On March 11, 2020 the Close-down of the Economy of Planet Earth Began

The World Health Organization ordered this shutdown because of only 87 cases of ‘Corona’ in a world population of 7.9 billion people. An act of economic and social warfare.

The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, July 23, 2021

Yes indeed, Fauci is a fraud and a liar just like Biden

**Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) went to town on Dr. Anthony Fauci Tuesday during a Tuesday hearing in front of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee.**

Paul alleged that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) had used a middle-man to funnel money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology via EcoHealth Alliance – which worked with the lab on bat coronavirus projects.

Paul specifically referenced so-called “gain-of-function” research which in this case has been focused on how to make animal viruses more transmissible to humans – specifically **bat coronaviruses**.

>**“Government scientists like yourself who favor gain of function research,” **Paul began…

>…only to have Fauci interject “I don’t favor gain of function research in China,” adding “You are saying things that are not correct.”

Paul pushed back – continuing:

Congress Launches New Policy For Cars Used Less Than 49 Miles/Day ()

>***“[Those who favor gain of function] say that COVID-19 mutations were random and not designed by man.”***

“I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done,” Fauci shot back, adding that he’s in favor of further investigation, but that the NIH had nothing to do with the origins of COVID-19.

>***“We have not funded gain of function research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” ***he added.

>“No matter how many times you say it, it didn’t happen.”

Yes indeed, Fauci is a fraud and a liar just like Biden

Killing Democracy Once and for All: The Global Elite’s Coup d’Etat that Is Destroying Life as We Know It – Global Research

China investigated weaponising coronaviruses in 2015: Reports

Chinese military scientists allegedly probed the weaponising of coronaviruses in 2015, according to global media reports which draw on documents obtained by the US State Department.

Chinese military scientists allegedly investigated weaponising coronaviruses five years before the Covid-19 pandemic and may have predicted a World War III fought with biological weapons, according to media reports referring to documents obtained by the US State Department.

According to ‘The Sun’ newspaper in the UK, quoting reports first released by ‘The Australian’, the “bombshell” documents obtained by the US State Department reportedly show the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) commanders making the sinister prediction.

Judy Mikovits American researcher who was mercilessly attacked by the mainstream medical system who demonized her to the point of ruining her entire career. A successful witch-hunt of spectacular proportions, literally medieval and pathological.

Dr. Bret Weinstein: ‘Perverse Incentives’ in the Vaccine Rollout and the Censorship of Science

“We are exposing a huge fraction of the population to what is in effect a scientific experiment, except that it isn’t a scientific experiment because we are deliberately avoiding collecting data that would allow us to evaluate the impact,” says Dr. Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary biologist and co-host of the DarkHorse podcast.

In this deep-dive with Dr. Weinstein, we discuss COVID-19 vaccine safety, the efficacy of repurposed drugs, the Wuhan lab leak theory, and this new age of censorship. What scientific data and information is currently being denied to the public?

Below is a rush transcript of this American Thought Leaders episode from July 3, 2021. This transcript may not be in its final form and may be updated. 

Jan Jekielek: Bret Weinstein, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.

Dr. Bret Weinstein: Thanks for having me.

Mr. Jekielek: Bret, I think what we have to talk about today is censorship, and actually kind of a myriad of forms and some things which seem like censorship, but I’m not even sure if that’s the right thing to call them, but it’s certainly heading in that direction. You’ve been demonetized on YouTube recently.

Your DarkHorse channel is in jeopardy from what I understand. One of your recent guests, Dr. Robert Malone, he seems to have been kicked off LinkedIn. I think he’s appealing and might come back. We don’t know. As we’re filming here, that’s the state of affairs. Hopefully they will change. What’s going on?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, what’s going on is something is attempting to retain control of the narrative. I think in some sense, it has been stung by being forced to backtrack on the lab-leak hypothesis and it is attempting to keep discussion within certain bounds on other topics.

Dr. Weinstein: We don’t know. And we can infer certain things from the pattern. We know that it is very interested in policing the discussion of evidence surrounding repurposed drugs and possible harms of the COVID-19 vaccines, but it’s hard to say how it works and what its objective is.

We can only tell that there are boundary lines and if one crosses them, one puts their livelihood in my case, and their ability to speak to an audience in jeopardy.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, so let’s kind of dig into it, okay? You mentioned two areas. One is repurposed drugs therapeutics for COVID, another one is of course, vaccine safety. So what are you seeing? Well, let’s pick one. Let’s go into the vaccine safety first.

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I’m not sure that there is even a way to do one without the other. The two appear to be the same story viewed from two different sides. And I think what people need to track is the fact that in order for the vaccines to be administered, they had to get an Emergency Use Authorization. And one of the requirements for the Emergency Use Authorization is that there’d be no safe and effective treatments available.

So if the repurposed drugs are as good as some people believe they are, then the vaccines would not be available at all. They would still be in testing. Add to that the fact that the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture these vaccines have been granted immunity from liability. And these two things in combination, I believe, have created a headlong rush to administering the vaccines to everyone irrespective of medical or epidemiological need.

Mr. Jekielek: And that’s of course, very interesting. So where does the censorship happen? How does the censorship play out?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I’ve seen a piece of the censorship on YouTube. YouTube has in their community guidelines, a provision that actually forbids the discussion of ivermectin if the discussion involves the claim that it works. And the problem is that there is substantial evidence that it works. And works doesn’t mean one thing, it actually means two distinct things.

There is strong evidence that ivermectin works for the treatment of COVID, especially if it is given early in the course of disease. It is also apparently highly effective as a prophylactic. And these things are clearly visible in the recent meta-analysis that have been released that show a clear pattern.

So somehow on YouTube, the discussion of evidence that has been peer-reviewed and delivered within the scientific literature is forbidden because it contradicts the CDC’s view, which is that ivermectin does not work or that there is no evidence that it works.

Narration: Our team reached out to YouTube, but we did not immediately receive a response.

Mr. Jekielek: And that’s one drug in particular, but so I want to think about this from a little bit of a different angle just for a sec. The process of scientific discovery, there needs to be conflicting, dissenting views, hypotheses that are tested rigorously. You need to have that discussion. You don’t want to just pick one view and say, “This is the be-all and end-all,” especially when there’s a situation where I guess there’s just a lot of chaos happening.

Dr. Weinstein: Well, there are two kinds of scientific consensus. And I think we are seeing a kind of shell game that pretends that we are looking at one type when in fact we are looking at the other. A scientific consensus can emerge when something becomes clear over time.

So for example, plate tectonics was deeply controversial when it was first suggested. The idea that the continents might actually float around and move was considered very unlikely by most people. It is now well-accepted and there is a consensus surrounding it, but it is a consensus that took time to emerge.

In the case of COVID-19, what we are looking at are consensuses that emerge suddenly and are impervious to new evidence. That is a very unnatural and very unscientific process. Consensus in a chaotic complex system like this is unlikely because frankly, the noise that arises out of so many different inputs to the system inherently makes for a confusing dataset.

Mr. Jekielek: Something that you mentioned in one of your podcasts that I was watching is just that there’s certain… Actually, you’ve mentioned this a few times, but there’s certain types of data that seems to be very important in your view and some experts’ views that just simply isn’t being gathered. And I found that really fascinating. Can you kind of elaborate on this a little bit?

Dr. Weinstein: Yes. I learned this from Robert Malone, who is the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, and he is also somebody who has been involved in a professional capacity inside the regulatory apparatus. And what he said is that at the point that the Emergency Use Authorizations for the vaccines were granted, there was the opportunity to require extra data to be collected to find out what the impact of these vaccines was on the people who received them.

And a choice was made not to collect the data, which I find quite alarming in light of the fact that the process of establishing the safety of these vaccines was necessarily truncated in order to bring them to the public so quickly.

Mr. Jekielek: Okay, well, so what are the ramifications of that?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, the ramifications of it are that we are exposing a huge fraction of the population to what is in effect, a scientific experiment, except that it isn’t a scientific experiment because we are deliberately avoiding collecting data that would allow us to evaluate the impact.

And I find that shocking. It is one thing to argue that we have no choice that COVID-19 is an emergency and we have to make shortcuts that we would not ordinarily consider. I accept that argument. I also accept that these vaccines appear to work at least in the short term.

But the right thing to do in order to make proper medically justified decisions and epidemiologically justified decisions is to collect the data on what happens after administration.

These are brand new technologies. They have many different ways in which they could fail, and it is our obligation, especially to the people who receive these vaccines, that we collect the data on what happened. And to not do so means that we are very likely to put people in danger in the future with no justification for it.

Mr. Jekielek: Do you think of this as a kind of censorship? This is one of those things I think it feels to me like a kind of censorship because we just can’t access a certain type of information which might prove to be quite valuable.

Dr. Weinstein: I don’t think of it as censorship exactly, but it functions in the same direction. And there are many different ways that one can adjust a scientific conclusion in favor of something that is not actually manifest in the phenomena in question or the data. And arranging not to collect certain data is one way to avoid certain conclusions.

Especially in the context of a liability waiver, one can imagine that the pharmaceutical industry might not be interested in having that data collected because if there is a signal of adverse events, then it could result in the vaccines no longer being administered. And although the vaccines are free to Americans, they are being paid for. And so there’s profit to be made.

Mr. Jekielek: So, for example, there are some adverse effects from these vaccines. These amazing mRNA new technology being deployed never been seen before, I guess, right? And we know that I think the CDC has said, yes, there’s some cases for example, of heart inflammation among the young people, right?

What strikes me is in these types of situations where there are these kinds of effects, people are told, “Nothing’s happening. That’s perfectly safe.” It creates a situation where you actually end up getting a whole bunch of conspiracy theories being created around what’s really happening because people can sense there’s something that’s not quite right, but they don’t know what. What are your thoughts here?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, first thing is I think it is necessary to say I’m enthusiastic about vaccines generally, and I am actually enthusiastic about these new vaccine platforms in principle. I’m alarmed at what I am seeing in the case of these vaccines that are being administered currently, and it has something to do with an avoidance of the patterns that seem to be emerging.

Now, I don’t know that we can say that these vaccines are having these effects. What we have are alarming signals of adverse events in the various data. We have good reason to think that the various data is a significant under-report of those adverse events.

And what we have to wonder is if the adverse events are showing up in close proximity to these vaccinations, is there another explanation? I have not heard one advanced.

And so in the absence of an alternative hypothesis, we would have to say it appears that something is going on. The myocarditis and pericarditis being obvious examples of things that have shown up conspicuously, but at the very least, we need to look at that data carefully and do a proper analysis. And the instinct seems to be the opposite.

Mr. Jekielek: Why? Why do you think that’s the case?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, again, I think the only way to evaluate these things properly is using scientific tools. And that is my home turf as it were. I would say we have to think in terms of hypothesis. And the problem for me is that the only hypothesis that I have heard of or thought of that explains our seeming biases is that what is driving is a desire to vaccinate as many people as possible. And the only reason to vaccinate as many people as possible seems to be that there is profit in it.

Mr. Jekielek: That’s a huge assertion I think because extensively, this is being done for the good of society.

Dr. Weinstein: Well, it isn’t a huge assertion. If one is to say, “Yes, this is what is taking place,” then that is beyond the evidence. But to say that no other hypothesis accounts for our biases I think is just simply a fact now. Anybody who believes they have a different hypothesis is welcome to advance it, but let’s take the most obvious example.

We are currently vaccinating people who have already had COVID-19. There is no medical justification for doing that. And if you look at the CDC website, they say that the reason to do it is that we do not know how long the immunity from the disease will last. If the vaccines appeared to be harmless, then that justification would still not fly because we don’t know anything about the long-term effects, but it could at least be understandable.

But in the context of a significant adverse events signal, it makes no sense. We could take the large fraction of the population that has COVID and not expose them to the risks of the vaccines, and if it became apparent that the vaccines were providing immunity as the immunity from the disease itself failed, we could administer them then. That would be a medically reasonable approach.

But that’s not what we’re doing. We’re vaccinating people who do not appear to get a benefit who seem to have an excess risk of adverse events cropping up in the aftermath, and they are not getting something special. The fact is what they effectively got from their encounter with COVID-19 is a broader immunity than they will get from the very narrowly focused vaccines that they are now being given.

So it is not as if the vaccines contain some novel information that will give them some new kind of immunity to variants or something like that. It could be that down the road, the vaccines would be altered to provide immunity to variants, but at the moment, they are effectively redundant with the natural immunity that comes from the disease.

Mr. Jekielek: I have to say, I’ve been wondering about that policy. And basically you’re saying that there is no medical justification that you’ve come across. And I know you’ve been searching.

Dr. Weinstein: I have looked. I will also say that because the chain seems to be from the CDC to the social media platforms which then deploy the CDC’s wisdom as their justification for their censorship policy, I don’t think we have to look farther than what the CDC itself says and what the CDC itself says does not add up.

There’s no reason to vaccinate people who’ve already had COVID-19 until we know that the immunity that comes from COVID-19 is failing. And there are reasons not to do it that begin with the adverse event signal in the various data.

Mr. Jekielek: So here’s another hypothesis I’ve heard, right? As you mentioned, there’s kind of nuance here and it’s maybe complicated to figure out who has what? When did they get the disease? I don’t know, right? So let’s make a very, very simple policy. Everyone gets vaccinated, right? And that will create the best social good.

I have no idea if this is what people are thinking, but this is one thing that’s been forwarded to me as an idea. It’s just too complicated to try to go into all the different nuance here.

Dr. Weinstein: I must say I’ve heard that as well, but I find it shocking because to the extent that the conditions that we are seeing show up in the various data are very serious and the number of deaths is very substantial, well beyond what the stopping condition for a regular vaccine under normal conditions would be.

Every time we vaccinate somebody who doesn’t need it in order to simplify our policy and they die, they are leaving a family bereft. They may be leaving a family struggling to figure out how to get by in the world. The harm done by a single death is so substantial that we cannot justify exposing people to that risk to simplify a policy.

What’s more, although there is ambiguity for many people on whether they have had COVID-19, part of that ambiguity is almost inexplicable. We’ve done a very poor job of coming up with definitive tests that would give you a good sense.

That said, there are many people who have an almost unambiguous case for having had COVID-19. People who tested positive and lost their taste and smell sense, those people had COVID-19. There is no reason at all to expose them to this extra danger and it is not substantially more complicated to say so.

Mr. Jekielek: You’ve called the mass vaccination of COVID-19 the biggest gain of function experiment ever. What does that mean?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, what we are doing is unusual. We are deploying a novel technology that contains the code for a very narrow antigen signal, and we are deploying it into an active pandemic. And because the vaccines are not perfectly effective at preventing breakthrough cases, they are effectively exerting a very strong kind of selection on the virus.

And there’s every reason to worry that this selection will drive the evolution of escape mutants. That is to say selection in favor of mutations that make the virus invisible to the aware immune system that has been alerted by the vaccines. And that could produce an ongoing pandemic where we might end the pandemic if we were to approach it differently.

Mr. Jekielek: So how is this different than in a typical situation where you would use traditional vaccines, for example?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, a traditional vaccine, you would deploy where there was a very low chance of contact and a long-lasting immunity. And what that means is that the majority of people who would encounter the pathogen would be immune by the time they did encounter it because the vaccine would have had time to fully develop the immunity and there would be negligible selection in favor of escape mutants.

In this case, what we have is two things. One, we have the incomplete effectiveness of the vaccines, which means that within people who have breakthrough cases, the immune system is exerting a selective pressure against variants that are easily seen and towards variants that-

Mr. Jekielek: Just to be clear, breakthrough cases are cases where someone is vaccinated and they still get the disease.

Dr. Weinstein: Correct.

Mr. Jekielek: Just for our viewers benefit. Yeah.

Dr. Weinstein: But the other thing that we have in addition to people within whom you would have the selection is we also have people who are in the process of developing immunity because they’ve been vaccinated and they’re perhaps between the two vaccinations or the immune system is simply taking time to learn the lesson of the protein that is being used to train it.

And those people, their incomplete immunity also constitutes an environment in which selection can cause the evolution of escape.

Mr. Jekielek: We have one example of, I’m going to go back to the censorship question that we’re facing. We have an example of something, a topic which was completely verboten for a long time, which is the idea that the virus could have escaped from the Wuhan lab. For better part of a year I think, it was just…

You were in that case basically to suggest it, even though there were some people out there who were like, “It’s a nutcase thing to say that it’s an a nutcase thing. How could you say that?” Right? A lot of us were thinking that sort of stuff and frankly, writing about it. There was huge censorship and huge pressure to not talk about it, but that’s somehow changed.

Dr. Weinstein: It did. Yeah. Your question is why?

Mr. Jekielek: Well, no. I mean, it’s interesting. I guess it offers hope on one side that the scenario that you’re describing could change. The other one is why?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, let’s start with the why question. So I should say my channel was very early on this topic. And it was quite clear to many of us starting with the tremendous coincidence of this virus having emerged first in Wuhan, where there is a biosafety level four labs studying these viruses and enhancing them.

But it was quite clear that there was at least a viable hypothesis that needed to be discussed. And as you point out, those of us who did discuss it were stigmatized and demonized and portrayed as everything from racist to reactionary when in fact, all we were doing was following the evidence.

The change in that story was, I have to say, completely mysterious. What we had was a moment in time in which an article written by Nicholas Wade emerged, and suddenly it became discussable. It was a very unnatural event because although the article was quite good and it did make a very strong case, it was not the first such article.

And so it was as if on the basis of no new evidence whatsoever, suddenly the case had been solved. And that I must say gave those of us who were paying attention to kind of whiplash.

There was then a headlong rush by all of those who had gotten the story wrong to explain themselves and their explanations made less than no sense. They seemed to center on the fact that because Donald Trump had been favorable to the idea that this might have emerged from a lab that that made it not true, which of course is such an illogical conclusion that it’s hard to imagine how anybody who considers themselves a journalist could for a moment have been misled.

At worst, if you thought everything that Donald Trump said was a lie, at worst, you would have to take it as no evidence either way.

But that’s not how people treated it. They treated it almost as if the truth was always the opposite of what he said. And in any case, when the story changed, I had the distinct sense that what had happened was those of us who had been dogged about revealing the evidence and discussing what it meant and pointing to the implications of it, the implications being that although there is no conclusive proof, there is good reason to think that this emerged from a lab, that that is actually the most likely explanation.

Eventually, I think we made it impossible to maintain the public lie that a laboratory origin was somehow obviously in conflict with the evidence. And we now know from Dr. Fauci’s emails that behind the scenes, the top people didn’t believe it either. They were just simply feeding the public a lie that they had their own reasons for wanting the public to believe.

But I think the answer to your question is simple. There comes a point at which you’re caught lying and your best move is to revise the story. And that’s what happened to them.

Mr. Jekielek: Does this provide some hope in trying to elucidate… Because basically, we’re talking about censorship here, but the censorship is around having a meaningful, educated discussion about what’s happened, these profound things that are happening in society around our health and so forth, right? So is there some hope here in your mind?

Dr. Weinstein: I do have hope, but it is contingent on the several different stories that surround COVID revealing to us just how corrupt our system has become. The lab leak behaved differently than a normal story.

In general, there are people who see what is taking place and they try to call public attention to the evidence. Whistleblowers of a kind. And in general, they are not successful. Sometimes we find out about them in retrospect when a story breaks because some catastrophe has happened and suddenly we discover that somebody was warning that it would.

In this case, the whistleblowers were largely a number of people who go by the acronym DRASTIC on Twitter. These are people with scientific skills and insight who did the analysis in public, unearthed evidence that was not known and put the story together. And that provides a template for how you can deal with such stories when the evidence is available.

The problem is the other legs of the stool involved in the COVID story are of a different type. And the apparatus that wishes to maintain control and hold us to the official narrative has ratcheted up its censorship game.

So I was able to talk about the lab leak hypothesis, and I did run into trouble periodically, but my channel was not jeopardized on YouTube as far as I know. This time around, we are facing substantial pressure to stand down and not talk about the evidence of the repurposed drugs that appear to be effective at preventing and treating COVID-19 and to not talk about the adverse event signal in the various data regarding the vaccines. That is going to make it harder for this story to emerge.

Now, I’m hopeful that it will, but people have to understand this set of stories where there is a narrative supported by the evidence and then there’s an official narrative that pretends to be supported by the evidence but has the weight of the tech sector, governmental officials, that is a symptom of a deeper problem.

It is a symptom of something that goes by the name of capture. Unfortunately, capture is too closely associated with the idea of regulatory capture, which is where that term shows up. What we are facing is something that is much broader than that term usually connotes.

Mr. Jekielek: Maybe just tell us what is regulatory capture? And then let’s expand from that.

Dr. Weinstein: Regulatory capture is when a company or an industry captures the apparatus that is supposed to regulate it in the public’s interest and begins turning that agency or whatever its structure might be so that it actually does the bidding of the company or the industry. And that is a fairly common phenomenon and people are aware of it.

It does not usually involve things like the tech sector doing the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry. It is not clear why that connection exists, but we can see that that connection exists because, well, consider the question of what would be ideal from the point of view of the vaccine manufacturers?

It would be ideal if it were recommended that all people get the vaccine irrespective of their age, irrespective of whether or not they were pregnant, irrespective of whether they had had COVID-19. Now, it happens-

Mr. Jekielek: Assuming ethics don’t play into this at all. That’s what you’re saying here. Right?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I guess what I’m really saying is I don’t know how ethics interface with something like the fiduciary responsibility inside these corporations, and I’m not going to pretend to, but they do have a perverse incentive to deliver as many vaccine doses as possible.

That perverse incentive lines up with a medical conclusion that everybody should be vaccinated, and that medical conclusion is now the CDC recommendation mirrors exactly what would be in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry, and the tech sector, the social media platforms have now taken the CDC recommendations and encoded them as the basis for their censorship policy.

So that suggested capture has now worked its way down to the level of Facebook, and YouTube, and Twitter. And the danger that that poses is that we can’t have a conversation about the capture of the public health agencies, even when it is urgent that we do so.

Mr. Jekielek: Because our platforms of conversation won’t allow it essentially.

Dr. Weinstein: Yes. If you do it as a hypothetical, imagine that you don’t believe that capture has taken over the CDC, but that it could, in the case that we take CDC beliefs and recommendations, and we encode them as the basis for a censorship policy, then what we would see is the evidence does not match the recommendations of the CDC.

We would have to have a conversation that says, “Has the CDC been compromised? Is there evidence that it’s been compromised? Are there mechanisms we can see that would allow it to be compromised?” We would have to have that discussion.

But if that very discussion is shut down, because it is deemed to be medical misinformation, then there’s effective silence. And it appears to those who are only casually paying attention, that there isn’t the suggestion that the CDC has been captured, because nobody’s talking about it.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, but in this situation, you also would have a whole lot of people who I guess are rapidly losing faith in the system if the system can’t be somehow tested or held to account, or even assessed, I guess.

Dr. Weinstein: Well, unfortunately what you get is the worst of both worlds, because on the one hand, you don’t get the necessary conversation about whether the apparatus that’s supposed to keep us safe is still functioning in our interests. And that leaves those who detect that something is wrong to fantasize about what may be going on.

And so the understanding of how bad things are, what the nature of them is runs wild, because the only conversations in which the fact of a discrepancy between the evidence and the policy can be discussed are also conversations in which people are undisciplined and are allowing their imaginations to get the better of them.

Mr. Jekielek: I keep thinking about this because we’re in this time period over, I don’t know how many years it’s now, where you have lawmakers, you have significant portions of society advocating in general for censorship, for the good of society extensively. I’ve certainly heard that cited a lot.

It’s not something that I necessarily was expecting, but that’s where we are. And this whole kind of, I guess, reality or ethos intersects with this whole phenomenon somehow, right? I mean, that’s what I’m thinking, but I haven’t thought much further than that.

Dr. Weinstein: I must say I’m shocked by it, but I also know that I’ve been warned again and again, I’ve been warned about the burning of witches and the burning of books and big brother. And I know that history does not repeat itself, but that it rhymes, and this rhymes in a way that I think caught us off guard. But yes, we have people cheering for the very things that our forefathers understood were a threat to our ability to persevere in the world.

And I do feel like I’m not sure what our forefathers needed to say to us in order to alert us that this might happen. But the number of warnings is great. And the degree to which we are now seeing people who until very recently were apparently on board with the idea that free expression was a good idea. We now see those very people cheering for the sensors and aiding them. And it’s frightening.

Mr. Jekielek: And so here’s the question, how does this… There’s some portion of the population that seems to believe this is a good idea, and it’s not a tiny portion. How does that intersect with this type of censorship that we’re seeing exactly?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I don’t think it works that way exactly. In fact, I think that our founders understood something quite counterintuitive. Everybody can imagine that lots of speech has no value, and some speech is destructive. And so it is an obvious thought that maybe we could improve the world by just simply eliminating the speech that is obviously beyond the pale.

And the problem is the speech that is obviously beyond the pale is not an easy category to operationalize. What you often have are cranks and heterodoxy that travel together. And the admixture is an unfortunate one. In general, there are 100 cranks for every really interesting heterodox idea, and they very often sound alike for reasons that probably aren’t worth going into.

But the point is it becomes a good bet for a lazy thinker to bet against all of the things on the fringe, because the things on the fringe so strongly tend to be wrong that if you bet against them, you’ll be right 99 times out of 100.

But if you bet against the fringe and you stop thinking about the fact that hanging out on that fringe will be the heterodox ideas that are the root of the next rung of progress. Then you will freeze progress and you won’t know what happened.

So our founders recognizing that there was no good way to surgically separate the bad ideas from the good ideas on the fringe said, “Well, we have to accept the cost of the bad ideas being protected.” That is the cost of having the good ideas that are in amongst them free to be voiced.

And it’s hard to exceed their formulation. We still don’t know how to separate heterodoxy from crank ideas. And we need the heterodoxy. The fact is every great idea starts with a minority of one. And if you’re not willing to surrender the advantage that comes from all of those next great ideas, then we’re stuck with having to deal with what’s on the fringe. And it’s not that the cost of it is zero.

Mr. Jekielek: Is this whole kind of scenario that we’re discussing here today with respect to health and expression somehow above the fact that we’re heading into this kind of stasis because of the way the collective thinking of society is changing, or somehow being guided to change?

Dr. Weinstein: I don’t know why it’s happening, but I can say this is happening across every industry that I’m aware of. it’s happening across every institution that I’m aware of. And frankly, it’s happening across every topic that is important for us to discuss. We are undoing all of the basic principles that allow us to think, that allow us to disagree with each other productively to discover what is true.

And the consequence for us is going to be catastrophic. I mean, really we are taking a system that, yes, is deeply flawed, but does improve over time. We are taking that most vibrant, productive, innovative system, and we are undoing it in pursuit of what appear to be utopian ideas that stand no chance of being true.

Mr. Jekielek: So this is actually quite interesting, because basically it’s like we’ve decided or, and again some portion of the population or the elite class or something has decided that the cost outweighs the benefit. Is that-

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I don’t think that’s exactly how it works. I think everybody sees their little quadrant, and they have their interests. And so I can imagine that inside the pharmaceutical, for example, it would be very frustrating that there are repurpose drugs that have a promising signal of utility.

There are people who are pursuing things that absolutely won’t work. And that whole discussion of alternatives is counterproductive to the mission of somebody who is involved in a career selling vaccines.

So they might target a small amount of speech and they might see it as just a simply normal part of competition in the same way that the people who make tide might seek to out-compete the people who make cheer.

The problem is that this isn’t tied versus cheer, right? These are different medical technologies with different levels of unknown attached to their use, and the consequences are harm to human beings. And frankly, none of this is safe.

The repurpose drugs are also not inherently safe to be used off label. But the question is where is the greater risk? And we can’t even have that conversation, because there are certain claims that are supported by substantial evidence, which we’re not even allowed to make publicly on these platforms.

Mr. Jekielek: From your vantage point right now, where do you see this going?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I have a hope, and I have a fear. I hope that what is about to happen is that the clear evidence that we have a small cluster of repurposed out of patent drugs that appear to be effective, both as treatments for COVID-19, and in one case as a prophylactic to prevent COVID-19.

And the fact that there is an alarming signal in the various data with respect to adverse events, following the vaccines, I am hoping that enough of us have come forward to discuss these issues that we have done it in a way that is careful. And I’m not saying we have not made errors, I have made errors, but that we have dealt with them honorably.

And I’m hoping that that has become clear enough that there will be another pivot. And that just as it was with the laboratory leak, whatever it is that decides what the official narrative is going to be is going to have to retreat.

And when it does retreat, my hope is that people will put two and two together, and they will recognize that what has been revealed by the laboratory leak, by the suppression of information about repurposed drugs, and by the silencing of discussion of harms that appear to be arising from the vaccines, that the real implication is that something is deeply wrong with the systems that are supposed to be serving our interests, that there has been capture, that we need to find out how it works, and we need to stop it, because we absolutely have to have our government. We have to have our universities. We have to have our journalists working on the public’s behalf because without them we are lost.

Mr. Jekielek: So that’s your hope. What about the fear?

Dr. Weinstein: My fear is that each time we go through one of these, the antagonists to truth are learning. They’re evolving. And that what happened with the lab leak has alerted them to the danger of allowing people to sort through evidence in public, and that their level of tolerance for that is going to be driven through the floor, that they effectively will be motivated to pay a higher price in terms of the ridicule that arises when people censor in order to make sure that the discussions don’t happen.

And I think that that is what I am feeling on my channel. And I fear that it could work, that those of us who face this, some of us will choose not to bend, and we will be purged from these platforms. And once we are purged from these platforms and other people have been induced to self-censor, that the conversation simply won’t be taking place. And that means that the official narrative will function as received wisdom.

Mr. Jekielek: I know you have obviously a lot of people communicating with, what are people saying to you in response to hearing of this demonetization and some of these videos being removed, like the one that you did with Dr. Malone?

Dr. Weinstein: Well, I get two kinds of responses in this case. One is, there’s an overwhelming response where people are grateful to have somebody attempting to sort this out in a responsible way in public, and there is great enthusiasm and support and offers of help.

And then there’s another signal which I must say, I find troubling on so many different levels, where people effectively want to hold me and others involved in these discussions responsible for the possible harms that will arise if people are led to understand, for example, that there are adverse events that seem to be arising as a consequence of vaccination.

Mr. Jekielek: So I want to just jump back to this idea, again, it seems to be like people… I’m spit balling here, but it seems people need a kind of simple answer, right? That the simple answer is vaccinate everyone, so that will be socially good. I don’t know. This is troubling.

Dr. Weinstein: There are several things going on at once. First of all, the discussion is happening in the context of a large fraction of the population having been vaccinated. And I can certainly imagine that for any person who has been vaccinated, it would be just simply much easier to imagine that these things are so safe, that there’s no reason to think more about it than you would any other vaccine.

I also think people, because they’re not in a position to evaluate the biological realities here, are unaware that there’s uncertainty across the board with respect to what we’re doing, and that it is not obvious, even though I freely admit, it appears that these vaccines work in the short term, that does not mean that they are a net benefit in the longterm.

There are ways that these vaccines could go wrong, and indications that some of these things may be happening. There is the question of whether or not they will drive the evolution of escape mutants that will prolong the pandemic and kill more people.

Ultimately, there’s a question of the possibility of antibody dependent enhancement, which could result in people who have been vaccinated being more susceptible to a virus in the long-term that has occurred with the attempts to produce previous mRNA vaccines. And there’s the question about the long-term harms to people who have been vaccinated.

So what I and my wife, Heather Heying, have been saying on our podcast is that we actually have a series of complex systems. We have three levels. The immune system is a complex system embedded within a person, which is a complex system embedded within a society, which is a complex system.

And all three of these are in play with respect to the harms. That does not mean that ultimately we will see all these things play out, but it means that anybody who is saying that these vaccines are simply good. They are the route out of the pandemic. And therefore we must get everybody to get vaccinated because it is obviously a good idea for us to do that. That is not clear.

And those who proceed from the idea that it is clear seem to be motivated by a removal of the normal constraints that typically surround discussion. And they are fighting as if they’re dealing with an evil foe, but they are not dealing with an evil foe.

They are dealing with people who on the basis of the evidence, and on the basis of what we understand about this three layer complex system are alarmed at what we are doing. And at the very least, even if we are wrong, it is vitally important that we pay attention to what might be wrong here, so that we will find out whether or not we are doing harm, and, among other things, stop it if that’s what we’re doing.

Mr. Jekielek: Bret, any final thoughts before we finish up?

Dr. Weinstein: To understand where we are, people need to recognize that the conversation exists at two different levels. There is disagreement amongst those who have looked at the evidence of the efficaciousness of repurposed drugs against COVID-19, and of the adverse event signal with respect to the vaccines.

The fact that we don’t all agree on what it means is actually a good thing. It’s a sign of a healthy scientific discussion. This is complex phenomenon, and the data does not tell a single story. That story will emerge over time if we are allowed to have the discussion.

But no matter where you stand with respect to the implication of the evidence, none of it accounts for the policy that we are seeing handed down. And that is alarming.

It would be alarming under normal circumstances, but it is especially alarming in the context of immunity from liability and the Emergency Use Authorizations.

In effect, we are seeing medical policy that for whatever reason, perfectly matches what would be in the interests of pharmaceutical manufacturers and does not appear to match the medical interests of the public.

Now, I have the sense that five years ago, three years ago, if we had asked people whether or not they trust the pharmaceutical industry not to corrupt lawmakers and cause the production of policy that serves their interests, and is not in the interest of the public, most people would have recognized that there was some danger from these corporations having undue influence over government.

Somehow in the context of the pandemic, people have forgotten this, and they don’t realize that even the normal protections have been removed by the way that these products were produced. The fact that the vaccines require that there are no safe and effective drugs in existence, and that there is now debate over drugs that do exist, which some of us having looked at the evidence believe are efficacious, and others swear there is no evidence for it.

That is an interesting and conspicuous fact. And people ought to look at it in the context of effectively the safety having been taken off the gun. That’s what happens when you immunize a corporation from liability, is it becomes more gung-ho about its product because it doesn’t fear ending up in court.

Has that happened here? I think it’s likely, but at the very least, we certainly have to be able to have that conversation. And the fact that censorship is now on the table at the very same moment, and topics on which we are being censored are central to that question of how safe we are being made by those charged with ensuring that we are served by the medical policy of the government is certainly something that requires discussion.

So I hope that members of your audience will understand no matter where they fall out on these questions, no matter what they think is going on, it is obvious that there is a danger that arises from immunizing corporations from liability. And that that danger puts an extra onus on us to discuss whether or not something has gone wrong.

Mr. Jekielek: Well, Bret Weinstein, it’s such a pleasure to have you on.

Dr. Weinstein: Thanks for having me on. It was a very interesting discussion.


47 thoughts on “THE CHINA VIRUS

      channel image
      The HighWire with Del Bigtree
      Published 2 months ago |

      Fox News’ Tucker Carlson uses a FOIA, obtained by Informed Consent Action Network ( containing 3000 new pages of Anthony Fauci’s emails, to expose the ‘lies’ of the beleaguered director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

      #ICANFauciemails #Tucker #RoundTwo #FauciEmails #Fauci #TheHighWire #FOIA

      credit: Fox News



      1. GOP Report Points to Wuhan Lab Leak as Source of CCP Virus

        BY TOM OZIMEK | August 2, 2021
        House Republicans have released an addendum to their Origins of COVID-19 (pdf) report released last year, concluding that evidence points to a leak from a Chinese lab as the source of the outbreak.

        Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, released the updated (pdf) report on Aug. 2, which was authored by the panel’s Republican staff.

        “As we continue to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, I believe it’s time to completely dismiss the wet market as the source of the outbreak. Instead, as this report lays out, a preponderance of the evidence proves that all roads lead to the WIV,” McCaul said in a statement, referring to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the lab at the heart of the controversy over the origins of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, the pathogen that causes the disease COVID-19.

        The addendum to the report cites multiple pieces of evidence in support of the conclusion that the virus leaked from the Wuhan lab, including actions by Chinese officials and scientists at the WIV to “hide or cover-up” the type of research being done at the facility. It also cites what it refers to as new and underreported information about lax safety protocols at the lab.



      2. Moderna and Pfizer mRNA Gene Therapies

        The issue is the exact and particular mRNA solutions now being injected into the unwitting subjects of a grand humane experiment. These particular mRNA solutions have been proven to contain the poisonous Graphene Oxide in the nanoscale, which can breach the blood brain barrier and cause subarachnoid hemorrhaging in the meninges.
        These solutions also contain a Spike protein that causes blood clotting throughout the body.


      3. HUGE! Italy’s Suspected Covid Death Tally Corrected From 132,161 To 3,783HAFNovember 3, 2021

        A new report from Italy’s Higher Institute of Health provides an objective analysis of the nation’s misleading covid-19 death tally. Italy’s official covid death tally rose to 132,161 in October of 2021. This tally is unrealistic because covid-19 was diagnosed in haste and under conditions of financial bribery using non-specific diagnostic criteria.

        Covid-19 was often listed as the cause of death when it was merely “suspected” and when “it could not be ruled out.”

        After careful review of the medical reports, it turns out that respiratory infections may have been a contributing factor but did not cause most of these covid-19 deaths outright.

        Various forms of medical malpractice, withheld treatment, inhumane isolation, undernourishment, and unethical standards of care are at the root of this worldwide medical crisis. The deaths are real, but the causes are skewed.



    2. Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus
      Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola


      Hundreds of patents show SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus that has been tinkered with for decades. Much of the research was funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and may have been an outgrowth of attempts to develop an HIV vaccine
      In 1999, Fauci funded research at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. This appears to be the virus that became known as SARS-CoV
      U.S. Patent 7279327 shows we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein, and other elements of SARS-CoV-2 were engineered and could be synthetically modified using gene sequencing technologies
      The CDC holds patents to a SARS coronavirus that is 89% to 99% identical to the sequence identified as SARS-CoV-2, as well as the PCR test to diagnose it
      120 patents detail supposed “unique” features of SARS-CoV-2: the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 binding, proving it’s not a novel virus at all
      In a January 2021 lecture, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., introduced the term “the pandemic virus industrial complex,” to describe the academic, military and commercial complexes that are driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring facts that indicate SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus.

      In the video above, David E. Martin, Ph.D., introduces shocking evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is indeed a manmade bioweapon, and has been in the works for decades. Much of this research was funded by none other than the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

      Pandemic virus industrial complex indeed! You do not want to miss this bombshell interview, conducted by Reiner Fuellmich,1 founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee2,3 (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss or ACU4). A transcript5 is available if you prefer to read it.

      SARS-CoV-2 Is Not a Novel Coronavirus at All
      Martin has been in the business of tracking patent applications and approvals since 1998. His company, M-Cam International Innovation Risk Management, is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. M-Cam has also monitored biological and chemical weapons treaty violations on behalf of the U.S. government, following the anthrax scare in September 2001.

      According to Martin, there are more than 4,000 patents relating to the SARS coronavirus. His company has also done a comprehensive review of the financing of research involving the manipulation of coronaviruses that gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family.

      In his testimony to ACU, he reviews some of the most pertinent patents, showing SARS-CoV-2 is not a novel coronavirus at all but, rather, a manmade virus that has been in the works for decades.

      And what we found … are over 120 patented pieces of evidence, to suggest that the declaration of a ‘novel coronavirus’ was actually entirely a fallacy. There was no novel coronavirus … it’s not been novel for over two decades. ~ David Martin, Ph.D.


      1. The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

        This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

        This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CCBY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.

        The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at
        Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on
        synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic
        enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1

        In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV)
        that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2 On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective,
        coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between
        1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

        Click to access The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf



      2. Realization of ferromagnetic graphene oxide with high magnetization by doping graphene oxide with nitrogen
        Yuan Liu, Nujiang Tang, Xiangang Wan, Qian Feng, Ming Li, Qinghua Xu, Fuchi Liu & Youwei Du

        The long spin diffusion length makes graphene very attractive for novel spintronic devices and thus has triggered a quest for integrating the charge and spin degrees of freedom. However, ideal graphene is intrinsic non-magnetic, due to a delocalized π bonding network. Therefore, synthesis of ferromagnetic graphene or its derivatives with high magnetization is urgent due to both fundamental and technological importance. Here we report that N-doping can be an effective route to obtain a very high magnetization of ca. 1.66 emu/g and can make graphene oxide (GO) to be ferromagnetism with a Curie-temperature of 100.2 K. Clearly, our findings can offer the easy realization of ferromagnetic GO with high magnetization, therefore, push the way for potential applications in spintronic devices.

        Chemical doping is a fascinating way to intrinsically modify and improve graphene’s physical and chemical properties. Notably, among the potential dopants, N atom is considered as an excellent candidate because it has comparable atomic size and contains five valence bonds with carbon atoms1. Nowadays, N-doped graphene (NG) has attracted much attention because of its excellent performance in electrocatalytic activity, electrical, fuel cells and optical properties, etc2,3,4. Notably, magnetism of graphene and its derivatives is of particular interest since the light weight magnets could open up new ways to design adaptable and flexible information storage systems5. Especially, the greatly potential application of graphene-based magnets in spintronics is promising, since graphene has extraordinary carrier mobility and may provide an easy way to integrate spin and molecular electronics6. The long spin diffusion lengths and coherent times arising from the weak spin-orbit and hyperfine interactions in graphene can provide ideal conditions for coherent spin manipulation which can act as the next-generation spintronic devices7. However, graphene is usually intrinsic non-magnetic and lacks of localized magnetic moments due to a delocalized π bonding network, which limits its applications in spintronic devices8.

        Generally, point defects such as vacancies, zigzag edges, chemical doping of foreign atoms can induce localized magnetic moments in graphene, which is the preliminary of the existence of magnetic ordering9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. It is demonstrated that high-density vacancies can make graphene fragile and lose its structural stability, by contrast, chemical doping can keep its structural stability and can introduce more point defects in graphene19,20. For example, fluorination of graphene can obtain a high magnetization up to 0.2 emu/g, one order higher than the maximum value of 0.02 emu/g induced by vacancies20. Up to now, the reported magnetic moment of graphene is still low and the distance between magnetic moments is long. As a result, these graphene materials always exhibit typically Curie-like paramagnetism20,21,22. Therefore, to combine charge and spin manipulation for the novel spintronic devices, it is urgent to develop effective methods for sythesizing ferromagnetic graphene with high magnetization. Note that, graphene oxide (GO) is usually considered as an insulator or a semiconductor. However, after chemical or thermal reduction, it can be zero-band-gap semi-metal graphene nanosheets23. Actually, after efficient reduction, the achieved mobility value of 5000 cm2 V−1 s−1 is close to that of mechanically cleaved graphene (ca. 10000 cm2 V−1 s−1)24. It has been demonstrated that annealing in ammonia can effectively reduce GO3, indicating its potential in spintronics.

        Theoretical study confirmed that N-doping is an effective method to introduce magnetic moments into graphene25,26,27,28,29. In this study, we demonstrate that doping GO with N can obtain a very high magnetization (1.66 emu/g) and a significant increase of magnetization of GO (ca. 1509.1%). Most importantly, it makes the magnetism of GO from purely spin-half paramagnetism to ferromagnetism with Curie temperature (TC) of ca. 100.2 K.

        Microstructures of GO and NGO
        We prepared N-doped graphene oxide (NGO) by directly annealing GO in ammonia at 500°C. For GO, two factors have important influence on N content: few-layer ratio and O content of GO. It has been reported that compared to multi-layer GO, few-layer GO is more sensible to the adatoms and can be doped with higher N content30. It also has been confirmed that oxygen groups in GO favor the reactions with NH3 and C–N bond formation and directly annealing GO in ammonia can obtain high-content NGO31. Thus, to get GO with high few-layer ratio32, we centrifugated GO solution at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes and only collected GO dispersed in the brown supernatant for N-doping. To quantitatively analyze the layer number, we investigated GO by atomic force microscope (AFM). Shown in Fig. 1a is the typical AFM image. As indicated by the height images (inset of Fig. 1b), most of the heights of GO layers are ca. 1 nm. Based on the fact that the height may increase because of the trapped solvent and the folds between GO and the substrate, one can expect that most of the GO sheets are single- or bi-layer6. Shown in Fig. 1b is a typical transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of GO. One can find that the GO sheets are not well flat and look like wrinkled or crumpled thin papers with the size of several micrometers. To detect the O content of GO, we performed the X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) measurement. As shown in Fig. 1c, the XPS spectrum of GO indicates that O content of GO defined as 100 O/C at.% is 48.37 at.%, indicating that the O content is high. Namely, we have synthesized GO with high few-layer ratio and O content.

        Figure 1


    3. CDC, FDA faked “covid” testing protocol by using human cells mixed with common cold virus fragments

      In a shocking revelation, an FDA document admits that the CDC and FDA conspired to fabricate a covid-19 testing protocol using human cells combined with common cold virus fragments because they had no physical samples of the SARS-CoV-2 “covid” virus available.

      All the PCR analysis based on this protocol is utterly fraudulent, flagging people as “positive” for covid when they merely possess tiny quantities of RNA fragments from other coronavirus strains circulating in their blood.

      The CDC also just issued a “laboratory alert,” announcing their intention to withdraw the faulty PCR testing protocol by the end of this year. As part of their announcement, they implied that the current PCR test — the same one the FDA mentioned above, which was developed without any physical covid samples for calibration — cannot tell the difference between influenza and covid.

      Get the full, breaking story in today’s podcast.

      Large outbreak in Massachusetts mostly infected vaccinated people, CDC study finds
      The Associated Press · Posted: Jul 30, 2021

      In another dispiriting setback for U.S. efforts to stamp out the coronavirus, scientists who studied a large COVID-19 outbreak in Massachusetts concluded that vaccinated people who got so-called breakthrough infections carried about the same amount of the coronavirus as those who did not get shots.

      Health officials on Friday released details of that research, which was key in this week’s decision by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to recommend that vaccinated people return to wearing masks indoors in parts of the U.S. where the delta variant is fuelling infection surges.

      The authors said the findings suggest that the CDC’s mask guidance should be expanded to include the entire country, even outside of hot spots.

      The findings have the potential to upend past thinking about how the disease is spread. Previously, vaccinated people who got infected were thought to have low levels of virus and to be unlikely to pass it to others. But the new data shows that is not the case with the delta variant.

      The outbreak in Provincetown — a seaside tourist spot on Cape Cod, in the county with Massachusetts’s highest vaccination rate — has so far seen more than 900 cases.

      The CDC report is based on about 470 COVID-19 cases linked to the Provincetown festivities, which included densely packed indoor and outdoor holiday events at bars, restaurants, guest houses and rental homes.

      Researchers ran tests on a portion of them and found roughly the same level of virus in those who were fully vaccinated and those who were not.

      Three-quarters of the infections were in fully vaccinated individuals. Among those fully vaccinated, about 80 per cent experienced symptoms with the most common being cough, headache, sore throat, muscle aches and fever.

      In the report, the measure researchers used to assess how much virus an infected person is carrying does not indicate whether they are actually transmitting the virus to other people, said Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan.



      1. Dr. Joseph Mercola: “The Truth about Covid-19”
        Mar 12 2021
        Length: 27 mins

        Natural health expert Dr. Joseph Mercola talks about his new book “The Truth About Covid-19,” Big Tech Censorship, what he think is wrong the medical establishment, what it’s like to be smeared, and what it all has to do with pharmaceutical interests.

        Subscribe to my two podcasts: “The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast” and “Full Measure After Hours.” Leave a review, subscribe and share with your friends!



      2. The Official Narrative is ALWAYS BULLSHIT.

        Nolte: CDC’s Own Math Proves Vax Mandates, Re-Masking Is Anti-Science

        Panic Mode: Internal Document Reveals CDC Pushing for More Forceful Messaging

        Surgeon General Murthy: Localities Reinstituting Mask Mandates ‘to Protect the Vaccinated,’ and Stop Transmission




      Dr. Judy Mikovits interviewed by the Health Ranger: Fauci’s covid crimes aren’t his first “plandemic”

      Dr. Judy Mikovits interviewed by Mike Adams.
      NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency.



      1. *More than 270 million people around the world could face life-threatening food shortages as the pandemic continues, the U.N. predicts.

        *France and Germany will give additional vaccine shots to vulnerable people, despite a request from the W.H.O. to not administer boosters.

        *The U.S. will pause funding on Novavax’s vaccine production, the company said. Novavax has been struggling to produce the shots.

        *Virginia will require state employees to be vaccinated or get tested weekly. In New Jersey, public school students will have to wear masks.

        *CNN said it had fired three unvaccinated employees who went into the office.

        –NY TIMES 8/6/2021




      A Big Tech/biotech whistleblower, who is concealing his true identity for now and going by “Liberty Man” has been working on a documentary series for Infowars and he joins Alex Jones to explain why the Globalists are so desperate to force-inject us and why we must educate ourselves as much as possible about this.

      He says, “The reality is they’re deploying technology on us and if you don’t understand that technology, you will not understand what’s going on. If you’re a politician and you don’t understand the DARPA technology that’s being deployed on us right now, you are unfit to govern.

      “We’re going to be digging into basically, what I think is the Rosetta Stone…It’s going to give you the perspective on why they’re pushing this stuff so hard. For the doctors and scientists out there, you’re going to understand all the vaccine injuries going on right now. But more importantly, you’re going to understand two key things of the agenda and why they’re pushing so hard; what this means to them…


      Pfizer whistleblower, Karen Kingston that graphene oxide was redacted as an ingredient from Pfizer’s US patent, due to its status as a “trade secret”.

      Liberty Man confirms that the “worms” seen on the masks and swabs and the magnetization effects of human bodies that we’ve been seeing are all examples of functionalized graphene.

      Liberty Man asks, “How does the Hydrogel deliver the mRNA payload into our cells? The answer is graphene oxide,” which he says is also instrumental for their plan to make humans into nodes on the Internet of Things, as was first reported here in 2015 from the whistleblower pseudonymously-named “DJ” from Level9News,



      1. Bioelectrical Corona
        [graphene oxide was redacted as an ingredient from Pfizer’s US patent, due to its status as a “trade secret”]

        Association of bioelectric impedance analysis body composition and disease severity in COVID-19 hospital ward and ICU patients: The BIAC-19 study

        The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic is unprecedented in its impact. It is essential to shed light on patient characteristics that predispose to a more severe disease course. Obesity, defined as a BMI>30 kg/m2, is suggested to be one of these characteristics. However, BMI does not differentiate between fat mass and lean body mass, or the distribution of fat tissue. The aim of the present study was to assess the body composition of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ward or the ICU and identify any associations with severity of disease.

        We performed an observational cross-sectional cohort study. Bioelectric impedance analysis was conducted amongst all confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the ward or ICU of our hospital in the Netherlands, between April 10 and 17, 2020. Body water measurements and derived values were recalculated to dry weight, using a standard ratio of extracellular water to total body water of 0.38. Data were compared between the ward and ICU patients, and regression models were used to assess the associations between baseline characteristics, body composition, and several indicators of disease severity, including a composite score composed of mortality, morbidity, and ICU admission.

        Fifty-four patients were included, of which 30 in the ward and 24 in the ICU. The mean age was 67 years (95%-CI 64–71), and 34 (63%) were male. Mean BMI was 29.7 (95%-CI 28.2–31.1) kg/m2 and did not differ between groups. Body composition values were not independently associated with disease severity. In multiple logistic regression analyses, a low phase angle was associated with COVID-19 severity in the composite score (OR 0.299, p = 0.046).

        We found no significant associations between body composition, including fat mass, visceral fat area, and fat-free mass, and disease severity in our population of generally overweight COVID-19 patients. A lower phase angle did increase the odds of severe COVID-19. We believe that factors other than body composition play a more critical role in the development of severe COVID-19.



    6. Dr Piers Robinson – C0vid is a Global Propaganda Operation

      Never before has the world witnessed such a coordinated propaganda effort, featuring near perfect streamlining of messaging and policy, as well as an Establishment launching attacks against any dissenters by deploying “fact-checkers” and using social media firms to deplatform any voices who offer an opinion which differs from the official narrative. It is nothing short of a completely global, corporatised war effort.

      Asia Pacific Today talks with Dr. Piers Robinson, an expert on the subject of propaganda, as he explains how governments, mainstream media and the pharmaceutical industry have combined forces to push forward an unprecedented global propaganda onslaught since the onset of the Covid crisis

      Dr Piers Robinson is an expert on communication, media and world politics, focusing on conflict and war and especially the role of propaganda. He is presently Co-Director of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies, Convenor of the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media and Associated Researcher with the Working Group on Propaganda and the 9/11 ‘War on Terror’. From 2016 – 2019, he was Professor and Chair in Politics, Society and Political Journalism at the University of Sheffield. He has also served on the boards of several academic journals. He has lectured at the NATO Defense College in Rome and briefed senior UK military commanders and diplomats, and his research interests focus on Organised Persuasive Communication and Contemporary Propaganda and his current projects include Propaganda and the Syrian conflict; Propaganda and the 9/11 Global War on Terror and Covid19.





        Dr. Carrie Madej: c0vid vaccines use exotic nanotech for tracking and bio-control, once injected with patented synthetic gene you are owned by Pharma

        Dr. Carrie Madej and Mike Adams talk about VACCINE TRUTH censorships and the EVIL AGENDA behind vaccination campaigns

        Interviewed by Mike Adams, Dr. Carrie Madej talked about the continued censorship being experienced by people like her who speak the vaccine truth and oppose the use of experimental coronavirus vaccines in people.

        She said it’s like there’s a coup happening, and we’re not being told about it.

        While it’s a challenge to fight censorship, Madej said they will keep going on. She shared that they’re doing a 90-day tour around the United States that started May 15. The tour features different speakers in different cities talking about medical freedoms, freedom of speech,
        constitutional rights and human rights.

        Madej proceeded to talk about the bigger agenda behind the vaccination campaigns around the world. According to her, a corporation can technically own you overnight if a patented synthetic gene injected into you got inserted into your genetic code – which is possible according to
        science. If that happens, Adams said, you will need to get permission from the corporation that owns the patent before deciding to reproduce.

        Madej also noted the increasing number of miscarriages that happen following vaccinations.




    7. David Martin presents hard evidence showing COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon.
      February 17, 2021 11:30 AM By James Bailey

      You are here: Home » News » Jesuit Agendas » Biological Weapons » David Martin presents hard evidence showing COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon.
      David Martin presents hard evidence showing COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon.
      February 17, 2021 11:30 AM By James Bailey 17 Comments

      Share this post:Share this by EmailFacebookTwitterWhatsappRSS

      David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

      Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and was released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.

      In my opinion, the evidence presented below along with additional evidence presented in the video proves that all of these pathogenic variants of the coronavirus were laboratory developed, man-made bioweapons. And they’ve all been funded by the NIAID under the direction of a self-proclaimed Jesuit, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

      The following quotes from Dr. Martin were transcribed from the video.

      “Historically, coronaviruses have not been associated with significant illnesses in humans. So how is it that suddenly in 2002 going into 2003 that we have this magical alteration in beta coronaviruses that suddenly makes them lethal?

      And that question is the fundamental question that is behind an inquiry that we’ve been on since 1999 and Ralph Baric and NIAID’s (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) first efforts to figure out a way to increase the pathogenicity of beta coronaviruses.

      In 1999, there was a grant given to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and in that grant there was an effort to figure out how to amplify certain pathogenicities of what was called recombinant technology around coronavirus. Baric had a decade plus history in working with coronaviruses generally. He had done a lot of work in veterinary science around cardiac conditions for rabbits. There was a huge amount of research around cardiomyopathy in rabbits that had something to do with coronavirus. But in 1999, NIAID funded a project in which we first saw the amplification of pathogenic components of the beta coronavirus. (Note: Anthony Fauci has been Director of NIAID since 1984.)



    8. Report of Problems With Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Being Investigated: Contract Company

      BY ZACHARY STIEBER November 4, 2021

      Alleged problems with a major clinical trial examining Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine are being probed, a contract company involved in the research has confirmed.

      Ventavia Research Group operated several of the trial sites in the fall of 2020. Brook Jackson, who worked for the company during this time, told the British Medical Journal that the trial was riddled with issues, including the falsification of data.

      Jackson said she alerted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to the problems she witnessed and was fired within hours.

      Ventavia confirmed to The Epoch Times that it employed Jackson for two weeks last year. Lauren Foreman, director of business development and communications, said in an email that Ventavia is investigating Jackson’s allegations.

      “Ventavia takes research compliance, data integrity, and participant safety very seriously and stands behind its important work supporting the development of lifesaving vaccines and is conducting its investigation accordingly,” she said.

      The FDA appeared to confirm it was aware of the matter.

      “Although the agency cannot comment further at this time in this ongoing matter, FDA has full confidence in the data that were used to support the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine authorization and the Comirnaty approval,” a spokeswoman told The Epoch Times in an email.

      Ventavia worked on the trial that led to emergency use authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s jab. The FDA later approved the shot, though many or all of the doses being administered in the United States continue to be the EUA-version.

      Pfizer didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

      Jackson, who had worked with clinical trials for over 15 years, told the British Medical Journal she repeatedly raised concerns with her superiors about what she was witnessing, including patient safety concerns. She began to feel her reports were being ignored and began taking photographs using her phone. One photograph apparently showed that needles were discarded in a plastic bag instead of a box, while another was said to have showed packaging materials that revealed trial participants’ identification numbers, signaling they may have been unblinded.

      Jackson listed 12 concerns she had in a Sept. 25 message to the FDA, including participants not being monitored after receiving an injection and vaccines not being stored at proper temperatures. She also alleged that Ventavia staff members were targeted by higher-ups for reporting problems.

      Jackson said the FDA sent her an email acknowledging receipt of the list and she received a call from an FDA inspector, but she has heard nothing from the agency since then.

      The Epoch Times has submitted a Freedom of Information Act request concerning Jackson’s email to the FDA and internal communications from the agency regarding the message.

      The FDA said in August it inspected nine of the trial’s 153 sites. None of Ventavia’s sites were inspected.

      The inspections were limited “because the study was ongoing, and the data required for verification and comparison were not yet available to the IND [investigational new drug],” an FDA officer wrote in a summary of the inspections.

      Some pharmaceutical companies have seen inspections waived or FDA officials deciding to conduct an inspection remotely, Philip Crooker, technical vice president of Paraexel, told a forum in December 2020. Inspections of domestic sites plunged to 6,574 in 2020 from 13,001 in 2019, according to FDA data.



  1. Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on the Bioethics of Experimental Vaccines and the ‘Ultimate Gaslighting’

    “What would happen to the entire vaccine enterprise—I’m talking about pediatric vaccines, the fundamental bedrocks of public health—if we basically validate the criticisms of those that have been labeled anti-vaxxers?”

    In this episode, we sit down with mRNA vaccine pioneer Dr. Robert Malone to discuss questions surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines and repurposed drugs, as well as the bioethics of experimental vaccines.



    1. It is the major issues of our times, the ones that drive policies, that must be scrutinized most closely, for these critical issues are what have historically been found to be mostly PR and propaganda.
      The ‘Official Narrative’ is almost always a myth

      One such myth is that CIA is an institution formed to protect US interests. The fact is that the CIA is a sworn enemy of the United States. CIA has sworn allegiance to another entity entirely, that is the ‘Brotherhood of Skull & Bones”, a Prussian secret society with a global agenda. This agenda coincidentally allies with the same agenda promoted by the Davos cabal of the World Economic Forum led by technocrats like Klause Schwab (a member of the Nazi ‘Hitler Yourh in his teens).

      Suggested reading:




  2. Dr Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters to discuss a scientific report that just came out from the University of Almería School of Engineering in Spain entitled, “Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension: Observational Study in Optical and Electron Microscopy”, where it was found that each dose of the Pfizer shot “was found to contain 6 ng of RNA and 747 ng of graphene oxide, which is 99.103% of the medication.

    Dr Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters to discuss a scientific report that just came out from the University of Almería School of Engineering in Spain entitled, “Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension: Observational Study in Optical and Electron Microscopy”, where it was found that each dose of the Pfizer shot “was found to contain 6 ng of RNA and 747 ng of graphene oxide, which is 99.103% of the medication.

    Dr Ruby draws our attention to a 2016 study, “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles [GFNs]: a general review of the origins and mechanisms”, which found, “Several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.”

    She says, “These graphene sheets that investigators found in the Pfizer vial, when they get into your system and when they start to penetrate your cells – which they have a lipid nanoparticle that pushes them into your cells – you get oxidative stress…

    “It destroys literally everything inside the cell. It explodes the mitochondria. It creates a situation where the body is on a 10-Alarm fire truck and inflammation, cytokines, chemokines. This incredibly violent…inflammatory storm comes in and it has particular affinity for creating acute inflammation of the lungs, it creates an inflammatory storm in cardiac tissue and in brain tissue.

    “Stew, this is going to tie directly to strokes, to the heart attacks – and we’re giving this to pregnant mothers and babies? This is really something everybody’s gotta start paying attention to.”

    Stew asks her if graphene oxide is a poison and she responds, “It is most definitely a poison.”

    Stew says, “Spanish researchers have found that over 99% of the Pfizer vaccine is graphene oxide, is that right?”

    “That’s right. Stew, there’s no other reason for this to be in there except to murder people…If the rest of the companies that are pushing these jabs, all four of the companies in the US are filled with 99% of this toxic industrial chemical, I don’t know what to say to you but everybody better shut everything down right now. This is really dangerous.”

    Stew replies, “This is horrific. I get chills listening to this. I don’t know why the media’s not picking any of this up. They’re in on it. They want you dead. They’re part of the murder plot…



    1. Graphene oxide (GO) is the most prominent host of magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) composites because its properties make it advantageous for large-scale production. … Graphene-based composites are then obtained by transformation of GO to reduced graphene oxide (RGO).

      Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

      Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications. Currently, many studies have investigated the biocompatibility and toxicity of GFNs in vivo and in intro. Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells, eventually being excreted out of the bodies. This review collects studies on the toxic effects of GFNs in several organs and cell models. We also point out that various factors determine the toxicity of GFNs including the lateral size, surface structure, functionalization, charge, impurities, aggregations, and corona effect ect. In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways. In this review, we summarize the available information on regulating factors and the mechanisms of GFNs toxicity, and propose some challenges and suggestions for further investigations of GFNs, with the aim of completing the toxicology mechanisms, and providing suggestions to improve the biological safety of GFNs and facilitate their wide application.

      Graphene oxide nanoparticle attachment and its toxicity on living lung epithelial cells†

      Since its discovery, graphene and its oxidized form, graphene oxide (GO), have attracted interest in a wide range of technical applications. Concerns about their potential toxicity calls for scrutinized studies, but hitherto conflicting results have been reported which partly may be due to variations of synthesis and exposure procedures. Here we report on the attachment and toxicity of contamination-free graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONP) in living lung epithelial cells. The synthesis of chemically pure GONP was made by an improvement of the Hummer’s method based on graphene exfoliated from graphite using high-intensity ultrasonication, resulting in two dimensional sheets with a lateral dimension in the range 200 nm to 3 μm and thickness of 0.9 nm. Confocal Raman spectroscopy combined with multivariate analysis was used to study the interaction of GONP and living cells. It is shown that overlapping Raman bands due to GONPs and biomolecules in the cells can clearly be separated with this approach. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis was used to compare spectral data collected from cells exposed to GONP with spectral data collected from non-exposed control cells, and spectral data from cells exposed to a surfactant known to induce apoptosis. Our analyses show that GONP readily attach to the cells, forming sheets which cover a large fraction of the cell surfaces, and induce small chemical changes. In particular, chemical modifications of proteins and lipids in lung epithelial cells are inferred. GONPs do not, however, decrease cell viability. In contrast, enhanced cell proliferation is observed. Our results shed new light on the interactions of GO, and in contrast to some previous reports, suggest that GO is not toxic. The hyperspectral Raman spectroscopy analysis employed here should be applicable for other fields in nanomedicine as a label-free non-perturbing analytical method.!divAbstract



    2. Video: Graphene Oxide: A Toxic Substance in the Vial of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
      By Ricardo Delgado and Prof Michel Chossudovsky
      Global Research, July 28, 2021

      We bring to the attention of Global Research readers this important interview with Ricardo Delgado Martin, Founder and Director of Quinta Columna. Ricardo is responsible for coordinating the Spanish research team’s analysis of the impacts of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the vial of the mRNA vaccine.

      The results of their analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy are far-reaching. Graphene oxide is a toxin which triggers thrombi and blood coagulation. It also has an impact on the immune system. Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs can have devastating impacts.

      The results of the Spanish study suggest, yet to be fully confirmed and ascertained, that the recorded vaccine related deaths and “adverse events” (e.g. published in the US by the CDC and in the EU) are attributable to the presence of graphene oxide nano-particles contained in the Covid vaccine vial.

      Of significance, (acknowledged by national health authorities) graphene oxide is also contained in the face mask.
      Graphene has electromagnetic properties which have been detected in people who have been vaccinated. These effects have been amply documented and confirmed. See the study conducted by the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance

      Ricardo Delgado Martin is specialized in biostatistics, clinical microbiology, clinical genetics and immunology.

      For further details on this project see the report by Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, specialized in Chemistry and Biology, Escuela Superior de Ingenería, University of Almería.

      See summary of their report entitled Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension, Observational study in Optical and Electron Microscopy.

      Full Study (English)

      Speaking on behalf of the Spanish research team, Ricardo Delgado Martin recommends that the covid-19 experimental mRNA vaccine should be cancelled and discontinued immediately.


      This is a controversial study. There are scientists and medical doctors who disagree with the results of the Spanish study.

      The evidence has to be either ascertained or refuted. What is required is that independent scientists and health professionals conduct their own lab analysis of the contents of the vaccine vial.

      Similarly, we call upon the national health authorities of the 193 member states of the UN which are currently vaccinating their people, to conduct their own study and analysis of the vaccine vial. And if graphene-oxide is detected, the vaccination program should immediately be discontinued.




      1. The “Killer Vaccine” Worldwide. 7.9 Billion People
        By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, August 03, 2021

        The stated objective is to enforce the Worldwide vaccination of 7.9 billion people in more than 190 countries, to be followed by the imposition of a digitized “vaccine passport”. The evidence of mortality and morbidity resulting from the vaccine is overwhelming. Needless to say this is a multi-billion dollar operation for Big Pharma.



  3. Leftists Tell Biden to IGNORE Genocide to Preserve Climate Negotiations w/ China
    ‘Sounds like Chinese propaganda…’

    By Jacob Bruns | July 9, 2021

    Left-wing activists penned a letter to President Joe Biden on Wednesday, instructing him to remain on friendly terms with China, despite its long list human-rights abuses directed toward political dissidents and religious/ethnic minorities.

    A committee of over 40 far-left organizations urged the president to steer clear of engaging in potentially hostile acts against the rival superpower, according to Politico.

    “[N]othing less than the future of our planet depends on ending the new Cold War between the United States and China,” they wrote.

    The groups—including those linked to George Soros and other globalist oligarchs—claimed that the kid-glove treatment was necessary in order to slow the greatest global threat of all: climate change.

    “We, the undersigned organizations, call on the Biden administration and all members of Congress to eschew the dominant antagonistic approach to U.S.–China relations and instead prioritize multilateralism, diplomacy, and cooperation with China to address the existential threat that is the climate crisis,” they wrote.

    With some estimating that the world has only 10 more years until total destruction, any escalation of trans-Pacific tensions, as occurred during the prior Trump administration, could create even greater stress on the delicate global ecosystem, further shortening its lifespan.

    Thus, according to the activists, offending China by pressing its harsh treatment of its own citizens—as well as other abuses heaped on American economic and national security interests—could risk “undermining much-needed climate cooperation.”



  4. Dr. Fauci voices support for vaccine mandates, predicts mandates are coming once FDA gives shots full approval

    Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, suggested Sunday that municipalities should begin issuing COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

    During an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Fauci agreed that vaccine mandates should become a reality on the “local level.”

    “I have been of this opinion, and I remain of that opinion, that I do believe at the local level, Jake, there should be more mandates. There really should be,” Fauci told host Jake Tapper.

    “We’re talking about life-and-death situation. We have lost 600,000 Americans already, and we’re still losing more people. There have been 4 million deaths worldwide. This is serious business. So, I am in favor of that,” he added.

    In fact, Fauci foreshadowed what may come in the near future: vaccine mandates when the Food and Drug Administration gives the vaccines official approval.

    Currently, COVID vaccines being used in the U.S. have been awarded emergency authorization only.

    I think the hesitancy at the local level of doing mandates is because the vaccines have not been officially fully approved. But people need to understand that the amount of data right now that shows a high degree of effectiveness and a high degree of safety is more than we have ever seen with emergency use authorization. So, these vaccines are as good as officially approved with all the I’s dotted and the T’s crossed. It hasn’t been done yet because the FDA has to do certain things, but it’s as good as done.

    People should really understand that. But they are waiting now until you get an official approval before. And I think, when you do see the official approval, Jake, you are going to see a lot more mandates.



  5. During the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions hearing Tuesday, Paul dogged Fauci with questions about his previous assertions. “Dr. Fauci, as you are aware it is a crime to lie to Congress,” the Senator asked regarding the NIH’s funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. “And yet, gain-of-function research was done entirely in the Wuhan Institute … and was funded by the NIH,” Paul said.

    He cited a paper from the Chinese institution titled “Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses” where one of the authors “credits the NIH and lists the actual number of the grant that she was given by the NIH,” Paul said. “In this paper, she took two bat coronavirus genes, spiked genes, and combined them with a SARS-related backbone to create new viruses that are not found in nature,” he pointed out.

    Paul went on to summarize how the experiments fit with gain of function definition, combining “genetic information from different coronaviruses that infect animals but not humans to create novel artificial viruses able to infect human cells,” Paul said. “Viruses that in nature, only infect animals were manipulated in the Wuhan lab to gain the function of infecting humans,” Paul continued.



      1. John MacArthur Says Pandemic, Masks, a Deception Used to Produce State Slavery

        John MacArthur preached a sermon earlier this month titled “The Truth Will Set You Free.” In that sermon, he listed off a number of ways that people in our modern culture are willing to give up their freedoms.

        Of those ways, he listed crises, emphasizing the collective, mass psychosis, control of information, hedonism, and obsessive entertainment. It was under mass psychosis that MacArthur mentioned facemasks and pandemics as a way to get people to give up their freedoms…[Watch Video]



  6. This year marks a seminal turning point in human history. For the first time since human civilization began, our species is being genetically modified. Vaccine manufacturers have now made it possible for the human genome to be permanently altered—and humanity’s relationship with nature forever changed—by means of an experimental pharmaceutical injection that is being falsely referred to as a “vaccine.”

    In light of this defining event, I believe we must take a sober look at the motives and acts that are revamping humanity as we know it. Simultaneously, we must examine our increasingly destructive treatment of the natural world.

    In order to investigate the many variables that are hastening the demise of humanity and sabotaging our unique role as stewards of the earth and its billions of plant and animal species, I have divided this study into four main parts, which will appear as separate articles:

    In Part I: The Microbiome and The Virome, we will discover that we are literally swimming in a vast sea of genomic information that was essential for life to begin and flourish on this precious earth and that is still trying to help all species survive. The matrix of organisms that make up the microbiome have built a viromic information stream that has allowed for adaptation and biodiversity to occur on the planet. And that very same viromic information stream is responsible for building the human species.

    In Part lI: Our War Against Nature, we will explore how our own reckless behaviour is destroying the environment, thereby moving us toward the sixth mass extinction. By that I mean, I will be covering the real environmental catastrophe, not the billionaire-funded “global warming/climate change” hoax initiated by the Club of Rome and further promulgated by the World Economic Forum (WEF).

    In Part III: What Happened in 2020, we will examine how this real environmental devastation has contributed to the “pandemic” that was rolled out in 2020, that led to the mass experimental injections of unknown substances into human “subjects” in 2021, and that has no foreseeable end. (I put “pandemic” in quotes because of its fraudulent character. Indeed, it is more accurately and aptly described as a plandemic, a scamdemic, a pseudo pandemic or any other term indicating fakery.)

    In Part IV: Our Response, we will analyze the irresponsible and irrational response of most people on the planet to this so-called pandemic.

    Parts II, III and IV will be published later by Global Research.

    The Microbiome

    The microbiome (derived from the Greek words micro, meaning “small,” and biotikos, meaning “pertaining to life”) is a massive ecosystem consisting of trillions of microorganisms. Incredibly, some 40,000 species of bacteria, 300,000 species of parasites, 65,000 species of protozoa, and between 3.5 million and 5 million species of fungi inhabit the environment around us and live in or on the human body. This complex world of microorganisms continually secretes a sea of viruses, which serve as a communication network for the bacteria, parasites, protozoa, and fungi. And, as we will discover shortly, these viruses have always been here to help us, not hinder us. In other words, they are life-affirming, not death-inducing.

    Here’s a hint of the microbiome’s intricacy, incredible diversity, and infinitesimal size: The number of genes within the fungal kingdom is at least 125 trillion! The human genome, by comparison, consists of a mere 20,000 genes. A fruit fly has 13,000 genes, a flea 31,000. Thus, in terms of genetic complexity, the human genome has just a tiny fragment of genetic information compared to the vast world of genomic information contained within the microbiome.

    One fascinating aspect of the microbiome is its symbiotic communication network, which allows the transmission of protein information from one microorganism to one another. For example, the mycelial network (a matrix of fine white filaments) in fungi allows the fungi to communicate with each other over distances that can stretch to several kilometers. These mycelial structures are capable of transferring mineral and protein resources more than a kilometer. How? They use light energy and electrons that flow through the pathways within the soil system. In this way, the microbiome helps plants and other multicellular life forms flourish. It is no exaggeration to call the mycelial network in the fungal kingdom the literal “brain” of the planet. Incidentally, all of the tiny, intelligent organisms that make up the microbiome are powered by the biophotonic energy of the sun.

    Hard as it is to fathom, at least 1.4 quadrillion bacteria and 10 quadrillion fungi live inside the human body. Within the human colon alone are 3.8 x 1013bacteria cells. Every single organ in the body, including the brain, has its own microbiome. The purpose of the bacteria and fungi in our bodies is to nourish and nurture our cells, keeping us healthy and in equilibrium with the larger microbiome surrounding us.

    The Virome

    The virome is the immense world in which Mother Nature’s messengers exist. It is composed of trillions upon trillions of viruses produced by the aforementioned microbiome’s bacteria, parasites, protozoa, and fungi.

    The average adult human body contains 1 x 1015 viruses. By contrast, in the air enveloping the earth there are 1 x 1031viruses; in the earth’s soil there are 2.5 x 1031 viruses; and in the earth’s oceans there are 1.2 x 1030viruses. To provide some perspective on these awe-inspiring numbers, 1 x 1031is 10 million times greater than the number of known stars in the entire universe.

    Simply put, a virus is genomic information, either DNA or RNA, wrapped in a protein envelope. The small strands of protein protruding outward from the outer surface of a virus’s protein envelope are called spike proteins. Viruses are not living organisms. They do not produce their own fuel. They have no metabolism for producing energy. And they cannot reproduce.

    Viruses have been traveling globally, above the atmospheric boundary layer, for millions of years, long before machines for air travel were invented. Their genetic codes have been blanketing the earth for eons, creating biodiversity and allowing for adaptation throughout the ecosystem. By adaptation, I mean that viruses are always seeking to adapt their genetic codes for the purpose of creating resilient health in all of the planet’s life forms. It is ridiculous to suggest that, in order to travel from one region of the globe to another, a virus must hop on an aircraft, as RAND’s National Security Research Division would have us believe.

    Furthermore, viruses—including coronaviruses—do not come in waves and then disappear without a trace, only to miraculously reappear later in the same spot or a different one. Instead, viruses never leave, never expire. They inhabit every element in the environment around us. In short, they are omnipresent and ever-present.

    Our relationship with particular viruses can change as a consequence of our harmful actions toward nature. Whenever humans poison and pollute the air, soil, and water, they create an imbalance between humanity and the virome—an imbalance that can cause us to come into disequilibrium with a particular virus.

    Unfortunately, the allopathic medicine regime, which plutocrats John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie forced on most of the world with their 1910 Flexner Report, still has a large segment of the scientific community believing that bacteria, fungi, and viruses are our enemy.

    The foundation of Rockefeller’s allopathic medicine scheme is Louis Pasteur’s flawed “germ theory,” which claims that outside microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses attack, invade, and infect the body, thereby causing disease.

    Read the entire critical article:



    1. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? — Who watches the watchers?
      Six months ago, I began my first article on scientific censorship during COVID-19 by introducing Dr. Anthony Fauci as a surprise character who had emerged unexpectedly while I dug through what were then 83,000 FOIA emails, published by US Right-to-Know over the course of the last year: see files related to Ralph Baric, Linda Saif, Rita Colwell, Colorado State/Rocky Mountain National Laboratory and the NCBI; other FOIA releases from Judicial Watch, BuzzFeed, and the Washington Post include NIH funding of the WIV and Dr. Fauci’s emails.

      I’ve been trying for quite some time to get people to understand the full scope of the Dr. Fauci “situation,” but it’s clear that segments of our national leadership are preventing an honest and open inquiry into his actions because they fear the backlash or collateral damage that will result from the tarnishing of their sacred cow. It’s time Americans were told the truth: that the grant money sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is merely a footnote in this narrative. After all, Dr. Fauci controls nearly $4 billion of annual grant funding for the NIAID, the institute within the NIH he has directed since 1984. Over 37 years, more than 50,000 research projects have been supported with more than $50 billion (conservatively) of taxpayer funds that have been doled out to them.

      It’s reasonable to hold him accountable for the results of his organization’s efforts, but the direct funding received by the WIV for gain-of-function (GOF) research represents only a tiny fraction of Fauci’s involvement in enabling risky research. The 2017 repeal of the GOF ban was decided without the consultation of the Trump administration, even though news coverage during the pandemic blamed him for the decision. Neither Fauci nor his boss, NIH Director Francis Collins, bothered to clarify the record, which looks especially disgusting in the wake of persistent rejections of Sen. Rand Paul’s assertions (with accompanying evidence) that the NIH financially supported such research.

      First, do no harm … to Fauci’s legacy
      It’s important to plainly state that I’m aware of the intense politicization of virtually every aspect of the pandemic and the pandemic response. Since many readers may not be aware, I’ll point out that my specific motivation for building a COVID-19 website (later moved here to Substack) and speaking to a broader audience about the various facets of the pandemic was to offer unfiltered information to counter the disgusting polarization I observed:

      I have chosen to offer this website as a forum for information about the current COVID-19 pandemic, in an effort to provide meaningful, factual and useful content during what will continue to be a destabilizing time. There is no indication that our media will soon get better at filling the knowledge void they’ve created; as a result, confidence in those who deliver our news has hit rock bottom at the exact moment in recent history when we need responsible media the most.

      My past experience and current observations lead me to believe that the big picture of the pandemic is poorly understood, and there has been so much conflicting information floating around that it has been very difficult to see what awaits us beyond the immediate horizon. My goal is simply to provide resources so that each of us can approach the coming months with intention – as perspective widens, willpower to overcome circumstance increases. The opposite is also true, in that fear increases when awareness decreases, and in the aftermath of societal upheaval a vacuum appears that will be filled, by one voice or another.

      Just as the Native American parable states, courage and fear are interrelated; now is the time to feed courage and starve fear.

      My goal is to learn and prepare, because those who expect “normal” to return are going to be disappointed. The odds of future waves of infection are high, and a lot of changes will have to be made in order to keep the engine running once flu season arrives in the fall. The statistics paint a clear picture, in that the near-simultaneous global response saved millions of lives; it’s also clear that applying the same medicine several times will negate the economic prosperity that fuels innovation in medical technology. Being able to see a storm coming is meaningless if all you can do is watch and wait, and America’s economy has been even more critical during the last decade of malaise in a majority of the developed world. In particular, the last few years of higher growth gave a bigger cushion to land on, but after witnessing unemployment go from historically low to historically high in six weeks it would be foolish to expect us to fully recover before the re-emergence of a global peak in cases.
      I feel obligated to reiterate my stance, because the nature and importance of the situation can’t be ignored any longer: Congress is now actively engaged in investigating the pandemic’s origins, and we must confront the truth if we are to gain meaningful insight that can help us prepare for future crises. There is no level of partisanship that justifies ignoring a tragedy of this magnitude.
      The only proper action for Dr. Fauci to take at this point is to resign immediately and apologize for prioritizing the suppression of embarrassing and extensive conflicts of interest, double standards, and political decisions masked as sound policy. Ideally, such a statement would include a call for the retraction of “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” one of the most-read (and potentially most impactful) pieces of scientific propaganda published in at least a generation. Each of its five authors intentionally framed the COVID origin debate around “evidence” and “facts” that they couldn’t prove and a finality of their conclusions that the known facts couldn’t justify.

      These actions are independent of the ultimate answer to the origin question, because the failures of leadership I’ve described are ethically and morally indefensible, regardless of China’s guilt or innocence in the sparking of the pandemic. Any remaining shreds of credibility left in the public’s perception of scientists must be salvaged by new leaders who are willing to do what needs to be done to clean the Augean Stables.

      Sufficient evidence already exists for Congress to do the right thing moving forward. Given the enormity of the failures — and of the efforts to hide, censor, and destroy the credibility of anyone who spoke out against lockdowns, vaccines, masks, generic drugs, mRNA efficacy versus risks, and the curtailment of numerous constitutional/human rights in the last 18 months — it will take historic leadership to honestly converse with a righteously indignant citizenry (in the U.S. and everywhere else). We must accept that our current representatives have proven manifestly unqualified to assume such leadership — in the last six months, censorship has been expanding, not receding.

      The COVID-19 pandemic has manifestly proven that there is no lie so “noble” that it overrides the rights and wisdom of a free and informed public. That doesn’t mean that the public will inherently do better.

      It’s just acknowledging the inescapable conclusion — that we can’t possibly do worse.



  7. Dr. Samantha Bailey Explains the Fraud behind the Wuhan “Virus”

    Dr. Samantha Bailey, a medical doctor from New Zealand, shows that the so-called Wuhan “virus” started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, when 41 patients who had pneumonia were hospitalized and six died. There were no laboratory tests or any other evidence that a new, novel, never-seen-before virus was the agent of disease.

    The much touted genetic sequences came from a single patient who was declared to have COVID-19 without proof or evidence. On January 23, 2020, Christian Drosten’s team published a protocol to test for COVID-19/ SARS-CoV-2 virus using the PCR test, but the test protocol “was designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.”
    The tests were based on simply downloading the hypothetical sequences — no virus required!!

    A number of papers were published claiming to have used isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, but the authors later acknowledged that they never had purified particles.


    1. Schlichter: Imagine If They Hadn’t Lied To Us For The Last 18 Months

      FRIDAY, JUL 30, 2021 – 11:40 PM
      Authored by Kurt Schlichter, op-ed via,

      Everybody wrap something around your face again even though they said you wouldn’t need to if you got vaxxed! But they didn’t lie – no, apparently a bunch of people – and not just those evil white nationalist-Christian-gun-Jesus-flag people – are refusing to get the vaccine, and the reason is that they are moral defectives somehow in thrall to Tucker Carlson’s Svengali-like powers of persuasion.

      You see, the people who won’t get it are stupid people who hate science because they refuse to trust the people who have spent the last year-and-a-half lying to them.

      Let’s try a thought experiment. Let’s imagine our ruling class was not as utterly corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and downright stupid as it manifestly is. I know that’s hard, but go with me.

      This weird new virus appears and starts spreading. Instead of leveraging it to take down Trump, the Democrats appear with the Republican president and GOP leadership to announce they are working together to solve the problem. Imagine that instead of shaming people, first about wearing masks, then about not wearing masks, then about not wearing two masks, then no masks, then masks again, they went with transparency.

      “We are not sure how much, if at all, masks work. We’re running test trials to see and we’ll tell you what we find as soon as we have the data. In the meantime, let’s all wear them just in case.” And then, when they ran the studies, they would tell us the answer.

      Have you seen any studies about masks? We get a lot of that fascist gnome and others telling us to wear masks (after initially telling us they were useless – remember that memory-holed narrative?) but where’s the actual science?

      See, you have to believe the science, and believe them when they tell you what it is yet won’t show you. Obey!

      But trust is earned, and these people act like it is their right to have our trust, that we owe them to take it on faith that whatever these people say is the Gospel. Except they are wrong all the time, and instead of owning up to it, they treat you like some sort of idiot for noticing. When you don’t trust people who are perpetually wrong, that’s not denying science. That is science – you are making observations, and drawing reasonable conclusions. In this case, the observation is that our establishment sucks, and that it can’t be trusted.

      How far would a little humility gone? Very far. Imagine, and this will be hard, these masterminds getting up and saying,

      “America, we were wrong about something. We thought it was right, but we tested it and we found we were not right. Here is the data, and now that we have better information, we are changing our recommendation.”

      What would we say?

      “Oh, okay. They were doing the best they can and being straight with us. People make mistakes. We need to learn from them. After all, it’s been a century since the last pandemic so we have a lot of lessons to re-learn. Let’s move forward.”
      And then there are the revelations about where it came from. They first blamed the innocent pangolin. But it looks like it was our elite’s buddies the Chi Coms, except when people raised that notion earlier, they got banned by social media. Our establishment limited our ability to speak about something true. Think about that. And they want to do it again.

      And that’s where the vaccine hesitancy comes in. The smart set squanders its trust then is shocked to find that its trust has been squandered. People are seeing side effects from the vaccine. Those were always going to happen. But our elite is unwilling to level with people about them and let individuals manage their own risks. Instead, our garbage elite dismisses people with questions as “anti-vaxxers” instead of engaging with them and earning their trust. See, we peasants are unworthy of engagement. How dare we seek to choose for ourselves? The nerve of us serfs!

      I got the vaccine. I also had the disease. I talked to conservative doctors I trusted about my unique situation and made my decision. You should do the same – you know your situation, and you should balance the risks. I don’t tell other people what to do because it’s not my business and I don’t know their story. I’ve had people get on me for mine, and they need to back off – they don’t know my situation and it’s none of their business. Similarly, theirs is none of mine.

      The establishment has squandered its credibility, which is why its demand that everyone take the shot is getting shriller and the attempts to force people more punitive. Imagine if they had been honest from the beginning. Imagine if they had been held accountable. But to do that, you have to imagine having a ruling class that doesn’t suck. And that’s more imagination than anyone can muster.



      1. “Pushing the Reset Button” In the Wake of the Covid Crisis: “Coming to the Rescue of Humanity”, Implanting Chips in Human Beings
        By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
        Global Research, June 05, 2021

        The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset has been long in the making.

        Meetings behind closed doors coupled with important public statements: More than six years ago, at the outset of the January 2014 World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, WEF chairman Klaus Schwab called for “Pushing the Reset Button” as a means to resolving a Worldwide crisis.

        “What we want to do in Davos this year [2014] is to Push the Reset Button, The World is much too much caught in a crisis mode.”

        Two years late in a 2016 interview with the Swiss French language TV network (RTS), Klaus Schwab talked about implanting microchips in human bodies, which in essence is the basis of the “experimental” Covid mRNA vaccine. “What we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital and biological world” said Klaus Schwab.

        Schwab explained that human beings will soon receive a chip which will be implanted in their bodies in order to merge with the digital World.

        RTS: “When will that happen?

        KS: “Certainly in the next ten years.

        “We could imagine that we will implant them in our brain or in our skin”.

        “And then we can imagine that there is direct communication between the brain and the digital World”.

        une 2020. The WEF announces the Great Reset

        “The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future” — Klaus Schwab, WEF (June 2020)

        Below is the WEF video (June 2020); a short public relations video ploy in favor The Great Reset.

        “Our World Has Changed.Our Challenges are Greater. Fragilities Exposed.What are the Challenges.Our System Needs a Reset.Everyone has a Role to Play.The Great Reset. Join Us”


    2. How the COVID Scam Is Perpetrated: Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

      have provided numerous documented detailed accounts demonstrating the lack of evidence supporting the official Covid narrative. The next time you hear Big Pharma’s propagandists say “believe the science,” ask them what science.

      When believers in the official narrative and Covid vaccine are confronted with facts, they retreat to a second line of defense. If the Covid threat is exaggerated and the vaccine unsafe, why did all the doctors and nurses get vaccinated? If the vaccines are unsafe, why haven’t the predicted deaths and injuries showed up?

      The answer is that all the doctors and nurses are not vaccinated, do not believe in the extent of the “pandemic” or the hyped threat of Covid—indeed, many regard the hype and vaccine as greater threats than Covid—and the adverse effects of the vaccines are showing up. The believers in the narrative just do not know it because the presstitute scum suppress the information and do not report it unless to ridicule and denounce it as “disinformation.”

      All doctors and nurses are not vaccinated. For example, here is a report of an entire hospital—200 doctors and 1,500 nurses—on strike in protest of the Macron nazi’s attempt to force them to be vaccinated: see this.

      As for the alleged belief in the Covid narrative by doctors and medical personnel, here are 1,500 health professionals who say Covid is the “biggest health scam of the 21st century:” see this.

      A survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons finds that 60% of doctors are not vaccinated: see this.

      There are two stronger reasons than doctors’ belief in the efficacy and safety of the vaccine that explain why some doctors are vaccinated. One is that they get vaccinated in order to save their practices. Their fear-driven, terrorized patients are afraid to be examined by a doctor who hasn’t been vaccinated.

      The other reason is that the main consequence of Obamacare was the buy-up of independent practices by hospital chains and health care organizations. This transformed independent doctors into employees who have to follow guidelines. Many who have ignored guidelines by treating patients with HCQ or Ivermectin and by refusing vaccination have been fired. The big organizations for convenience and liability reasons follow whatever is the line of NIH, CDC, FDA, and WHO. In other words, coercion displaces medical judgement.

      As for the adverse effects of the vaccine, EudraVigilance, the European Union’s database of suspected drug reaction reports covering 27 European countries, reports that as of July 17, 2021, there have been 18,928 deaths and 1,823,219 injuries: see this.

      In the US the VAERS database reports a total of 463,457 adverse health effects among all age groups following Covid vaccination, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021: see this.

      A CDC whistleblower has revealed in a sworn statement under penalty of perjury that the VAERS deaths released in the report are understated at least by a factor of five and that the actual figure in the VAERS database as of July 9, 2021, is 45,000: see this.

      In response to the large numbers of deaths and adverse reactions associated with the vaccines, America’s Frontline Doctors filed a federal lawsuit to curtail emergency use of Covid vaccines: see this.

      The British counterpart to the US VAERS is called the Yellow Card system. It is operated by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Based on this database, researchers at the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy (EbMC) have concluded that the Covid-19 vaccines are “unsafe for humans.” The research group’s director, Dr. Tess Lawrie concluded: “The scope of morbidity is striking, evidencing a lot of incidents and what amounts to a large number of ill:” see this.

      Dr. Lawrie arrived at this conclusion based on the Yellow Card data for the first four months of 2021 during which the UK recorded 888,196 adverse vaccine events and 1,253 deaths.

      Authorities acknowledge that the reports in the databases of adverse vaccine effects are massively underreported, capturing only from 1-10% of adverse vaccine effects. One reason for the underreporting is that it is not easy to report an adverse vaccine event. The reporting doctor or health organization has to be determined and persistent. The reporting takes time and energy from other demands. Consequently, there are pressures not to report.

      In the case of adverse effects associated with the Covid vaccine, more powerful forces restrict reporting. Democrats do not want the adverse reactions reported. They have groomed Fauci as the hero who saved us from Trump’s rantings about HCQ and saved all of us from dying from Covid by getting a vaccine out in time. Health care organizations and medical associations that have complied with the official narrative want to protect their credibility from adverse reports in order to avoid providing grounds for employees and members to voice divergent opinions.

      A colleague says that her son experienced cardiac failure and blood clot following his vaccination, which kept him hospitalized for 22 days with his life hanging in the balance. The adverse event is not being reported to VAERS. The doctors or hospital administrator have avoided reporting to VAERS by attributing his case to an “unknown virus.” Her son refuses to report the case because he is an ideological Democrat and Democrats have made Fauci and the vaccine their issue.

      My colleague also says that her cousin, who lost the use of his legs immediately after the vaccine just as did my friend, then lost the use of his arms the next day, had a heart attack on the way to the ER, and another heart attack 3 days later that killed him. The doctors won’t report it to VAERS. The cousin’s wife, an ideological Democrat, defends the vaccine and will not report the case either.

      Let’s take the most optimistic case that VAERS, Yellow Card, and EudraVigilance capture 10% of adverse Covid vaccine effects. That means that databases covering the US and part of Europe through about the middle of July 2021 would reveal 299,190 deaths if all deaths were captured by the reporting systems and 639,280 deaths if the whistleblower’s correction of the VAERS deaths is used.

      The databases covering the US and part of Europe would show 22,866,760 injuries.

      Assuming the UK reporting also captures 10% of adverse events, during the first four months of 2021 the British experienced 8,881,960 adverse effects and 12,530 deaths.

      Read entire article:



      1. Dr. Judy Mikovits: Fauci’s C-19 Crimes Aren’t His First ‘Plandemic’


        Has all of this been smoke and mirrors? Has SARS-CoV-2 really never been isolated? How have the Globalists managed to lock down the planet and cause 20 million people to starve to death over the past 17 months without an actual virus? Some argue that viruses don’t even exist, which is a whole other topic that further confuses matters.

        Mike Adams is joined by virologist, Dr Judy Mikovits to explain all of this. He tells her that he has a food and supplement safety laboratory and that he has not found any certified reference material for the COVID-19 virus. He says, “Apparently, it does not exist. Why would that be?”

        Dr Judy, who worked at Fort Detrick and who worked for years with Anthony Fauci at NIH replies, “Correct. That’s because SARS-CoV-2 was never a human virus isolated from human cells and shown to be infectious and transmittable to human cells.

        “What was done is the SARS-CoV-2 virus was manufactured in the Vero monkey kidney cell line…and so every picture you get of SARS-CoV-2 – or SARS or MERS – is literally a manufactured particle that is a monkey virus.

        “It’s a monkey virus…its DNA sequences were injected [into the populace] in polio vaccines, in MMR vaccines, in flu vaccines and they’ve been in that cell line since the mid-’90s.

        “So, just like Dr David Martin was saying, it’s only just a bunch of sequences. And this is what PCR detects, is sequences.

        “A virus particle buds out of the cell of the host. So if that infectious RNA was in the blood or in the sputum or in the lung lavage from a human with COVID-19, what you have to do is take the lung lavage, culture it in a continuously-growing human cell line that supports the replication of SARS-CoV-2.

        “Well, that didn’t happen. They took it out of the lung lavage in people – and I looked at every one of the Level 4 Biosafety Labs reported to have a paper that said they isolated it – and in every single case, they put it in the Vero monkey kidney cell line.

        “It never was a human virus, that I coughed on you or you coughed on me…So I see these doctors’ reports, saying that the ‘transmission of the virus is airborne.’

        “No, it wasn’t! Show me the virus. The sequence is not the virus…”

        “[The spike protein, aka the envelope] is the disease-causative agent…and we’ve known that since 1980! That was the work of my longtime colleague, Frank Ruscetti’s wife. So if you change two amino acids from the envelope from a mouse leukemia virus, two amino acid changes in the envelope – the spike – gives you a Parkinson’s-causing virus, instead of a leukemia virus. And so they call them ‘variants’.

        “Well, you can put any sequences you want – and this is what Dr David Martin is trying to tell you – this is lab-created, never was transmitted from people. Oh, they tried over the last 20 years, but because of people like you, Children’s Health Defense, the Informed Consent Action Network, Del Bigtree, everybody’s been catching them…

        “So in 2019, they had to do their little Event 201 game, which basically says, ‘Whoops! We better inject everybody as fast as we can or they won’t get sick enough or they won’t die and we won’t cover-up the evidence.’”

        Read entire article and watch video:



      2. The Technological Society

        Howard Falk, J. Ellul, J. Wilkinson
        Published 1954

        [Political Science, Sociology, Engineering]

        Technology and Culture techniques and their relation to morals underwent the same evolution. Earlier, economic or political inquiries were inextricably bound with ethical inquiry, and men attempted to maintain this union artificially even after they had recognized the independence of economic technique. Modern society is, in fact, conducted on the basis of purely technical considerations. But when men found themselves going counter to the human factor, they reintroduced—and in an absurd way—all manner of moral theories related to the rights of man, the League of Nations, liberty, justice. None of that has any more importance than the ruffled sunshade of McCormick’s first reaper. When these moral flourishes overly encumber technical progress, they are discarded—more or less speedily, with more or less ceremony, but with determination nonetheless. This is the state we are in today. The elimination of these evolutionary factors and of technical diversification has brought about a transformation of the basic process of this evolution.
        Technical progress today is no longer conditioned by anything other than its own calculus of efficiency. The search is no longer personal, experimental, workmanlike; it is abstract, mathematical, and industrial. This does not mean that the individual no longer participates. On the contrary, progress is made only after innumerable individual experiments.

        But the individual participates only to the degree that he is subordinate to the search for efficiency, to the degree that he resists all the currents today considered secondary, such as aesthetics, ethics, fantasy. Insofar as the individual represents this abstract tendency, he is permitted to participate in technical creation, which is increasingly independent of him and increasingly linked to its own mathematical law. It was long believed that rational systematization would act to reduce the number of technical types: in the measure that the factors of diversification were eliminated, the result would be fewer and more simple and precise types. Thus, during the latter part of the nineteenth century—in the mechanical, medical, and administrative spheres—exact instruments were available from which fantasy and irrationality had been totally eliminated. The result was fewer instruments. As further progress was made, however, a new element of diversification came into play: in order that an instrument be perfectly efficient, it had to be perfectly adapted. But the most rational instrument possible takes no account of the extreme diversity of the operational environment. This represents an essential characteristic of technique. Every procedure implies a single, specific result. As Porter Gale Perrin puts it “Just as a word evokes an idea which exactly corresponds to no other word,” so a Collapse
        View via Publisher

        Click to access Jacques%20Ellul%20-%20The%20Technological%20Society.pdf



      3. The Sorcerer’s Apprentice By Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

        That old sorcerer has vanished
        And for once has gone away!
        Spirits called by him, now banished,
        My commands shall soon obey.
        Every step and saying
        That he used, I know,
        And with sprites obeying
        My arts I will show.
        Flow, flow onward
        Stretches many
        Spare not any
        Water rushing,
        Ever streaming fully downward
        Toward the pool in current gushing.

        Come, old broomstick, you are needed,
        Take these rags and wrap them round you!
        Long my orders you have heeded,
        By my wishes now I’ve bound you.
        Have two legs and stand,
        And a head for you.
        Run, and in your hand
        Hold a bucket too.

        Flow, flow onward
        Stretches many,
        Spare not any
        Water rushing,
        Ever streaming fully downward
        Toward the pool in current gushing.

        See him, toward the shore he’s racing
        There, he’s at the stream already,
        Back like lightning he is chasing,
        Pouring water fast and steady.
        Once again he hastens!
        How the water spills,
        How the water basins
        Brimming full he fills!

        Stop now, hear me!
        Ample measure
        Of your treasure
        We have gotten!
        Ah, I see it, dear me, dear me.
        Master’s word I have forgotten!

        Ah, the word with which the master
        Makes the broom a broom once more!
        Ah, he runs and fetches faster!
        Be a broomstick as before!
        Ever new the torrents
        That by him are fed,
        Ah, a hundred currents
        Pour upon my head!

        No, no longer
        Can I please him,
        I will seize him!
        That is spiteful!
        My misgivings grow the stronger.
        What a mien, his eyes how frightful!

        Brood of hell, you’re not a mortal!
        Shall the entire house go under?
        Over threshold over portal
        Streams of water rush and thunder.
        Broom accurst and mean,
        Who will have his will,
        Stick that you have been,
        Once again stand still!

        Can I never, Broom, appease you?
        I will seize you,
        Hold and whack you,
        And your ancient wood
        I’ll sever,
        With a whetted axe I’ll crack you.

        He returns, more water dragging!
        Now I’ll throw myself upon you!
        Soon, O goblin, you’ll be sagging.
        Crash! The sharp axe has undone you.
        What a good blow, truly!
        There, he’s split, I see.
        Hope now rises newly,
        And my breathing’s free.

        Woe betide me!
        Both halves scurry
        In a hurry,
        Rise like towers
        There beside me.
        Help me, help, eternal powers!

        Off they run, till wet and wetter
        Hall and steps immersed are Iying.
        What a flood that naught can fetter!
        Lord and master, hear me crying! –
        Ah, he comes excited.
        Sir, my need is sore.
        Spirits that I’ve cited
        My commands ignore.

        “To the lonely
        Corner, broom!
        Hear your doom.
        As a spirit
        When he wills, your master only
        Calls you, then ’tis time to hear it.”

        (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice By Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe – Translation By Edwin Zeydel, 1955)



  8. “One Step Closer To Dictatorship”: Joe Rogan Slams Vaccine Passports, Warns Vax May Cause ‘Virulent Mutations’

    oe Rogan raised eyebrows during a Friday episode of his podcast, where he railed against vaccine passports and suggested that the vaccine may in fact lead to vax-resistant SARS-CoV-2 mutations.

    Now you have a mini dictator. You have one step away from a king. One step closer. You’re moving one step closer to dictatorship. That’s what the f**k is happening. That’s what’s going to happen with the vaccine passport. That’s what’s going to happen if they close borders. You can’t enter New York City unless you have your papers! You can’t go here unless you have that! You can’t get on a plane unless you do what I say.


    Rogan – who acknowledge that he’s not a doctor or an anti-vaxx person, says that concerned doctors have been anonymously sending him studies – including one which asserts that an imperfect vaccine can lead to ‘highly virulent pathogens,’ and that ‘vaccines that keep the host alive but still allow transmission can thus allow virulent strains to circulate in a population.’

    “The very sort of environment that we’re creating by having so many people vaccinated with a vaccine that doesn’t kill off the virus, it actually can lead to a more potent virus. Try finding that story anywhere,” said Rogan, who was referring to a peer-reviewed paper published in 2015, in which its authors – from Penn State and the Pirbright Institute concluded that “anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.”

    Meanwhile, mRNA pioneer Dr. Robert malone points out that if 95% of severe patients in Israel were indeed vaccinated, and 85-90% of hospitalizations are among the truly vaccinated, it could suggest Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is occurring, in which antibodies generated during an immune response can bind to a pathogen, but are unable to prevent infection – instead acting as a Trojan Horse.

    95% of the severe patients are vaccinated”.
    “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in Fully vaccinated people.”
    “We are opening more and more COVID wards.”
    “The effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out”

    (Dr. Kobi Haviv, earlier today on Chanel 13 @newsisrael13 )



  9. Dan Stock, MD, a family-practice physician in Noblesville, Indiana, testified on August 7, 2021, before the local Mt. Vernon School Board. His presentation immediately went viral – and for good reason. In slightly less than seven minutes, Dr. Stock explained why everything advocated by the CDC and National Institute of Health are contrary to known science. We will not attempt to summarize his presentation, because it is like a fast-moving freight train with a hundred box cars of information rolling by. The amount of information packed into his short presentation is phenomenal. Expect the pro-vaccine gate keepers of information to go ballistic over the fact that this has gone viral and do everything in their power to discredit this courageous doctor.



    1. Red Alert: Covid internment camps announced in America

      On Friday, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed Executive Order 83, which authorizes National Guard and State Guard troops to break into peoples’ homes, kidnap them at gunpoint, and take them to covid internment camps, all without any due process or respect for civil rights. Individuals can be targeted for this medical kidnapping by armed troops via “telephone assessments,” and the medical kidnapping of American citizens is being labeled “involuntary commitment” to “temporary quarantine and isolation facilities.”

      The Tennessee EO is on top of the CDC’s announcement that covid camps will be set up on a nationwide basis, with people being medically kidnapped and taken to “humanitarian settings” where they will be forced into labor pools, just like a scene ripped right out of Nazi Germany.

      It’s all now publicly announced. What Americans once dismissed as “conspiracy theory” has become government policy, and the mass arrests, executions and death camp operations will commence as soon as the vaccine is “approved” by the FDA.

      Full details in today’s podcast here.


      Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings

      Updated July 26, 2020

      This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.1,2 This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.

      Click to access exec-orders-lee83.pdf



        AUG O 6 2021
        Secretary of State
        Tre Hargett
        No. 83


        WHEREAS, hospitalizations are increasing as COVID-19 variants continue to increase
        positive case rates and burden the health care system; and
        WHEREAS, the reinstatement of certain regulatory flexibilities is necessary to support
        adequate capacity within the health care system; and
        WHEREAS, COVID-19 vaccines are widely available and effective, and widespread
        vaccination is the best tool to combat COVID-19 and ensure social, economic, and educational
        stability, and all eligible persons are strongly encouraged to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
        NOW THEREFORE, I, Bill Lee, Governor of the State of Tennessee, in order to facilitate
        regulatory flexibility in the healthcare system, economic and other recovery, and maintenance of
        federal compliance and eligibility, do hereby declare and recognize a continuing state of
        emergency and hereby order the following:
        1. Out-of- tate health cme providers may pra tic in Tennessee. The relevant
        provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated, Titles 63 and 68, and related rules are
        hereby suspended to the extent necessary to give the Commissioner of Health the
        discretion to allow a health care professional who is licensed in another state, and
        who would otherwise be subject to the licensing requirements under Title 63 or
        Title 68, to engage in the practice of such individual’s profession in Tennessee, if
        such individual is a health care professional who is assisting in the medical response
        to COVID-19, including treating routine or other medical conditions. The
        Commissioner of Health shall provide the requisite form for practicing under this
        Paragraph on the Department of Health’s Health Professional Boards webpage.
        2. Retired medical professionals can easily reenter the health care workforce. The
        provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated, Titles 63 and 68, and related rules and
        policies are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to give the Commissioner of
        Health the authority to grant a license, certificate, or registration t


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: