,000 of the money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

      At the time and repeatedly since, Fauci has denied that the research constituted what’s known as ‘gain-of-function’ research.

      Gain-of-function research is the scientific term given to research that deliberately changes an organism to make give it new functions in order to test a theory.

      When applies to studying human viruses, it can mean making the virus more transmissible and or even deadly in order to test what can and can’t survive it.

      ‘The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful,’ Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, tweeted.

      Ebright studied the papers and alleged that the scientists performed ‘the construction – in Wuhan – of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells’.


      1. John Taylor Gatto, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, Carl Sagan & Antony Sutton also said, “they are dumbing us down”, and they did not carry the baggage that Howard Zin had, of being a Marxist who despises The US and lied about it’s founding principles, and is actually the proximate source of the 1619 Project, a historical lie of major proportions.

        If you read my articles on 9/11, you will see that the physics of the so-called ‘collapses’ proves that they were blown up by chemical explosives.

        I have indeed provided adequate evidence that SARS/Covid is a bioweapon. There is adequate evidence that the mRNA gene therapy injections are toxic.,, perhaps the most terrifying revelation of all, This is a planned genocidal program. It is part of the Great Reset agenda..

        But it is telling that these so-called ‘vaccines’ are unproven, untested and shielded from liability.

        One thing is crystal clear, you are absolutely correct, WE ARE IN DEEP SHIT.

        The only thing we can do is remain sane and try to stay alive. The rocky road ahead leads to the abyss. We must pull over and refuse to go any further.

        Good luck!


      2. More than 500,000 adverse events reported after COVID vaccines, from temps to neuropathy
        As of Sept. 27, 2021 there were 569,294 adverse event reports associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S., according to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

        he most common disorders reported after COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. include temperature-related issues (226,457), skin problems (174,793), and a category that includes movement, muscle, nerve, neuropathy, numbness, and paralysis (164,200).

        That’s according to an original analysis of the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

        Next in line are non-specified pain-related issues (139,395), feeling abnormal, tired or weak (139,395), injection site reactions (121,538), headaches (111,549), heart events (79,012), and lung or respiratory problems (77,976).

        Abdominal problems (40,415), getting COVID-19 after vaccination (34,589), and blood clots or bleeding, including in the heart and brain (32,023), are also common among the VAERS reports.

        So are product issues (29,661) and mood or memory problems (31,720).

        As of Sept. 27, 2021 there were 569,294 adverse event reports associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S., with a total of 2,433,730 symptoms reported.

        Report an adverse event after vaccination online here.

        Each symptom reported does not necessarily equal one patient. Adverse event reports often include multiple symptoms for a single patient.

        Reporting of illnesses and symptoms that occur after COVID-19 vaccination does not necessarily mean they were caused by the vaccine. The system is designed to collect adverse events that occur after vaccination to uncover any patterns of illnesses that were not captured during vaccine studies.

        Read CDC info on COVID-19 vaccine here.

        Reports can be made by doctors, patients or family members and/or acquaintances, or vaccine industry representatives.

        Scientists have estimated that adverse events occur at a rate manyfold higher than what is reported in VAERS, since it is assumed that most adverse events are not reported through the tracking system.

        Read: Exclusive summary: COVID-19 vaccine concerns.

        However, some observers claim COVID-19 vaccine adverse events are not as likely to be underreported as those associated with other medicine, due to close monitoring and widespread publicity surrounding COVID-19 vaccination.

        Approximately 391 million doses of COVID-19 vaccine have been given in the U.S. to 185 million people. It’s estimated about 56% of the population is fully vaccinated. This is not believed to include more than one million people who crossed the border illegally so far this year.

        According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the benefits of COVID-19 vaccine outweigh the risks for all groups and age categories authorized to receive it.

        Watch: CDC disinformation re: studies on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in people who have had COVID-19.

        The following is a summary of health alerts issued in the U.S. or around the world, and how the adverse events reported in the VAERS database fit in. That’s followed by a list broken down into 78 groupings of common categories of side effects reported.

        Health concerns raised in the U.S. and around the world:

        Functional Neurological Disorder

        Researchers in the United Kingdom are studying cases of Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) in women in their 30s who became ill after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. FND Symptoms can include limb weakness, paralysis, tremor, spasms, problems walking, speech problems, tingling, vision loss, seizures, fatigue, anxiety, chronic pain, memory symptoms, and blackouts.

        An analysis of the VAERS database shows hundreds of thousands of reports of such symptoms.

        Lymphadenopathy: 16,858 reports

        Earlier this month, the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was found to be associated with an increased risk of lymphadenopathy, swelling or inflammation of lymph nodes according to a real-world case-control study from Israel.

        Facial Paralysis: 5,273 reports

        An analysis in Hong Kong showed risk of Bell’s palsy is higher with CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) shot, a vaccine formulation not currently used in the U.S. Bell’s palsy is facial paralysis, muscle twitching, or weakness. It may include change in taste and pain around the ear, increased sensitivity to sound known as hyperacusis.

        Guillain-Barre Syndrome Paralysis: 696 reports

        In July, the FDA added warnings about Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) paralysis in people who got the Johnson and Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. GBS is an autoimmune disorder that damages nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis. One in 20 cases is fatal.

        The European Union has also reported GBS as a possible side effect from Johnson and Johnson’s vaccine. In the U.K. and India, scientists have also linked Guillain-Barre syndrome to the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is not used in the U.S. A case has also been reported in a patient who got the Pfizer vaccine.

        According to CDC, most cases have been reported about two weeks after vaccination in men, many 50 years and older.

        A study in Journal of Neurology examined possible links between the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, and acute Central Nervous System (CNS) demyelination, including Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

        Demyelination including Multiple Sclerosis (MS): More than 650 reports

        Demyelinating diseases damage the protective covering surrounding nerve fibers in the brain, optic nerves and spinal cord, causing neurological problems. Ages ranged from 24 to 64 years old. Four patients were ultimately diagnosed with exacerbation of their stable MS. Two were diagnosed with new cases of MS. One was diagnosed with neuromyelitis optica.

        An analysis of the VAERS database shows more than 650 related reports, including MS.

        Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Endocarditis: 2,810 reports

        According to CDC, it is investigating reports of the heart disorders myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccine to see if there is a relationship.

        Learn more about COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis.

        The Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was found to triple the risk of myocarditis, according to a real-world case-control study from Israel, which found “vaccination had a strong association with an increased risk of myocarditis.”

        The FDA added a warning to Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines about risk of heart inflammation.

        As of June of 2021, CDC said more than 1,200 cases of heart inflammation (myocarditis or pericarditis) in young people had been reported after Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccination.

        More than half were after the second dose.
        Most of the injuries are in males under age 30.
        However, in August, a new, independent study of medical records found the incidences of myocarditis and pericarditis are more than five times more common than CDC reported.

        The Israeli Ministry of Health announced it’s monitoring for heart inflammation after Pfizer’s vaccine due to reports of problems. An Aug. 10 study in JAMA Cardiology confirms the Pfizer vaccine’s previously identified myocarditis (heart inflammation) risk in young boys.

        Read the study here.

        A study of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines published in September finds teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer heart issues from COVID-19 vaccination than from COVID.

        Breakthrough COVID cases (lack of immunity): 34,589

        Concerns about waning immunity heightened in June 2021 when Israel announced that about half of the adults infected with COVID-19 during its outbreak in the June 2021 time period were fully vaccinated. The fully vaccinated individuals had received the Pfizer shots.

        In early September, an analysis of data in Israel showed almost 60% of those hospitalized for COVID were fully vaccinated. “This is a very clear warning sign for the rest of the world,” said Ran Balicer, CIO at Clalit Health Services, Israel’s largest health maintenance organization. “If it can happen here, it can probably happen anywhere.”

        With evidence of seriously waning immunity at the five- to six-month mark, and thousands of fully vaccinated patients hospitalized with COVID-19 or dying from the virus, CDC is now recommending a third “booster” shot in some patients.

        The VAERS database shows 34,589 reports of COVID-19 after vaccination as well as COVID-19 pneumonia, suspected cases, and complications.

        Blood Clots and Disorders: More than 32,000 reports

        In late June, the first case of a blood clot disorder called “thrombosis with thrombocytopenia” after an RNA double-dose vaccine was reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine. The case was that of a 65-year-old man who developed symptoms ten days after his second dose of the Moderna vaccine.

        According to the CDC, “Recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event — blood clots with low platelets — which has caused deaths.”

        The CDC and FDA say they identified 47 confirmed reports of people who “got the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and later developed TTS. Women younger than 50 years old especially should be aware of the rare but increased risk of this adverse event.” The agencies also confirmed two cases after Moderna’s vaccine but say they do not believe there is a link.

        An Aug. 10 study in JAMA Cardiology urged caution in giving COVID-19 vaccine to certain high-risk patients due to the vaccine link to thrombocytopenia with thrombosis. “One of the devastating manifestations of this syndrome, termed vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), is cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST),” say the study authors. The link involves the AstraZeneca/Oxford and Johnson & Johnson vaccines, according to the study.

        Read the study here.

        An editorial published in the Journal of the American Medical Association recommended women under age 50 avoid the Johnson & Johnson vaccine due to concerns about blood clots. The recommendation discussed 12 case reports of a blood disorder known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia following the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

        The AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, not used in the U.S., has been linked to a dangerous disorder involving blood clots with low blood platelets. On April 7, 2021, the European Medicines Agency says it made the association after it analyzed 62 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 24 cases of splanchnic vein thrombosis reported in the EU drug safety database (EudraVigilance) as of March 22, 2021; 18 of which were fatal.

        The Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccine was temporarily removed from the market.

        Read: BBC radio news anchor dies of blood clots after COVID vaccine

        The Johnson & Johnson vaccine was allowed back on the market April 27, 2021 with new warnings about the disorder.

        Many countries have restricted vaccines in people under age 65, 60 or 50 due to reports of blood clots in young people. Some countries have halted the Astra Zeneca or Johnson & Johnson shots due to blood clot concerns.

        Menstrual-related: 10,318 reports

        All brands of COVID-19 vaccines are associated with changes in menstrual cycles of women, according to a British study in September. The more-than-10,000 reports of menstrual issues in the VAERS database includes periods that are abnormally heavy, painful, irregular, short or absent.

        Death: 8,164

        “Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare,” according to the CDC.

        “Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem,” the national public health agency emphasizes. “A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.”

        Pregnancy-related: 1,844 reports

        CDC says that COVID-19 vaccines are safe for pregnant women and their unborn children. There are more than 1,800 reports of pregnancy-related problems in the VAERS database.

        Herpes-related: 6,339 reports

        The Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was found to be associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster infection, according to a real-world case-control study from Israel.

        Anaphylactic reaction or shock: 1,803 reports

        According to the CDC, “anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and has occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States.”

        Appendicitis, perforated, appendectomy: 926 reports

        The Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was found to be associated with increased risk of appendicitis, according to a real-world case-control study from Israel.


      3. So tell us Ian, what are the ingredients in the placebo in these studies?
        I read a report that these placebo injections had a different kind of toxin in them. They are not simply saline solutions as we might imagine.

        Some researchers conducting clinical trials on a COVID-19 vaccine have not revealed to the public what the placebo contains, but they should. This is because the placebo ingredients influence how effective or harmful the active treatment, with which the placebo is compared, appears. Our new guideline published in PLOS Medicine remedies this problem by providing a template for reporting what’s in placebo controls.

        In some COVID-19 vaccine trials, participants in the control group (the group receiving a placebo) are injected with a saline solution. In other trials, they receive an actual treatment. For example, in the COVID-19 vaccine developed by the University of Oxford, the control group receives a meningitis and septicaemia vaccine as a placebo.

        The benefit of using an actual vaccine as the placebo control is that it will cause a similar reaction at the site of the injection as the COVID-19 vaccine, such as muscle pain and soreness. This prevents patients from knowing whether they are getting the placebo or the real treatment. The scientific term for hiding knowledge of who got what treatment is “blinding”.

        If patients know they are getting the real thing, they may expect to get better, and their expectations can make them get better a bit faster. And if they know they are getting the placebo, they could drop out of the trial because they know they aren’t getting the actual treatment. Adding an actual vaccine to the placebo control helps the trial remain blinded and so prevents bias arising from differing expectations.


    2. William Gates Sr. Worked With Planned Parenthood and the Rockefeller-Financed Eugenics Movement in America
      Bill Gates’ father is William H. Gates Sr., a Co-Founder of Preston Gates & Ellis (they had offices across the United States and China). A prominent banker and lawyer, William H. Gates Sr. was also deeply involved with politics and “philanthropy”. In the era before Roe v. Wade, he sat on the board of Margret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood.

      Why is that important? The Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion, but almost no body knows that legal abortion was a law formed by eugenicists, to “genetically improve” the population, by “reducing” the population.

      In his book, ‘Vaccine-Nation: Poisoning the Population, One Shot at a Time’, Andreas Moritz, documented the very real eugenics connection between the Rockefeller Foundation (and family) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (and family). In it, He write this about them… “While launching the initiative called the Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines, Bill Gates had said in 2000, “It seems like every new corner we turn, the Rockefellers are already there. And in some cases, they have been there for a long, long time.”

      Gates made that speech while announcing that his foundation was pledging $555 million to health programs across the globe.

      I say ironic because the Rockefellers have been notorious in their funding of controversial research, dubbed by some as “genocidal”. This research concerns depopulation programs, communist and socialist programs, ‘mind control’ or behavioural modification experiments and the notoriously controversial experiments of Alfred Kinsey.

      But the Gates and Rockefellers are old friends and partners in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). The alliance, which controls major international vaccine programs, has the following as members: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, UNISEF, World Bank, WHO, and many national governments.

      In vaccine research, it doesn’t get bigger than this. I am detailing this to show just how incestuous the vaccine (and medical) world is. It also illustrates that power is concentrated in just a handful of [unelected] entities.”,+the+Rockefellers+are+already+there.+And+in+some+cases,+they+have+been+there+for+a+long,+long+time.%22&source=bl&ots=JVx2QiwRFZ&sig=ACfU3U2raoI_F2uZlD00k99yD6P-7KtS8A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3iZbP6IbpAhWKXM0KHbS0AD8Q6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=It%20seems%20like%20every%20new%20corner%20we%20turn%2C%20the%20Rockefellers%20are%20already%20there.%20And%20in%20some%20cases%2C%20they%20have%20been%20there%20for%20a%20long%2C%20long%20time.%22&f=false

      If you want to know exactly what those in the Rockefeller-financed eugenics movement think of the common, or “unfit” man, read the following statements made by Margret Sanger…

      “But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies.”

      “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

      “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population…”

      “Eugenics without birth control seems to us a house builded [sic] upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit.”

      “No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.”

      As a side note, in 2010, William H. Gates Sr. was also the face of a socialist (communist)-styled State Income Tax Initiative (Initiative 1098), in Washington State.


    3. THE VACCINE DEATH REPORT – Millions Have Died From The Injections

      The Vaccine Death Report shows all the scientific evidence that millions of innocent people lost their lives and hundreds of millions are suffering crippling side effects, after being injected with the experimental covid injections. The report exposes the strategic methods used by governments and health agencies to hide 99% of all vaccine injuries and deaths. You will also learn who is really behind all of this, and what their true agenda is.

      The report also shows horrifying lab results

      from microscopic investigation of some vaccine vials:

      living creatures with tentacles, as well as

      self-assembling nanorobots. See picture:



        Evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events
        resulting from the experimental COVID-19 injections
        V E R S I O N 1 . 0 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 1

        P U R P O S E
        The purpose of this report is to document how all over the world millions of people have died,
        and hundreds of millions of serious adverse events have occurred, after injections with the
        experimental mRNA gene therapy. We also reveal the real risk of an unprecedented genocide.

        F A C T S
        Our aim is to only present solid facts, and stay away from unfounded claims. The data is clear
        and verifiable. References can be found with all presented information, which is provided as a
        starting point for further investigation.

        C O M P L I C I T Y
        The data shows that we are currently witnessing the greatest organized mass murder in the
        history of our world. The severity of this situation compels us to ask this critical question: will we
        rise up to the defense of billions of innocent people? Or will we permit personal profit over
        justice, and be complicit? Networks of lawyers all over the world are preparing class action
        lawsuits to prosecute all who are serving this criminal agenda. Hundreds of millions of people
        worldwide are rising up against this criminal operation. To all who have been complicit so far, we
        say: There is still time to turn and choose the side of truth. Please make the right choice.
        W O R L D W I D E

        Although this report focuses on the situation in the United States, it also applies to the rest of
        the world, as the same type of experimental injections with similar death rates – and comparable
        systems of corruption to hide these numbers – are used worldwide. Therefor we encourage
        everyone around the world to share this report. May it be a wake up call for all of humanity



      2. MODERNA: 300,000 ADVERSE EVENTS
        A whistleblower from Moderna made a screenshot of an internal company notice labeled
        “Confidential – For internal distribution only”, showing there were 300,000 adverse events
        reported in only three months time.” This is a quote from this confidential notice:
        ‘This enabled the team to effectively manage approximately 300,000 adverse event reports
        and 30,000 medical information requests in a three month span to support the global launch of
        their COVID-19 vaccine.’


      3. Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst who joined Stew Peters to discuss the new contact tracing apps that Australians are being forced to use and which will inexorably arrive here.

        She says:

        “Americans thought that being vaccinated, they were getting their ticket back to their liberties and freedom, when actually, it is a gateway to an obedience platform and potentially, an execution platform, if you are not obedient, based on your score…

        “Let’s go to US Patent #20210082583 [Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals filed by Gal Ehrlich and Maier Fenster ] and if you go to Section [0378] – remember now, this patent talks about having devices that connect to external servers, including apps and…what it says is:

        “‘In view of the pandemic, the government may order the citizens to install a dedicated application on their smartphones…to help the government with the logistics of the vaccination procedures.’

        “It goes on to say that, ‘In some embodiments, the app and/or the smart device is configured to inform on the user’s location at all times and to communicate with adjacent smart devices (via Bluetooth for example) to assess the interactions between users, for example vicinity between users, movement of users, etc.)’




      The COVID vaccine is not something that happened overnight, at “Warp Speed”. It is the culmination of decades of collaboration among several individuals and institutions, including Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, NIH, DARPA, the Rockefeller Foundation, Johns Hopkins University, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and others, in addition to the pharmaceutical companies who, like all of the above are subsidizing this global genocide with the tax dollars of the very citizens being extinguished.

      This is the modern warfare model.

      Dr Richard Fleming, PhD, MD, JD joins journalist, Alex Newman to say that the people responsible for weaponizing and releasing the COVID-19 bio-weapon against humanity will be held accountable.

      Together with Dr Luc Montagnier and others, Dr Fleming, who is a medical doctor and attorney has filed for joint submission to the International Criminal Court (The Hague) alleging that Governments worldwide are complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.

      See Video:


    5. Have spent this rainy morning, 5:30 – current tic tock clock 8:42, reading your work. William you’ve provided links I’m grateful for acknowledging. Hats off

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you Kathlean! I am happy to have your support.
        We are obviously in a very dangerous situation, and we must choose our actions very carefully by not falling for the official narrative, and doing the best we can to keep from being forced into a medical procedure that is very likely toxic to our personal health.
        Please keep you and yours safe.


      2. Kathlean, This is an important presentation, Give it a close listen:

        David Martin presents hard evidence showing COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon.
        February 17, 2021 11:30 AM By James Bailey

        David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

        Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and was released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.

        In my opinion, the evidence presented below along with additional evidence presented in the video proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

        The following quotes from Dr. Martin were transcribed from the video.

        “Historically, coronaviruses have not been associated with significant illnesses in humans. So how is it that suddenly in 2002 going into 2003 that we have this magical alteration in beta coronaviruses that suddenly makes them lethal?

        And that question is the fundamental question that is behind an inquiry that we’ve been on since 1999 and Ralph Baric and NIAID’s (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) first efforts to figure out a way to increase the pathogenicity of beta coronaviruses.

        In 1999, there was a grant given to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and in that grant there was an effort to figure out how to amplify certain pathogenicities of what was called recombinant technology around coronavirus. Baric had a decade plus history in working with coronaviruses generally. He had done a lot of work in veterinary science around cardiac conditions for rabbits. There was a huge amount of research around cardiomyopathy in rabbits that had something to do with coronavirus. But in 1999, NIAID funded a project in which we first saw the amplification of pathogenic components of the beta coronavirus. (Note: Anthony Fauci has been Director of NIAID since 1984.)

        And it’s very important to understand that happened in 1999 and the work that was done between 1999 and then published in 2002 and 2003 actually started suggesting that there were parts of the coronavirus that could be modified, specifically the Ace-2 receptor and the S-1 spike protein, that could be modified to increase the degree to which the coronavirus could represent a health threat to humans.

        Let that just settle in for a moment. Three years before we have the first SARS outbreak (in 2002-2003, called SARS1) we have researchers who are working on amplifying the pathogenicity of the things that make coronavirus extremely harmful to the human system. Now, that feels like that should invoke in at least one or two people a set of questions, which is, how is it that we went for allegedly whatever our evolutionary time frame is where we were coexisting with coronaviruses and suddenly we started manipulating them with recombinant technology in 1999, 2000, 2001, and suddenly nature figures out a way to make these things also highly pathogenetic, in 2002 and 2003, using the exact same mechanism that we’ve done in the lab. Possible? Yes. Plausible? Not a chance.

        Listen to the presentation by David Martin at this link:


    6. You More Likely to Die From the Shot than Covid

      Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas, analyzes evidence that shows Covid vaccines are very dangerous and more people are dying from the injections rather than from illness diagnosed as Covid. Dr. McCullough said that Americans stopped taking Covid vaccines in late April after many Covid injection-linked deaths were reported and he contends that Americans failed to meet Joe Biden’s target of a 70% vaccination rate. He said that people are walking off the job rather than risking their lives by taking Covid shots. According to a September 2021 analysis, the COVID shots have killed five times more seniors (65+) than the infection. In younger people and children, the risk associated with the COVID shot, compared to the risk of COVID-19, is bound to be even more pronounced. 50% of reported deaths after COVID-19 “vaccination” occur within 24 hours, and 80% occur within the first week; we have previously reported that the CDC counts people as unvaccinated if they only received one dose of a Covid injection and if it has been less than two weeks since they received their second jab. Data show higher vaccination rates do not translate into lower COVID-19 case rates.





  2. This report also lays out ample evidence that researchers at the WIV, in conjunction with U.S. scientists and funded by both the PRC government and the U.S. government, were conducting gainof-function research on coronaviruses at the WIV, at times under BSL-2 conditions. Much of this research was focused on modifying the spike protein of coronaviruses that could not infect humans so they could bind to human immune systems. The stated purpose of this work was to identified viruses with pandemic potential and to create a broad-spectrum coronavirus vaccine. In many instances, the scientists were successful in creating “chimeric viruses” – or viruses created from the pieces of other viruses – that could infect human immune systems. With dangerous research like this conducted at safety levels similar to a dentist’s office, a natural or genetically modified virus could have easily escaped the lab and infected the community.

    Committee Minority Staff has also identified scientists who are directly tied to the WIV, and who worked on gain-of-function research in the years prior to the start of the current pandemic, who had the ability to modify genetically modify coronaviruses without leaving any trace evidence. An American scientist, Dr. Ralph Baric, assisted in creating a method to leave no trace of genetic modification as early as 2005. And as early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same. This makes it clear that claims by the scientific community that SARS-CoV-2 could not be man-made because it has no genetic modification markers are disingenuous.

    We conclude there is ample proof that the virus could have been genetically manipulated, and that it is vitally important we fully investigate this hypothesis to determine if that happened here.

    The Cover-Up

    In the original report, we laid out many of the ways the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) went to great lengths to cover up the initial epidemic, and how their cover-up likely turned what could have been a local outbreak into a global pandemic. The CCP detained doctors in order to silence them, and disappeared journalists who attempted to expose the truth. They destroyed lab samples, and hid the fact there was clear evidence of human-to-human transmission. And they still refuse to allow a real investigation into the origins. At the same time, the WHO, under Director General Tedros, failed to warn the world of the impending pandemic. Instead, he parroted CCP talking points, acting as a puppet of General Secretary Xi.

    In this addendum, we have uncovered further evidence of how top scientists at the WIV and Dr. Peter Daszak, an American scientist, furthered that cover-up. Their actions include bullying other scientists who questioned whether the virus could have leaked from a lab; misleading the world about how a virus can be modified without leaving a trace; and, in many, instances directly lying about the nature of the research they were conducting, as well as the low-level safety protocols they were using for that research.

    These actions not only delayed an initial investigation into the possibility of a lab leak costing valuable time, but provide further proof the virus likely leaked from the WIV. These actions also call into question the way in which U.S. government grants are used in overseas labs and call for more oversight of those grants.

    Click to access ORIGINS-OF-COVID-19-REPORT.pdf



    1. Are Viruses Living?
      9 June 2004 by Vincent Racaniello

      Let’s first define life. According to the online Merriam-Webster Dictionary, life is “an organismic state characterized by capacity for metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction.”

      Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.

      When a virus encounters a cell, a series of chemical reactions occur that lead to the production of new viruses. These steps are completely passive, that is, they are predefined by the nature of the molecules that comprise the virus particle. Viruses don’t actually ‘do’ anything. Often scientists and non-scientists alike ascribe actions to viruses such as employing, displaying, destroying, evading, exploiting, and so on. These terms are incorrect because viruses are passive, completely at the mercy of their environment.

      Are Viruses Living?



      1. In 1838, upon reading Thomas Malthus’ “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” (who is known for calling for the courting of the plague to address the crisis of overpopulation), Darwin formulated his theory for “evolution” based on the “natural selection” of the fittest, he coined the term as an analogy of what he termed the “artificial selection” of selective breeding, with reference in particular to the practice of horse breeding. Darwin saw a similarity between farmers picking the best stock in selective breeding, and a Malthusian “Nature” selecting from chance variants.

        That is, Darwin’s ideas of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest” implied no directionality to evolution but rather was based upon Nature’s selection of random variants. But how does one part of an organism evolve without affecting the other parts of said organism?

        According to Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, there is an inherent “potential” in evolution; the potential for change is inherent within the organism, and the shaping of its many parts occurs in a harmonic, coherent way. That is, change moves in a purposeful manner, not a random manner.

        The evolution of wings for flight, the eyes for sight, the nervous system for thought; Geoffroy was stating that these were not the result of countless minute mutations occurring and being selected upon separate from the other, but that the transformations were occurring with the very intention to create forms of flight, sight and thought.

        By Darwin rejecting this thesis, he created a paradox within his own theory. Either the potential for change is inherent in the organism in which many parts are able to change in a harmonic/coherent way, or it is not. However, if it is the latter, as Darwin claims it to be, random change of any part by itself without acknowledgement of the whole would more often than not lead to the death of the organism, as seen in studies of embryo formation, or would create a Dr. Moreau’s Island of freaks (which by the bye is another novel by our anti-hero H.G. Wells).




      2. SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits
        V(D)J Recombination In Vitro
        Hui Jiang 1,2,* and Ya-Fang Mei 2,*
        1 Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University,
        SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
        2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden
        * Correspondence: (H.J.); (Y.-F.M.)

        Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV–2) has led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic, severely affecting public health and the global economy.
        Adaptive immunity plays a crucial role in fighting against SARS–CoV–2 infection and directly influences the clinical outcomes of patients. Clinical studies have indicated that patients with severe COVID–19 exhibit delayed and weak adaptive immune responses; however, the mechanism by which SARS–CoV–2 impedes adaptive immunity remains unclear. Here, by using an in vitro cell line, we report that the SARS–CoV–2 spike protein significantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is required for effective V(D)J recombination in adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.
        Keywords: SARS–CoV–2; spike; DNA damage repair; V(D)J recombination; vaccine

        Click to access viruses-13-02056-v2.pdf


      3. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) altered the definition of “vaccine” because of concern that its definition did not apply to COVID-19 vaccines, according to newly released internal emails.

        The agency updated its definition on Sept. 1.

        The definition was formerly, “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” It is now, “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

        One CDC employee in August, shortly before the definition was changed, said that the definition was being used by “right-wing COVID-19 pandemic deniers … to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines,” according to the newly published emails.

        The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines utilize messenger RNA technology. All three COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the United States have plummeted in effectiveness against infection in recent months after initially being promoted as protecting against infection and severe disease.

        The definition “was twisted to claim that the existing COVID-19 vaccines were not vaccines because they only prevented severe illness,” the CDC employee said.

        Alycia Downs, listed on LinkedIn as the lead health communication specialist for the agency, messaged a colleague on Aug. 19, saying she needed to update the definition and others like it “since these definitions are outdated and being used by some to say COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines per CDC’s own definition.”

        Downs didn’t receive a response so she messaged again the following week, writing, “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition.”

        Valerie Morelli, another CDC official, approved the change on Sept. 1, even though it seems to differ greatly from a definition she laid out in an earlier document (pdf).



  3. Video: Does the Virus Exist? Has SARS-CoV-2 Been Isolated? Interview with Christine Massey
    By Christine Massey and Prof Michel Chossudovsky
    Global Research, September 13, 2021

    The Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that they had isolated and identified “a new type of virus”. Then on the 28th of January 2020, the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that the novela corona virus had been isolated.

    Christine Massey, M.Sc conducted an extensive report over a period of more than a year. The central question raised in her study is the following:

    “is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?

    Christine Massey submitted Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to some 90 Health /Science institutions.

    Does the Virus Exist? The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.”


  4. An Open Letter To Dr. Anthony Fauci
    “You are responsible for all government funded AIDS treatment research. In
    the name of right, you make decisions that cost the lives of others. I call
    the decisions you are making acts of murder.”
    Larry Kramer
    “An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci”
    San Francisco Examiner, June 26, 1988

    Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer and should not be the guest of honor at any
    event that reflects on the past decade of the AIDS crisis. Your refusal to
    hear the screams of AIDS activists early in the crisis resulted in the deaths
    of thousands of Queers. Your present inaction is causing today’s increase in
    HIV infection outside of the Queer community. We are outraged that Project
    Inform, an organization that supposedly works on behalf of the infected
    community, would insult us by bringing you to our city. You can’t hide the
    fact that you are nothing but a despicable Reagan-era holdover and drug
    company mouthpiece.

    With 270,000 dead from AIDS and millions more infected with HIV, you should
    not be honored at a dinner. You should be put before a firing squad.

    Clinical trials: government sanctioned mass murder of PWAs

    Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer because you oversee government sponsored
    clinical trials that test and retest combinations of immunosuppressive, toxic
    therapies that kill people with HIV. The majority of U.S. clinical trials
    involve worthless antivirals like AZT combined with some other drug
    (generally another toxic antiviral). What these tests have proven is that you
    are able to piss away billions of dollars testing dangerous compounds that DO
    NOTHING to improve the quality of life, to stop opportunistic infections or
    to extend survival for people with HIV. AZT, 3TC, ddI, ddC, d4T and the
    current crop of protease inhibitors are nothing but poison. Ten years of the
    plague has shown us that trying to kill the virus kills people with AIDS, and
    you, Dr. Fauci, know it.

    How long will it take you to start focusing on the immune system, how to
    boost it and how to prevent the opportunistic infections that are killing
    people with AIDS? Even you admit that “the immune response against HIV is
    extremely powerful and is clearly more effective than any of the therapeutic
    approaches currently available in controlling virus replication.” Still , you
    give your blessing to clinical trials of highly profitable toxins that
    destroy PWAs’ already compromised immune systems.

    CD4s and viral load: a marketing exec’s wet dream

    Anthony Fauci, you are a liar because you have known for years that CD4
    counts are a travesty of a surrogate marker that, through drug company
    coercion, have been elevated to the status of “a standard.” Now that everyone
    else knows it too, you and your corporate drug company cronies are urging
    researchers to foist another useless marker, peripheral blood viral load
    counts, on our frightened, desperate community. Peripheral blood viral load
    fluctuates in blood circulation and offers virtually no indication of the
    health or disease progression in HIV+ people. According to a recent article
    in the April 1995 issue of Lancet concerning viral replication, “the
    principle that virus suppression will produce a major clinical benefit must
    remain an article of faith.” Information like that isn’t stopping doctors of
    death like Marcus Conant from insisting that “patients should be treated
    earlier with combination therapy, and we should be using markers such as PCR
    and branched DNA to measure viral load as surrogate markers in clinical

    Your scheme isn’t too difficult to figure out; promote another invalid
    surrogate marker that has no relation to health or life expectancy of PWAs;
    develop a test that costs $200-$300 to measure this invalid marker; encourage
    the creation of more deadly drugs that effect this invalid marker; and then
    compare the pathetic results you get from these deadly drugs to the more
    pathetic results you got from AZT and other nukes. In the eyes of the
    government everybody wins. Companies that sell drugs and market tests get
    rich and PWAs who sacrifice their bodies in your trials of death are
    eliminated from the face of the earth.

    The fact that your clinical trials aren’t meant to save our lives is no
    secret. A December 1994 BETA article “A Remarkable Combination: AZT plus 3TC”
    reports that the Phase II/III studies of these drugs were “designed to
    evaluate the effect of the combination on laboratory markers of HIV disease
    progression, such as viral load and CD4 counts, not critical endpoints, such
    as opportunistic infections and survival.”


  5. Christine Lagarde on how to address COVID-19, climate change and inequality

    Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, spoke with Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, as part of the TIME 100 Talks program on 1 September.
    They discussed COVID-19 recovery, climate change, inequality and more.
    Read the full transcript below.

    The following is a discussion between Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank. It was featured by TIME on 1 September as part of the TIME 100 Talks programs.

    I’m Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. And I have the great pleasure to have a discussion today with the president of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde. President Lagarde, I think we met for the first time just about 20 years ago, and you were a very prominent lawyer at the time. In the meantime, you have developed also a career as a politician, as an economist, as a statesman, and as a banker.

    Knowing and admiring your global perspectives and, I would say, your global responsibilities, I would like to concentrate our discussion on what I consider the four foremost challenges we are faced with at this present time: COVID-19 of course, climate change, inclusion and especially gender parity, and finally, the fourth industrial revolution — how well we can harness new technologies in order so they can serve and not harm humanity.


  6. Justin Haskins, editorial director of the Heartland Institute, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to expose a shocking conversation between two Great Reset proponents — Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (Europe’s equivalent to the Fed).

    The way Schwab and Lagarde discuss the role central banks should play in establishing societal norms, determining your way of life, and defending against potential crisis is proof that the Great Reset is upon us, Justin explained. And the scariest part is that they’re not even trying to hide it. The entire, unbelievable conversation has been published on the WEF website, which you can read here.

    Glenn read an excerpt from the conversation:

    Christine Lagarde: At the ECB, we have now wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire Governing Council unanimously agree that the fight against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine monetary policy. So at least the European Central Bank is of the view that climate change is an important component in order to decide on monetary policy. …

    Can we arrive at that trade-off between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm, is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we do have major threats on the horizon that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. …

    So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. How can we come together to make sure that we secure the first priority, which is life, and also protect the way of life that people have? And make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some people, that they just cannot tolerate it. I think that the trade-off that we reach will probably require some redistribution, because it is clear that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.
    “Do you understand, America, what that means?” Glenn exclaimed. “You have elites, that you never elected, that are having these meetings … deciding what is a legitimate need for you. And telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime. You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading this wrong?”

    Don’t miss out on content from Dave Rubin free of big tech censorship. Listen to The Rubin Report now.
    “This is absolutely what is being said here,” Justin agreed. “She’s very clear that we need to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all these people, hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from this supposedly existential threat of climate change. And their wants, and their desires, and their quality of living, all of that has to come second.”

    “This is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official, who is accountable directly to the people. This is a central bank saying, we’re going to print money. We’re going to use monetary policy, to impose these ideas, to rework society in order to accomplish our goals,” Justin added, addressing Lagarde’s call for “some redistribution.”

    Will Great Reset elites — not elected by the U.S. — soon be dictating to the rest of the world? Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn and Justin break it down:


      1. Social Justice and the Emergence of Covid Tyranny
        by Michael Rectenwald

        Signs of incipient totalitarianism impulses have been evident since the rise of political correctness.[1] Yet, warnings from those who saw the character of contemporary “social justice” went largely unheeded. Nevertheless, even before degenerating into “wokeness,” social justice bore the seeds of civilizational decline and the simultaneous rise of social and political tyranny. The weaponization of mostly feigned fragility by snowflake totalitarians has been marshaled to abrogate the rights of those deemed offensive, injurious, and even “dangerous.” It also has evinced “paralogistic discourse,” or “[d]iscourse that is out of touch with reality, involving illogical, fallacious, unwarranted premises and conclusions.”[2] Such thinking is characteristic of societal hysteria.[3] his weaponization escalated, germinating “cancel culture,” the buds from which neo-Stalinist purges have since blossomed.

        As I was first to point out, social justice amounts to “practical postmodernism.”[4] The relativism, subjectivism, and antiobjectivity of postmodern theory, as well as the priority it places on language, have been harnessed by social justice activists and their followers and put to political ends. Social justice ideology claims that “narratives,” “my truth,” and language trump or produce reality. In terms of transgender ideology, this means that declaring one’s gender, or mere (re)naming, supersedes and cancels biology. In terms of critical race theory and the Black Lives Matter movement, it means that personal stories of oppression overwrite evidence, statistics, and the arc of history. Given that appeals to objective criteria are banished, when backed by the requisite power, such claims are necessarily authoritarian. Without objective criteria, there is no court of appeal other than power, and thus such “truths” are deemed incontrovertible.[5] The legal ramifications of practical postmodernism have been nothing less than astonishing.

        The policies of so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) accelerated the already prevalent upward movement of unqualified persons, those who have achieved important positions thanks to affirmative action and adherence to political ideology. DEI (or DIE) metastasized throughout the culture at large, with signs of the upward mobility of the unqualified seen in government, academia, and the corporate world. On Twitter, the accounts of unremarkable activists and otherwise unaccomplished leftists are granted the official blue checkmark of authority and significance.

        Historically, the upward movement of the unqualified has been a harbinger of increasing authoritarianism; the unqualified favor authoritarianism, which protects their unearned status, and authoritarianism selects the unqualified, who become avid loyalists of the authoritarian regime.[6] Thus, the upward movement of the unqualified should be taken as a telltale sign.

        The covid regime has extended and deepened the epistemic crisis inaugurated by postmodernism and practical postmodernism. Paralogistic discourse has now penetrated “the science,” which has devolved into a series of non sequiturs backed by force. Science has become postmodern, proving the claim of the sociologist of science Bruno Latour—in the postmodern world, scientific facts are merely socially constructed statements that become “too costly” to overthrow.[7] Science is now a power gambit that relies on enrolling “allies” in a process of “black boxing” claims. Facts are merely “black boxes” that become resistant to opening. Such resistance comes from the number and strength of other facts and allies—other scientists, businesspeople, the media, etc.—that the scientists can link to their own claims, making for black boxes that become too difficult to open. The strength of a fact is the result of the social network that is created in the process of staking a claim.[8]

        The covid regime is postmodern “science in action,” to quote Latour. It has never been about legitimate science or public health. Otherwise, known remedies for covid-19 and the dangers of the vaccines would never have been suppressed.

        Wokeness set the stage for full-blown covid tyranny—the lockdowns, the masking, and now the demonization of the unvaccinated and the institution of the vaccine passport. The weaponization of fragility by the snowflake totalitarians has been extended and amplified by the covid regime, which construes all who oppose it as “domestic violent extremists.” The unvaccinated are the new “dangerous persons,” reprobates who should be locked down, quarantined, and, according to some, shot.

        The woke and covid have proven to be the same people, and the two concerns have converged at every turn. For example, the covid regime came to the defense of the Black Lives Matter movement when over twelve hundred health officials signed an open letter defending BLM protests, claiming that since, like covid, white supremacy poses a great danger to public health, BLM protests should continue unmolested. As unwitting foot soldiers of Big Pharma and agents of the state, Antifa “members” have harassed and shot antivaccine protesters. Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union, now fully woke, has been silent about cancel culture and the civil liberties of nonleftists. Recently, the organization argued that “far from compromising civil liberties, vaccine mandates actually further civil liberties” (emphasis in original). So much for the meaning of “civil liberties” and the ACLU’s defense of bodily autonomy. Like many corporations and trade associations, the National Football League is also woke. The organization requires its players to be vaccinated or otherwise isolated and penalized. It recently canceled the national anthem performance of Grammy Award winner Victory Boyd for her refusal, on religious grounds, of covid vaccines, despite the fact that the singer would have been hundreds of yards from anyone on the field. The list of woke-covid connections could go on and on.

        Covid totalitarianism involves the postmodern inversion of reality and morality. The vaccinated now need to be protected from the unvaccinated, even though vaccine was supposed to provide that protection. It is now “moral” to demand that others take injections against their will and “immoral” to resist such demands.

        The covid regime involves practical postmodern science. “The science” is whatever the authorities claim is true, and all other scientific inquiry is banned in advance. Those engaged in open scientific inquiry and debate are ridiculed and dismissed a priori, and their reputations destroyed.

        Like the assembly of postmodern theorists, the covid regime is a convention of charlatans. Lord Fauci makes declarations ex cathedra, despite their contradiction of accepted epidemiological standards and his own earlier statements, while the medical establishment and the media go along for the ride.

        The covid regime is a consensus of postmodern hysterics. The compliant observe superstitious rituals and direct their outrage at the unvaccinated rather than at the authorities responsible for their madness.

        All of this adds up to the continual elimination of individual rights and the growing power of a delusional bureaucratic state.

        Only a post-postmodern turn can bring about the overthrow of covid totalitarianism. The tide must turn against the practical postmodern consensus, leading to a reinstatement of the competent over the promotion of the unqualified, the reestablishment of legitimate science, a renewed regard for the value of truth, and the subsequent elimination of authoritarianism from the public sphere. In short, it will require the complete reconstruction of the social order.

        Michael Rectenwald, “Why Political Correctness Is Incorrect,” International Business Times, Nov. 22, 2020,

        Andrew M. Łobaczewski, Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of Totalitarianism, rev. ed., ed. Harrison Koehli (Otto, NC: Red Pill Press), forthcoming, p. 87n173. (Page numbers subject to change.)

        Andrew M. Łobaczewski, Political Ponerology, p. 87.

        Michael Rectenwald, Springtime for Snowflakes: “Social Justice” and Its Postmodern Parentage: A Memoir (Nashville, TN: New English Review Press, 2018), pp. xii, and 114–15.

        Michael Rectenwald, “Why Postmodernism Is Incompatible with a Politics of Liberty,” Mises Wire, Apr. 5, 2021.

        Łobaczewski, Political Ponerology, p. 72.

        Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), p. 243.

        Bruno Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).

        SEPTEMBER 16, 2021


  7. Fauci was in fact involved in the AIDS project.

    The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

    This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

    This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.

    While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public. In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:

    “This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”

    The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot in this case.

    Further, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his bogus “invention”

    Indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or with the knowledge that such funds are to be used, in full or in part, in order to carry out—

    (A) an act which constitutes an offense within the scope of a treaty specified in subsection (e)(7), as implemented by the United States, or

    (B) any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its

    nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act….

    By no later than April 11, 2005, Dr. Anthony Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein.

    Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment – Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang – Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004.8

    This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.

    *PDF available on web for free*



  8. Hundreds of protesters took to the streets in New York City’s Times Square Saturday to protest coronavirus vaccine mandate requirements.

    Protesters could be seen waving flags and signs on Saturday with many of them chanting against mandatory vaccines.


    Protesters could be heard chanting “freedom” and “my body my choice.”

    At one point a woman got on a stage and told Biden that she has lost her patience with him prompting chants of “F— Joe Biden” from the crowd.

    The event was part of the “World Wide Rally For Freedom” which took place in cities across the globe including in Australia where protesters clashed with police in videos posted to social media.

    “We will push back against widespread propaganda, by producing our own media, and advancing our own narrative, instead of succumbing to the one being pushed on us. We will not accept the rampant politicization of science and medicine, and we will return these institutions to being neutral sources of information for the benefit of society, over government and corporate interests,” a press release about Saturday’s event reed on the organizers’ website.



    World leaders return to UN and face many escalating crises

    NEW YORK (AP) — World leaders will be back at the United Nations for the first time in two years on Tuesday with a formidable agenda of escalating crises to tackle, including the still raging COVID-19 pandemic and a relentlessly warming planet


  10. COVID 19 is a Meme


    Global Intel Hub — Charlotte, NC 10/10/21 — What is “COVID” is it a disease, a virus, a syndrome, a phenomenon, or just some code word for something else? If a virus, scientists have not been able to isolate it in the lab [1]. We can all agree that it is a phenomenon, which involves not only the medical system but also the political system, law, industry, and all parts of society. In a recent desperate letter from the International Chamber of Shipping [2] who represent $20 Trillion in global trade annually, they blame policies mostly those created by a privately funded organization (of which the greatest private funder is Bill Gates) [3]. From their letter:

    We ask that our transport workers are given priority to receive WHO recognized vaccines and heads of government work together to create globally harmonized, digital, mutually recognized vaccination certificate and processes for demonstrating health credentials (including vaccination status and COVID-19 test results), which are paramount to ensure transport workers can cross international borders.

    So it is easy to see how a Great Reset is implemented logistically. Not only the US Government, but 90% of governments worldwide, do not make their own decisions. The word ‘deep state’ is highly misleading because it implies a shadow government, which affects the United States exclusively. A better word may be “Global Octopus” based on the new logo of the National Reconnaissance Office, the least known but most powerful intelligence agency.

    You may ask, what is the point of electing politicians if they are reading from the same script whether Democrat or Republican. The Rockefeller Foundation says on their site [4]:

    The Rockefeller Foundation exists to meet moments like this.

    RAND Corporation has even made an online tool [5] in order to ‘help policymakers make decisions’ i.e. make decisions for them.

    The World Health Organization (WHO) is another influential policymaker which is a private organization accountable to only it’s funders.

    Johns Hopkins is the medical institution where 99% of COVID 19 data is coming from, as well as being the policy source for the medical industry. Ironically, Johns Hopkins was founded by leading Skull and Bones influencers from Yale, and continues to have that connection and influence to this day [6]. If we are to look at this differently, if there is a single source of information about something that is totally changing the economy of the planet, should we not ask about the origins of this “Johns Hopkins” when it is the shady Skull and Bones society who founded it? If the secret societies are just fun and games, why all the secrecy? Readers may not be surprised that the current CDC director Rochelle Walensky worked at Johns Hopkins medical center as well as receiving her medical degree from Johns Hopkins as well [7]. Also, it will not surprise readers that the “COVID” pandemic is very lucrative for the Walensky’s,

    That became very lucrative for the Walenskys, who became affiliated with the company in October 2019. Only four months later, the company managed to receive a grant in the amount of $16.9 million from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in order to “develop antibacterial peptides with broad activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria.” Information shows that only $5.3 million of that money was initially disbursed to the company, while the remaining $11.6 million is to be disbursed upon the achievement of “certain development milestones.” The writer of the piece, Scott Hounsell, a former political consultant notes that having previously worked in grant writing, most agencies don’t give grants to companies or organizations that have existed for less than a year, nor have any other stream of funding. “In this particular case Crunchbase, which monitors funding for corporations and non-profits, shows that the only funding that Lytica has received to date is the $5.3 million allocated from the grant received,” he wrote. In other words, two years after its founding, the only funding the company has received is the $5.3 million allocated from the HHS grant. The grant was apparently “funded and organized by the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees and administers the Biomedical Advanced and Development Authority (BARDA) program, which is similar to the PREDICT program at the center of Wuhan institute of Virology gain-of-function research controversy.

    COVID 19 is a meme, a virus of the mind. It’s the catalyst for a business. Trillions of dollars have been and will be made by those who planned and are running this operation. Readers who are quick to blame Democrats don’t understand how deep the rabbit hole goes, it’s the entire global system. Many ask what are the motivations of Fauci and other ringleaders? Money, power, and fame on the surface. COVID has made those who do these deeds rich and powerful beyond their wildest dreams. But what if they were puppets too?

    (For a great MUST READ on this subject, checkout this book – 300.
    Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300

    Read entire article:



  11. Did you hear about HUMAN 2.0?

    It’s the plan to transform humanity into cyborgs – step by step – by implementing more and more nanotechnology into our bodies.

    They want to connect all of us to the iCloud and artificial intelligence, so we will be our own ‘smart devices’ that can send and receive information.

    That may sound cool, but the reality is it would totally remove our autonomy and freedom.

    Those in control of this technology will know EVERYTHING about us: our emotions, our conversations, our hormones, our romantic activity – everything.

    According to vaccine and DNA expert Dr Carrie Madej, who studied this for the past twenty years, there are several proposals to start the transition to HUMAN 2.0 with… the coming COVID-19 vaccines.

    The vaccine companies are silent about it, but she has solid evidence that the coming vaccines will be used to start the process of trans humanism: shifting humanity from HUMAN 1.0 to HUMAN 2.0

    This is why the pandemic was set up and why every cure is banned: this new generation of high tech vaccines MUST be injected into ALL of humanity.

    This will usher in the age of unlimited control of the elite over entire mankind. With the pressing of a button, they will be able to send commands to our bodies, to do… whatever they want to do.

    Does that sound outrageous to you? Just remember your history: humanity has always seen the rise of power-hungry despots who stopped at nothing to gain total world control.

    Enslaving humanity has always been the ultimate desire of the wicked. Now technology enables it, combined with ‘health care’.

    To know more about it, watch the incredible documentary with Dr Carrie Madej here:

    This film is aggressively banned from Social Media, within one minute of posting it. You can however share the webpage that has the video posted on it.


    1. Lucifer ase WTF?!?!? Seriously? Yes LUCIFER RAISE.

      Amplite® Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay Kit *Bright Glow*

      Overview SDS Protocol
      See also: Enzymes, Luciferases, Cell Metabolism, Cellular Processes, Amplite® Reagents and Assay Kits
      Common reporter genes include beta-galactosidase, beta-glucuronidase and luciferase. The advantages of a luciferase assay are the high sensitivity, the absence of luciferase activity inside most of the cell types, the wide dynamic range, rapidity and low cost. The most versatile and common reporter gene is the luciferase of the North American firefly Photinus pyralis. The protein requires no posttranslational modification for enzyme activity. It is not even toxic in high concentration (in vivo) and can be used in pro- and eukaryotic cells. The firefly luciferase catalyzes the bioluminescent oxidation of luciferin in the presence of ATP, magnesium and oxygen. This Amplite® Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay Kit uses a proprietary luminogenic formulation to quantify luciferase activity in live cells and cell extracts. Our formulation generates a luminescent product that gives strong luminescence upon interaction with luciferase. The kit provides all the essential components with our optimized ‘mix and read’ assay protocol that is compatible with HTS liquid handling instruments. It has extremely high sensitivity, and can be used for the assays that require demanding sensitivity.



        COVID-19 vaccination will help protect you from getting COVID-19. You may have some side effects, which are normal signs that your body is building protection.

        Learn more on



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: